[00:28] <directhex> micahg, time to recompile the world?
[00:28] <micahg> directhex: almost, we have to make sure it builds in Debian first, otherwise there will be a -3 :)
=== plustwo_ is now known as plustwo
[07:24] <Laney> jesus
[07:24] <Laney> you scared me, I certainly hoped it wasn't unstable
[08:15] <iulian> :)
[08:17] <Laney> syncin'
[08:18] <Laney> (to proposed)
[08:18] <iulian> Great.
=== jpds_ is now known as jpds
=== lynxman- is now known as lynxman
[09:18]  * dupondje trying to get pbuilder running for lenny :( damn
[09:18] <dupondje> changed sources.list (in pbuilder-dist lenny login --save-after-login
[09:18] <dupondje> but on pbuilder-dist lenny update it still uses other sources :(
=== _ruben_ is now known as _ruben
=== dinojoker is now known as jokerdino
=== Ng_ is now known as Ng
[15:57] <Riddell> anyone know why http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/uehs/ doesn't do universe?
[15:58] <Laney> what do you mean 'do'?
[15:58] <Laney> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/uehs/no_updated.html lists universe packages for me
[16:03] <Laney> Riddell: ^
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
=== mfisch` is now known as mfisch
=== mfisch is now known as Guest16307
=== Guest16307 is now known as mfisch
[18:06] <Laney> iulian: jbicha: other interested folks: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/ghc.html
[19:45] <geser> Laney: haskell-* packages from round 1 uploaded
[19:46] <Laney> oh, nice
[19:46] <Laney> good job I didn't do any yet :P
[19:46] <geser> do haskell-dummy and haskell-platform really need a rebuild too?
[19:46] <Laney> red there merely means they are uninstallable
[19:47] <Laney> just leave those until last and we'll see
[19:49] <geser> I noticed too late that haskell-diagrams doesn't need a rebuild either (no ABI in Depends:)
[19:51] <Laney> yeah it's a metapackage
[20:39] <paultag> hey kirkland - around?
[20:46] <paultag> kirkland: OK, I'll just leave this here for you - have you thought about getting overlayfs into Debian? It'd be really handy
[20:55] <arand> I'm getting this issue when trying to (fast-forward) merge from one bzr repo to the other, both contains patches which are committed as applied (LP import from Debian seems to do that bit :( ###bzr: ERROR: Unable to unapply quilt patches for 'other' tree: rmdir: failed to remove `.pc/security-text-command-fix.patch': No such file or directory
[20:56] <arand> ^that particular patch exists in the updated branch but not the one I'm merging into.
[21:01] <arand> Also, does the lp branch matter as far as the bzr repo goes, i.e. if the PP and QQ repos are content/commitwise identical would it matter if I branched PP, did some commits and sent that as a merge proposal for QQ?
[21:10] <geser> Laney: do you have an idea why haskell-text (-1build2) is still complete red?
[21:11] <geser> I tried "apt-get -s install" for the binary packages and all can be installed (tested on amd64 but it's red too)
[21:25] <Laney> geser: no
[21:25] <Laney> let's wait for the next refresh ...
[21:35] <geser> Laney: looks good now
[21:35] <geser> we can process level 2 now
[21:36] <Laney> i'll not do anything tonight
[21:36] <Laney> so feel free
[21:38] <geser> me probably neither