| === rsalveti` is now known as rsalveti | ||
| spoleeba | no that is odd... compiling libunity from bzr tag:5.92.0 on fedora 17... works fine.. compiling from the 5.92.0 tarball... failure | 03:22 |
|---|---|---|
| spoleeba | hmmm | 03:22 |
| spoleeba | i wonder what is different between the bzr checkout and the tarball release | 03:23 |
| spoleeba | ah found it | 03:48 |
| === elky` is now known as elky | ||
| sil2100 | didrocks: hello, how are you today? | 08:43 |
| didrocks | sil2100: hey, I'm fine, thanks, yourself? | 08:43 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: not bad ;) | 08:44 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: is there any news regarding the gsettings metacity/g-c-c/compiz thing? | 08:44 |
| didrocks | sil2100: unfortunately, it seems that nobody answered | 08:45 |
| didrocks | sil2100: I was hoping that Tim will answer to the email as "he didn't have time yesterday" | 08:45 |
| === andy_ is now known as andyrock | ||
| sil2100 | JohnLea: hi | 09:07 |
| JohnLea | sil2100; hyia | 09:15 |
| === andy_ is now known as andyrock | ||
| sil2100 | JohnLea: how are you? | 09:21 |
| === andy_ is now known as andyrock | ||
| didrocks | sil2100: https://launchpad.net/~sil2100/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/2578627/+listing-archive-extra | 09:48 |
| didrocks | sil2100: you took one more commit that you should have for nux FYI | 09:48 |
| didrocks | sil2100: I did the ~ubuntu-desktop/nux/precise branch | 09:48 |
| didrocks | but please, don't change anything packaging-wise in a SRU if there is no good reason. It will be rejected otherwise :) | 09:49 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: ah, ok ;) Good to know | 09:51 |
| JohnLea | sil2100; good, and you? | 09:51 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: since I thought that taking the --parallel change might be harmless | 09:51 |
| sil2100 | JohnLea: same here ;) | 09:51 |
| JohnLea | sil2100; what's up? | 09:52 |
| sil2100 | JohnLea: would like to get some final clarification about the super+W case | 09:52 |
| sil2100 | The one from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/933776#47 | 09:52 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 933776 in compiz (Ubuntu Precise) "[regression] scale/spread: "Initiate Window Picker for All Windows" does not show all windows. It shows only windows from curent workspace." [High,Triaged] | 09:52 |
| JohnLea | sil2100; yup, I remember that discussion | 09:52 |
| sil2100 | JohnLea: so, the behavior we expect to be is - when pressing super + W should show windows only from the given workspace? | 09:53 |
| didrocks | sil2100: you never know what can happen with packaging change :) | 09:53 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: true true ;) | 09:54 |
| JohnLea | sil2100; the default behaviour when a user presses SUPER + W should be to spread all windows from the *current* workspace only. However ideally this behaviour should be configurable in 'System Settings/Keyboard/Shortcuts' | 09:54 |
| sil2100 | JohnLea: excellent - just wanted to confirm this | 09:55 |
| JohnLea | sil2100; thanks! | 09:55 |
| sil2100 | JohnLea: since we're actually making a switch to gsettings now, so for quantal it might be ideal to fix this by changing the keybinding to 'how they're supposed to be' | 09:56 |
| JohnLea | great, will be good fix some of our keybinding issues | 09:56 |
| popey | hmm can someone else check https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1013751 please? I have tried to verify with -proposed enabled and it doesn't seem fixed | 11:06 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1013751 in nux (Ubuntu Precise) "Nothing should be written into the dash/hud searchbar when holding super, ctrl or Alt" [Undecided,New] | 11:06 |
| popey | welcome back sil2100 :) | 11:10 |
| popey | sil2100, <popey> hmm can someone else check https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1013751 please? I have tried to verify with -proposed enabled and it doesn't seem fixed | 11:10 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1013751 in nux (Ubuntu Precise) "Nothing should be written into the dash/hud searchbar when holding super, ctrl or Alt" [Undecided,New] | 11:10 |
| sil2100 | ;) | 11:18 |
| sil2100 | popey: will try to verify in a moment | 11:19 |
| === andy_ is now known as andyrock | ||
| popey | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/987955 makes no sense | 11:36 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 987955 in Ayatana Design "Multimonitor, Launcher - When the Launcher is set to autohide and 'Sticky edges' are turned off, 'Launcher Edge Stop Overcome Pressure' seems to be broken when revealing the Launcher" [Critical,Fix committed] | 11:36 |
