=== Edgan_ is now known as Edgan [02:35] ethanchang, do you see abnormal situation on Asahi while pressing F4? === smb` is now known as smb [10:20] is there a way to check if a system has been suspended? [10:20] brendand, since boot ? [10:21] apw, yeah [10:21] apw, does dmesg just cover one boot? i could look in there [10:21] brendand, yeah its just one boot in dmesg [10:22] there are also logs in /var/log/pm-suspend [10:22] [393718.228670] ACPI: Low-level resume complete [10:22] that line is probabally pretty indicative [10:23] brendand, though if i am honest for a proper check i would look at how suspend_test from firmware test suite does it [10:25] apw, it doesn't need to be too thorough, just a cursory check so i can validate that X event happened after suspend [11:06] * ppisati goes hunting for food.. [11:08] * henrix follows ppisati [11:09] henrix, dont eat ppisati ! [11:10] ogra_: nah, not in the mood for italian food [11:10] lol [11:18] * apw goes splash about [12:11] wet [12:11] apw, one of you less secure passwords ? [12:11] rtg, heh no a state of being right now :) [12:12] rtg, and arn't you away today ? [12:12] apw, not until 11:30 [12:12] Hi! I've just seen the latest kernel team meeting minutes, it has a note about testing kernel 3.5 in precise. Where are problems supposed to be reported? looked around on launchpad but couldnt find the right spot. [12:12] FreddrH, file a bug against linux i'd say, the version number should clue is in [12:14] FreddrH, file it against linux-lts-quantal [12:15] ok thx! [12:32] apw: whee, the overlayfs patch looks good.. building mesa right now :) [12:34] but I'm not sure how long it took to fail, so let's see.. [12:40] apw: yeah, it would fail right in the beginning, so.. success with the patch [12:41] tjaalton, thanks, will clean it up for submission [12:46] apw: would it be ok for precise as well? [13:10] tjaalton, dunno will see [14:55] * ogasawara back in 20 [15:07] ogasawara, between calxeda and ecryptfs I think there are enough major function patches in the hopper that we should upload again. [15:08] rtg: ack, was thinking the same [15:08] ogasawara, and that revert for aufs [15:08] apw: yep, I think I pushed that revert already [15:08] ogasawara, cool [15:38] ogasawara, smoke testing the ecryptfs patches on -9 seem to work OK [15:39] rtg: thanks, good to know [15:39] though I haven't tested the boundary conditions. cking has some tests for that. he'll be busy when he returns. [15:48] smb, hey, where is your .33 tree [15:48] apw, where it has been before... [15:49] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/smb/linux-2.6.32.y-drm33.z.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/drm-next [15:49] or [15:49] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=smb/linux-2.6.32.y-drm33.z.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/drm-next [15:49] without drm-next [15:49] (was the first place I found for pasting) [15:56] * dileks thought drm-next was a backport GIT branch from airlieds development tree [15:56] bjf, that 17" Dell you were admiring in PDX is beginning to die. Major nVidia display corruption. [15:57] huh [15:57] smb: what about compat-drm? an option? tested? [15:57] that sucks [15:57] 4+ years of hard use though [15:57] bjf, yeah, I'm bummed. I may actually have to buy a laptop this time :) [15:58] rtg, of find one to "enable" [15:58] s/of/or/ [15:58] bjf, I'll send it to sforshee first :) [16:03] dileks, No option I would say. It just is the way the 2.6.32 relase was done (Ubuntu and Debian) as nobody liked the drm in 32 [16:03] IIRC the same with drm in 3.2.y [16:03] "Failed to create pty - disabling logging for job [16:04] can someone help me out ? [16:04] i am trying to boot an Ubuntu FS Image in qemu with just the kernel. Its a 64 bit Ubuntu image though it boots up i dont see the console and it does not get me to the prompt. Its a 12.04 FS image and the kernel is 3.4.7. I am using an Ubuntu kernel config [16:04] the error that i get is Failed to create pty - disabling logging for job [16:07] G__81, that error just tells you one of your upstart jobs failed to open a logging channel [16:08] G__81, it should not prevent anything working thoough [16:08] i have the tty drivers stuff enabled too [16:08] the devpts98 stuff is enabled along with the kernel [16:08] yep that error normally means there is a race being tickled, it still does not affect functionality [16:08] if your functionality missing, its not likely to be related to that error [16:09] what kernel command line are you supplying [16:09] it boots but i get the error and it stops and then it