| === marcavis_ is now known as marcavis | ||
| === james is now known as Guest15651 | ||
| === mdeslaur_ is now known as mdeslaur | ||
| johann_ | Someone can tell me how to get the source code of unity | 04:16 |
|---|---|---|
| MCR1 | sil2100: Hi :) | 07:18 |
| MCR1 | sil2100: Are there problems with Unity landings or why is it jamming ? | 07:19 |
| MCR1 | sil2100: Could you also approve this branch ? : https://code.launchpad.net/~brandontschaefer/unity/improve-keyboard-shortcut-overlay-wording/+merge/119071 | 07:21 |
| sil2100 | MCR1: unity is still in freeze, I hope to unfreeze it today | 07:21 |
| sil2100 | Starting next week we'll try to use a different release approach | 07:22 |
| sil2100 | So it won't be a problem hopefull | 07:22 |
| sil2100 | *hopefully | 07:22 |
| MCR1 | sil2100: It would be important to have this ^^ in trunk, so I could start working on the elimination of the hardcoded shortcuts that would probably also touch the same code... | 07:23 |
| didrocks | sil2100: we will probably need a compiz snapshot next Monday/Tuesday FYI once the gsettings g-c-c part is landed FYI | 07:23 |
| didrocks | (just to keep you up to date) | 07:23 |
| didrocks | sil2100: there will be a need of two cherry-picks in the unity codebase | 07:24 |
| MCR1 | didrocks: Hi :) My plan is to convert all hardcoded Unity keys to Compiz keys and integrate those that are currently hardcoded to the Unity plug-in. Is thos a good plan and is there something special I should take care of ? | 07:28 |
| MCR1 | *this a good plan | 07:28 |
| didrocks | MCR1: this is great, you will need to coordinate later on with sam to ensure those are exposed in g-c-c (there are a hardcoded list for that) and how to make those optionals for people not having unity | 07:29 |
| didrocks | MCR1: just remember that Feature freeze is 2 weeks away, so approx only one week to get things integrated :) | 07:30 |
| MCR1 | didrocks: Ok, I hope I can get this done (weekend is reserved for that task) - I'll try to coordinate stuff with Sam, probably he needs to help me anyway... ;) | 07:31 |
| MCR1 | didrocks: One thing that came to my mind is how Unity-2d will handle stuff if those hardcoded shortcuts are converted for example... | 07:32 |
| didrocks | no more unity-2d starting next week | 07:32 |
| didrocks | so don't bother :) | 07:33 |
| MCR1 | didrocks: Oh, ok. One thing less to worry about then, although it works quite nice... | 07:33 |
| MCR1 | duflu: Hi :) If feature-freeze is near, I would be very happy if we could get the most important "lost" plug-ins merged before the freeze. We do not need to activate those in GLES, or do we (afaik trip for example is simply deactivated in GLES) ? | 07:46 |
| sil2100 | mhr3: hello! Will you find a free few moments of your time for releasing tarballs for bamf, libunity and the lenses (files, apps, music) in an hour or so ;)? | 07:47 |
| mhr3 | sil2100, did we have any changes to lenses? | 07:47 |
| duflu | MCR1: Sorry, am in a mad rush getting the important features completed. The new plugins come after that | 07:47 |
| sil2100 | mhr3: just the vala update, true... so maybe I'll just distropatch those | 07:48 |
| sil2100 | mhr3: so only bamf and libunity for now ;) | 07:48 |
| mhr3 | oh right, that's actually worth a release | 07:48 |
| mhr3 | sil2100, we just finished standup, so i guess it's ok if i do them right away | 07:49 |
| didrocks | mhr3: sit! :) | 07:50 |
| mhr3 | didrocks, grrrrrrrr | 07:50 |
| MCR1 | duflu: I hope and wish your mad rush is successful and does end before feature freeze ;) - I stop disturbing you now :-X | 07:52 |
| sil2100 | mhr3: I'll just check one more autopilot test and we're ready for release | 07:53 |
| mhr3 | meh, it's not like there could a bug in libunity :P | 07:53 |
| sil2100 | True, but still! ;) Better safe then sorry ;p | 07:53 |
| mhr3 | i'll wait with bamf though :D | 07:54 |
| didrocks | sil2100: don't believe him, don't believe him! | 07:54 |
| mhr3 | didrocks, ssshushhh | 07:54 |
| * mhr3 shakes fist at the half broken build system in trunk libunity | 07:56 | |
| didrocks | mhr3: if it's only half broken, it's fine, take the other half! | 07:56 |
| mhr3 | didrocks, right, half of the source files should do, right? :) | 07:57 |
| didrocks | sure, you write useless code, let's cut it down! :) | 07:57 |
| mhr3 | didrocks, it's a sign of project maturity though, you know that libreoffice has like 20% of code that's unused? | 07:58 |
| didrocks | mhr3: yeah, I heard about that, it's scary that we have that much code around, and still not real good way to instrumente the code to detect dead part | 07:59 |
