[00:48] ls [00:48] sorry === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === bilal_ is now known as bilal === sagaci_ is now known as sagaci [12:30] anyone know how can I re-apply for the motu? [12:34] freeflying: you expired fairly recently. Please mail the developer-membership-board, saying you'd like to re-apply [12:34] err not re-apply, have your membership re-activated [12:36] tumbleweed: so a email to developer-membership-board to re-activated works? [12:37] sure, it expired fairly recently. I'm happy to re-activate it [12:37] tumbleweed: btw, what is the mail address? can't find it from lists.ubuntu.com [12:37] tumbleweed: thanks a lot [12:39] developer-membership-board@lists.u.c === yofel_ is now known as yofel [12:47] tumbleweed: done, thanks for your help === mfisch` is now known as mfisch === mfisch is now known as Guest52926 [13:35] freeflying: you're welcome. :) [13:35] bdrung: :) [14:22] somebody here ever packaged mozilla stuff ? :) === Guest52926 is now known as mfisch === mfisch is now known as Guest6741 === Guest16807 is now known as vibhav === Guest6741 is now known as mfisch === glebihan_ is now known as glebihan === mfisch` is now known as mfisch === mfisch is now known as Guest80389 === Guest80389 is now known as mfisch === LordOfTime is now known as TheLordOfTime [21:16] hi, wondering if anyone is around who can help me get a package into ubuntu / help test that i packaged it correctly :) [21:17] I have created a package and put it on my own ppa, and installed and removed using this on a few machine, but not really sure what todo with it from here and would like to learn [22:02] oly_: You might be interested in http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/packaging-new-software.html#submitting-for-inclusion (Note that Debian is currently frozen in preparation for wheezy) [22:03] yeah i saw that it was frozen, and it something i read said to ask in here and that you can get people to mentor or confirm the package was safe [22:06] thought it made sense to just try and get it in ubuntu for now then submit to debian when its not frozen, but perhaps i am wrong in that assumption [22:06] my goal was to aim for 12.10 release [22:07] oly_: The page I mentioned included a link to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages . This will help you get your package into the list of things needing to get reviewed/sponsored [22:08] cheers just taking a look, [22:09] oly_: we can always backport from 13.04 to 12.10 as well [22:09] Actually read that, thats why i ended up here as it says it needs to be reviewed by two people from motu :) [22:11] thats an option i guess, what i have done already are under these links, the bug is here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1031894 and the package here https://launchpad.net/~oly/+archive/ppa [22:11] Launchpad bug 1031894 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] [needs-packaging] yii framework" [Wishlist,In progress] [22:13] debian 597899 [22:13] Debian bug 597899 in wnpp "RFP: yii-framework -- High-performance component-based PHP framework" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/597899 [22:14] hum, that sounds like they need it packaging [22:18] lol, as usual i dont get debians organisation thats a mailing list is there not some where i can submit the deb, or do i just attach it, they really need to adopt something more modern, perhaps thats just me i like shiny webpages :) [22:21] oly_: mentors.debian.net [22:24] that just presents me with a message basically saying dont bother because we are in feature freeze, perhaps i just submit it and see what happens [22:25] yes [22:25] there are DDs here that can sponsor as well [22:29] I'm trying to package a new version of an app, and although "make" works and compiles it, when I run dpkg-buildpackage I get the following arch error: i386:x86-64 architecture of input file '***' is incompatible with i386 output. Is there a way to tell dpkg-buildpackage not to make clean, so I can compile separatly? [22:32] cheers guys for the help, dputing the package the mentors now will see what happens from there :) [23:05] philsf: No. A packaging is supposed to be a complete build routine from start to finish; without that being true, it's impossible for any automatic build to take place, or for any other human to build the package without first acquiring outside knowledge. [23:07] philsf: Pass dpkg-buildpackage the -nc option. [23:07] Of course that just works for testing. [23:07] Eventually you'll have to get it to work. [23:07] cool, package has appeared on debian mentors now :)