does not proceed [16:10] that error only means some logging is being dropped on the floor from upstart [16:10] the jobs continued as normal, so if they were working they'd work with that error there [16:10] this is the command http://pastebin.com/qurG1uEd [16:10] i would add --verbose to the end of the kernel command line and see what that says [16:14] hmm, xserver with releasename [16:15] dileks, ? [16:15] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=c22c936b35cee60609041ccb7ee52c00b0634d7b [16:16] heh must have got bored of being the only ones without a silly name for every release [16:20] G__81, what did that sayb [16:21] ogasawara, sforshee, go back to bed both ... i was using that machine :) [16:21] apw: :) [16:21] ogasawara, you do kill her in the face [16:24] hi - https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/7/442 seems noteworthy. bug in the apparmor+selinux cooperation with netfilter [16:24] jjohansen, ^^ [16:25] apw, looks like its got to do with the lib/modules . That verbose option really helped :) Thanks a ton [16:25] np [16:25] apw: thanks, looking at it [16:26] hallyn, how do we know its AA related ? [16:27] apw: it's not strictly AA related, but AA is running (default precise systems) and selinux nf hooks are running [16:28] so i think it's a bug in the initcalls stuff causing selinux's netfilter hook init to happen before selinux_disable() gets called [16:28] perhaps just an ordering issue, don't some of them flop into the same buckets [16:28] (i could dive deeper but thought i should mention it here first) [16:29] as in there are more levels exposed than exist in initcalls [16:29] right, it's possible that it working so far relied on luck in the ordering of the initcall() entries. [16:30] so to answer again, it don't think it's AA related, i think it's a bug in selinux, but not one selinux users will care about :) [16:30] indeed [16:30] and likely jjohansen will grok the interaction better than us [16:30] yup. thanks. [16:35] jj [16:35] bah [16:36] * smb -> gone [16:46] apw, ping [16:46] pong [16:47] i corrected the modules problem in the FS but now again the same problem. it stops with the error which i pasted earlier , logging disabled [16:47] as you said i have the verbose option enabled [16:47] and what else does it say, the error is only a warning [16:48] it does not say anything it just stops :( i can probably upload the screenshot too if you want to look @ it [16:48] --verbose will vomit all over the place so it must have said something [16:50] apw, i just created ./lib/modules/3.4.7 in my FS it does not have the drivers as such, thats ok right ? [16:50] hallyn, apw: the config in that bug report hash selinux as the only security module and enabled by default [16:50] G__81, if you have no modules you have only half of your kernel installed [16:50] jjohansen, oh, so its not an ubuntu config then [16:51] jjohansen: eh what? i thought he said he was running the ubuntu kernel! [16:51] hallyn: well he said running ubuntu, I double checked [16:51] apw, ok then i ll do the install_mod_path [16:51] I think we assumed an ubuntu kernel [16:52] yeah that looks to be a straight selinux issue, its enabled, its the only one, its on by default, and it explodes [16:55] jjohansen: thanks, and sorry. do you care to reply to the thread? [16:55] hallyn: sure [16:56] jjohansen: great, thanks === kamal1 is now known as kamal [17:15] * rtg is officially on vacation [17:17] sconklin, ok sorted out that 0044 it is now back to needed like it should be (for lucid) [17:18] apw: not following you [17:18] sconklin, CVE-2012-0033 [17:18] apw: ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-0033) [17:19] sconklin, CVE-2012-0044 [17:19] apw: Integer overflow in the drm_mode_dirtyfb_ioctl function in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c in the Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel before 3.1.5 allows local users to gain privileges or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted ioctl call. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-0044) [17:19] apw: ack [17:19] sconklin, we should likely prioritise getting that fixed as it has been announced as not broken for lucid [17:20] ok, I'll have at it [17:23] http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTE1NTk [17:24] what is the sound of one hand whacking? [17:24] that will sort itself out [17:27] what should be the arch option in deboostrap that i should give if the system is 64 bit [17:42] * henrix -> EOD === johanbr_ is now known as johanbr === mfisch` is now known as mfisch === mfisch is now known as Guest6140