| sil2100 | ...;) I'm scared when I listen to you guys ;p | 08:00 |
| sil2100 | Arrgh | 08:02 |
| sil2100 | hm, I need JohnLea! | 08:02 |
| sil2100 | Since either something changed by design, or we have a small regression | 08:02 |
| mhr3 | sil2100, in? | 08:03 |
| sil2100 | mhr3: in switcher - it's probably unity-only though | 08:03 |
| sil2100 | mhr3: checking how it looks in 6.0 | 08:04 |
| mhr3 | sil2100, tarball for dee as well? | 08:05 |
| mhr3 | seems like there's wasn't one for quite a while | 08:05 |
| sil2100 | mhr3: hell, why not? If you only feel like it ;) | 08:07 |
| mhr3 | sil2100, what version are we doing now? | 08:16 |
| mhr3 | 6.2? | 08:16 |
| mhr3 | or 6.4? | 08:16 |
| sil2100 | 6.2 | 08:18 |
| sil2100 | Ah, no, it seems to work - no regression here | 08:20 |
| didrocks | sil2100: btw, do not forget to have a google doc with the results of manual tests and autopilot ones :) | 08:28 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: it's already done ;) | 08:28 |
| mhr3 | sil2100, so green to push the tarballs? | 08:34 |
| mhr3 | quick! hide! kamstrup's here | 08:35 |
| kamstrup | mhr3: hey! | 08:35 |
| kamstrup | what ever you do - I DISAPPROVE! | 08:35 |
| kamstrup | ;-) | 08:35 |
| mhr3 | kamstrup, hey, hey! i see holiday has good effect on you :) | 08:35 |
| kamstrup | i know, right?! | 08:37 |
| sil2100 | mhr3: GREENZ | 08:55 |
| mhr3 | eeek, i have to create 6.0 series for all the lenses :/ | 09:08 |
| gord | sucks to be yoou | 09:10 |
| mhr3 | sil2100, disted, milestoned, uploaded, tagged, pushed | 09:18 |
| sil2100 | mhr3: awesooome! I'll release for unity in nux in a moment | 09:18 |
| sil2100 | s/in/and | 09:18 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| mhr3 | sil2100, oh dear, i forgot about bamf | 09:58 |
| mhr3 | Trevinho, you here? | 09:58 |
| Trevinho | mhr3: yep | 10:02 |
| mhr3 | Trevinho, still no big changes in bamf for the major bump? | 10:03 |
| Trevinho | mhr3: no :( | 10:03 |
| mhr3 | 61st release of 0.2 series then? :/ | 10:04 |
| sil2100 | ...;) | 10:04 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: in the changelog, should I also put changes from trunk that weren't assigned to any bugs? | 10:08 |
| sil2100 | Or only the ones with bugs? | 10:08 |
| didrocks | sil2100: only those with bugs are enough, it's long enough already :) | 10:09 |
| didrocks | sil2100: btw, IIRC, there are some merges with contains "UIFe" in the bug title (not sure before this release, but some are proposed now) | 10:09 |
| didrocks | sil2100: if it's the case, you can remove the "UIFe" part :) | 10:09 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: could you later on run unify again to generate the changelog for unity ;p ? | 10:10 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: since for nux and the rest I do manually, since those are small | 10:11 |
| sil2100 | But unity, phew | 10:11 |
| didrocks | sil2100: sure, tell me once you are ready :) | 10:11 |
| sil2100 | \o/ thank you! | 10:12 |
| mhr3 | sil2100, uploaded bamf | 10:12 |
| sil2100 | mhr3: excellent, thanks! | 10:12 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: for unify, all other unity projects (nux, bamf) should have unity upstream in their bugs as well, right? | 10:13 |
| didrocks | sil2100: yeah, as usual :) | 10:13 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: last thing, since I forgot - do I need to set the milestone to 6.2 for unity on those as well? For instance, for nux? | 10:14 |
| didrocks | sil2100: on the unity upstream task, yeah | 10:14 |
| === zya-afk is now known as zyga | ||
| sil2100 | didrocks: can I publish the new unity tarball, or do you need to do it yourself for unify to work? | 11:07 |
| === andy_ is now known as andyrock | ||
| didrocks | sil2100: no, you can publish it | 11:16 |
| didrocks | sil2100: just don't close the milestone | 11:16 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: so, I should tick 'keep the 6.2. milestone active'? | 11:19 |
| didrocks | exactly | 11:22 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === mdeslaur_ is now known as mdeslaur | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| sil2100 | didrocks: I sent an e-mail with branches and all the release details | 11:53 |
| didrocks | sil2100: "I checked lintian warnings - had to silence some for unity, but besides that no *new* ones seem to have appeared. " | 11:59 |
| didrocks | can you detail please? | 11:59 |
| didrocks | also,should I run unify now as you are telling you are waiting on the changelog? | 11:59 |
| didrocks | (ok on unify, running now) | 12:00 |
