[00:06] <IlikeMoose> does launchpad email you with a bug number if you are submitting a new bug?
[00:10] <wgrant> IlikeMoose: You should get an email within a few minutes, unless you haven't got the "Send me bug notifications for changes I make" option on https://launchpad.net/~/+edit selected.
[00:22] <IlikeMoose> wgrant: thanks, i tried submitting the same bug several times but it seems launchpad wouldn't even accept the bug unless I had that checked.
[00:22] <IlikeMoose> after i checked that box it accepted the bug and didn't give me a duplicate bug report
[00:26] <wgrant> IlikeMoose: That doesn't affect whether or not the bug is accepted. It just controls notifications.
[00:28] <IlikeMoose> wgrant: if you submit the same bug it sends a duplicate bug submission email correct?
[00:28] <wgrant> IlikeMoose: What do you mean by duplicate bug submission email?
[00:29] <IlikeMoose> i submitted a bug a few days ago and i got a reply back from launchpad saying something about a "duplicate bug being filed" and that my bug submission was rejected
[00:29] <IlikeMoose> i got an automatic email
[00:31] <wgrant> Launchpad doesn't send emails like that itself. Was it an Ubuntu bug? Ubuntu runs various bots over their bugs to automatically detect and mark duplicates.
[00:31] <wgrant> It sounds like your bugs were filed successfully.
[00:31] <wgrant> What's your Launchpad username?
[00:32] <IlikeMoose> mike-destein-1977
[00:33] <wgrant> You've filed 6 bugs
[00:33] <IlikeMoose> uh-oh
[00:33] <wgrant> https://bugs.launchpad.net/~mike-destein-1977
[00:33] <IlikeMoose> any way to cancel bug submissions ?
[00:33] <wgrant> Why'd you file through the email interface, rather than the web UI or Ubuntu's usual bug filing mechanisms?
[00:34] <IlikeMoose> email was the first way i found
[00:34] <wgrant> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu has a "Report a bug" link which takes you to a page detailing the various ways.
[00:35] <wgrant> I'll mark the bugs as duplicates of the first one
[00:35] <IlikeMoose> yeah thanks....my bad i'll try the web interface next time
[00:36] <wgrant> https://bugs.launchpad.net/~mike-destein-1977 looks a bit nicer now
[00:37] <IlikeMoose> nice thanks
[00:41] <IlikeMoose> i'll try not to be so hasty on the send button next time
[07:54] <ScottK> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parley/4:4.9.0-0ubuntu1/+build/3695883 <--- has been stuck unpacking chroot for 4 hours.  It needs to be taken out and shot ...
[07:56] <wgrant> webops: Can you look at that stuck panda build, please? ^^
[07:56] <mthaddon> checking
[08:11] <mthaddon> I don't seem to be able to login to it - might need kicking
[09:12] <ttx> Elaborate spam: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1032516
[09:12] <ttx> Reuses a closed answer, and pads with links
[09:16] <czajkowski> removed the link
[09:17] <ttx> czajkowski: nice, that should solve it :) Thanks
[09:17] <czajkowski> np
[09:17] <ttx> these guys are getting smarter. Took me 5 min to prove wrong :)
[09:25] <crass> any ideas what's wrong with this build? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/111794033/buildlog.txt.gz
[09:26] <crass> it looks like missing dependencies, but they should all be there
[09:32] <geser> crass: you are building for oneiric and python-messaging only exist in precise (and later). or do you have it in your PPA too (backport)?
[09:33] <crass> yes, it looks like its there: https://code.launchpad.net/~crass/+archive/v-mobile-broadband
[09:37] <geser> how old it this build log?
[09:37] <wgrant> crass: That build started just a very few minutes after python-messaging finished building
[09:37] <wgrant> crass: It probably wasn't published yet.
[09:40] <geser> wgrant: could someone set the clock on that buildd? checking when the build started from the log with an offset of -113970.257299 sec isn't fun
[09:41] <wgrant> geser: It's not quite that easy, as I believe the saved VM memory image would include the clock. That's part of the reason NTP is run on startup.
