[02:56] <Iconic> I need help
[02:57] <Iconic> I click on my profile and it says page gone
[03:04] <wgrant> Iconic: What's your username?
[03:16] <Iconic> Iconic255
[03:17] <wgrant> Iconic: And what's the URL that shows the error?
[03:20] <Iconic> https://launchpad.net/~iconic255
[03:21] <wgrant> Is there an OOPS ID? What does the page look like?
[03:21] <wgrant> It works fine for me, and even when not logged in.
[03:23] <Iconic> it says Page gone
[03:23] <Iconic> There's no page with this address in Launchpad
[03:23] <Iconic> it shows my project page
[03:24] <Iconic> but when I click on my personal page it doesnt come up
[03:24] <Iconic> could it be from a recent suspension? cause they suspended my account for i dont know what reason
[03:24] <Iconic> even after i emailed about it
[03:24] <lifeless> Iconic: https://launchpad.net/~iconic255 says page gone ?
[03:27] <wgrant> Iconic: I see a response to your email explaining why your account was suspended, and that it had been reenabled.
[03:28] <wgrant> So that URL hasn't said "Page gone" since Friday.
[03:31] <Iconic> then is my URL wrong?
[03:31] <Iconic> cause I have no clue man
[03:32] <lifeless> Iconic: What URL ?
[03:32] <wgrant> Iconic: Have you forced your browser to refresh the page?
[03:41] <Iconic> WOW
[03:42] <Iconic> I just refreshed and it worked LOL
[13:16] <nh2> is it possible to turn that link from "report new bug" to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs off and go straigt to the report page? I really know it by now
[13:17] <wgrant> nh2: No. The wiki page exists for a reason -- you should only be using the direct link when none of the other methods work for you.
[13:18] <mgz> ha, cute, never noticed that before
[13:18] <mgz> is that ubuntu specific or can projects redirect their report bug link generally?
[13:18] <wgrant> Ubuntu's the only project that has requested it, so it's currently restricted to them.
[14:07]  * jml raises an eyebrow
[14:07] <czajkowski> jml: it'll stay like that one day!
[14:08] <jml> czajkowski: I doubt it.
[14:09] <exarkun> hey, what's the deal here?  http://codepad.org/2Nl1kCQ4  compare to https://code.launchpad.net/~exarkun/divmod.org/spambayes-hammie-args
[14:13] <exarkun> I see.  That's not what "target branch" means.
[14:16] <jml> exarkun: I think you want source_branch
[14:25] <exarkun> is the first argument to Launchpad.login_anonymously text or bytes?
[14:32] <mgz> exarkun: as in you're doing a port to py3k? because it's str in practice.
[14:32] <exarkun> nothing to do with py3k at all.
[14:32] <exarkun> just want to know what its type is supposed to be
[14:33] <mgz> it's python 2, pass and ascii str and who cares :)
[14:33] <mgz> -d
[14:33] <exarkun> I care.  I like writing working software.
[14:33] <exarkun> otherwise I wouldn't bother asking...
[14:35] <mgz> try: consumer_name.encode("ascii") except UnicodeError: raise ValueError("Stop being so foreign")
[14:35] <mgz> robust!
[14:35] <exarkun> thanks very much for your assistance
[14:36] <mgz> ...he was not in a jokey mood
[14:37] <mgz> the real answer is it takes me longer than that to chase through lazr layers and find out
[15:46] <dannf> can someone help me figure out why there's no MP option for this branch? https://code.launchpad.net/~dannf/qemu-linaro/highbank
[15:47] <czajkowski> jelmer: ^^
[21:38] <cheako> Hello, is this an appropriate place to get assistance with a bug that's been ignored?  I'd ask for the permissions/rights to set the Importance of something I opened higher.
[21:38] <cheako> Bug number 1007089 is a kernel bug and it's effects are greater then I originally suspected.  There are 4 packages that have bug because of this bug, including dpkg/start-stop-daemon.
[21:59] <maxb> cheako: Sounds like more of an Ubuntu matter than a Launchpad matter to me
[22:00] <maxb> bug 1007089
[22:00] <cheako> maxb: The question is about permissions, but yes a solution on the Ubuntu side would be welcomed.
[22:02] <cheako> It's also always appropriate to ask where/how to get assistance for any issue, ppl taking here should have some clue how to ping Ubuntu about issues... or else why bother having a bug tracking system.
[22:03] <czajkowski> cheako: have you asked in #ubuntu-kernel ?
[22:03] <cheako> czajkowski: Thank you!
[22:04] <cheako> ohh, that's a fav right next to #kernel
[22:05] <maxb> cheako: I think you may be placing a little too much importance on the "Importance" bug field, no pun intended
[22:05] <maxb> "Medium" seems to be in line with the guidelines per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance
[22:07] <cheako> maxb: This bug applies with none of those.  I'd suggest that if it dosn't match any other section that the wording of this document is at fault, it's horrible.
[22:08] <cheako> Prevents the application or any dependencies from functioning correctly at all.  A match, High.
[22:09] <cheako> Renders essential features or functionality of the application or dependencies broken or ineffective.  Second match for High.
[22:09] <czajkowski> cheako: they bug squad usually deal with that
[22:09] <cheako> Impacts accessibility of a core application.  Possible match, High.
[22:09] <czajkowski> and they are usually the ones to talk to about it, noting we can do in here about it
[22:10] <maxb> If you wish to argue over bug triage semantics #ubuntu-bugs is the place to do it
[22:10] <cheako> Severely affects applications beyond the package responsible for the root cause. one match for Critical.  This was basically why I was saying the bug needed an importance bump.
[22:11] <cheako> maxb: Ohh, thank you.
[23:24] <cody-somerville> Whats with the 'Latest test runs' at the bottom of projects?
[23:25] <james_w> cody-somerville, do you have the results tracker greasemonkey stuff enabled?
[23:25] <cody-somerville> oh, yea.
[23:25] <cody-somerville> james_w, thanks.
[23:31] <kanliot> i'm a newb but i submitted a patch to launchpad.  is there anywhere where i can get a sponsor to double-check my "work"
[23:31] <kanliot> ?
[23:33] <lifeless> kanliot: thats up to the project you submitted it to really
[23:33] <kanliot> k