| didrocks | sil2100: unfreeze should be done by mmrazik | 12:00 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: I know ;) Will ask him once I get your ACK | 12:14 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: no *new* lintian errors, since I remember getting this one before: E: unity-common: python-script-but-no-python-dep usr/lib/unity/makebootchart.py | 12:15 |
| sil2100 | For unity ;p | 12:15 |
| sil2100 | But since it's like not a main script, I think that's ok? | 12:15 |
| didrocks | sil2100: all in one commit :/ | 12:16 |
| didrocks | don't remember about the one commit per act I really insisted on | 12:16 |
| didrocks | that makes the review painful | 12:16 |
| sil2100 | ah, shit, sorry about that - in unity it's like that because I first did merge-upstream ... | 12:17 |
| sil2100 | Could have started from the override branch already | 12:17 |
| didrocks | sil2100: just remember that for next time :) | 12:17 |
| * sil2100 writes that down this time | 12:18 | |
| sil2100 | My desk is actually getting very messy with all these notes | 12:18 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| didrocks | Conflicting tags: | 12:37 |
| didrocks | upstream-3.2.0 | 12:37 |
| didrocks | hum, interesting | 12:37 |
| didrocks | in nux | 12:38 |
| didrocks | sil2100: you should use unify btw | 12:38 |
| didrocks | sil2100: you miss bugs | 12:38 |
| sil2100 | :( | 12:38 |
| sil2100 | So I missed one... | 12:39 |
| sil2100 | Actually I though I had them all, hmm | 12:39 |
| didrocks | 3 in nux | 12:39 |
| sil2100 | Which ones? | 12:39 |
| didrocks | - Support for automation (LP: #685199) | 12:40 |
| didrocks | - add alpha function on a NuxBaseWindow (LP: #718827) | 12:40 |
| didrocks | - Timestamp field on the event structure is always 0 (LP: #735645) | 12:40 |
| sil2100 | Ok, those completely I missed, need to check why | 12:40 |
| didrocks | I get 20 conflicting tags on unity | 12:42 |
| didrocks | have you done anything special? | 12:42 |
| didrocks | or is bzr going crazy? | 12:42 |
| sil2100 | hm, no? 20 conflicting tags? That's a bit too much for a 'mistake' | 12:42 |
| didrocks | sil2100: no, you made something weird | 12:43 |
| didrocks | your bzr branch is based on revision 25 | 12:43 |
| didrocks | and you remerged everything from that | 12:43 |
| sil2100 | Which one? lp:ubuntu/unity ? | 12:43 |
| didrocks | right | 12:43 |
| === zyga is now known as zyga-afk | ||
| sil2100 | All I did was bzr branch lp:ubuntu/unity freshly today | 12:43 |
| didrocks | hence conflicting tags all over your branch when pulling on ubuntu/unity | 12:43 |
| didrocks | sil2100: look at your revision | 12:44 |
| didrocks | you start at rev 25 | 12:44 |
| sil2100 | And did a bzr merge-upstream | 12:44 |
| didrocks | or something is really weird in bzr-gtk | 12:44 |
| didrocks | revno: 55.813.24 [merge] | 12:44 |
| didrocks | should rather be revno: 746 | 12:44 |
| sil2100 | revno: 747 [merge] | 12:45 |
| sil2100 | committer: Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak <lukasz.zemczak@canonical.com> | 12:45 |
| didrocks | yeah, this is your upper commit | 12:45 |
| sil2100 | This is what bzr log |less gives me | 12:45 |
| sil2100 | revno: 746 | 12:45 |
| sil2100 | tags: 6.0.0-0ubuntu6 | 12:45 |
| sil2100 | This is the one I based on | 12:45 |
| didrocks | now, look at the first nested entry | 12:45 |
| didrocks | bzr log -n 1 | 12:45 |
| didrocks | -n 2 sorry | 12:45 |
| didrocks | revno: 55.813.24 [merge] | 12:45 |
| didrocks | this is your merge-upstream | 12:45 |
| didrocks | same issue with nux btw | 12:46 |
| didrocks | you started from revno: 159.3.40 [merge] | 12:46 |
| sil2100 | Wait, so what did I do wrong? | 12:46 |
| sil2100 | I did exactly this: | 12:46 |
| didrocks | well, tell me you did do :) | 12:46 |
| sil2100 | bzr branch lp:unity | 12:46 |
| sil2100 | bzr branch lp:ubuntu/unity ubuntu | 12:46 |
| sil2100 | cd ubuntu | 12:46 |
| sil2100 | bzr merge-upstream ../unity-6.2.0.blabla ../unity --version=6.2.0 -r -1 | 12:47 |
| sil2100 | # changelog editing | 12:47 |
| didrocks | let me try that with nux | 12:47 |
| sil2100 | debcommit | 12:47 |
| sil2100 | And that's all I did | 12:47 |
| sil2100 | Everything fresh from 0 today | 12:47 |
| didrocks | well, the log shows that something is wrong, isn't it? | 12:47 |
| didrocks | btw, when you did merge-upstream, I think it bailed on conflicting tags | 12:47 |
| didrocks | so you should have noticed that something went wrong (also, look at the logs) | 12:48 |
| didrocks | so let me redo this for nux | 12:48 |
| didrocks | and see if it's a merge-upstream issue | 12:48 |
