=== bilal_ is now known as bilal | ||
izidor | all: hi, what does it mean when import branch has only "Partial success" ? | 16:51 |
---|---|---|
izidor | My branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~gtg/gtg/liblarch | 16:51 |
izidor | I don't see any error in logs but the latest revision is not fetched | 16:52 |
maxb | izidor: It means the importer made progress but stopped after importing a defined number of revisions, and will reschedule another run to make more progress / complete the import. Which is seems to have now done | 18:21 |
ESphynx | hey guys... how does the branch= work for the git import? | 18:37 |
ESphynx | bzrlib.plugins.git.errors.NoSuchRef: The ref refs/heads/dev. was not found in the repository at git://github.com/ecere/sdk.git,branch=dev.. | 18:38 |
maxb | Looks like you've got an extra . character in there | 18:40 |
Logan_ | Can somebody please remove the upstream link from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/youtube-dl ? | 19:03 |
Logan_ | It is linked to an incorrect project. | 19:03 |
maxb | Done | 19:10 |
Logan_ | Thanks. :) | 19:10 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
* Logan_ wishes Launchpad would track GitHub bugs. | 19:11 | |
ESphynx | maxb: For example the other branch (which does work) https://code.launchpad.net/~jerstlouis/ecere/ppaPrecise | 21:10 |
ESphynx | display exactly the same :P | 21:10 |
maxb | I don't know how that one's working. You do have an extra '.' in there | 21:11 |
ESphynx | maxb: I never wrote those . I swear!! | 21:12 |
ESphynx | maxb: I'll delete the dev branch and do it over again.. | 21:12 |
ESphynx | it's annoying, the recipes will get deleted too? | 21:13 |
maxb | Don't delete it, I'll change the url | 21:13 |
ESphynx | oops | | 21:13 |
ESphynx | :| too late | 21:13 |
ESphynx | I hate how you can't 'edit' the git import path... | 21:15 |
ajf_ | I deleted a ppa once, then regretted it because you're unable to create a new one with the same url (which was the project name) | 21:16 |
ajf_ | I guess it makes sense for other users to not be allowed to "take over" PPAs, but not the user of the old one | 21:17 |
maxb | Yeah, for git imports editing the url could probably be allowed | 21:17 |
ESphynx | that'd be nice :) | 21:17 |
maxb | There are interesting issues in the implementations of some of the other import types, though | 21:17 |
ESphynx | maxb: So I recreated it... | 21:18 |
ESphynx | This branch is an import of the HEAD branch of the Git repository at git://github.com/ecere/sdk.git,branch=dev. | 21:18 |
maxb | Hmm, so those ppa imports of yours with the extra dots in them seem to have imported master | 21:18 |
ESphynx | is that correct / different ? | 21:18 |
ESphynx | why the heck are there . there anyways | 21:18 |
ESphynx | Oh they did?? | 21:18 |
* maxb has a go at reconfiguring them | 21:18 | |
ESphynx | thanks man. | 21:18 |
ESphynx | Yeah. death to the dots man. | 21:19 |
ESphynx | having the URL on its own line and the . in the same font | 21:19 |
ESphynx | is very confusing | 21:19 |
ESphynx | (and the git import editbox should error on an invalid path ;| especially since you can't edit it later... ANd you have to delete associated recipes :P) | 21:20 |
maxb | jelmer: Around, perchance? | 21:20 |
ESphynx | branch=refs/heads/ppa/oneiric ? | 21:22 |
maxb | Hmm, neither ,branch=ppa/oneiric nor ,branch=refs/heads/ppa/oneiric seems to have resulted in LP importing something other than master | 21:23 |
ESphynx | that is annoying | 21:24 |
ESphynx | doesn't support the branches with / in them? | 21:24 |
maxb | I guess we'll see what happens with dev | 21:24 |
ESphynx | my feeling is it's the / | 21:24 |
ESphynx | that's why it didn't err on the .. | 21:24 |
ESphynx | I had branch=debian before and that worked fine | 21:24 |
ESphynx | Is there a quick fix for this, or should I rename my branches ppaOneiric ? | 21:25 |
* maxb thankful for the 'Import now' button | 21:26 | |
maxb | Ah, there we go | 21:26 |
maxb | ,branch=ppa%2foneiric | 21:27 |
ESphynx | ah, nice :) | 21:28 |
ESphynx | thanks | 21:28 |
ESphynx | are you able to fix them up? :) | 21:29 |
