/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/07/26/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

=== pi-rho|away is now known as pi-rho
=== chilicui1 is now known as chilicuil
=== zyga-afk is now known as zyga
s9iper1any body knows how can we disable the guest account ???08:07
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== pi-rho is now known as pi-rho|away
tewardhggdh: around?13:18
=== teward is now known as LordOfTime
LordOfTimeirssi, stop redoing my nick!  :/13:20
hggdhI am around in 20 minutes13:21
LordOfTimei'll poke you then :P13:22
hggdhLordOfTime: ready13:39
LordOfTimehggdh: sorry, got sidetracked, one moment13:48
LordOfTimesorry, got innundated with phone calls13:50
LordOfTimebeing ITSec is hard sometimes :P13:50
hggdhheh13:50
LordOfTimehggdh: was looking over bugsquad join applications, was going to support someone on that list joining given their bugs work.  lemme find that applicant again13:50
* LordOfTime has 25 IExplore windows open13:50
hggdhLordOfTime: bugsquad, or bugcontrol?13:51
LordOfTimebugsquad13:51
LordOfTimenot bugcontrol13:51
LordOfTimei leave the vets of bugcontrol for those13:51
hggdhLordOfTime: all that is needed for joinging bugsquad is...13:51
LordOfTimehggdh: indeed, but it appears there's some since may and nobody's checked hence the poke :p13:52
LordOfTimeif it were bugcontrol it'd be via the mailing list and i dont comment on those...13:52
LordOfTimeDAMN IT STOP RINGING!  *yells at his phone*13:52
hggdhoh, I know what happened -- there are a few admins for bugsquad, and we get the join request in a round-robin way13:52
hggdhI will look at the pending requests13:53
LordOfTime4 dont seem to have done significant bug work13:53
LordOfTimeone has13:53
* LordOfTime was looking at all teams he's with to find a serial joiner who has had no other LP activities, and was checking bugsquad just to be safe13:53
LordOfTimehggdh: there's no harm in me pointing members of the security team to bugs which ask whether a bug is actually a security bug or not, right?13:56
LordOfTimei mean, they'd truly know :P13:56
hggdhLordOfTime: no, not at all. You can also poke them at #ubuntu-hardened13:56
LordOfTimeindeed13:56
LordOfTime i sit there daily :p13:56
* LordOfTime works on nginx security bugs, so keeps checking often13:57
hggdhLordOfTime: all pending join requests to bugsquad have been processed13:57
LordOfTimehggdh: i think a few weren't following the rules though13:57
LordOfTimesome ahvent signed the CoC13:57
hggdhand I apologise for not checking there...13:57
hggdhLordOfTime: the rules are quite simple, and easy... if one does not follow them, one will be rejected13:58
LordOfTimei see :)13:58
hggdhand what happens is an email is sent to the rejected candidate explaining why13:58
LordOfTimei know the rules for bugcontrol are much more stringent.  they could be a bit more stringent for bugcontrol-via-other-projects-interactions13:58
hggdhinterestingly, most of those rejected never apply again13:59
hggdhwell, sort of. If you are an upstream to one of our packages, we have a real interest in having you here and helpin13:59
* hggdh is rebooting, trying to find out if libvirt/qemu will work again14:02
=== LordOfTime is now known as MasterOfTime
=== MasterOfTime is now known as LordOfTime
om26er_could anyone try a nautilus crash please?18:10
om26er_press super+d while desktop is in focus18:10
om26er_*in Quantal18:10
om26er_okay then, its bug 102802818:19
ubot2Launchpad bug 1028028 in nautilus "nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/102802818:19
om26erthat was bug 102802818:20
om26erno bottu :/18:20
om26er*ubottu18:20
=== margo_ is now known as margo
njinomer26er: hallo, I cannot reproduce18:43
njinom26er:^^18:44
LordOfTimeom26er: "Fix Committed" is the correct status, upstream's waiting for the package to be updated in Quantal18:46
LordOfTimeonce that happens, it becomes Fix Released18:46
LordOfTimeif the bug still exists after that, well...18:47
micahgLordOfTime: well, that's the way the Desktop team uses that status, it's not listed that way on the wiki18:55
LordOfTimemicahg: indeed.18:56
LordOfTimemicahg: when you hang out around the Desktop guys, you learn that's how they interpret that.18:57
* LordOfTime sometimes forgets what the wiki specifically says18:57
LordOfTime*yawn*18:57
LordOfTimei shouldnt even be looking at bugs, but alas, slow days at work *shrugs*18:57
* LordOfTime notices he missed an important email chain, and shifts his attention18:58
om26erLordOfTime, yeah, thats fixed in -proposed19:04
om26ernjin, you might be using -proposed repo?19:05
om26ernjin, its fixed there19:05
njinom26er, yes i use -proposed19:23
trismThe reporter for bug 1021783 would like an SRU of the fix from quantal to precise. I attached a debdiff and updated the description, but the bug is already marked fixed, so I'm not sure if anyone will see it (so I thought I'd ask here if someone could take a look), thanks20:03
ubot2Launchpad bug 1021783 in python3.2 "invalid behavior of curses.newpad().refresh() " [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/102178320:03
micahgtrism: looking20:09
micahgtrism: task granted, go ahead and subscribe ubuntu-sponsors if the rest of the paperwork is there20:10
trismmicahg: thanks20:16
ldz420When using apport to make a bug report should I use the apport on the application before or after the bug happens?21:36
ldz420because I am wondering if the erroneous data show up after the error has occured21:43
ldz420Or does apport simply show all of the application that are involved so the information show doesn't change before or after the bug occurs21:45

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!