| sil2100 | hmmm, maybe it's something broken on my system? | 12:49 |
| sil2100 | Since I'm doing what I was always doing | 12:49 |
| didrocks | nux is fine, no tag conflict | 12:50 |
| didrocks | let me try unity | 12:50 |
| didrocks | did you uncommit at some point? | 12:50 |
| sil2100 | hm, in the past you mean? | 12:51 |
| didrocks | like, for the last release? | 12:51 |
| sil2100 | hm, I don't remember :/ I don't think so though | 12:52 |
| didrocks | sil2100: ok, anyway, the history is good, let me "force" bzr for the tagging issue | 12:53 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: sorry about that, whatever might have caused it :( | 12:53 |
| didrocks | sil2100: I have unfortunately no idea of what the actual cause is TBH :/ | 12:53 |
| didrocks | maybe something in bzr in quantal | 12:54 |
| didrocks | ok, forced :) | 12:54 |
| didrocks | sil2100: on another note… | 12:54 |
| didrocks | nux broke its abi | 12:54 |
| didrocks | so, in the build-dep, you need to dep on latest nux as we are pushing everything at the same time | 12:55 |
| didrocks | (doing it now) | 12:55 |
| sil2100 | Thank you! | 12:55 |
| didrocks | the abi system will then do the right think to dep on the right version :) | 12:55 |
| sil2100 | Ok, need to attend a meeting now, brb | 12:55 |
| didrocks | mhr3: does u-l-a, u-l-f or u-l-m needs latest libunity API addition? | 13:02 |
| mhr3 | didrocks, latest being? | 13:03 |
| mhr3 | 94? | 13:03 |
| mhr3 | but actually, no | 13:04 |
| * mhr3 remembers that the latest changes are only proposed so far | 13:04 | |
| didrocks | mhr3: great, thanks :) | 13:07 |
| didrocks | sil2100: geis: the build-dep has been bumped in nux to 2.2.10 | 13:11 |
| didrocks | think about doing a diff in configure.ac (again :p) | 13:11 |
| didrocks | sil2100: oh oh, and we ship the script for transitionning to gsettings | 13:15 |
| didrocks | sil2100: we shouldn't yet | 13:15 |
| didrocks | as compiz is not there | 13:15 |
| didrocks | so you have those changes shipped and not in the changelog as well | 13:17 |
| === zyga-afk is now known as zyga | ||
| sil2100 | didrocks: we ship it already? Wait ;) | 13:22 |
| * sil2100 didn't see it | 13:22 | |
| didrocks | sil2100: yeah, you did | 13:23 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: I don't see any script though | 13:23 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: where is it? | 13:23 |
| didrocks | sil2100: you do have debian/unity.migrations in your branch, right? | 13:24 |
| didrocks | let me see, maybe me and some cruft around | 13:24 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: but that's yours | 13:24 |
| didrocks | rev 750 | 13:24 |
| didrocks | yeah, but it's your branch as well, right? | 13:24 |
| sil2100 | bzr blame unity.migrations | 13:24 |
| sil2100 | 736 didier. | tools/migration-scripts/01_unity_change_dconf_path | 13:24 |
| didrocks | indeed | 13:25 |
| didrocks | but it's in the branch you ship, right? | 13:25 |
| sil2100 | Yes, but it was already in lp:ubuntu/unity | 13:25 |
| didrocks | yes because we were supposed to land the gsettings branch first | 13:25 |
| didrocks | which didn't happen | 13:25 |
| sil2100 | Ah, shit ;) | 13:25 |
| didrocks | so we need to revert that | 13:25 |
| didrocks | no worry, doing it | 13:25 |
| didrocks | just to tell you: look at everything | 13:25 |
| didrocks | litterally, everthing :) | 13:25 |
| didrocks | everything* | 13:25 |
| didrocks | sil2100: speaking of migration | 13:26 |
| didrocks | sil2100: as you are not around next week | 13:26 |
| didrocks | sil2100: the script is in trunk, right? | 13:26 |
| didrocks | there is nothing you didn't add? | 13:26 |
| didrocks | (for both compiz and unity) | 13:26 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: yes :) | 13:28 |
| sil2100 | All seems merged in | 13:28 |
| didrocks | sil2100: excellent, thanks! I'll maybe add more keys due to the g-c-c keybindings migration, but good to know everything is good to go on your side | 13:29 |
| didrocks | sil2100: finishing with the lenses right now, the rest seems good :) | 13:29 |
| seb128 | sil2100, hey | 13:30 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: I'll double-check with Timo about gsettings in a moment | 13:31 |
| seb128 | sil2100, do you plan to update dee? it was not listed on your ubuntu-release@ email | 13:31 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: thanks! | 13:31 |
| sil2100 | seb128: yes, I missed it in the mail :( | 13:31 |
| seb128 | ok, no worry | 13:31 |
| seb128 | I was just checking you did notice it | 13:31 |