| popey | it says that with sticky edges _off_ it should still be sticky, as I read it | 11:36 |
| popey | is that how anyone else reads the section "What should happen:" ? | 11:37 |
| sil2100 | popey: when sticky edges are _off_ and auto-hide is _on_, the edge where the launcher is should still be sticky | 11:40 |
| sil2100 | popey: so that you can reveal the launcher | 11:40 |
| popey | but what if you dont want to reveal the launcher? | 11:41 |
| popey | e.g. when moving quickly from screen to screen | 11:41 |
| popey | or when you're dragging a window | 11:41 |
| sil2100 | popey: not sure, never used this feature | 11:41 |
| sil2100 | JohnLee should probably help here | 11:41 |
| popey | i mailed him | 11:45 |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| sil2100 | popey: I will try confirming the bug you mentioned now | 12:05 |
| popey | also https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/987156 | 12:09 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 987156 in unity (Ubuntu Precise) "alt-backtick flickers between windows" [Low,Fix committed] | 12:09 |
| popey | left a comment on that | 12:09 |
| popey | i still get flicker | 12:10 |
| popey | i would video it but kazam is broken for me today | 12:10 |
| popey | and it's so quick to appear I wouldn't be surprised if at 15fps it doesn't capture the flicker | 12:10 |
| sil2100 | popey: did you try filming that? | 12:10 |
| popey | lemme try with my phone | 12:10 |
| sil2100 | hm, anyway, strange thing - what about your quantal box? | 12:10 |
| sil2100 | Can you reproduce it on quantal? | 12:10 |
| sil2100 | I need to first make unity 3d run on my old box, eh | 12:11 |
| popey | yes, same on quantal | 12:11 |
| popey | both i7 if it matters | 12:11 |
| nmarques | yo | 12:11 |
| sil2100 | You need to show me that, since I cannot reproduce it at all | 12:11 |
| popey | ok | 12:12 |
| popey | doing now | 12:12 |
| sil2100 | It does appear from time to time, but only because I hold the two keys a bit longer | 12:12 |
| sil2100 | And the timeout strikes in | 12:12 |
| * popey uploads to youtube | 12:15 | |
| popey | I'm pressing the buttons insanely fast | 12:15 |
| popey | faster than I normally would | 12:15 |
| popey | sil2100, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEwiUGMkKVk | 12:18 |
| sil2100 | popey: thanks | 12:18 |
| sil2100 | popey: holy shit, this is really a bug | 12:19 |
| sil2100 | popey: I can show you how it looks like on my PC - completely different | 12:20 |
| popey | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/939436 | 12:23 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 939436 in Ayatana Design "HUD - Formatting of text in the auto-complete is wrong" [Critical,Fix committed] | 12:24 |
| popey | also doesn't look fixed to me | 12:24 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| popey | how often does http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html run? | 13:09 |
| didrocks | popey: nice work on SRU confirmation bugs btw :) | 13:11 |
| popey | np | 13:12 |
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| sil2100 | Trevinho: hi | 13:20 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: are you around? :) | 13:20 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: just back | 13:29 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: excellent - I have a question ;) | 13:29 |
| sil2100 | Since we've been testing https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1013751 from the unity SRU - which was supposed to be fixed | 13:29 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1013751 in nux (Ubuntu Precise) "Nothing should be written into the dash/hud searchbar when holding super, ctrl or Alt" [Undecided,New] | 13:29 |
| sil2100 | But when running unity with the unity patch included, we can still reproduce this problem | 13:30 |
| sil2100 | Is the nux patch required as well? | 13:30 |
| sil2100 | Or should the unity patch be sufficient? | 13:31 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: for 5.0 or 5.0? | 13:33 |
| didrocks | or also, 5.0? ;) | 13:34 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: 5.0 ;) | 13:36 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: since the bug is still there without the nux patch, at least from what we can test | 13:36 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: the nux patch was required for 6.0, however.... For 5.0 the change has been different to avoid regressions | 13:37 |
| Trevinho | basically we only filter Alt keys, not Ctrl keys... | 13:37 |
| Trevinho | or the ibus wouldn't work | 13:37 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: hm | 13:38 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: so the unity 5.0 patch should be enough to fix that bug? | 13:38 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: or not? | 13:38 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: I can get the ctlr fix as well with one line patch in nux btw | 13:38 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: it fixes it partially.... | 13:38 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: it fixes the super and Alt thing, not the ctrl | 13:39 |
| Trevinho | the super one was priority however, since othwerise when doing Super+W with dash opened would have caused a w to be written in the text entry before initiating the spread | 13:39 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: when holding down ctrl and typing in some letters I get some strange text | 13:39 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: yes, that happens... But I can't fix that at unity level without not breaking ibus :/ | 13:40 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: hm, ok, but this still means that the fix is not working in its current form | 13:41 |
| sil2100 | Not good | 13:41 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: thanks, we'll try sorting this out somehow | 13:42 |
| sil2100 | andyrock: ping! | 13:42 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: you only have to include this in nux to get it fixed: https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/nux/text-entry-meta-filters/+merge/113137 | 13:42 |
| andyrock | sil2100, pong | 13:42 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: ah, yes, about that one - I need to poke you too regarding this commit ;) | 13:42 |
| sil2100 | andyrock: hello! | 13:42 |
| andyrock | sil2100, hey | 13:42 |
| sil2100 | andyrock: can I poke you about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/939436 ;) ? | 13:43 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 939436 in Ayatana Design "HUD - Formatting of text in the auto-complete is wrong" [Critical,Fix committed] | 13:43 |
| andyrock | sil2100, shoot | 13:43 |
| andyrock | :) | 13:43 |
| andyrock | I've already answerd btw | 13:43 |
| sil2100 | andyrock: ah, I see - so hm, what was this bug about anyway ;p ? | 13:44 |
| sil2100 | andyrock: since the HUD looks different than in the attached screenshot right now | 13:44 |
| andyrock | we used to highlight hud keyword using bold font | 13:45 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: well about this nux fix - since we're doing a nux SRU release this week anyway, and Brandon was gluing together some commits that could be ported to 2.0 | 13:45 |
| andyrock | sil2100, now we use alpha .50 for normal words/letters | 13:46 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: and he wanted to include rev 627 (the merge/branch) you have mentioned, but said that it depends on some other change in the past and could break the ABI | 13:46 |
| andyrock | sil2100, and alpha 1.0 for highlighted words/letters | 13:46 |
| sil2100 | andyrock: ah! | 13:46 |
| sil2100 | andyrock: so it's not about how it should look, but what techniques for matching should be used? | 13:46 |
| sil2100 | andyrock: so it is indeed fixed in this case | 13:47 |
| andyrock | sil2100, yeah... i think we should open another bug for "but what techniques for matching should be used" | 13:47 |
| andyrock | not sure it's a unity bug though | 13:48 |
| sil2100 | andyrock: anyway, thanks for clearing this up | 13:49 |
| andyrock | sil2100, np :) | 13:49 |
| didrocks | nice work sil2100 ;) | 13:50 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: thanks ;) | 13:50 |
| didrocks | sil2100: speaking of which, did you have a documentation summarizing the upgrade tests you did from gconf -> gsettings? (just to know if all is green on your side) | 13:51 |
| didrocks | and if we are just blocked by the metacity/g-c-c/unity-2d fun | 13:51 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: no, I'll prepare it later today - since I actually wanted to test it also somewhere else, since VMs seem to have some problems | 13:51 |
| didrocks | sil2100: ok ;) | 13:52 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: it breaks the api too... | 13:52 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: aww :( | 13:52 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: I can prepare one that doesn't break the abi, but that fixes the ctrl issue | 13:52 |
| didrocks | sil2100: so I see at least 2 upgrades tests (in fact 3, but 2 should be enough to cover the 3rd) | 13:53 |
| didrocks | - install old compiz/unity, tweaks a lot of settings, upgrdae to newer compiz/unity, restart the session | 13:53 |
| didrocks | all tweaks should be there | 13:53 |
