| * micahg kicks off a few haskell rebuilds | 04:30 | |
| * ScottK uploads haskell so micahg can start over. | 04:33 | |
| * micahg grumbles over the default suite being precise on precise | 04:36 | |
| bkerensa | micahg: might you know whats causing this bzr error? http://paste.ubuntu.com/1135538/ | 05:53 |
|---|---|---|
| bkerensa | nvm I forget to add my ssh key back | 05:55 |
| === vorian is now known as v | ||
| bdrung | micahg: that's for getting you using quantal! :p | 09:53 |
| dupondje | Best way to setup a local apt repo is mini-dinstall ? | 13:14 |
| dupondje | but then you need to build the packages localle with pbuilder? And then dput them? | 13:14 |
| Lasall | don't use mini-dinstall, reprepro is much better, dupondje | 13:15 |
| Zhenech | reprepro | 13:15 |
| Lasall | and you are not restricted to use pbuilder. just create your package with -sa and then upload it with dput | 13:16 |
| Lasall | (if you missed that -sa you can use changestool provided by reprepro) | 13:16 |
| dupondje | the package gets builded on the server then? | 13:17 |
| paultag | no :) | 13:17 |
| Lasall | no, first build it. either with dpkg-buildpackage/debuild/pbuilder/... then upload it | 13:18 |
| paultag | remember, you could host an arch:ppc on an arch:i386 machine | 13:18 |
| dupondje | true :) | 13:18 |
| dupondje | then I need a build machine & repo machine :d | 13:19 |
| paultag | (rather then doing a sourceful upload *source*changes, you can do a binary upload, like Debian, and stich together more then one build -- like *amd64*changes | 13:19 |
| paultag | ) | 13:19 |
| paultag | dupondje: you can build them locally before a dput | 13:19 |
| paultag | via sbuild, pbuild or any other exoctic what-have you | 13:19 |
| dupondje | need to check that :) | 13:23 |
| dupondje | thx | 13:23 |
| paultag | yarp. | 13:23 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === Zic is now known as Guest81042 | ||
| === vibhav is now known as Guest78758 | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| elgaton | Hi everyone, stumbled across ITP in bug #328324, decided to fix it. Seems the package was in Debian up to Etch, then it got removed due to lack of maintainers. Should I get the old, original changelogs and debian/ files or start with a fresh packaging? | 20:07 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 328324 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] webmin" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/328324 | 20:07 |
| arand | elgaton: It might need quite a bit of work, since I've normally heard it being discouraged on the basis of it being incompatible with the debian/ubuntu administration model... | 20:09 |
| elgaton | arand: What kind of work, more precisely? | 20:10 |
| arand | I have no idea... | 20:10 |
| elgaton | OK, I'll just have a look at it and see | 20:12 |
| elgaton | Thanks anyway | 20:12 |
| arand | elgaton: The only thing I've heard is what you get from ubottu: "/msg ubottu !webmin" | 20:16 |
| elgaton | arand: OK, I think I got a rough idea. Configuration files in Debian/Ubuntu are usually created from templates in /etc/default or the like (then actual configuration files are generated from them using a script). On the contrary, Webmin directly edits the final configuration files, so, when they are regenerated from the templates (e.g. because a new package version is installed), all edits are lost. | 20:19 |
| === mfisch` is now known as mfisch | ||
| === mfisch is now known as Guest6140 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!