=== beuno_ is now known as beuno
[08:40] <ajf_> Hello, is the export all translations (as tarball) feature on launchpad really supposed to be all? There's a few missing from it which I can export individually.
=== jpds_ is now known as jpds
[08:46] <mgz> ajf_: presumably. is there any pattern to the missing ones? the most recent? anything else?
[08:51] <ajf_> Yeah, there's two missing and they're both relatively new, last updated around 2 weeks ago. There's some other new translations that are there however.
[08:55] <mgz> can't find any likely looking bug reports...
[09:57] <mgz> do we let people take over inactive accounts if they like the username better than their current one?
[10:01] <lifeless> in general no
[10:01] <lifeless> they can click on the contact-this-user link on the username to ask them for it
[10:02] <lifeless> if the user is really truely gone - like 5 years gone; then maybe
[10:03] <mgz> well, we have a bunch of created-and-immediately-forgotten accounts, which are unlikely to get a response via email
[10:03] <wgrant> mgz: In pedro's case, the user hasn't done anything at all (see +karma), so it's safe
[10:03] <wgrant> In the other one, the user has done stuff.
[10:04] <wgrant> I would be reluctant to rename without a response.
[10:04] <wgrant> Oh
[10:04] <wgrant> You've already done the other one :)
[10:04] <wgrant> Or someone has
[10:04] <mgz> always said no to requests like this, but we did make an exception for one of our core guys because no one could remember his account name wasn't the same as his irc nick
[10:04] <mgz> someone not me
[10:05] <mgz> curtis it seems.
=== jamestunnicliff_ is now known as jamestunnicliffe
[10:06] <mgz> so, I guess I just rename the current user then rename the usurper?
[10:06] <mgz> anything else?
[10:11] <wgrant> Nope.
[10:11] <wgrant> Be wary of PPAs on the origin user, though
[10:11] <wgrant> Well, on either user
[10:11] <wgrant> You can't rename if there are undeleted PPAs.
[10:12] <mgz> will fortunately not an issue here.
[10:45] <mgz> how do we determine the virtue of a request for more PPA space? the wiki tells them to ask, but not to justify.
[11:04] <mgz> what the hell is +hwdb and who owns it? doesn't friendly supercede it?
[13:28] <bdrung> sinzui: why is bug #1033446 a bug in launchpadlib? even visiting https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches leads to an OOPS
[13:28] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1033446 in launchpadlib "TypeError: __init__() takes at least 4 non-keyword arguments (3 given)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1033446
[13:30] <sinzui> bdrung: Maybe I was wrong.
[13:30] <bdrung> sinzui: it is definitively a server side issue.
[13:32] <wgrant> bdrung: That's a pretty big "even", and it's unrelated to the merge proposal issue, which is unrelated to the launchpadlib crash
[13:32] <sinzui> the oops error is about a branch not being in a collection, KeyError. The traceback in the bug shows that a launchapdlib issue and I was confused
[13:33] <wgrant> There's bug #1031764
[13:33] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1031764 in Launchpad itself "timeout on code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1031764
[13:33] <wgrant> And bug #1029642
[13:33] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1029642 in Launchpad itself "ScopedCollection:CollectionResource:#branch_merge_proposal-page-resource (landing candidates) dying from late evaluation of security rules" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1029642
[13:33] <wgrant> About the two unrelated timeouts that that bug talks about as being one, even though they're not related except that they're Launchpad code pages.
[13:35] <wgrant> And the launchpadlib interface change is old and not really a bug.
[13:36] <wgrant> It's undesirable, but that change was made a long time ago
[13:36] <wgrant> Maverick or early Natty
[13:37] <wgrant> So, it's not clear which of those three unrelated bugs was intended to be reassigned to Launchpad.
=== Ng_ is now known as Ng
[15:51] <Elv1313> Hi, I build a (qt/kde) package on launchpad and it segfault when opening the config dialog. I tried on 3 computers with 11.04, 11.10 and 12.04 and it happen on all of them. However, if I use dpkg-build to build the code, then there is no problem and it work proprely. Any idea?
[15:53] <Lasall> Elv1313: I can't help you but can you point to your package?
[15:53] <Elv1313> sflphone-client-kde
[15:54] <Elv1313> ~savoirfairelinux nightly ppa
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch]
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck
[17:51] <phillw> Hi, i'm already logged on into lp, but it is refusing my connection to http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-r/sponsorship stating my password is wrong?
[17:55] <NCommander> Hey all, so when building a package in a PPA, is it running only as an unprivilleged user with fakeroot or is there actual root privilleges during a build?
[18:55] <geser> NCommander: as even the official buildds use fakeroot, I doubt PPAs are different there
[18:55] <NCommander> geser: figured as much.
[18:56] <NCommander> I've got a workaround to deal with what I'm done so it isn't a huge issue, but fakeroot tripped me up