jbicha | micahg: I saw the bug a minute after I synced :( | 00:28 |
---|---|---|
micahg | jbicha: well, there's cleanup still :), you could've found an AA to take care of the removal of tob | 00:28 |
micahg | jbicha: it also needs to be moved to multiverse most likely | 00:30 |
micahg | the RC bug was for the licensing | 00:31 |
jbicha | universe shouldn't depend on multiverse, right? | 00:32 |
micahg | right | 00:33 |
micahg | which is why tob needs to be removed | 00:33 |
micahg | (normally would be moved to multiverse, but it's being removed from Debian) | 00:33 |
=== akher0n is now known as akheron | ||
=== achiang` is now known as achiang | ||
=== emma is now known as em | ||
bdrung | jtaylor: about which package are you talking? | 08:02 |
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
yaffs | !ops | 11:55 |
ubottu | Help! Hobbsee, Riddell, sladen, fbond, mneptok, gnomefreak, Seveas, dholbach, elkbuntu, PriceChild, or jpds! | 11:55 |
yaffs | !yay | 11:55 |
ubottu | Glad you made it! :-) | 11:55 |
_ruben | errr, ok :) | 11:58 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
LoT | so i have a very generic question, perhaps a MOTU would be able to answer... | 13:41 |
LoT | if i have SRU'd a main package, and uploaded a debdiff, and I've subscribed the sponsors team... should i poke the sponsors mailing list if the SRU should be included in 12.04.1? | 13:42 |
LoT | since that release date is fast approaching | 13:46 |
geser | we have a sponsors mailing list? | 13:57 |
geser | LoT: is it important that the SRU gets on the discs? | 13:58 |
LoT | geser: not sure if it'd hit the discs, might hit the server discs if any, though, because it fixes a medium and a high importance bug in PHP (one being a segfault, and one being a fix to allow php to report errors to the webserver) | 14:14 |
LoT | it was suggested by SpamapS, though, that it might be included in 12.04.1 | 14:15 |
LoT | geser: the other problem is that part of the SRU might not be accepted, as its fix is upstream, and awaiting inclusion in Debian (and therefore waiting inclusion in Quantal) | 14:17 |
LoT | and since this is in Main, i was hesitant to drop in here and poke around. | 14:17 |
LoT | (and the php-error-reporting bug was a regression in Precise, that wasnt present in Oneiric) | 14:18 |
LoT | so if only because its a regression, it should be included/fixed (in my opinion) | 14:18 |
geser | LoT: you could create a patch for quantal too (even if it's gets dropped again with the next php5 merge), so it can get SRUed | 14:28 |
LoT | geser: indeed, although its already incorporated into the PHP upstream | 14:28 |
geser | as Debian is in Freeze it might take some time till a new upstream version gets into Debian which then can get merged/synced | 14:28 |
* LoT will have to dig around for the patch and update/refresh the patch in case parts dont apply) | 14:29 | |
LoT | geser: apparently i am unable to create bzr branches of my own, so i would have to put the patch up, but i cant include it in the bzr code. | 14:29 |
LoT | i think somewhere my perms got busted. | 14:29 |
LoT | s/busted/screwed up | 14:29 |
geser | you mean pushing to lp:~$user/ubuntu/quantal/php5? | 14:30 |
geser | (assuming you branched lp:ubuntu/quantal/php5) | 14:32 |
LoT | geser: can't even do that | 14:33 |
LoT | apparently, either (1) my SSH keys are no longer valid | 14:33 |
LoT | or (2) | 14:33 |
LoT | bzr is broken on my computer | 14:33 |
LoT | even then, the comp with my PGP keys has no internet here, so i cant do anything now | 14:34 |
=== Ng_ is now known as Ng | ||
geser | you don't need pgp/gpg for this (gpg is only needed when uploading a package) | 14:35 |
geser | re (1) check the ssh key on your computer with that listed on your LP profile page | 14:35 |
geser | if those match than try to get help in #launchpad for why it isn't working for you | 14:36 |
LoT | geser: i plan to, the issue i'm having right now is no internet | 14:36 |
LoT | then again, i AM at work :P | 14:37 |
LoT | (Windows only :/) | 14:37 |
LoT | i'll try branching again, although if bzr is busted on my system, that'll be a problem | 14:37 |
* LoT might have to generate a key specific to his server(s) in order to use those | 14:37 | |
=== ante_ is now known as ivoks | ||
heraclide | hello | 15:23 |
heraclide | sorry to disturb, I'm new to ubuntu-motu, I have make some fix to some ubuntu packages swift_1.4.8-0ubuntu2_all.deb, I have created a new package, can someone point me good url to know to to submit it for review please ? | 15:24 |
LoT | geser: is there an SRU freeze right now on Precise? | 15:25 |
Laney | heraclide: probably this… | 15:25 |
Laney | !sponsprship | heraclide | 15:25 |
LoT | if so, when did that go into effect? | 15:25 |
Laney | !sponsorship | heraclide | 15:26 |
ubottu | heraclide: You can find out about the package sponsorship process here http://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess - For !UDS sponsorship see http://uds.ubuntu.com/participate/sponsorship/ | 15:26 |
Laney | the first link there | 15:26 |
heraclide | thanks, I'll read it :) | 15:26 |
micahg | LoT: seeded packages or stuff affecting seeded packages will on be accepted into proposed if it'll bring us closer to the 12.04.1 release, everything else should be unaffected | 15:35 |
micahg | s/on/only/ | 15:35 |
LoT | .w 5 | 15:52 |
=== Zic_ is now known as Guest89846 | ||