[09:42] <crass> thanks wgrant, I'll rebuild it and see
[09:42] <wgrant> Although that time is oddly close, so maybe not.
[09:43] <wgrant> Also it's in the wrong direction.
[09:43] <wgrant> So who knows.
[09:43] <wgrant> sbuild writes convenient timestamps, but build-recipe does not :(
[09:47] <geser> it would even help when the the current time after setting the clock would get logged once
[13:07] <ScottK> mthaddon and/or wgrant: Still stuck (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parley/4:4.9.0-0ubuntu1/+build/3695883)
[13:49] <mdeslaur> Is there a bug open for hitting timeouts when attempting to nominate to releases?
[13:49] <mdeslaur> ie: OOPS-2da8002c673ce15e4b33b96b47be73fc
[13:50] <czajkowski> ping webops can you look at ScottK issue again please
[13:54] <wgrant> mdeslaur: Bug #874250. Try targetting not all of the series at once.
[13:56] <mdeslaur> wgrant: thanks
[13:56] <wgrant> It appears to have created 4 of the 5 before it timed out
[14:44] <agateau> hi, I'd like to get a bzr branch moved from one project to another. Can anyone with enough power do it for me? It seems I am not allowed to do that.
[14:52] <czajkowski> agateau: what do you mean ?
[14:54] <agateau> czajkowski: I have a Launchpad branch which is an import of a git repository. It is in lp:~cyberspace/sal-qml/trunk, I'd like it to be lp:~cyberspace/homerun/trunk
[14:55] <czajkowski> jelmer: is this possible
[14:58] <dobey> agateau: just delete the one, and make the new one import the same git repo
[14:59] <czajkowski> dobey: did you resolve your issue from yesterday ?
[15:00] <dobey> czajkowski: no. but i'm on a call right now, so will have to deal with it after that/lunch
[15:00] <agateau> dobey: oh right, can do. feels a bit like a waste though.
[15:01] <mgz> I didn't think branch moves worked, but wgrant had a method last time this came up... may not apply to imports
[15:01] <wgrant> Branch moves work, but you have to use the API
[15:01] <wgrant> Imports should work the same as any other branch
[15:02] <czajkowski> dobey: catch wgrant before he sleeps ;)
[15:03] <mgz> agateau: so, I can move that via the api for you, or you can do that yourself
[15:04] <dobey> czajkowski: maybe james_w would be a better person to ask, not sure.
[15:04] <agateau> mgz: I am not sure what "via the api" means, is it using the python lp bindings?
[15:04] <mgz> yup.
[15:05] <dobey> wgrant: maybe you would know too; lp:ubuntu/ubuntuone-control-panel is out of date, and it is not mentioned as a failure or anything on the UDD package import status page
[15:06] <agateau> mgz: is there some doc about this feature somewhere? I played once with the lp api, but that was a long time ago
[15:07] <wgrant> dobey: I'm not sure, sorry.
[15:08] <wgrant> I don't have access to the relevant machine, and its logs aren't synced where I can see them, AFAICT
[15:10] <mdeslaur> would be nice if I could look at this page without launchpad timing out: https://launchpad.net/apport/trunk
[15:11] <mgz> agateau: I'll write a little script and link it to you
[15:11] <agateau> mgz: awesome, thanks!
[15:11] <dobey> james_w: any idea about why ubuntuone-control-panel would have succeeded the package import and not actually be in the branch?
[15:22] <james_w> dobey, seems that it somehow missed that the new version was published, I've told it to try an import now
[15:22] <dobey> james_w: ah, thanks
[15:23] <dobey> james_w: is there any way i can do that myself in the future?
[15:23] <james_w> dobey, unfortunately not
[15:23] <james_w> it would have got to it eventually
[15:23] <james_w> but bzr people can trigger it
[15:23] <dobey> ok, thanks
[15:24] <james_w> dobey, it's going now, should be a few minutes and you'll see the update
[15:24] <james_w> or a failure, but hopefully not
[15:33] <dobey> james_w: it's updated now. thanks again
[15:33] <james_w> np
[15:38] <mgz> agateau: try <lp:~gz/+junk/lpmvbranch> then something like `./lpmvbranch --project=homerun lp:~cyberspace/sal-qml/trunk`
[15:38] <mgz> and I hate python-keyring more and more every day, having to retype a sodding password three times every script run is sucha huge slow down
[15:41] <wgrant> 3 times!?
