[00:00] I freakin' win. Much nicer. [01:15] stgraber: That live-build in -proposed should fix your kernel headers sadness, I believe. [01:15] stgraber: I uploaded the same to quantal, if you'd like to watch a quantal daily run or two to make sure it DTRT. [01:16] stgraber: (Or, to watch it do not much of anything, I suppose) [02:05] infinity: I'll take a look. I supposed that the fact that we're building with -proposed enabled for the livefs won't magically make the builders use the live-build from proposed right? [02:06] (which would be quite convenient to very the SRU) [02:10] stgraber: I can't recall if we asked IS to enable proposed in the livefs chroots or not, TBH. [02:10] stgraber: But when the time comes, we can ask either if that's so (it might be), or if they can upgrade live-build. [05:46] slangasek: Is the raw efi stuff for AA's to do documented? [05:47] ScottK: not in the least [05:47] ScottK: where do you think we should document this? wiki.u.c/ArchiveAdministration? [05:47] I was thinking there. yes. [05:47] Unless there's something that's sekrit. [05:47] nah [05:48] it's just early days and therefore undocumented [05:49] I suspected as much. Best to start writing it up from the beginning before infinity's just cargo culting because he always did it that way before. [05:49] ;-) [05:58] ScottK: done,https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#Raw_UEFI_uploads [05:58] Thanks. [06:20] Wow. Built on all archs faster than I could review the next source. === yofel_ is now known as yofel === xdatap is now known as xdatap1 [10:06] could somebody get larsu in ubuntu-community-contributors so he get tracking on status [10:07] skaet, ^ [13:01] skaet, release meeting today? [13:31] skaet, is it planned an Ubuntu chinese edition for 12.04.1 ? [13:55] stgraber: FYI: I've got two more issues that should be gotten to for 12.04.1 - Bug #1029640 and Bug #1023550. I expect to have them uploaded today and don't anticipate any delays due to verification. [13:55] Launchpad bug 1029640 in python2.7 "Bad characters in Python logger output when using rsyslog" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1029640 [13:55] Launchpad bug 1023550 in postfix "Postfix missing libresolv in chroot jail" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1023550 [13:56] ScottK: both look like things we want fixed indeed and we still have enough time to verify these and get them to -updates, so all good. Thanks for the update [14:28] skaet: I mostly won't be at the release meeting, clashing call. [14:28] arosales: ^ [14:31] brendand, Daviey, I'm cancelling the release meeting today, day after release, and nothing immediately urgent for next week to discuss. [14:35] wfm :) [14:35] skaet, awesome ! [14:36] seb128, larsu's been added [14:37] skaet, thanks [14:42] Daviey: that worked well for you :-) [14:42] arosales: yes sir! [14:59] stgraber, during manual upgrade testing I found bug 1029531. I think it should be fixed for 12.04.1 [14:59] Launchpad bug 1029531 in update-manager "cdromupgrade from Lucid to Precise failed with unmet dependencies without network connection" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1029531 [15:02] jibel: hmm, do you know what package is missing on the media? the logs don't make it easy to figure out [15:03] stgraber, no I didn't investigate it yet. [15:22] jibel: so, short answer is, yes, I think this should be targeted to the point release, but we'll need to know what's the source of the problem and see how we can deal with that [15:23] stgraber, ack assigning to foundation for the moment [15:23] jibel: it might involve having to SRU some dependency fixes to lucid or precise or change some cleanup logic in update-manager or even (and I certainly hope not), seed some extra stuff to make the upgrade possible [15:23] jibel: sounds good === ev_ is now known as ev [15:40] sru team: bug 1018579 being a race but milestoned to the point release, I'm going to do a standard install of dovecot and check that it works as expected, review the diff again and consider it verification-done if I don't see anything wrong [15:40] Launchpad bug 1018579 in dovecot "dovecot panic" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1018579 [19:18] slangasek: around? [19:19] slangasek: my understanding of bug 988819 is that the fix is now limited to just the two apache plugins and that's how I've been testing them. Shouldn't apache2 itself be pulled from -proposed? [19:19] Launchpad bug 988819 in modsecurity-apache "[SRU] wrong path to libxml2.so.2 in mod_security - broken by multiarch enabled libraries" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/988819 [19:19] it's making testing harder as it contains the old fix that was then discarded (bug task is marked invalid) [19:20] stgraber: I hadn't been tracking that SRU; if the module package has been reuploaded with a more self-contained (and IMHO more sensible) fix, then yes, we should withdraw apache2 from -proposed [19:21] stgraber: removed [19:22] thanks [19:30] slangasek, (or any AA) can you accept my kernel packages in the upload queues? (natty & lucid) [19:30] sure, looking [19:34] bjf: this may be the first time I've done this part of it; is this supposed to be a binary sync, or a source only sync? LP shows me only a single item in the queue so I'm not sure how to interpret this [19:34] (I suspect https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#Copying_PPA_kernels_to_proposed is not at all current) [19:34] slangasek: it should be a binary sync [19:34] slangasek: it's a "pocket-copy" from our ppa [19:35] * slangasek nods [19:37] well, I hope this is right then, since LP won't show me any details :) [19:37] accepted [19:37] slangasek: what could go wrong? :-) [19:37] bjf: it could be a source-only sync and we'd have to wait for the kernels to be built anew... so no big deal :)