| freeflying | ls | 00:48 |
|---|---|---|
| freeflying | sorry | 00:48 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === bilal_ is now known as bilal | ||
| === sagaci_ is now known as sagaci | ||
| freeflying | anyone know how can I re-apply for the motu? | 12:30 |
| tumbleweed | freeflying: you expired fairly recently. Please mail the developer-membership-board, saying you'd like to re-apply | 12:34 |
| tumbleweed | err not re-apply, have your membership re-activated | 12:34 |
| freeflying | tumbleweed: so a email to developer-membership-board to re-activated works? | 12:36 |
| tumbleweed | sure, it expired fairly recently. I'm happy to re-activate it | 12:37 |
| freeflying | tumbleweed: btw, what is the mail address? can't find it from lists.ubuntu.com | 12:37 |
| freeflying | tumbleweed: thanks a lot | 12:37 |
| tumbleweed | developer-membership-board@lists.u.c | 12:39 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| freeflying | tumbleweed: done, thanks for your help | 12:47 |
| === mfisch` is now known as mfisch | ||
| === mfisch is now known as Guest52926 | ||
| bdrung | freeflying: you're welcome. :) | 13:35 |
| freeflying | bdrung: :) | 13:35 |
| dupondje | somebody here ever packaged mozilla stuff ? :) | 14:22 |
| === Guest52926 is now known as mfisch | ||
| === mfisch is now known as Guest6741 | ||
| === Guest16807 is now known as vibhav | ||
| === Guest6741 is now known as mfisch | ||
| === glebihan_ is now known as glebihan | ||
| === mfisch` is now known as mfisch | ||
| === mfisch is now known as Guest80389 | ||
| === Guest80389 is now known as mfisch | ||
| === LordOfTime is now known as TheLordOfTime | ||
| oly_ | hi, wondering if anyone is around who can help me get a package into ubuntu / help test that i packaged it correctly :) | 21:16 |
| oly_ | I have created a package and put it on my own ppa, and installed and removed using this on a few machine, but not really sure what todo with it from here and would like to learn | 21:17 |
| nhandler | oly_: You might be interested in http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/packaging-new-software.html#submitting-for-inclusion (Note that Debian is currently frozen in preparation for wheezy) | 22:02 |
| oly_ | yeah i saw that it was frozen, and it something i read said to ask in here and that you can get people to mentor or confirm the package was safe | 22:03 |
| oly_ | thought it made sense to just try and get it in ubuntu for now then submit to debian when its not frozen, but perhaps i am wrong in that assumption | 22:06 |
| oly_ | my goal was to aim for 12.10 release | 22:06 |
| nhandler | oly_: The page I mentioned included a link to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages . This will help you get your package into the list of things needing to get reviewed/sponsored | 22:07 |
| oly_ | cheers just taking a look, | 22:08 |
| micahg | oly_: we can always backport from 13.04 to 12.10 as well | 22:09 |
| oly_ | Actually read that, thats why i ended up here as it says it needs to be reviewed by two people from motu :) | 22:09 |
| oly_ | thats an option i guess, what i have done already are under these links, the bug is here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1031894 and the package here https://launchpad.net/~oly/+archive/ppa | 22:11 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1031894 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] [needs-packaging] yii framework" [Wishlist,In progress] | 22:11 |
| micahg | debian 597899 | 22:13 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 597899 in wnpp "RFP: yii-framework -- High-performance component-based PHP framework" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/597899 | 22:13 |
| oly_ | hum, that sounds like they need it packaging | 22:14 |
| oly_ | lol, as usual i dont get debians organisation thats a mailing list is there not some where i can submit the deb, or do i just attach it, they really need to adopt something more modern, perhaps thats just me i like shiny webpages :) | 22:18 |
| micahg | oly_: mentors.debian.net | 22:21 |
| oly_ | that just presents me with a message basically saying dont bother because we are in feature freeze, perhaps i just submit it and see what happens | 22:24 |
| micahg | yes | 22:25 |
| micahg | there are DDs here that can sponsor as well | 22:25 |
| philsf | I'm trying to package a new version of an app, and although "make" works and compiles it, when I run dpkg-buildpackage I get the following arch error: i386:x86-64 architecture of input file '***' is incompatible with i386 output. Is there a way to tell dpkg-buildpackage not to make clean, so I can compile separatly? | 22:29 |
| oly_ | cheers guys for the help, dputing the package the mentors now will see what happens from there :) | 22:32 |
| maxb | philsf: No. A packaging is supposed to be a complete build routine from start to finish; without that being true, it's impossible for any automatic build to take place, or for any other human to build the package without first acquiring outside knowledge. | 23:05 |
| ScottK | philsf: Pass dpkg-buildpackage the -nc option. | 23:07 |
| ScottK | Of course that just works for testing. | 23:07 |
| ScottK | Eventually you'll have to get it to work. | 23:07 |
| oly_ | cool, package has appeared on debian mentors now :) | 23:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!