[01:29] <nibalizer> so uh, nvidia exploit, is the package in the updates ppa patched against that?
[01:30] <Sarvatt> nibalizer: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates/+sourcepub/2596304/+listing-archive-extra
[01:30] <Sarvatt> yep
[01:31] <nibalizer> yes
[01:31] <nibalizer> awesome
[01:31] <nibalizer> thanks
[01:37] <nibalizer> Sarvatt: is that good for natty as well?
[01:37] <Sarvatt>  nvidia-graphics-drivers	 302.17-0ubuntu1~natty~xup2	Brandon Snider (2012-08-04)
[01:37] <Sarvatt> yep
[01:38] <nibalizer> sweet
[01:38] <Sarvatt> bjsnider: thanks for updating all of those man
[01:39] <bjsnider> lol, somebody would have to ask about natty
[01:39] <bjsnider> there's one guy out there using it
[01:39] <Sarvatt> i know right, been end of life for a long time and surprised me ya even updated it :)
[01:40]  * nibalizer feels shame
[01:40] <bjsnider> nibalizer, just out of curiosity, why are you using natty?
[01:40] <Sarvatt> oh its end of lifed yet, whoops!
[01:40] <Sarvatt> err not EOL
[01:40] <nibalizer> nibalizer: nvidia drivers, lulzy i kno
[01:41] <nibalizer> bjsnider: i mean
[01:41] <nibalizer> bjsnider: thanks a ton
[01:41] <bjsnider> a lot of people emailed me about it as i recall
[01:41] <Sarvatt> last one with a decent gnome2 stack?
[01:42] <bjsnider> could be
[01:42] <bjsnider> he's not telling
[01:42] <blkperl> bjsnider: nibalizer and I will be updating them all to Precise after fall term :)
[01:43] <blkperl> err after summer term :)
[01:43] <bjsnider> precisely
[07:05] <mlankhorst> morning :)
[07:05]  * mlankhorst slaps Sarvatt around a bit with a trout
[13:08] <tedg> tseliot, So is there going to be an nvidia update soon?  Thinking about backing out my X stack...
[13:19] <tseliot> tedg: no, I haven't seen any new public announcements by Nvidia
[13:20] <tedg> tseliot, Ah, okay.  Thanks!
[17:11] <mlankhorst> tjaalton: feel like making a evdev 2.7.2 release? :)
[17:37] <tjaalton> mlankhorst: upstream?
[17:45] <bryceh> hmm, mesa 8.1 is now mesa 9.0.  also late
[17:47] <mlankhorst> tjaalton: yeah pushed changes to git
[17:49] <mlankhorst> I feel like making another push of all packages to the qbp ppa
[17:53]  * mlankhorst was kind of hoping for a libdrm 2.4.38 release first
[17:53] <tjaalton> bryceh: huh?
[17:54] <tjaalton> mlankhorst: bit too late for that :)
[17:54] <mlankhorst> yeah it can wait
[17:54] <tjaalton> after the weekend
[17:55] <mlankhorst> unless bryceh wants to :p
[17:55] <mlankhorst> running the qbp script is like 5 minutes work for me anyhow
[17:56] <bryceh> tjaalton, as per phoronix anyway
[17:57] <mlankhorst> I love how nvidia attending xdc is 'news'
[17:57] <bryceh> it's sounding like the whole stack is coming late, either end of sept or into october
[17:58] <mlankhorst> there's no hurry on our side
[17:59] <tjaalton> oh right, so it said on the email
[17:59] <tjaalton> we need it though for hsw enablement..
[17:59]  * mlankhorst feels like evilly sneaking in all the userspace changes for prime so only a kernel update would be needed..
[18:00] <tjaalton> well
[18:00] <tjaalton> ...
[18:00] <mlankhorst> ..?
[18:04] <tjaalton> let's see what kerneöl drm will end up in 12.10..
[18:04] <tjaalton> -ö
[18:04] <tjaalton> and now back to wknd mode :)
[18:05] <mlankhorst> yeah I'm hoping to be done with the dma-fence/bufmgr crap, submitted it today as hopefully final revision, next week r600 wiring up
[18:12] <shadeslayer> tjaalton: did I mention upgrading to new X stuff from proposed worked?
[18:12] <shadeslayer> no more mem leaks
[18:15] <bryceh> shadeslayer, quantal or precise?
[18:15] <shadeslayer> bryceh: quantal
[18:16] <shadeslayer> precise is for people who run production software :P
[18:18] <bryceh> ...and why memory leaks are more exciting there ;-)
[18:22] <mlankhorst> bryceh: that's why those statements amuse me
[19:16] <mlankhorst> similar to all the debug statements that get run during debugging and would allow silent corruption on live that doesn't run the extra work :)
[19:49] <shadeslayer> bryceh: heh :P
[22:31] <bryceh> tjaalton, bad news on the 8.0.3 piglit tests...
[22:31] <bryceh> tjaalton, I've run through them several times now, same thing each time, and don't think it's user error
[22:32] <bryceh> tjaalton, on radeon, the gpu starts lagging out on one of the tests and then wedges the kernel.  Total tests passed is less than before
[22:34] <bryceh> tjaalton, on nouveau it also sees a GPU lockup, after only 1658 test run (it ran 6598 previously)
[22:35] <bryceh> which is odd because this should be the exact same mesa.
[22:35] <bryceh> Intel seems ok so far (but don't have numbers yet)
[22:35] <bryceh> well, it crashes compiz.  But I think it did that before.
[22:36] <bryceh> tjaalton, anyway, I'm wondering if maybe it's due to a changed kernel or other bits in -proposed.
[22:56] <mlankhorst> http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8k80eiq0W1rttwwro1_1280.png
[22:56] <mlankhorst> :D
[23:46] <bryceh> hrm, the intel tests also show worse numbers.  6445/6595 vs. 6453/6592
[23:48] <bryceh> although, those are still better than mesa 8.0.2