/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/08/11/#launchpad.txt

=== bilal_ is now known as bilal
izidorall: hi, what does it mean when import branch has only "Partial success" ?16:51
izidorMy branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~gtg/gtg/liblarch16:51
izidorI don't see any error in logs but the latest revision is not fetched16:52
maxbizidor: It means the importer made progress but stopped after importing a defined number of revisions, and will reschedule another run to make more progress / complete the import. Which is seems to have now done18:21
ESphynxhey guys... how does the branch= work for the git import?18:37
ESphynxbzrlib.plugins.git.errors.NoSuchRef: The ref refs/heads/dev. was not found in the repository at git://github.com/ecere/sdk.git,branch=dev..18:38
maxbLooks like you've got an extra . character in there18:40
Logan_Can somebody please remove the upstream link from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/youtube-dl ?19:03
Logan_It is linked to an incorrect project.19:03
maxbDone19:10
Logan_Thanks. :)19:10
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
* Logan_ wishes Launchpad would track GitHub bugs.19:11
ESphynxmaxb: For example the other branch (which does work) https://code.launchpad.net/~jerstlouis/ecere/ppaPrecise21:10
ESphynxdisplay exactly the same :P21:10
maxbI don't know how that one's working. You do have an extra '.' in there21:11
ESphynxmaxb: I never wrote those . I swear!!21:12
ESphynxmaxb: I'll delete the dev branch and do it over again..21:12
ESphynxit's annoying, the recipes will get deleted too?21:13
maxbDon't delete it, I'll change the url21:13
ESphynxoops |21:13
ESphynx:| too late21:13
ESphynxI hate how you can't 'edit' the git import path...21:15
ajf_I deleted a ppa once, then regretted it because you're unable to create a new one with the same url (which was the project name)21:16
ajf_I guess it makes sense for other users to not be allowed to "take over" PPAs, but not the user of the old one21:17
maxbYeah, for git imports editing the url could probably be allowed21:17
ESphynxthat'd be nice :)21:17
maxbThere are interesting issues in the implementations of some of the other import types, though21:17
ESphynxmaxb: So I recreated it...21:18
ESphynxThis branch is an import of the HEAD branch of the Git repository at git://github.com/ecere/sdk.git,branch=dev.21:18
maxbHmm, so those ppa imports of yours with the extra dots in them seem to have imported master21:18
ESphynxis that correct / different ?21:18
ESphynxwhy the heck are there . there anyways21:18
ESphynxOh they did??21:18
* maxb has a go at reconfiguring them21:18
ESphynxthanks man.21:18
ESphynxYeah. death to the dots man.21:19
ESphynxhaving the URL on its own line and the . in the same font21:19
ESphynxis very confusing21:19
ESphynx(and the git import editbox should error on an invalid path ;| especially since you can't edit it later... ANd you have to delete associated recipes :P)21:20
maxbjelmer: Around, perchance?21:20
ESphynxbranch=refs/heads/ppa/oneiric ?21:22
maxbHmm, neither ,branch=ppa/oneiric nor ,branch=refs/heads/ppa/oneiric seems to have resulted in LP importing something other than master21:23
ESphynxthat is annoying21:24
ESphynxdoesn't support the branches with / in them?21:24
maxbI guess we'll see what happens with dev21:24
ESphynxmy feeling is it's the /21:24
ESphynxthat's why it didn't err on the ..21:24
ESphynxI had branch=debian before and that worked fine21:24
ESphynxIs there a quick fix for this, or should I rename my branches ppaOneiric ?21:25
* maxb thankful for the 'Import now' button21:26
maxbAh, there we go21:26
maxb,branch=ppa%2foneiric21:27
ESphynxah, nice :)21:28
ESphynxthanks21:28