=== Guest89846 is now known as Zic | ||
micahg | scottK: I was wrong, not gcc-4.7, same failure in precise, it's just missing an include I think | 18:34 |
ScottK | OK. | 18:35 |
micahg | maybe if I examine the problem I'll get a better answer :), those variables are defined in various places in the file, but not in that function, seems like some refactoring it needed for a proper fix, possible a copy/paste for a temporary fix | 18:38 |
micahg | scottK: ^^ | 18:39 |
=== funkyHat_ is now known as funkyHat | ||
ScottK | micahg: If you could have a look at it, that'd be absolutely lovely. | 18:39 |
micahg | ScottK: sorry, can't right now, already doing too many things at once | 18:42 |
ScottK | Sure. Thanks for looking. | 18:42 |
micahg | scottK: since it has the same issue in unstable, I'd throw it over the fence as an RC bug and see if that elicits a removal RoM response :) | 18:51 |
ScottK | micahg: Good point. Thanks. | 18:51 |
ScottK | micahg: Debian Bug 684078, in case you care to watch the fun. | 19:25 |
ubottu | Debian bug 684078 in wv2 "calligra: Buffer overflow" [Grave,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/684078 | 19:25 |
micahg | scottK: thanks | 19:26 |
LoT | does the MOTU recommend using pbuilder, or sbuild for building packages locally (for testing) | 19:28 |
ScottK | Yes. | 19:30 |
LoT | ScottK: lemme rephrase | 19:33 |
LoT | which is recommended more, pbuilder, or sbuild? | 19:34 |
maxb | They both have their ups and downs | 19:34 |
LoT | given that pbuilder is breaking on my precise system, i'm curious which would be more recommended. | 19:35 |
ScottK | Odd. It's working here for me. | 19:35 |
ScottK | In 5 1/2 years of Ubuntu/Debian development it's what I've always used. | 19:35 |
LoT | ScottK: apparently my system isnt autoincluding universe and multiverse | 19:36 |
maxb | Neither is intrinsically superior in all use cases | 19:36 |
Laney | usually it's helpful to share the way in which you're seeing breakage | 19:36 |
LoT | even though i have a devscripts that says to | 19:36 |
LoT | Laney: i'd have to retest, i'm still recovering my PGP keys on my main dev system xD | 19:36 |
ScottK | LoT: Use pbuilder-dist from ubuntu-dev-tools as a wrapper. It makes it much easier. | 19:36 |
* LoT ran into partial partition corruption | 19:36 | |
LoT | ScottK: see previous /me | 19:36 |
LoT | i ran into partial system corruption, recovered my /home, and am now working on restoring the data :/ | 19:37 |
LoT | until then, well... | 19:41 |
* LoT has been using a build-testing PPA | 19:41 | |
maxb | Using a PPA is inadvisable; unnecessary waiting, no ability to break in and examine the state of a failed builds files | 19:59 |
LoT | well generally all i do is build packages with patches (SRU tests) | 19:59 |
LoT | so if it fails, then the patch was invalid :P | 20:00 |
maxb | If you use pbuilder, I highly recommend the cowbuilder addon - makes build startup considerably faster | 20:00 |
LoT | rarely, if at all, do I end up writing the patch, its usually from upstream. | 20:00 |
Quintasan | LoT: You can try sbuild, the downside is that it will download dependencies EVERYTIME (unless I'm configuring it wrong) you build something | 20:02 |
LoT | Quintasan: pbuilder does the same when you daily-purge the base tgz in the cache | 20:02 |
Quintasan | LoT: Who does that actually? | 20:03 |
* LoT grins | 20:03 | |
Quintasan | LoT: There is also cowbuilder which uses copy-on-write chroots instead of base.tgz | 20:03 |
LoT | need I say more? :p | 20:03 |
LoT | anyways, time to go home, end of day! | 20:03 |
maxb | Quintasan: Run a local apt caching proxy | 20:08 |
maxb | I use approx, and all my sbuild chroots are set up to download from http://localhost:9999/ | 20:08 |
maxb | (or bindmound /var/cache/apt/archives into the chroot, I suppose) | 20:08 |
TheLordOfTime | geser: you know, its almost easier to make a damn debdiff instead of branching php5's quantal code | 20:50 |
* TheLordOfTime has been running the branch for twenty minutes and hasnt finished | 20:51 | |
Laney | nothing wrong with debdiffs | 20:52 |
TheLordOfTime | Laney: so if i have a patch, for Quantal, and i upload the debdiff *with* the upstream patch, that'd have just as much chance of being accepted as if I requested a code merge from a project branch of my own with the fix? | 20:54 |
ScottK | Probably more. | 20:54 |
ScottK | I don't know of any sponsors that are unwilling to use debdiffs. | 20:55 |
TheLordOfTime | that's typically how i've handled bugs, upload the debdiff rather than branch the code | 20:57 |
TheLordOfTime | given that bzr is horridly evil on this system | 20:57 |
TheLordOfTime | esp. when you're working remotely | 20:57 |
TheLordOfTime | oh, that's interesting... | 20:59 |
TheLordOfTime | apparently the bugcontrol-managed plugin for launchpad improvements is incompatible with Firefox latest on precise...? | 20:59 |
TheLordOfTime | whoops wrong channel :P | 20:59 |
* TheLordOfTime intended that to go to -bugs :p | 20:59 | |
TheLordOfTime | btw, any of you happen to notice if the wiki's lagging like hell? | 21:01 |
Laney | It's never snappy. | 21:01 |
Laney | And yeah, everyone knows how to drive patch. Go go debdiff | 21:02 |
* TheLordOfTime agrees with debdiffs | 21:03 | |
TheLordOfTime | i do not agree with bzr xD | 21:03 |
micahg | \o/ ghc 7.4.2-2 in unstable | 23:33 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!