| infinity | I freakin' win. Much nicer. | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| infinity | stgraber: That live-build in -proposed should fix your kernel headers sadness, I believe. | 01:15 |
| infinity | stgraber: I uploaded the same to quantal, if you'd like to watch a quantal daily run or two to make sure it DTRT. | 01:15 |
| infinity | stgraber: (Or, to watch it do not much of anything, I suppose) | 01:16 |
| stgraber | infinity: I'll take a look. I supposed that the fact that we're building with -proposed enabled for the livefs won't magically make the builders use the live-build from proposed right? | 02:05 |
| stgraber | (which would be quite convenient to very the SRU) | 02:06 |
| infinity | stgraber: I can't recall if we asked IS to enable proposed in the livefs chroots or not, TBH. | 02:10 |
| infinity | stgraber: But when the time comes, we can ask either if that's so (it might be), or if they can upgrade live-build. | 02:10 |
| ScottK | slangasek: Is the raw efi stuff for AA's to do documented? | 05:46 |
| slangasek | ScottK: not in the least | 05:47 |
| slangasek | ScottK: where do you think we should document this? wiki.u.c/ArchiveAdministration? | 05:47 |
| ScottK | I was thinking there. yes. | 05:47 |
| ScottK | Unless there's something that's sekrit. | 05:47 |
| slangasek | nah | 05:47 |
| slangasek | it's just early days and therefore undocumented | 05:48 |
| ScottK | I suspected as much. Best to start writing it up from the beginning before infinity's just cargo culting because he always did it that way before. | 05:49 |
| ScottK | ;-) | 05:49 |
| slangasek | ScottK: done,https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#Raw_UEFI_uploads | 05:58 |
| ScottK | Thanks. | 05:58 |
| ScottK | Wow. Built on all archs faster than I could review the next source. | 06:20 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === xdatap is now known as xdatap1 | ||
| seb128 | could somebody get larsu in ubuntu-community-contributors so he get tracking on status | 10:06 |
| seb128 | skaet, ^ | 10:07 |
| brendand | skaet, release meeting today? | 13:01 |
| jibel | skaet, is it planned an Ubuntu chinese edition for 12.04.1 ? | 13:31 |
| ScottK | stgraber: FYI: I've got two more issues that should be gotten to for 12.04.1 - Bug #1029640 and Bug #1023550. I expect to have them uploaded today and don't anticipate any delays due to verification. | 13:55 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1029640 in python2.7 "Bad characters in Python logger output when using rsyslog" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1029640 | 13:55 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1023550 in postfix "Postfix missing libresolv in chroot jail" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1023550 | 13:55 |
| stgraber | ScottK: both look like things we want fixed indeed and we still have enough time to verify these and get them to -updates, so all good. Thanks for the update | 13:56 |
| Daviey | skaet: I mostly won't be at the release meeting, clashing call. | 14:28 |
| Daviey | arosales: ^ | 14:28 |
| skaet | brendand, Daviey, I'm cancelling the release meeting today, day after release, and nothing immediately urgent for next week to discuss. | 14:31 |
| Daviey | wfm :) | 14:35 |
| ogra_ | skaet, awesome ! | 14:35 |
| skaet | seb128, larsu's been added | 14:36 |
| seb128 | skaet, thanks | 14:37 |
| arosales | Daviey: that worked well for you :-) | 14:42 |
| Daviey | arosales: yes sir! | 14:42 |
| jibel | stgraber, during manual upgrade testing I found bug 1029531. I think it should be fixed for 12.04.1 | 14:59 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1029531 in update-manager "cdromupgrade from Lucid to Precise failed with unmet dependencies without network connection" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1029531 | 14:59 |
| stgraber | jibel: hmm, do you know what package is missing on the media? the logs don't make it easy to figure out | 15:02 |
| jibel | stgraber, no I didn't investigate it yet. | 15:03 |
| stgraber | jibel: so, short answer is, yes, I think this should be targeted to the point release, but we'll need to know what's the source of the problem and see how we can deal with that | 15:22 |
| jibel | stgraber, ack assigning to foundation for the moment | 15:23 |
| stgraber | jibel: it might involve having to SRU some dependency fixes to lucid or precise or change some cleanup logic in update-manager or even (and I certainly hope not), seed some extra stuff to make the upgrade possible | 15:23 |
| stgraber | jibel: sounds good | 15:23 |
| === ev_ is now known as ev | ||
| stgraber | sru team: bug 1018579 being a race but milestoned to the point release, I'm going to do a standard install of dovecot and check that it works as expected, review the diff again and consider it verification-done if I don't see anything wrong | 15:40 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1018579 in dovecot "dovecot panic" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1018579 | 15:40 |
| stgraber | slangasek: around? | 19:18 |
| stgraber | slangasek: my understanding of bug 988819 is that the fix is now limited to just the two apache plugins and that's how I've been testing them. Shouldn't apache2 itself be pulled from -proposed? | 19:19 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 988819 in modsecurity-apache "[SRU] wrong path to libxml2.so.2 in mod_security - broken by multiarch enabled libraries" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/988819 | 19:19 |
| stgraber | it's making testing harder as it contains the old fix that was then discarded (bug task is marked invalid) | 19:19 |
| slangasek | stgraber: I hadn't been tracking that SRU; if the module package has been reuploaded with a more self-contained (and IMHO more sensible) fix, then yes, we should withdraw apache2 from -proposed | 19:20 |
| slangasek | stgraber: removed | 19:21 |
| stgraber | thanks | 19:22 |
| bjf | slangasek, (or any AA) can you accept my kernel packages in the upload queues? (natty & lucid) | 19:30 |
| slangasek | sure, looking | 19:30 |
| slangasek | bjf: this may be the first time I've done this part of it; is this supposed to be a binary sync, or a source only sync? LP shows me only a single item in the queue so I'm not sure how to interpret this | 19:34 |
| slangasek | (I suspect https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#Copying_PPA_kernels_to_proposed is not at all current) | 19:34 |
| bjf | slangasek: it should be a binary sync | 19:34 |
| bjf | slangasek: it's a "pocket-copy" from our ppa | 19:34 |
| * slangasek nods | 19:35 | |
| slangasek | well, I hope this is right then, since LP won't show me any details :) | 19:37 |
| slangasek | accepted | 19:37 |
| bjf | slangasek: what could go wrong? :-) | 19:37 |
| slangasek | bjf: it could be a source-only sync and we'd have to wait for the kernels to be built anew... so no big deal :) | 19:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!