[01:29] so uh, nvidia exploit, is the package in the updates ppa patched against that? [01:30] nibalizer: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates/+sourcepub/2596304/+listing-archive-extra [01:30] yep [01:31] yes [01:31] awesome [01:31] thanks [01:37] Sarvatt: is that good for natty as well? [01:37] nvidia-graphics-drivers 302.17-0ubuntu1~natty~xup2 Brandon Snider (2012-08-04) [01:37] yep [01:38] sweet [01:38] bjsnider: thanks for updating all of those man [01:39] lol, somebody would have to ask about natty [01:39] there's one guy out there using it [01:39] i know right, been end of life for a long time and surprised me ya even updated it :) [01:40] * nibalizer feels shame [01:40] nibalizer, just out of curiosity, why are you using natty? [01:40] oh its end of lifed yet, whoops! [01:40] err not EOL [01:40] nibalizer: nvidia drivers, lulzy i kno [01:41] bjsnider: i mean [01:41] bjsnider: thanks a ton === mdeslaur_ is now known as mdeslaur [01:41] a lot of people emailed me about it as i recall [01:41] last one with a decent gnome2 stack? [01:42] could be [01:42] he's not telling [01:42] bjsnider: nibalizer and I will be updating them all to Precise after fall term :) [01:43] err after summer term :) [01:43] precisely [07:05] morning :) [07:05] * mlankhorst slaps Sarvatt around a bit with a trout === yofel_ is now known as yofel === mdeslaur_ is now known as mdeslaur [13:08] tseliot, So is there going to be an nvidia update soon? Thinking about backing out my X stack... [13:19] tedg: no, I haven't seen any new public announcements by Nvidia [13:20] tseliot, Ah, okay. Thanks! [17:11] tjaalton: feel like making a evdev 2.7.2 release? :) [17:37] mlankhorst: upstream? [17:45] hmm, mesa 8.1 is now mesa 9.0. also late [17:47] tjaalton: yeah pushed changes to git [17:49] I feel like making another push of all packages to the qbp ppa [17:53] * mlankhorst was kind of hoping for a libdrm 2.4.38 release first [17:53] bryceh: huh? [17:54] mlankhorst: bit too late for that :) [17:54] yeah it can wait [17:54] after the weekend [17:55] unless bryceh wants to :p [17:55] running the qbp script is like 5 minutes work for me anyhow [17:56] tjaalton, as per phoronix anyway [17:57] I love how nvidia attending xdc is 'news' [17:57] it's sounding like the whole stack is coming late, either end of sept or into october [17:58] there's no hurry on our side [17:59] oh right, so it said on the email [17:59] we need it though for hsw enablement.. [17:59] * mlankhorst feels like evilly sneaking in all the userspace changes for prime so only a kernel update would be needed.. [18:00] well [18:00] ... [18:00] ..? [18:04] let's see what kerneöl drm will end up in 12.10.. [18:04] -ö [18:04] and now back to wknd mode :) [18:05] yeah I'm hoping to be done with the dma-fence/bufmgr crap, submitted it today as hopefully final revision, next week r600 wiring up [18:12] tjaalton: did I mention upgrading to new X stuff from proposed worked? [18:12] no more mem leaks [18:15] shadeslayer, quantal or precise? [18:15] bryceh: quantal [18:16] precise is for people who run production software :P [18:18] ...and why memory leaks are more exciting there ;-) [18:22] bryceh: that's why those statements amuse me [19:16] similar to all the debug statements that get run during debugging and would allow silent corruption on live that doesn't run the extra work :) [19:49] bryceh: heh :P === yofel_ is now known as yofel === JanC_ is now known as JanC [22:31] tjaalton, bad news on the 8.0.3 piglit tests... [22:31] tjaalton, I've run through them several times now, same thing each time, and don't think it's user error [22:32] tjaalton, on radeon, the gpu starts lagging out on one of the tests and then wedges the kernel. Total tests passed is less than before [22:34] tjaalton, on nouveau it also sees a GPU lockup, after only 1658 test run (it ran 6598 previously) [22:35] which is odd because this should be the exact same mesa. [22:35] Intel seems ok so far (but don't have numbers yet) [22:35] well, it crashes compiz. But I think it did that before. [22:36] tjaalton, anyway, I'm wondering if maybe it's due to a changed kernel or other bits in -proposed. [22:56] http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8k80eiq0W1rttwwro1_1280.png [22:56] :D [23:46] hrm, the intel tests also show worse numbers. 6445/6595 vs. 6453/6592 [23:48] although, those are still better than mesa 8.0.2