[06:29] morning [06:34] ricotz: I made geode compile but it's probably broken since I lack the hw to test, still should we upload it? Might be a good way to figure out if anyone actually uses it or not :) [06:36] I'll try to get my hands on a geode in the meantime [06:37] but apart from that, xorg 1.13 has the drivers for xserver-xorg-input/video-all ready [06:43] mlankhorst: Awesome. [06:52] mlankhorst: If you wanted to test that our xserver coredumping patch was working, what would you do? [07:03] pkill -SEGV Xorg? [07:11] * RAOF adds that to the set of things to test. [07:13] jcristau: The trick, for of course there is a trick, is that the coredumping patch *sometimes* works :) [07:14] ick. [07:14] Yeah. [07:14] could you get rid of the patch and just always pretend you've been passed -core? [07:15] (maybe that's what the patch does. i haven't looked.) [07:15] That's actually something I've been thinking aobut. [07:16] Although -core would result in everything being killed with SIGABRT, rather than the true cause. [07:16] RAOF: actually that wouldn't work since the X server checks if it comes from kernel or not [07:17] Hm maybe why it fails. [07:17] oh. bad X server. [07:17] mlankhorst: Really? Where? [07:17] hm let me check [07:19] OsSigHandler [07:20] it does FatalErorr anyway [07:20] Error, even [07:21] just changes the ErrorF msg afaict [07:22] Oh, yeah. That bit. [07:22] ah k then [07:23] my preferred way to kill annoying dialog boxes that don't have a close button is with kill -SEGV :) [07:24] I wonder how hard it is to use X's apport hook to teach apport how to extract the right signal from the OsAbort backtrace. [07:25] RAOF: what's stopping you from simply calling apport hook from there directly? Xorg is toast at that point anyhow [07:26] mlankhorst: Nothing. Well, except that you don't *know* what the right signal is at that point. [07:26] stuff it in a global :p [07:27] isn't it already with the rethrow patches? [07:27] hm guess not, but fatalsignal gets it as argument [07:28] It is already with the rethrow patches; I'm hoping to *drop* those patches (given they don't work reliably) in favour of post-processing it in apport. [07:28] oh ok [07:51] I guess the default hook will fail due to lack of X at that point? [07:52] else just stop handling sigabrt/segv w/e [08:05] yay, freedesktop.org account works :) [08:05] congrats === shadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer_ === shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer === yofel_ is now known as yofel === shadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer_ === shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer [22:16] yay, got a mesa provisional MRE [22:41] oh thanks for reminding me i need to test a srgb fix in mesa. it should fix multisampling in nouveau :) [22:41] gnight :) [23:05] bryceh: Wooo! [23:13] RAOF, the regression testing plan was their main concern; all that time spent running piglits paid off :-) [23:13] RAOF, so at this point can you just wave the mesa package through, or is anything else needed? [23:15] At this point it'll be waved through into -proposed, then build, then we'll want to run some tests on the build from -proposed (because we're paranoid), then it'll get waved through to -updates after the 7 day "does anyone notice if it blows up" phase. [23:16] ok, I'm going to be on vacation for a week starting wednesday, so won't be able to do any testing really [23:17] Ok. [23:17] but I'm set up to do the runs so if no one gets to it before I get back, I can certainly fire the chips up after that. [23:18] I'll talk to gema and see if I can get it set up in the QA lab, too. [23:20] you might check to see if there's already a WI open to do that. I had talked to her about piglit running at sessions last UDS. [23:21] however, I'm skeptical it's going to be feasible, given that the tests have been hanging for me and so need manual monitoring [23:22] but hey, where there's a will there's a way. [23:23] Yeah, we also talked about it at UDS: P. [23:23] They surely have the tools to handle a hanging testcase. :)