=== pi-rho|away is now known as pi-rho === TJSmith_ is now known as TJSmith === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ === bcurtiswx_ is now known as bcurtiswx === Jikan is now known as Jikai === rsalveti` is now known as rsalveti [11:40] Hi, I reported a bug to launchpad can someone change it to a wishlist bug please Bug #1028392 [11:40] Launchpad bug 1028392 in ubuntu "shutdown shortcut " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1028392 [14:33] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1028462 is really a bug against Launchpad right? [14:33] Ubuntu bug 1028462 in ubuntu "Launchpad reports incorrect package" [Undecided,New] [14:41] yep, confirmed as a Launchpad issue :p [14:41] * LordOfTime changed where the bug points, and marked the ubuntu bug as Invalid [15:17] can anyone on 12.10 test bug 1027955 please? [15:17] Launchpad bug 1027955 in unity "Clicking on a quicklist item highlights the last item in the list" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1027955 [15:43] om26er: cannot reproduce === yofel_ is now known as yofel [15:46] om26er, i don't see it in the quantal daily [15:46] bregma, what if you hold left-click on a quicklist item ? [15:47] right click on nautilus icon and hold left click on 'pictures' [15:48] om26er: not even then here. Holding the click does nothing until it is released [15:49] oh wait [15:49] got repro steps [15:50] 1.) hold down left-click on the item [15:50] 2.) move the mouse [15:54] ah that might have something to do with the touchpad on my laptop, when I click it might be moving a bit for me ;-) [16:01] yep, confirmed, now [16:01] (although my touchpad is inverted, being left-handed === Logan_ is now known as Guest73515 === Logan__ is now known as Logan_ === zyga is now known as zyga-afk === Ursinha` is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha is now known as Guest69114 === hjd_ is now known as hjd [22:57] Does anyone know workarounds fro bug 1015567? [22:57] Launchpad bug 1015567 in dpkg "upgrade failed: mixed non-coinstallable and coinstallable package instances present" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1015567 [22:57] I don't have perl =( [23:16] alex_mayorga: not really, except the probable bypass in comment #6 [23:17] hggdh: Thanks! Could you dumb it down a bit for me, please? [23:20] alex_mayorga: you would have to edit /var/lib/dpkg/status and add a line "Multi-Arch: same" in the stanza for the offending package [23:20] alex_mayorga: if you are NOT confortable with potentially messing up your system, I strongly suggest to wait for an official resolution [23:22] hggdh: Is there a specific place for this "Multi-Arch: same" or could it go anywhere? [23:24] alex_mayorga: anywhere; usually it is found after the "Architecture: ..." line [23:24] alex_mayorga: MUST be in the offending package stanza [23:26] hggdh: Trying, thanks! [23:26] good luck. I do hope you saved the file before changing [23:27] hggdh: Do I keep doing the same for other packages that pop [23:28] alex_mayorga: yes [23:28] (as long as it is the same error) [23:29] * hggdh calls it a day [23:30] hggdh: Thanks! [23:44] Could someone take a look at http://paste.ubuntu.com/1109228/ and suggest a fix? [23:49] alex_mayorga: what exactly are you trying to do? [23:51] alex_mayorga: first of all, apt-get upgrade? Why not dist-upgrade? There is a difference... quite important (hint: man apt-get) [23:52] hggdh: just trying apt back to a working state I'd say [23:53] apt/get dist-upgrade outputs pretty much the same thing [23:54] alex_mayorga: there are ~ 1500 packages not upgraded. What are you trying to do? Upgrade a Ubuntu version? [23:54] guess yesterday was not a good day to upgrade to Quantal [23:54] IDK, I have been running Q for a while now [23:54] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1015567/comments/9 [23:54] Ubuntu bug 1015567 in dpkg "upgrade failed: mixed non-coinstallable and coinstallable package instances present" [High,Triaged] [23:55] yes, and there is a probable bypass [23:55] hggdh: ^^^ that was the beginning of my saga [23:55] Then I tried as you suggested, I added 3 multi arch: same [23:56] and here I am =) [23:56] and what is the output of a dist-upgrade? [23:57] * hggdh also wonders why is there such a mix of i386 and amd64 [23:57] hggdh: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1109244/ [23:58] hggdh: Dunno, as far as I know this system is amd64 (Linux VPCCW1FFXL 3.2.0-27-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 6 14:25:57 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux) [23:59] alex_mayorga: the arch packages have incompatible versions (meaning the i386 are more up-to-date)