[01:13] <alex_mayorga> Anyone here that could help me get over bug 1015567?
[01:38] <Daekdroom> Gah. I hate how Gwibber every once in awhile reconfigures itself to not send tweets, only receive. :(
[01:38] <Daekdroom> Gotta dig Launchpad to check if there's a bug #
[05:59] <X-tonic> There was a post on planet.ubuntu.com about accpeting py3 as default py for 12.10. Is this expected within the schedule?
[06:21] <gnomefreak> aanyoen else not have GUI, anyohe know how to start Unity from CLI?
[08:28] <Pawel_128> hi, why did you change default scheduler to Deadline?
[09:11] <philballew> Has anyone here having problems with jockey?
[09:23] <gnomefreak> sorry not me
[09:24]  * gnomefreak testing upgrade again but i will keep my eyes open for jocky issues
[09:24] <gnomefreak> jockey even
[09:24] <philballew> alright, sweet`
[09:32] <gnomefreak> anyone having mouse/keyboard issues?
[09:51] <taneli> latest updates and a reboot dropped me into grub
[09:52] <taneli> how to boot again?
[09:53] <taneli> oh, and it completely halts if it tries to scroll, so using tab to explore is tedious, have to constantly reboot
[09:55] <gnomefreak> i ran into that issue when i installed from daily installer so i went with aan installer i know works. you can ask the bot about wiki pages for grub
[09:55] <gnomefreak> !grub2 taneli
[09:55] <gnomefreak> !grub2 > taneli
[09:56] <taneli> oh, thanks
[09:57] <taneli> got it to boot, only to find out that kernel does not support xfs?
[09:58] <taneli> at least that's my reading of the line "No filesystem could mount root, tried: ext3 ext4 fuseblk"
[09:59] <gnomefreak> i dont remember anyone having issues with xfs in 12.04
[10:00] <gnomefreak> anyone know if fglrx works in 12.10?
[10:24] <taneli> i can't figure out how to recover -- if somebody knows for sure that 12.10 latest updates support root on xfs, please mention, otherwise it's reinstall time
[10:34] <trijntje> will wubi be supported for quantal and later? I recall something about it being removed, but I cannot find any announcements to that effect
[10:53] <MrChrisDruif> trijntje; wubi is removed from the default disk, but there is a separate download with wubi on it still
[10:54] <trijntje> MrChrisDruif: so the project is still active, thanks!
[10:55] <MrChrisDruif> Afaik, yes
[11:13] <taneli> ah, i had an old image still available, booted to it, reinstalled 3.5.0-6 image and now it works
[11:13] <taneli> i guess initramfs/initrd was misconstructed and missing xfs?
[11:13] <taneli> gnomefreak, thanks for pointers, bye
[11:55] <BluesKaj> hiyas all
[12:35] <Daekdroom> Am I supposed to have the ubuntu-release-upgrader packages installed?
[15:13] <om26er> hey!
[15:14] <om26er> could anyone test bug 1027955 please?
[15:24] <DasEi> The alternate-iso with it's 900MB won't boot in my vbox (md5sum fine), and I can't find a netinstall either; d/l'ing desktop now, is there no way for a finer grained install ?
[15:35] <DasEi> nvm, I changed the virtual cd from sata to ide, there the alternate is bootable :)
[18:41] <lehjr> is there any chance of getting this fixed before quantal ships? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1022351
[18:43] <micahg> lehjr: from the upstream comments, it looks like it'll make it in at some point, not sure if that's before release or not
[18:44] <lehjr> maybe it just seems like a bigger issue to me because I have the effected hardware, but no root access, no ability to reboot or shutdown from within the OS seems to be a pretty big deal
[18:45] <lehjr> + no network access at all to that
[18:46] <micahg> you might want to ask in #ubuntu-kernel, this is just a support channel
[18:47] <lehjr> oh, thank you, I really wish that I had known about that channel sooner :D
[21:58] <smallfoot-> when ubuntu will replace /usr/bin/python from 2 to 3?
[21:58] <smallfoot-> when will update weston in repo, cuz its old and boring
[21:58] <smallfoot-> 12.10 looks to be like a shit boring release
[22:00] <bekks> Thn jump of a sky scraper "armed" with a bunjee, when in dire need of "action". :)
[22:04] <IdleOne> !language | smallfoot-
[23:01] <lehjr> hypothetically speaking, what happens if wayland isn't ready for the beta release?
[23:05] <lehjr> I'm looking specifically at this: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-q-system-compositor
[23:06] <micahg> well, it's not even the default anywhere yet
[23:06] <lehjr> ...and thinking back to February when the big announcement was that Wayland was almost ready for a 1.0 release
[23:09] <lehjr> After looking at the Wayland mailing list I don't think it will be default anywhere for awhile. Really, I'm not confident that there will be a 1.0 release this year, but I'm not a developer
[23:15] <lehjr> but they're talking about freezing the API as of today with a 0.95 release, something you don't generally expect when you announce 5 months before that there will be a 1.0 soon
[23:18] <lehjr> oh well, not that important, at the moment. I'm just hoping it doesn't turn out to be another pulseaudio :-P
[23:49] <alex_mayorga> Could someone take a look at http://paste.ubuntu.com/1109228/ and suggest a fix?
[23:52] <IdleOne> heh 1597 packages not upgraded
[23:52] <IdleOne> sudo apt-get -f install && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade