[02:27] <kubotu> ::qt-bugs:: [1028704] package libqt4-test 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2 failed to install/upgrade: libqt4-test:amd64 4 @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028704 (by Tim Desmond)
[09:23] <Riddell> !testers
[09:23] <Riddell> alpha 3 images for the testing!
[09:29] <soee> ok, thanks for the info
[09:30] <soee> Riddell, KDE 4.9 for 12.04 will be available only after final release ?
[09:44] <Riddell> soee: well it won't be available before releae of 4.9 :)
[11:46] <Tm_T> 1445.52 < evll> just want to express my gratitude towards developers of kubuntu. was using it for a long time, but had a problem during version update and switched to chakra. now  I am back and I must say, that is like a breath of fresh air
[11:46] <Tm_T> 1445.57 < evll> everything just works
[11:53] <shadeslayer> :D
[11:59]  * apachelogger stumbles in and mumbles things about being out of coffee
[12:00] <apachelogger> !sru
[12:02] <apachelogger> Riddell: ping
[12:03] <Riddell> hi apachelogger 
[12:04] <Riddell> Tm_T: always nice to hear :)
[12:05] <apachelogger> Riddell: say I want to SRU phonon gstreamer 4.6.1, would I file multiple SRU bugs for the invidiual issues addressed as to provide verification steps for each, or would I file one bug with all steps, or would I file one bug and simply shoot for "does not work worse than 4.6.0 verification"
[12:06] <Riddell> apachelogger: SRU is for paticular known problems so it should be one bug per issue
[12:07] <apachelogger> Riddell: would I also have to micro-patch it then?
[12:07] <Riddell> no but the SRU team will want to be able to review the diff
[12:08] <apachelogger> mhh
[12:08]  * apachelogger starts filing then ^^
[12:08] <apachelogger> Riddell: merci cheri
[12:16]  * shadeslayer tries compiling okular with gcc-4.6
[12:29] <Tm_T> Riddell: indeed
[12:30] <Tm_T> considering people typically give feedback only when things are going bad
[13:28] <littlegirl> Hey there, Riddell, are you at keys?
[13:37] <Riddell> keys?
[13:39] <Riddell> ooh http://dot.kde.org/2012/07/24/introducing-project-neon-kvm
[13:40] <Riddell> go shadeslayer 
[13:41] <Riddell> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Project-Neon-provides-daily-builds-of-KDE-modules-1652063.html
[13:42] <Riddell> shadeslayer: what are those kvm images used with?  qemu?
[13:42] <apachelogger> cool
[13:42] <apachelogger> archive is rejecting my upload
[13:42] <apachelogger> and the mail does not say anything useful
[13:43] <Riddell> apachelogger: upload of what?
[13:44] <apachelogger> pgst 4.6.1 to precise-proposed
[13:44] <apachelogger> http://paste.kde.org/522608/
[13:44] <apachelogger> that's what I get
[13:45] <Riddell> now that's broken
[13:45] <Riddell> try again?
[13:45] <Riddell> or give me packages to try?
[13:45] <apachelogger> that's already the second time I tried
[13:45] <apachelogger> sec
[13:47] <apachelogger> Riddell: http://people.ubuntu.com/~apachelogger/tmp/pgst/
[13:47] <apachelogger> perhaps it simply dislikes ubuntu0.* uploads to pockets other than security
[13:48] <Riddell> hi jsubl2, how did testing go?
[13:48] <apachelogger> mhh, we also use that for regular kde SRUs... 
[13:48] <jsubl2> i found a bug if this test is valid.  I did it 2x
[13:49] <jsubl2> burn the image to flash drive with dd_rescue.  boots and installs ok.  grub tries to install to flash drive instead of the hard drive i installed to
[13:49] <jsubl2> grub fails.  no boot
[13:49] <Riddell> jsubl2: what's dd_rescue?
[13:50] <jsubl2> utility to burn an iso to flash drive.
[13:50] <Riddell> jsubl2: time to report a bug then
[13:51] <Riddell> attach /var/log/syslog
[13:51] <jsubl2> ok.  i have to read those docs yet on doing that
[13:51] <Riddell> and /var/log/installer/*
[13:51] <Riddell> or run  ubuntu-bug ubiquity
[13:52] <jsubl2> ok so ubuntu-bug ubiquity would guide me through the bug opening process
[13:53] <Riddell> it should do
[13:53] <jsubl2> i am on  12.04.  i will boot the image and run the command.
[13:56] <ScottK> Riddell and apachelogger: If you go the multiple bugs route, it'll be more painful to get verified.  My recommendation is one metabug that references the others.
[13:57] <apachelogger> SRU documentation says that ubuntu-sru does not like this at all
[13:57] <apachelogger> and FWIW I could slap a verified stamp on each of those as those are the test cases we used to verify release quality ^^
[13:58] <ScottK> apachelogger: If you can do that quickly, then that works too as it's getting the verification stamp on each one that can be painful.
[14:00] <jsubl2> i ran ubuntu-bug ubiquity.  entered the summary. its asking if any on the list is similiar. one is but it is a 2006 bug.  what should i do
[14:01] <jsubl2> report a new bug is my guess
[14:01] <shadeslayer> Riddell: yeah, just download the tar and run the script included
[14:01] <Riddell> jsubl2: yes
[14:04] <jsubl2> i cant find /var/log/installer
[14:05] <Riddell> just syslog should do from the live system
[14:05] <Riddell> but doesn't ubuntu-bug attach the files for you?
[14:06] <jsubl2> not sure i clicked on extra options.  this is from 12.10 installed.  not the live.  is this report valid
[14:06] <jsubl2> or do i need to run this from the failed live install
[14:06] <Riddell> jsubl2: is it the install you had problems with?
[14:07] <jsubl2> yes.  but its dual boot. so i added the 12.10 to another grub
[14:07] <jsubl2> so i could test it
[14:07] <Riddell> and it doesn't have anything in /var/log/installer/ ?
[14:07] <jsubl2> no
[14:08] <Riddell> hum, weird
[14:08] <jsubl2> dpkg.log has a few comments. but  not much
[14:08] <Riddell> that won't have anything about grub
[14:09] <jsubl2> dpkg.log:2012-07-24 14:03:34 status half-configured grub-pc-bin:amd64 1.99-22ubuntu1
[14:09] <jsubl2> i dont see anything that i believe would be helpful to the devs
[14:09] <jsubl2> i could recreate the error and run the command from the live.  if it would be helpful
[14:09] <Riddell> yeah I guess so
[14:10] <jsubl2> ok
[14:10] <Riddell> "I thought I'd report that http://www.kubuntu.org/ says "OK" and                                                                                                                     
[14:10] <Riddell> nothing else at the moment...                                                                                                                                                       "
[14:10] <Riddell> anyone have problems?  I don't
[14:10] <ScottK> Works here.
[14:12] <Riddell> thanks
[14:32] <jsubl2> from the live cd how do i get a konsole window to start the bug report.  then i need a browser
[14:34] <Riddell> jsubl2: same way you do anywhere else
[14:34] <Riddell> kmenu->konsole
[14:34] <Riddell> or alt-f2 -> konsole
[14:34] <Riddell> alt-tab if you have a full screen ubiquity hiding it
[14:34] <jsubl2> so i should bring up the desktop and install from there. 
[14:35] <jsubl2> then see if the bug occurs
[14:36] <Riddell> jsubl2: yes
[14:37] <jsubl2> ok
[14:41] <Riddell> apachelogger: [ubuntu/precise-proposed] phonon-backend-gstreamer 4:4.7.0really4.6.1-0ubuntu0.1 (Waiting for approval)
[14:41] <Riddell> so it seems not to have liked you for some reason
[14:41] <tsdgeos> Quintasan: very simple test for the okular search problem http://paste.kde.org/~fabiod/521714/
[14:42] <tsdgeos> Quintasan: notice how when run in precise, the " No such method" notice contains 10 ints, but when run in quantal it has 9 ints
[14:42] <tsdgeos> i.e. one magically disappeared
[14:42] <tsdgeos> shadeslayer: i think you were interested in this too ↑
[14:45] <jsubl2> e
[14:46] <apachelogger> Riddell: outragous :(
[14:46] <apachelogger> Riddell: thanks for sponsoring
[14:51] <shadeslayer> tsdgeos: yeah, I was looking into how to use nm and objdump to see what the object file contains
[14:51] <shadeslayer> so that we can report a bug in gcc
[14:51] <tsdgeos> goodie
[14:53] <shadeslayer> atm I'm testing some stuff, so will look at that in a bit
[15:02] <micahg> shadeslayer: congrats on the new job
[15:02] <shadeslayer> micahg: thanks! :)
[15:03]  * shadeslayer is really really hungry
[15:15]  * ScottK notes irony.
[15:25] <kubotu> ::workspace-bugs:: [1024464] rekonq 0.9.2 lost search with google right mouse button option @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024464 (by Marco Parillo)
[15:40] <jsubl2> testing the image on amd64.  i have a grub failure.  when running ubuntu-bug i get the following http://paste.kde.org/522716
[15:48] <Riddell> ug
[15:48] <Riddell> a bug in the bug tracker
[15:48] <jsubl2> yeah i am having the darnedest luck getting my first bug reported
[15:49] <Riddell> jsubl2: well you can report it manually at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+filebug
[15:49] <jsubl2> ok.  will do
[15:49] <Riddell> and then attach /var/log/syslog and /var/log/installer/
[15:52] <jsubl2> ok
[16:04] <jsubl2> bug 1028975 is open
[16:06] <Riddell> thanks jsubl2 
[16:06] <Riddell> jsubl2: please also report a bug on apport for the error you had http://paste.kde.org/522716/
[16:07] <Riddell> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+filebug
[16:07] <Riddell> (apport is ubuntu-bug)
[16:07] <jsubl2> ok
[16:10] <jsubl2> bug 1028984 filed
[16:11] <jsubl2> later
[19:04] <shadeslayer> !find pm.h
[19:19] <vHanda> shadeslayer: have you already packaged nepomuk-core?
[19:22] <yofel> !info nepomuk-core quantal | vHanda
[19:23] <yofel> *blink*
[19:23] <yofel> anyway, it's there, we're a bit behind on 4.9 packaging though
[19:23] <vHanda> good
[19:23] <vHanda> though someone at #kontact installed nepomuk-core through his distro, so I need to find out which one it is
[19:24] <vHanda> mainly cause I've broken binary compatibility between rc1 and the actual release
[19:24] <vHanda> ( nepomuk-core is new package, I'm allowed to do that )
[19:25] <yofel> vHanda: we have the beta2 package in the archive as we didn't get the RC's done. Thanks for the heads up at least
[19:48] <efislayer> amd64 mac images work, except you need a special xorg.conf on the macbook pro 8,2
[19:48] <efislayer> ah yes, no wireless as well
[19:54] <efislayer> http://imgur.com/Ax3yG < rekonq doesn't look righ
[19:54] <efislayer> t
[20:23] <efislayer_>  /query ubottu
[21:44] <Riddell> shadeslayer: did digikam get uploaded?