ESphynxare you able to fix them up? :)21:29
ESphynxseems like you have some editing controls I don't have :P21:29
maxbYeah, I'm a member of ~vcs-imports21:29
ESphynxah nice :) many thanks vcs-importer =)21:30
maxbOK, they're all good now21:30
ESphynxthanks man :)21:30
ESphynxNow I'm curious to see if these will build :) I added the libffi dependency...21:31
ESphynxalso first time I'm trying on Quantal :)21:31
ESphynxwhat's the animal btw? ;)21:31
ESphynxQuetzal!21:31
ESphynxis that related to Quetzalcoalt ?21:31
ESphynxQuetzalcoatl*21:31
ESphynxcute little bird21:32
ESphynxfitting name for the last release of this cycle of the Mayan calendar!21:33
ESphynxok I fixed the recipes :)21:39
ESphynxMissing build dependencies: lib32ffi-dev :S21:42
maxblib32? really?21:49
ESphynxyeah I dunno what's up with that... yeah my package still builds only as 32 bit even on 64 bit machines...21:50
ESphynxand ffi is architecture specific...21:51
ESphynxI dunno if I should say lib32ffi5 instead?21:51
maxbNot if you want to link against it21:52
maxbGot a link to the failed build?21:52
ESphynxsure21:53
ESphynxhttps://launchpadlibrarian.net/112505268/buildlog.txt.gz21:53
ESphynxNatty/Lucid says Dependency Wait: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/112517064/buildlog.txt.gz21:53
jelmerhi maxb, ESphynx21:54
jelmerESphynx: if you use a forward slash you need to URL encode it21:54
jelmerESphynx: there is branch=foo%2Fbar or ref=refs%2Fheads%2Ffoo%2Fbar21:55
ESphynxjelmer: Hi :) yes that seems to be what maxb found out :)21:55
ESphynxhe fixed them :)21:56
ESphynxmaxb: Did you find anything there? :| I'm really puzzled what dependency I should list22:16
maxbESphynx: So, the quantal failure suggests there was no debian/changelog present after the recipe had been performed22:25
ESphynxmaxb: hmm somethign wrong22:27
maxbESphynx: Meanwhile that natty build is executing in an i386 environment, so of course there's no lib32ffi-dev in existence; libffi-dev is 32-bit anywa22:27
ESphynxmaxb: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/112517040/buildlog.txt.gz22:27
maxbAgain, in that one, no lib32ffi-dev, except it then went on to fail in a particularly obscure way22:31
ESphynxshould I say: lib32ffi-dev [amd64] ?22:32
maxbyes22:33
ESphynxThere's libffi6 also :|22:34
ESphynxhttps://launchpadlibrarian.net/112525179/buildlog.txt.gz -- wth happened there? it's using a super old version name?22:53
ESphynxecere-0.44pre15prep5amd64 -- where did that come from?22:53
ESphynxI guess that's the {debupstream}-0~{revno} ?22:54
ESphynxchangelog :|22:55
ESphynx(0.44.01-0~766~precise1) is earlier than the previous one (0.44.01) ?23:47
wgrantESphynx: Yes.23:47
wgrantESphynx: ~ is less than everything -- including nothing at all.23:47
ESphynxwgrant: i do'nt understand why I'm getting these errors now :|23:48
ESphynxI just set my changelog version to be that...23:48
ESphynxah I had {time}-0~{revno} before23:49
wgrantINFO ecere_0.44.01-0~766~precise1.dsc: Version older than that in the archive. 0.44.01-0~766~precise1 <= 201204161936-0~580~precise123:49
ESphynxIf I go back to {time}-0~{revno} it should be good?23:50
wgrantWell, having a pure time-based version when there are real release version numbers is pretty strange.23:51
wgrantIf the PPA has few users, it might best to just pretend the {time}-based package versions never happened. Delete them and rerun the recipe.23:51
ESphynxwell there has only been one release...23:51
wgrantBut anyone who has the package installed would need to manually remove and reinstall it in order to get upgrades.23:52
ESphynxand they are daily build PPAs23:52
ESphynxand releases are sparse23:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!