[00:00] <infinity> I freakin' win.  Much nicer.
[01:15] <infinity> stgraber: That live-build in -proposed should fix your kernel headers sadness, I believe.
[01:15] <infinity> stgraber: I uploaded the same to quantal, if you'd like to watch a quantal daily run or two to make sure it DTRT.
[01:16] <infinity> stgraber: (Or, to watch it do not much of anything, I suppose)
[02:05] <stgraber> infinity: I'll take a look. I supposed that the fact that we're building with -proposed enabled for the livefs won't magically make the builders use the live-build from proposed right?
[02:06] <stgraber> (which would be quite convenient to very the SRU)
[02:10] <infinity> stgraber: I can't recall if we asked IS to enable proposed in the livefs chroots or not, TBH.
[02:10] <infinity> stgraber: But when the time comes, we can ask either if that's so (it might be), or if they can upgrade live-build.
[05:46] <ScottK> slangasek: Is the raw efi stuff for AA's to do documented?
[05:47] <slangasek> ScottK: not in the least
[05:47] <slangasek> ScottK: where do you think we should document this?  wiki.u.c/ArchiveAdministration?
[05:47] <ScottK> I was thinking there.  yes.
[05:47] <ScottK> Unless there's something that's sekrit.
[05:47] <slangasek> nah
[05:48] <slangasek> it's just early days and therefore undocumented
[05:49] <ScottK> I suspected as much.  Best to start writing it up from the beginning before infinity's just cargo culting because he always did it that way before.
[05:49] <ScottK> ;-)
[05:58] <slangasek> ScottK: done,https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#Raw_UEFI_uploads
[05:58] <ScottK> Thanks.
[06:20] <ScottK> Wow.  Built on all archs faster than I could review the next source.
[10:06] <seb128> could somebody get larsu in ubuntu-community-contributors so he get tracking on status
[10:07] <seb128> skaet, ^
[13:01] <brendand> skaet, release meeting today?
[13:31] <jibel> skaet, is it planned an Ubuntu chinese edition for 12.04.1 ?
[13:55] <ScottK> stgraber: FYI: I've got two more issues that should be gotten to for 12.04.1 - Bug #1029640  and Bug #1023550.  I expect to have them uploaded today and don't anticipate any delays due to verification.
[13:55] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1029640 in python2.7 "Bad characters in Python logger output when using rsyslog" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1029640
[13:55] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1023550 in postfix "Postfix missing libresolv in chroot jail" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1023550
[13:56] <stgraber> ScottK: both look like things we want fixed indeed and we still have enough time to verify these and get them to -updates, so all good. Thanks for the update
[14:28] <Daviey> skaet: I mostly won't be at the release meeting, clashing call.
[14:28] <Daviey> arosales: ^
[14:31] <skaet> brendand, Daviey,  I'm cancelling the release meeting today,  day after release, and nothing immediately urgent for next week to discuss.
[14:35] <Daviey> wfm :)
[14:35] <ogra_> skaet, awesome !
[14:36] <skaet> seb128, larsu's been added
[14:37] <seb128> skaet, thanks
[14:42] <arosales> Daviey: that worked well for you :-)
[14:42] <Daviey> arosales: yes sir!
[14:59] <jibel> stgraber, during manual upgrade testing I found bug 1029531. I think it should be fixed for 12.04.1
[14:59] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1029531 in update-manager "cdromupgrade from Lucid to Precise failed with unmet dependencies without network connection" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1029531
[15:02] <stgraber> jibel: hmm, do you know what package is missing on the media? the logs don't make it easy to figure out
[15:03] <jibel> stgraber, no I didn't investigate it yet.
[15:22] <stgraber> jibel: so, short answer is, yes, I think this should be targeted to the point release, but we'll need to know what's the source of the problem and see how we can deal with that
[15:23] <jibel> stgraber, ack assigning to foundation for the moment
[15:23] <stgraber> jibel: it might involve having to SRU some dependency fixes to lucid or precise or change some cleanup logic in update-manager or even (and I certainly hope not), seed some extra stuff to make the upgrade possible
[15:23] <stgraber> jibel: sounds good
[15:40] <stgraber> sru team: bug 1018579 being a race but milestoned to the point release, I'm going to do a standard install of dovecot and check that it works as expected, review the diff again and consider it verification-done if I don't see anything wrong
[15:40] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1018579 in dovecot "dovecot panic" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1018579
[19:18] <stgraber> slangasek: around?
[19:19] <stgraber> slangasek: my understanding of bug 988819 is that the fix is now limited to just the two apache plugins and that's how I've been testing them. Shouldn't apache2 itself be pulled from -proposed?
[19:19] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 988819 in modsecurity-apache "[SRU] wrong path to libxml2.so.2 in mod_security - broken by multiarch enabled libraries" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/988819
[19:19] <stgraber> it's making testing harder as it contains the old fix that was then discarded (bug task is marked invalid)
[19:20] <slangasek> stgraber: I hadn't been tracking that SRU; if the module package has been reuploaded with a more self-contained (and IMHO more sensible) fix, then yes, we should withdraw apache2 from -proposed
[19:21] <slangasek> stgraber: removed
[19:22] <stgraber> thanks
[19:30] <bjf> slangasek, (or any AA) can you accept my kernel packages in the upload queues? (natty & lucid)
[19:30] <slangasek> sure, looking
[19:34] <slangasek> bjf: this may be the first time I've done this part of it; is this supposed to be a binary sync, or a source only sync?  LP shows me only a single item in the queue so I'm not sure how to interpret this
[19:34] <slangasek> (I suspect https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#Copying_PPA_kernels_to_proposed is not at all current)
[19:34] <bjf> slangasek: it should be a binary sync
[19:34] <bjf> slangasek: it's a "pocket-copy" from our ppa
[19:35]  * slangasek nods
[19:37] <slangasek> well, I hope this is right then, since LP won't show me any details :)
[19:37] <slangasek> accepted
[19:37] <bjf> slangasek: what could go wrong? :-)
[19:37] <slangasek> bjf: it could be a source-only sync and we'd have to wait for the kernels to be built anew... so no big deal :)