| didrocks | sil2100: ok, all looks good here, after some dogfooding :) | 13:33 |
| didrocks | sil2100: I'll only upload on Monday though, still not found of Friday afternoon uploads, you can go on vacation with a light heart, well done! | 13:34 |
| didrocks | mhr3: FYI ^ | 13:34 |
| didrocks | mmrazik: you can unfreeze the unity stack I guess :) | 13:34 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: thank you! :) | 13:35 |
| mhr3 | didrocks, cool | 13:35 |
| didrocks | sil2100: thanks to you :) | 13:36 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: unfreezing then! | 13:36 |
| didrocks | sweet :) | 13:37 |
| === james is now known as Guest53826 | ||
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| jaytaoko | sil2100: didrocks: thanks for the release | 13:55 |
| didrocks | jaytaoko: yw ;) | 13:55 |
| sil2100 | jaytaoko: yw - thanks for the help ;) | 13:58 |
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| seb128 | sil2100, didrocks: any reason to not upload to proposed? nobody should run proposed or those who do can only blame themself | 14:28 |
| seb128 | speaking about unity 6.2, I saw the "will be uploaded on monday" | 14:28 |
| === andy__ is now known as andyrock | ||
| didrocks | seb128: not really, but I hope there will be no "copy to release in the wild" | 14:29 |
| didrocks | if you are confident, I can do it | 14:29 |
| seb128 | didrocks, I'm confident, nobody is here during W.E and I will announce it in the release meeting | 14:30 |
| didrocks | ok, doing then | 14:30 |
| seb128 | didrocks, thanks | 14:32 |
| seb128 | BRING THE CRACK | 14:32 |
| seb128 | sil2100, your phone number is in the directory right? and you have your phone with you at night, w.e and holidays? | 14:32 |
| * seb128 hides | 14:32 | |
| didrocks | seb128: just for your pleasure! | 14:32 |
| sil2100 | Erm... | 14:32 |
| * sil2100 throws away his phone through the window | 14:33 | |
| sil2100 | I have no phone | 14:33 |
| seb128 | lol | 14:33 |
| sil2100 | Sorry | 14:33 |
| sil2100 | ;) | 14:33 |
| didrocks | seb128: I have his address! | 14:34 |
| sil2100 | Need to run! | 14:35 |
| didrocks | sil2100: you won't run fast enough, why do you think I'm training everyday? :) | 14:36 |
| sil2100 | I'm doomed! | 14:43 |
| sil2100 | ;) | 14:43 |
| sil2100 | mhr3: how busy are you? ;) | 14:57 |
| mhr3 | sil2100, ehm, moderately busy? :) | 14:58 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch | ||
| didrocks | sil2100: you need to ensure that -proposed is added to the merger I guess | 15:26 |
| didrocks | sil2100: mmrazik and his team should do that, I don't remember if I added it back last time | 15:27 |
| didrocks | (as the packaging needs latest nux) | 15:27 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: ok, will ping him about that | 15:28 |
| didrocks | thanks :) | 15:28 |
| nmarques | anyone can help me with a build issue (unity 6.2.0) ? (http://fpaste.org/tMI3/) | 16:13 |
| === dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader | ||
| MCR1 | bschaefer: Hi :) +1 for re-proposing and fixing conflicts for improve-keyboard-shortcut-overlay-wording. | 16:30 |
| MCR1 | Does someone know why the Jenkins unity-automerger failed to merge so many branches ? The console output https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/automerge-unity/1021/console does not really help, but I noticed that many other branches also failed to merge... | 16:34 |
| nmarques | is unity and nux ready for gcc47 ? | 16:51 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, you're welcome, and im not sure....I think it's being looked at | 16:54 |
| MCR1 | bschaefer: thx | 16:55 |
| MCR1 | nmarques: I am compiling on Quantal, so I guess the answer is yes | 16:56 |
| nmarques | MCR1, I'm having here a strange issue around, preventing me from building it | 16:58 |
| MCR1 | nmarques: oh, maybe it is the same issue jenkins has ? I did not try lately - what is your error ? | 16:59 |
| nmarques | [ 16s] CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:178 (add_subdirectory): | 16:59 |
| nmarques | [ 16s] add_subdirectory called with incorrect number of arguments | 16:59 |
| nmarques | strangely somehow it inserts a line in CMakeLists.txt with: add_subdirectory() | 17:00 |
| nmarques | and it doesnt build :) | 17:00 |
| MCR1 | nmarques: I will try to confírm, wait a minute. | 17:00 |
| MCR1 | nmarques: nux compiled | 17:05 |
| nmarques | nux also builds here fine :) | 17:06 |
| MCR1 | nmarques: test_launcher.cpp fails | 17:09 |
| nmarques | I'm not building the tests and documentation :) | 17:12 |