| didrocks | - and same test, with compiz/unity, but in the fallback session (default profile = Default) | 13:54 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: will do! Francis also wants to help me out prepare some automatic tests for the migration script | 13:54 |
| didrocks | excellent! | 13:54 |
| didrocks | sil2100: if you have good automatic tools, we can even include them in the precise -> quantal migration upgrader test | 13:55 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: thanks ;) But we might think about that next time - for now anyway the unity fix is not enough, and that's all I wanted to know | 13:57 |
| sil2100 | didrocks, seb128: what should we do if a bug that was supposed to be fixed in an SRU is not fixed completely? | 14:04 |
| seb128 | sil2100, if there are no regression set the bug verification-done anyway and reopen it once the update is copied to -updates or open a new bug for remaining issue | 14:05 |
| sil2100 | seb128: ok, thanks - no regression, just the fix that landed requires some nux changes that we _currently_ cannot land due to possible ABI/API breaks | 14:06 |
| jaytaoko | sil2100: hello | 14:06 |
| sil2100 | seb128: but without those it just doens't fix all the problems | 14:06 |
| sil2100 | jaytaoko: hi! | 14:06 |
| jaytaoko | sil2100: I am on precise. trying to compile unity i get an error related to missing 'unity-protocol-private' | 14:06 |
| seb128 | sil2100, that's fine as long as there are no regression | 14:06 |
| seb128 | sil2100, or just keep a nux component open on the bug | 14:06 |
| sil2100 | seb128: thanks :) | 14:07 |
| seb128 | sil2100, set it verification-done anyway if you verified there are no regression, so it doesn't block the SRU | 14:07 |
| sil2100 | jaytaoko: hm, what unity you try to compile? lp:unity trunk? | 14:07 |
| jaytaoko | sil2100: yes lp:unity | 14:07 |
| jaytaoko | sil2100: do I need to compile lp:libunity | 14:08 |
| sil2100 | jaytaoko: yes, sadly... | 14:09 |
| sil2100 | jaytaoko: you need the latest libunity - and also, you probably need to use the latest packaging for unity as well | 14:09 |
| sil2100 | jaytaoko: are you building a package, or just the source? | 14:09 |
| jaytaoko | sil2100: just the source | 14:10 |
| didrocks | jaytaoko: you should upgrade to quantal, at least, you will have the latest stack :) | 14:10 |
| sil2100 | jaytaoko: as didrocks once said, it is almost always better to build with packaging ;) But anyway, if you just build from source, be sure to have trunk libunity | 14:11 |
| sil2100 | jaytaoko: and then somehow ensure that the private libunity libraries are accessible for unity | 14:11 |
| jaytaoko | sil2100: yes, I will probably upgrade this week | 14:11 |
| sil2100 | (if there are any problems) | 14:11 |
| jaytaoko | sil2100: will do! thanks! | 14:11 |
| === cnd` is now known as cnd | ||
| sil2100 | popey: ok, so I verified a few bugs more for the SRU - the only 2 ones left for verification are: | 14:46 |
| sil2100 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/987156 <- which you can still reproduce | 14:46 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 987156 in unity (Ubuntu Precise) "alt-backtick flickers between windows" [Low,Fix committed] | 14:46 |
| sil2100 | and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/987955 <- which you needed John's answer, right? | 14:47 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 987955 in Ayatana Design "Multimonitor, Launcher - When the Launcher is set to autohide and 'Sticky edges' are turned off, 'Launcher Edge Stop Overcome Pressure' seems to be broken when revealing the Launcher" [Critical,Fix committed] | 14:47 |
| === andy__ is now known as andyrock | ||
| sil2100 | jaytaoko: hm, I remember we had some manual-tests in nux in the past - did those get removed? | 14:57 |
| jaytaoko | sil2100: well we have a description of a few manual tests, but not more than that | 14:59 |
| jaytaoko | sil2100: are you referring to executable programs? | 14:59 |
| sil2100 | jaytaoko: no, to text files with test steps | 15:04 |
| sil2100 | jaytaoko: ah, so they're removed now | 15:05 |
| sil2100 | Ok | 15:05 |
| sil2100 | Thanks | 15:05 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| spoleeba | mhr3, just a follow up ping. got libunity building and packaged for submission in Fedora. I need to do a make clean in the tarball release to clean out some pregenerated vala files in the tarball that do not exist in the bzr checkout. | 16:05 |
| spoleeba | mhr3, thanks for the pointer | 16:05 |
| mhr3 | spoleeba, cool :) | 16:06 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: could you help me with something ;)? | 16:11 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/unity/missing-launcher-icon-fix-5.0/+merge/106644 <- what do you think could be a regression potential here? | 16:11 |
