| nibalizer | so uh, nvidia exploit, is the package in the updates ppa patched against that? | 01:29 |
|---|---|---|
| Sarvatt | nibalizer: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates/+sourcepub/2596304/+listing-archive-extra | 01:30 |
| Sarvatt | yep | 01:30 |
| nibalizer | yes | 01:31 |
| nibalizer | awesome | 01:31 |
| nibalizer | thanks | 01:31 |
| nibalizer | Sarvatt: is that good for natty as well? | 01:37 |
| Sarvatt | nvidia-graphics-drivers 302.17-0ubuntu1~natty~xup2Brandon Snider (2012-08-04) | 01:37 |
| Sarvatt | yep | 01:37 |
| nibalizer | sweet | 01:38 |
| Sarvatt | bjsnider: thanks for updating all of those man | 01:38 |
| bjsnider | lol, somebody would have to ask about natty | 01:39 |
| bjsnider | there's one guy out there using it | 01:39 |
| Sarvatt | i know right, been end of life for a long time and surprised me ya even updated it :) | 01:39 |
| * nibalizer feels shame | 01:40 | |
| bjsnider | nibalizer, just out of curiosity, why are you using natty? | 01:40 |
| Sarvatt | oh its end of lifed yet, whoops! | 01:40 |
| Sarvatt | err not EOL | 01:40 |
| nibalizer | nibalizer: nvidia drivers, lulzy i kno | 01:40 |
| nibalizer | bjsnider: i mean | 01:41 |
| nibalizer | bjsnider: thanks a ton | 01:41 |
| === mdeslaur_ is now known as mdeslaur | ||
| bjsnider | a lot of people emailed me about it as i recall | 01:41 |
| Sarvatt | last one with a decent gnome2 stack? | 01:41 |
| bjsnider | could be | 01:42 |
| bjsnider | he's not telling | 01:42 |
| blkperl | bjsnider: nibalizer and I will be updating them all to Precise after fall term :) | 01:42 |
| blkperl | err after summer term :) | 01:43 |
| bjsnider | precisely | 01:43 |
| mlankhorst | morning :) | 07:05 |
| * mlankhorst slaps Sarvatt around a bit with a trout | 07:05 | |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === mdeslaur_ is now known as mdeslaur | ||
| tedg | tseliot, So is there going to be an nvidia update soon? Thinking about backing out my X stack... | 13:08 |
| tseliot | tedg: no, I haven't seen any new public announcements by Nvidia | 13:19 |
| tedg | tseliot, Ah, okay. Thanks! | 13:20 |
| mlankhorst | tjaalton: feel like making a evdev 2.7.2 release? :) | 17:11 |
| tjaalton | mlankhorst: upstream? | 17:37 |
| bryceh | hmm, mesa 8.1 is now mesa 9.0. also late | 17:45 |
| mlankhorst | tjaalton: yeah pushed changes to git | 17:47 |
| mlankhorst | I feel like making another push of all packages to the qbp ppa | 17:49 |
| * mlankhorst was kind of hoping for a libdrm 2.4.38 release first | 17:53 | |
| tjaalton | bryceh: huh? | 17:53 |
| tjaalton | mlankhorst: bit too late for that :) | 17:54 |
| mlankhorst | yeah it can wait | 17:54 |
| tjaalton | after the weekend | 17:54 |
| mlankhorst | unless bryceh wants to :p | 17:55 |
| mlankhorst | running the qbp script is like 5 minutes work for me anyhow | 17:55 |
| bryceh | tjaalton, as per phoronix anyway | 17:56 |
| mlankhorst | I love how nvidia attending xdc is 'news' | 17:57 |
| bryceh | it's sounding like the whole stack is coming late, either end of sept or into october | 17:57 |
| mlankhorst | there's no hurry on our side | 17:58 |
| tjaalton | oh right, so it said on the email | 17:59 |
| tjaalton | we need it though for hsw enablement.. | 17:59 |
| * mlankhorst feels like evilly sneaking in all the userspace changes for prime so only a kernel update would be needed.. | 17:59 | |
| tjaalton | well | 18:00 |
| tjaalton | ... | 18:00 |
| mlankhorst | ..? | 18:00 |
| tjaalton | let's see what kerneöl drm will end up in 12.10.. | 18:04 |
| tjaalton | -ö | 18:04 |
| tjaalton | and now back to wknd mode :) | 18:04 |
| mlankhorst | yeah I'm hoping to be done with the dma-fence/bufmgr crap, submitted it today as hopefully final revision, next week r600 wiring up | 18:05 |
| shadeslayer | tjaalton: did I mention upgrading to new X stuff from proposed worked? | 18:12 |
| shadeslayer | no more mem leaks | 18:12 |
| bryceh | shadeslayer, quantal or precise? | 18:15 |
| shadeslayer | bryceh: quantal | 18:15 |
| shadeslayer | precise is for people who run production software :P | 18:16 |
| bryceh | ...and why memory leaks are more exciting there ;-) | 18:18 |
| mlankhorst | bryceh: that's why those statements amuse me | 18:22 |
| mlankhorst | similar to all the debug statements that get run during debugging and would allow silent corruption on live that doesn't run the extra work :) | 19:16 |
| shadeslayer | bryceh: heh :P | 19:49 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| bryceh | tjaalton, bad news on the 8.0.3 piglit tests... | 22:31 |
| bryceh | tjaalton, I've run through them several times now, same thing each time, and don't think it's user error | 22:31 |
| bryceh | tjaalton, on radeon, the gpu starts lagging out on one of the tests and then wedges the kernel. Total tests passed is less than before | 22:32 |
| bryceh | tjaalton, on nouveau it also sees a GPU lockup, after only 1658 test run (it ran 6598 previously) | 22:34 |
| bryceh | which is odd because this should be the exact same mesa. | 22:35 |
| bryceh | Intel seems ok so far (but don't have numbers yet) | 22:35 |
| bryceh | well, it crashes compiz. But I think it did that before. | 22:35 |
| bryceh | tjaalton, anyway, I'm wondering if maybe it's due to a changed kernel or other bits in -proposed. | 22:36 |
| mlankhorst | http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8k80eiq0W1rttwwro1_1280.png | 22:56 |
| mlankhorst | :D | 22:56 |
| bryceh | hrm, the intel tests also show worse numbers. 6445/6595 vs. 6453/6592 | 23:46 |
| bryceh | although, those are still better than mesa 8.0.2 | 23:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
