jimerickson | xorg-server still not fixed with latest update. log in screen is still all i get. this is on the 12.10 omap4+armhf image on a pandaboard ES. | 00:09 |
---|---|---|
jimerickson | after a reboot there isn't even a log in screen just the console. | 00:20 |
=== ndec|away is now known as ndec | ||
marvin24 | janimo: the ac100 said, that xserver doesn't crash without xorg.conf ... | 08:06 |
marvin24 | maybe another test point ... | 08:06 |
prologic | Anyone aware of any other 1RU/2RU ARM powered servers? I've found the ZT R1801e (http://www.ztsystems.com/Default.aspx?tabid=1483) and am inquiring on price. Wondering if anyone is aware of any others like this? | 08:26 |
scientes | http://content.dell.com/us/en/enterprise/d/campaigns/project-copper | 08:30 |
scientes | http://www.calxeda.com/ | 08:30 |
scientes | prologic, ^ | 08:30 |
scientes | they are a bit bigger than 2U however | 08:31 |
prologic | yeah I'm aware of calxeda, but avoiding it due to cost | 08:33 |
scientes | also the dell link | 08:34 |
scientes | thats 3U sie | 08:35 |
scientes | *size | 08:35 |
prologic | yeah and it's price range would be high too | 08:35 |
prologic | so far I've only found the ZT system that might fit the power and cost budget | 08:35 |
scientes | prologic, how much does the full 8 slow thing cost? | 08:38 |
scientes | *slot | 08:38 |
prologic | I'm finding out :) | 08:39 |
prologic | but I bet it'll be cheaper than the Del 3RU version | 08:39 |
prologic | and the Calxeda based Boston viridis is about $50k fully speced | 08:40 |
lilstevie | I'll be happier using arm servers once we get a decent amount of ram in them | 08:44 |
=== prologic is now known as Guest42436 | ||
janimo | marvin24, I am not aware of creating and xorg.conf, do the L4T tools do? I don't have the ac100 open now, but will check this too | 11:33 |
marvin24 | janimo: L4T provides an almost empty xorg.conf | 11:37 |
marvin24 | I don't know if nvidia-tegra just copies it | 11:37 |
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
prpplague | infinity: ping | 16:52 |
prpplague | oops | 16:52 |
prpplague | infinity: give me a shout when you have a couple minutes | 16:52 |
infinity | prpplague: I'm vaguely around, what's up? | 16:59 |
prpplague | infinity: see /msg | 17:02 |
wookey | something is very wrong in quantal: dpkg --print-foreign-architectures is: i386 armhf | 17:51 |
xnox | wookey: looks good to me. | 17:52 |
wookey | but sudo apt-get install zlib1g-dev:armhf gives: zlib1g-dev:armel : Depends: zlib1g:armel (= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13) but it is not going to be installed | 17:52 |
xnox | wookey: now that's funny ;-) | 17:52 |
wookey | apt seems to be deciding I'd much prefer armel for reason despite not mentioning it anywhere | 17:52 |
wookey | well, the only place it is mentionned is in sources.list: deb [arch=armhf,armel] http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports quantal main universe | 17:53 |
infinity | wookey: No, that means you already have the armel package installed. | 17:53 |
infinity | wookey: At least, I suspect that's what it means. | 17:53 |
wookey | dpkg --get-selections | grep zlib says zlib1g:amd64install zlib1g-dev:amd64install | 17:54 |
wookey | I have a libc6-armel-cross. that should be OK | 17:54 |
wookey | dpkg --get-selections | grep armel only shows toolchain armel-cross packages | 17:55 |
infinity | Weird. | 17:56 |
infinity | Could be that apt hates you. | 17:57 |
infinity | Drop the armel from sources.list and see if it gets wise? | 17:57 |
infinity | Though, I can't see how this would be apt's fault, even if both arches were enabled. | 17:58 |
infinity | Seems just plain weird. | 17:58 |
=== zyga is now known as zyga-afk | ||
=== plars_ is now known as plars |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!