| spoleeba | mhr3, need to figure out the next bit of the stack that isnt in yet. i have dbusmenu que'd for review libindicator just needs a revision bump, dee is in. | 16:13 |
| mhr3 | spoleeba, perhaps check the jhbuild modules we have for unity? | 16:16 |
| sil2100 | seb128: ok, there are like only 4 bugs that need their description SRUable, but besides that we're done - 2 bugs still need verification, but we'll probably have those verified soon | 16:16 |
| seb128 | sil2100, great! | 16:16 |
| seb128 | sil2100, well done, the unity SRU seems going smoothly so far ;-) | 16:17 |
| sil2100 | seb128: thanks - more or less smoothly ;) I also started testing the nux SRU, but we'll probably be done with that around tomorrow... | 16:18 |
| seb128 | sil2100, ok | 16:19 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: hopefully nothing :) | 16:38 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: it could happen that an icon is not removed on close...or that this happen with some dealy | 16:39 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: thanks :) | 16:39 |
| sil2100 | seb128: could you ACK the nomination for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/920258 ? | 16:40 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 920258 in unity (Ubuntu) "compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in unity::ui::KeyboardUtil::GetKeycodeAboveKeySymbol()" [Critical,Fix committed] | 16:40 |
| sil2100 | seb128: with this one we're officially done with the SRU bug handling (I hope) | 16:41 |
| seb128 | sil2100, done | 16:41 |
| sil2100 | I'll double check everything tomorrow, but my list shows all bugs modified | 16:41 |
| sil2100 | Thank you ;) | 16:41 |
| seb128 | sil2100, excellent! | 16:41 |
| seb128 | sil2100, wait a few days and check the bugs showing on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html as non green I guess | 16:42 |
| seb128 | sil2100, in fact they are all green but 2 | 16:42 |
| seb128 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/987955 | 16:43 |
| seb128 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/987156 | 16:43 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 987955 in Ayatana Design "Multimonitor, Launcher - When the Launcher is set to autohide and 'Sticky edges' are turned off, 'Launcher Edge Stop Overcome Pressure' seems to be broken when revealing the Launcher" [Critical,Fix committed] | 16:43 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 987156 in unity (Ubuntu Precise) "alt-backtick flickers between windows" [Low,Fix committed] | 16:43 |
| sil2100 | seb128: yes, those 2 still need verification - one we're still checking, since popey is able to reproduce the problem while it's fine on my system | 16:44 |
| sil2100 | seb128: where the other one seems fine but popey woould like to get some feedback from the design team | 16:44 |
| sil2100 | Since one case is not completely clear | 16:44 |
| popey | I am happy to set https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/987955 green if someone can confirm the "What should happen" text is accurate seb128 | 16:53 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 987955 in Ayatana Design "Multimonitor, Launcher - When the Launcher is set to autohide and 'Sticky edges' are turned off, 'Launcher Edge Stop Overcome Pressure' seems to be broken when revealing the Launcher" [Critical,Fix committed] | 16:53 |
| popey | I just held off because it felt a bit odd, but I am not a designer :D | 16:53 |
| seb128 | popey, ok, no hurry, you have a week to find somebody | 16:53 |
| popey | i have mailed john, will poke him though | 16:53 |
| popey | nice to have lots of green there | 16:53 |
| sil2100 | ;) | 16:54 |
| sil2100 | Ok guys, see you tomorrow! | 17:04 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch | ||
| === zyga is now known as zyga-afk | ||
| === dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader | ||
| === fenris_ is now known as Guest9382 | ||
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| bobweaver | Hello I was wondering what the command are or Desktopfile that are being used to "reboot ,shutdown,suspend " So That I can call them With Unity2d on a launcher thanks | 22:41 |
| bobweaver | This is why I ask I am adding this to Ubuntu TV or what it is ATM http://imagebin.org/222016 thanks again | 22:46 |
| Jake7 | I'm not sure if this is the right channel to use, but I'm having a quicklist problem with 12.04 lts. I've saved an app there several times and when I reboot it's gone. Also, if I install it to the quicklist again I can't see it if I try edit the quicklist with ubuntu tweak. It's still there though and functional. That is until I reboot. Any ideas? | 23:16 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!