| MCR1 | nmarques: maybe this is a good idea, but here now also BFBLauncherIcon.cpp fails :(, might be my cmake config though | 17:14 |
| nmarques | MCR1, mine doesn't even start to build :) it fails on the initial config fase | 17:15 |
| nmarques | http://fpaste.org/tMI3/ | 17:15 |
| MCR1 | http://pastebin.com/SZTgxgFD | 17:16 |
| bschaefer | nmarques, sorry, i haven't seen that error before... | 17:18 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, for that error you need libgeis | 17:18 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, and you need to autogen nux with this --enable-gestures | 17:18 |
| nmarques | bschaefer, CMakeLists.txt gets a 'add_subdirectory()' | 17:18 |
| MCR1 | bschaefer: Ah, thx | 17:18 |
| nmarques | bschaefer, and it blows, maybe a missing dependency (though they all seem to be there) | 17:19 |
| bschaefer | nmarques, but I don't get that error, so saying its the make file is odd... | 17:19 |
| bschaefer | are you trying to build unity on fedora? | 17:19 |
| nmarques | opensuse | 17:20 |
| nmarques | :) | 17:20 |
| MCR1 | bschaefer: Do I have to get libgeis from source and compile it also, or is libgeis-dev enough ? | 17:21 |
| bschaefer | nmarques, hmm well im not sure why you're getting that config error :( | 17:21 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, if you're on P then yes | 17:21 |
| bschaefer | P = 12.04 | 17:22 |
| bschaefer | Q = 12.10 | 17:22 |
| MCR1 | Q | 17:22 |
| nmarques | bschaefer, do you know where is the log file from the config? I'm not fluent with cmake | 17:22 |
| nmarques | bschaefer, maybe the answer lies there :) | 17:22 |
| bschaefer | nmarques, im not really either :( sadly... | 17:22 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, yeah that should be good then | 17:22 |
| MCR1 | nmarques: You could try cmake-gui, which is quite nice to configure options | 17:22 |
| nmarques | bschaefer, I think I found it ;) | 17:22 |
| nmarques | bschaefer, missing dependency, gtest | 17:22 |
| bschaefer | nmarques, awesome! | 17:22 |
| MCR1 | bschaefer: thx again :) | 17:23 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, np! | 17:23 |
| MCR1 | bschaefer: worked now. | 17:38 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, sweet | 17:38 |
| nmarques | bschaefer, it's building... but there's hardcoded paths for gtest in the makefile, uncool stuff :) | 18:06 |
| bschaefer | nmarques, :(, thats no good...if you make a bug report it should get looked at :) | 18:07 |
| niadh | hey | 18:08 |
| nmarques | bschaefer, it's commented out, so its something people are aware... (gtest) | 18:08 |
| nmarques | either way I've disabled the tests and kicked out gtest, hopefully no second effects :P | 18:08 |
| bschaefer | nmarques, oo alright, it must have been a work around :( | 18:08 |
| bschaefer | nmarques, you could just not built tests haha | 18:08 |
| bschaefer | nmarques, yeah! thats the way to do it :) | 18:08 |
| bschaefer | (there should be none! unless you want to run the gtest :) ) | 18:09 |
| niadh | Hi all, I was looking into packaging Unity for Arch Linux, was wondering if I might be able to get some help here on how to do that? | 18:09 |
| niadh | I have started with the nux component, but it has various dependencies on utouch libraries some of which I can find, others I cant | 18:11 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| MCR1 | bschaefer: Still here ? | 21:00 |
| MCR1 | Good news. I guess (hope) I fixed the first of the hardcoded Unity shortcut bugs. | 21:02 |
| MCR1 | \o/ | 21:02 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, yeah im around | 21:09 |
| bschaefer | cool, hmm what issue was it? | 21:09 |
| MCR1 | bschaefer: It was multiple issues, one moment | 21:09 |
| MCR1 | bug 1022743 | 21:10 |
| ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1022743 in unity (Ubuntu) "Hardcoded Unity shortcuts create multiple Compiz problems" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1022743 | 21:10 |
| * bschaefer looks | 21:10 | |
| MCR1 | the problem was that Unity takes over shortcuts, which Compiz already controls | 21:11 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, nice. I never noticed that as I usually keep my shortcuts default haha | 21:11 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, do you have a branch? If so we'll need some tests! | 21:12 |
| MCR1 | maybe you noticed the I don't know comments in the branch you have worked on | 21:12 |
| MCR1 | when you fixed the conflicts | 21:12 |
| MCR1 | the improve wording one | 21:12 |
| bschaefer | yeah, I was just fixing the conflicts, I noticed some //FIXME conflicts blah blah | 21:12 |
