[00:21] <bazhang> on himself
[00:23] <jrib> how nice
[01:25] <bazhang> salman is back at it
[06:39] <bkerensa> #ubuntu-offtopic
[06:49] <Tm_T> bkerensa: as you prolly have more insight what's been happening there, feel free to act there, you know, catalyst (:
[06:49] <bkerensa> kk
[07:49] <DJones> Watching
[07:56] <Myrtti> sorry if I barged in
[07:57] <DJones> No probs, I was about to do the same
[07:57] <bkerensa> good night folks
[07:57] <DJones> Goodnight
[08:32] <chu> So, ubottu has asked me to review the ban on user /28
[08:32] <chu> Whoops
[08:33] <chu> So, ubottu has asked me to review the ban on user `lechoked' - looking through the bt right now, I see that he was initially forwarded to #ubuntu-ops and from then he did not cooperate at all. I don't know if I should leave the ban in place or remove it. Any input?
[08:44] <topyli> chu: i would leave the ban in place, and if the user is online i'd nudge them to join -ops again and try to fix it
[08:45] <chu> Mmm, unfortunately the nick was not registered.
[08:45] <topyli> if the ban is very old, it might be worth considering to just remove it. they can be banned again if there's further trouble
[08:46] <topyli> someone who's been banned for several months might simply be gone by now
[08:48] <chu> Well, it's a week old, and he had no interest in reasoning about it - I gave him the guidelines link, but he just said "read it" straight away as if he didn't care
[08:49] <topyli> i'd consider the ban "active" if it isn't older than that. they can come here and resolve it if they're interested
[08:49] <topyli> so my advice is "do nothing" :)
[08:50] <chu> Well, initially I put the forward to #ubuntu-ops (although, if I recall IdleOne said it was unnecessary, but I wanted to give him a chance) and since we didn't resolve anything, I removed the forward but left the ban.
[08:50] <chu> Yep, thanks for your input topyli :)
[08:51] <chu> So, should I just recomment to ubottu about my decision, or reiterate the problem?
[08:51] <topyli> yes that's good work. the forward is unnecessary now since they know about this channel already
[08:55] <chu> Oh, I'm silly, there is no need for a recomment :)
[08:56] <topyli> no harm either :)
[09:48] <Tm_T> comments are always good
[09:49] <DJones> I've just tested, no on-join spam for me
[09:50] <Tm_T> usually ops and staff (when identified) are not infected
[09:50] <Tm_T> my cycle didn't get anything
[09:52] <DJones> I wasn't identified, used xchat & a none registered nick
[09:53] <LjL> vakaris is in very many channels and unidentified, that's an alarm bell but as long as we don't get a second report, i guess...
[09:55] <tomaw> LjL: any spam from it on your attempt?
[09:55] <LjL> no
[09:55] <tomaw> same here
[09:55] <Tm_T> looks clean to me
[17:33] <theadmin> (the current factoid info is pretty outdated, so there)
[17:35] <IdleOne> looks good
[17:35] <IdleOne> !no autostart is <reply> If you want to edit your Autostart programs, open the Unity dash and search for Startup Programs. If you're on XFCE, use menu -> Settings -> Settings Manager -> Session and Startup, if you're on KDE, use Kickoff -> Computer -> System Settings -> Autostart. For more details see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AddingProgramToSessionStartup
[17:35] <IdleOne> thanks theadmin
[17:36] <theadmin> IdleOne: No problem. I also have no idea how to do that for LXDE (edit ~/.config/openbox/autostart or something?)
[17:38] <theadmin> Anyway, thanks %)
[17:41] <Unit193> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/FAQ/Guides#How_I_can_autostart_a_program_when_logging_into_Desktop
[18:13] <IdleOne> !no autostart is <reply> If you want to edit your Autostart programs, open the Unity dash and search for Startup Programs. If you're on XFCE, use menu -> Settings -> Settings Manager -> Session and Startup, if you're on KDE, use Kickoff -> Computer -> System Settings -> Autostart. For more details see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AddingProgramToSessionStartup. For LXDE see http://ubottu.com/y/4
[18:13] <IdleOne> Unit193: That Good?
[18:15] <Unit193> Yeah, that's mostly for Lubuntu rather than LXDE, but generally Lubuntu users are the ones asking anyway.
[22:13] <TheLordOfTime> is the ops team pretty much dead?
[22:13] <TheLordOfTime> its as if #ubuntu isnt being watched.
[22:14] <genii-around> TheLordOfTime: I just gave Salman a warn
[22:14] <TheLordOfTime> cool, just making sure there's someone monitoring the channel.
[22:15] <TheLordOfTime> (that, and he's been reported to be spamming in other channels with messages as well, according to #freenode )
[22:15] <TheLordOfTime> and again, apparently the evil is rising from him.
[22:21] <Salman> How to bankic
[22:21] <Salman> K
[22:22] <Salman> ?
[22:22] <iceroot> hi
[22:22] <iceroot> would be great if someone could kick Salman in #ubuntu, thx
[22:29] <beandog> guys, can we get rid of a troll
[22:30] <beandog> ujoqaj Dr_Willis: then you probably werent capable of helping anyway
[22:30] <beandog> ujoqaj i mean, its going to require an attention span, what else can i tell you
[22:30] <beandog> won't check forums, anything else, anytime we try to help he throws it in our face
[22:30] <beandog> he's being a dork
[22:30] <beandog> he's not even doing basics to help himself out, and bugging not just me.
[22:33] <Salman> Help me
[22:33] <Salman> Ubuntu unbanned help me
[22:37] <IdleOne> ujoqaj, banned
[22:40] <iceroot> thanks
[22:40] <IdleOne> beandog: How can I help you?
[22:41] <beandog> IdleOne: nothing, Im good
[22:41] <beandog> thx
[22:51] <genii-around> Rebooting, back in a bit.
[22:52]  * IdleOne counts the bits