ESphynx | seems like you have some editing controls I don't have :P | 21:29 |
maxb | Yeah, I'm a member of ~vcs-imports | 21:29 |
ESphynx | ah nice :) many thanks vcs-importer =) | 21:30 |
maxb | OK, they're all good now | 21:30 |
ESphynx | thanks man :) | 21:30 |
ESphynx | Now I'm curious to see if these will build :) I added the libffi dependency... | 21:31 |
ESphynx | also first time I'm trying on Quantal :) | 21:31 |
ESphynx | what's the animal btw? ;) | 21:31 |
ESphynx | Quetzal! | 21:31 |
ESphynx | is that related to Quetzalcoalt ? | 21:31 |
ESphynx | Quetzalcoatl* | 21:31 |
ESphynx | cute little bird | 21:32 |
ESphynx | fitting name for the last release of this cycle of the Mayan calendar! | 21:33 |
ESphynx | ok I fixed the recipes :) | 21:39 |
ESphynx | Missing build dependencies: lib32ffi-dev :S | 21:42 |
maxb | lib32? really? | 21:49 |
ESphynx | yeah I dunno what's up with that... yeah my package still builds only as 32 bit even on 64 bit machines... | 21:50 |
ESphynx | and ffi is architecture specific... | 21:51 |
ESphynx | I dunno if I should say lib32ffi5 instead? | 21:51 |
maxb | Not if you want to link against it | 21:52 |
maxb | Got a link to the failed build? | 21:52 |
ESphynx | sure | 21:53 |
ESphynx | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/112505268/buildlog.txt.gz | 21:53 |
ESphynx | Natty/Lucid says Dependency Wait: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/112517064/buildlog.txt.gz | 21:53 |
jelmer | hi maxb, ESphynx | 21:54 |
jelmer | ESphynx: if you use a forward slash you need to URL encode it | 21:54 |
jelmer | ESphynx: there is branch=foo%2Fbar or ref=refs%2Fheads%2Ffoo%2Fbar | 21:55 |
ESphynx | jelmer: Hi :) yes that seems to be what maxb found out :) | 21:55 |
ESphynx | he fixed them :) | 21:56 |
ESphynx | maxb: Did you find anything there? :| I'm really puzzled what dependency I should list | 22:16 |
maxb | ESphynx: So, the quantal failure suggests there was no debian/changelog present after the recipe had been performed | 22:25 |
ESphynx | maxb: hmm somethign wrong | 22:27 |
maxb | ESphynx: Meanwhile that natty build is executing in an i386 environment, so of course there's no lib32ffi-dev in existence; libffi-dev is 32-bit anywa | 22:27 |
ESphynx | maxb: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/112517040/buildlog.txt.gz | 22:27 |
maxb | Again, in that one, no lib32ffi-dev, except it then went on to fail in a particularly obscure way | 22:31 |
ESphynx | should I say: lib32ffi-dev [amd64] ? | 22:32 |
maxb | yes | 22:33 |
ESphynx | There's libffi6 also :| | 22:34 |
ESphynx | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/112525179/buildlog.txt.gz -- wth happened there? it's using a super old version name? | 22:53 |
ESphynx | ecere-0.44pre15prep5amd64 -- where did that come from? | 22:53 |
ESphynx | I guess that's the {debupstream}-0~{revno} ? | 22:54 |
ESphynx | changelog :| | 22:55 |
ESphynx | (0.44.01-0~766~precise1) is earlier than the previous one (0.44.01) ? | 23:47 |
wgrant | ESphynx: Yes. | 23:47 |
wgrant | ESphynx: ~ is less than everything -- including nothing at all. | 23:47 |
ESphynx | wgrant: i do'nt understand why I'm getting these errors now :| | 23:48 |
ESphynx | I just set my changelog version to be that... | 23:48 |
ESphynx | ah I had {time}-0~{revno} before | 23:49 |
wgrant | INFO ecere_0.44.01-0~766~precise1.dsc: Version older than that in the archive. 0.44.01-0~766~precise1 <= 201204161936-0~580~precise1 | 23:49 |
ESphynx | If I go back to {time}-0~{revno} it should be good? | 23:50 |
wgrant | Well, having a pure time-based version when there are real release version numbers is pretty strange. | 23:51 |
wgrant | If the PPA has few users, it might best to just pretend the {time}-based package versions never happened. Delete them and rerun the recipe. | 23:51 |
ESphynx | well there has only been one release... | 23:51 |
wgrant | But anyone who has the package installed would need to manually remove and reinstall it in order to get upgrades. | 23:52 |
ESphynx | and they are daily build PPAs | 23:52 |
ESphynx | and releases are sparse | 23:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!