| MCR1 | yeah, somebody did an unfinished job there, haha | 21:13 |
| MCR1 | which introduced bugs | 21:13 |
| MCR1 | because both, Unity and Compiz were watching for those keys... | 21:14 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, does this just causes problem with the keyboard shortcut layout or actually causes usability issues? | 21:14 |
| MCR1 | usabilty also - no possibility to change shortcuts for example | 21:14 |
| MCR1 | if you change them they jump back currently | 21:14 |
| bschaefer | oo I should have looked at the code more....yeah. Im surprised it makes the shortcuts there... | 21:14 |
| MCR1 | I guess it was not your fault | 21:15 |
| * bschaefer just thought it was a nice pretty window | 21:15 | |
| MCR1 | somebody was to lazy to search for all the Compiz equivalents, so they just got hardcoded | 21:15 |
| bschaefer | and that it was 'pulling' the shortcuts from compiz, and if not then it was just hardcoded | 21:15 |
| bschaefer | yeaah, well if you have a branch that would be an awesome fix :) | 21:15 |
| MCR1 | sure, I am working on it, but it will ofc conflict with yours ;) | 21:16 |
| bschaefer | hmm yeah that stupid unity merger isn't working | 21:16 |
| MCR1 | maybe I should continue the work on improve-wording ? | 21:16 |
| bschaefer | though I do like the unity merger it just seems to be always angry :( | 21:17 |
| MCR1 | and make it improve-wording-and-shortcuts ;) | 21:17 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, you could do that and say its is a umm... | 21:17 |
| bschaefer | one sec I forgot the name... | 21:17 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, a Prerequisite Branch | 21:18 |
| MCR1 | the bad thing is that this was the task for the weekend, and now I fixed it already - haha | 21:18 |
| bschaefer | when you do a merge proposal, and under extra options there is a Prerequisite Branch, put my branch under that so it has to be merged first before yours | 21:18 |
| bschaefer | haha | 21:18 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, no worries, I can take a look at it as well. It's only Friday 2pm here | 21:19 |
| MCR1 | bschaefer: yes, I mistakenly used that once already... ;) | 21:19 |
| MCR1 | USA ? | 21:19 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, yup | 21:19 |
| bschaefer | it gets lonely on Fridays around this time haha | 21:19 |
| MCR1 | hehe | 21:19 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| MCR1 | ok, I'll start from your branch and re-fix and fix stuff there and then I submit the proposal with your branch as prerequisite, but it might take a while (I need a break now ;)) | 21:22 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, no worries ping me when it's ready for a review :) | 21:23 |
| MCR1 | ok, ql | 21:23 |
| cjohnston | me4oslav: ping | 21:52 |
| MCR1 | bschaefer: Part One should be ready for review: https://code.launchpad.net/~mc-return/unity/unity.merge.fix-hardcoded-keys-part1/+merge/119204 | 22:14 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, 32+ hints.push_back(std::shared_ptr<shortcut::AbstractHint>(new shortcut::MockHint(_("Switching"), "", "", _("Move the focus."), shortcut::HARDCODED_OPTION, _("Left & Right")))); | 22:16 |
| bschaefer | what was done on that line? | 22:16 |
| bschaefer | i can't see a change haha | 22:16 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| MCR1 | bschaefer: foucs -> focus | 22:16 |
| MCR1 | typo | 22:16 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, nice, im bad at finding those kind of typos haha | 22:16 |
| MCR1 | I am good at those -> they hurt my eyes | 22:17 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, let me test it. Yeah I was staring at it intensively but still couldn't find it! | 22:17 |
| MCR1 | bschaefer: Unfortunately some of the shortcuts need more investigation, while others, which are Unity-only, need additional options in the unityshell plug-in. | 22:18 |
| MCR1 | bschaefer: Some simply ARE hardcoded, which is bad. | 22:18 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, yeah...hmm but at lease it's slowly getting fixed...idk why they were hard coded | 22:19 |
| MCR1 | I think someone would have had to add additional code to the unityshell plug-in, but I have to investigate. | 22:20 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, hmm im still finding it hard to believe this is were shortcuts get generated though...cause im pretty sure events go X11 -> Compiz -> Unity or X11 -> Nux -> unity | 22:20 |
| MCR1 | I think, that when you invent a new feature you do not think about the possibility of configuring it, you simply add the feature first and make it work with some default | 22:20 |