[15:41] <wgrant> Also, you should use a DE with a session-wide keyring :)
[15:43] <mgz> yeah, it's buggy crap, that only gets tested with gnome keyring apparently.
[15:45] <mgz> it's safe to mess with branches on staging via the api, right?
[15:46] <agateau> mgz: thanks, trying
[15:47] <mgz> ...were it not for the fact it's returning 504 anyway...
[15:49] <mgz> hm, recipes might interfer with move
[15:52] <agateau> mgz: that failed with http://paste2.org/p/2093004
[15:58] <mgz> agateau: pull and try again, small error in that check
[15:58] <agateau> mgz: bzr says nothing to pull
[15:59] <mgz> my push was slow for some reason, it's now completed
[16:00] <agateau> mgz: now it says: http://paste2.org/p/2093029
[16:04] <mgz> agateau: please pull again (sorry, didn't want to move branches around on production so script not fully tested)
[16:05] <agateau> mgz, sure no pb
[16:06] <agateau> mgz: http://paste2.org/p/2093034
[16:07] <mgz> okay, that's more fun.
[16:08] <agateau> heh
[16:08] <mgz> it appears to have worked though.
[16:09] <mgz> location has changed.
[16:09] <agateau> mgz: oh right!
[16:10] <agateau> it even updated the recipe, nice
[16:10] <agateau> thanks a lot, mgz
[16:10] <mgz> I shall record your traceback for posterity, there's probably a way of not making lazr blow up like that
[16:10] <agateau> :)
[16:11]  * agateau mutters something about > /dev/null
[16:11] <mgz> :)
[16:28] <ScottK> czajkowski: Not sure how often I should ping, but the build is still stuck.
[16:40] <LoT> can i get a link to the pay-for-private-stuff info page for LP?
[17:40] <dobey> LordOfTime: https://launchpad.net/+tour/join-launchpad#commercial
[17:57] <czajkowski> ScottK: poking again
[17:57] <centrelink> ScottK
[17:57] <ScottK> Thanks.
[17:57] <centrelink> are you the same ScottK from webchat?
[17:58] <ScottK> Probably not.
[17:58] <centrelink> if you were, you would know
[18:00] <czajkowski> ScottK: mew is killing it now
[18:01] <ScottK> Thanks.
[18:14] <slank> ScottK: looks like it's unreachable, so I can't kill the job
[18:14] <ScottK> Nice.
[18:14] <ScottK> What next?
[18:14] <slank> ScottK: I've taken it out of rotation, but LP will just have to figure out it's dead.
[18:14] <ScottK> How long does that take?
[18:16] <slank> ScottK: checking into that
[18:16] <ScottK> Thanks.
[18:23] <slank> ScottK: looks like I got it to move. we'll see how that goes
[18:23] <slank> ScottK: it's already making progress
[18:56] <cyphermox> I'm having trouble uploading a new version of network-manager to quantal; dput says the upload is successful, but the new version never gets found by launchpad (and I don't get the confirmation email on quantal-uploads...)
[18:56] <cyphermox> any idea what could be wrong, or if someone could check on upload.ubuntu.com?
[19:04] <ScottK> Looks like it finally got built.  Thanks again.
[22:21] <jMCg> Hey folks
[22:21] <jMCg> http://dpaste.com/781016/
[22:21] <jMCg> Certificate error when doingloading stuff.
[23:44] <wgrant> jMCg: That's interesting, since the root cert has been around since 2004. I suspect your cert config is broken.
[23:44] <jMCg> wgrant: or I don't have ca-certificates installed in this chroot :-S
[23:45] <wgrant> Heh
[23:45] <wgrant> That would do it :)
[23:45] <wgrant> Yeah, it's an easy one to miss.