| bschaefer | yeah | 22:20 |
| bschaefer | well let me test this out! | 22:21 |
| bschaefer | cause unity overrides compiz events (which is also a bad workaround...) | 22:22 |
| bschaefer | sometimes | 22:22 |
| MCR1 | bschaefer: I cannot test the fix at the moment, but it makes sense for me, hopefully it works, but imho it should - or things are more complicated than needed | 22:22 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, cause what I would think it does is use a Get...to Get the current shortcut so it can draw the correct one | 22:23 |
| bschaefer | not set it, but if it also Sets it then that would be a problem...haha | 22:23 |
| bschaefer | (also bad design if it Gets and Sets with 1 function call...) | 22:24 |
| MCR1 | bschaefer: Can you test it ? I am a bit excited... | 22:24 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, yeah, i have to let it compile first :) | 22:24 |
| * bschaefer should have merged it to my unity branch... | 22:24 | |
| MCR1 | cool, thanks - I'll tell you in the meantime how to best test if it works... | 22:25 |
| bschaefer | either way though, you're branch is good. As it fixes hard coded problems | 22:25 |
| bschaefer | well im guessing to test it would be to change the shortcut option in CCSM with one of the ones you changed | 22:26 |
| MCR1 | to test it go to CCSM->General Options->Key Bindings and change the "Window Menu" key to something else than <Alt>space | 22:26 |
| MCR1 | bschaefer: yes, exactly - I just wanted to guide you along the way (many folks do not like CCSM it seems) | 22:27 |
| MCR1 | :) | 22:27 |
| bschaefer | yeeah CCSM can cause 'problems' | 22:27 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, /home/bschaefer/src/unity.merge.fix-hardcoded-keys-part1/shortcuts/StandaloneShortcuts.cpp:77:202: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token | 22:28 |
| bschaefer | you forgot a ')' :) | 22:28 |
| MCR1 | ups | 22:29 |
| MCR1 | it is 0:29 here ;) | 22:29 |
| bschaefer | no problem, I did that when I was fixing the conflict on all of them haha | 22:29 |
| bschaefer | oo that is a bit late! | 22:29 |
| MCR1 | I will fix it in the branch | 22:30 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, hmm I wonder if that was from my branch haha | 22:31 |
| bschaefer | it couldn't be though as it was compiling... | 22:31 |
| bschaefer | o well it's an easy fix :) | 22:31 |
| MCR1 | no, I think it was my fault during copypaste | 22:31 |
| bschaefer | oo yeah, that'll happen. I don't like how we even generate all those shortcuts... | 22:32 |
| bschaefer | I want to get it into a header in a const structure... | 22:32 |
| MCR1 | Compiz is great at shortcut handling imho | 22:32 |
| bschaefer | yeah, compiz does shortcuts well...I just don't like: | 22:33 |
| bschaefer | hints.push_back(std::shared_ptr<shortcut::AbstractHint>(new shortcut::MockHint(_("Menu Bar"), "", "", _("Reveals application menu."), shortcut::COMPIZ_KEY_OPTION, "unityshell", "show_hud"))); | 22:33 |
| bschaefer | 50 times... | 22:33 |
| bschaefer | we should be able to loop over a structure that will do that haha | 22:33 |
| bschaefer | plus we have duplication in unityshell.cpp and that Standalone one... | 22:33 |
| MCR1 | hehe | 22:34 |
| MCR1 | yes the duplication is stupid | 22:34 |
| MCR1 | pushed | 22:34 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, yeah. Hmm you're branch didn't seem to fix it :( | 22:34 |
| MCR1 | noooooooooooooooooooo | 22:34 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, I think this is a problem somewhere else, possibly in compiz or in unity.xml thingy hmm | 22:35 |
| MCR1 | then I have to dig further into the code - planned to find some time for that on the weekend... | 22:35 |
| MCR1 | thanks a lot for testing - does it still jump back to Alt+Space ? | 22:35 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, you're branch is still good though. As we don't want that hardcoded stuff in there... | 22:35 |
| bschaefer | yeah | 22:35 |
| MCR1 | grmmpf | 22:35 |
| bschaefer | so you're branch will still get merged :) | 22:35 |
| MCR1 | but should be easy to find the problem... but not today | 22:36 |
| bschaefer | yeah haha | 22:36 |
| MCR1 | ok, thx a lot for the help | 22:36 |
| bschaefer | MCR1, np! Go get some sleep :) | 22:36 |
| bschaefer | thanks for digging into that problem :) | 22:36 |
| MCR1 | yeah, I guess we will fix for 12.10 ;) | 22:37 |
| MCR1 | gn | 22:37 |
| bschaefer | yup. good night! | 22:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!