| stgraber | slangasek: looks like that worked. The upgrade is still running but it's past the point where the crash would usually happen. | 00:14 |
|---|---|---|
| cjwatson | slangasek: ah, I was about to assign 1034806 to myself :) | 00:14 |
| cjwatson | slangasek: I think it probably wants to look like http://paste.ubuntu.com/1140237/ ? | 00:14 |
| slangasek | cjwatson: <cough> yes, I just realized I should probably assign it to myself because I've been working on it for the past half hour :P | 00:15 |
| cjwatson | which would apply to quantal, even though using python3 there dodges the issue | 00:15 |
| slangasek | yeah, that matches mine | 00:15 |
| slangasek | just working on the test case now | 00:15 |
| cjwatson | good, we followed the same chain of logic | 00:15 |
| cjwatson | a test case was what I hadn't got to yet | 00:15 |
| stgraber | I'd have thought that with all that LP work, you'd know be completely converted to TDD ;) | 00:16 |
| slangasek | also needs the iso-codes build-dep, which is in quantal already but not yet in precise | 00:16 |
| slangasek | stgraber: well when 80% of the work is tracking down the bug and the other 10% is split evenly between figuring out the fix for the bug and figuring out the test case... :) | 00:17 |
| cjwatson | stgraber: :-P I make sure the test fails without the fix, but that doesn't always mean I write the test first ... | 00:17 |
| stgraber | ;) | 00:18 |
| cjwatson | (but it's true that the balance in LP is necessarily shifted more towards using the test suite, since it's so much less work to engineer a reproduction environment that way than by bothering to actually run a full instance) | 00:18 |
| slangasek | cjwatson: do you have time to review the mp I just sent for that buG? | 01:11 |
| cjwatson | urr, pretty confused by it being committed to lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/aptdaemon and thus containing a bunch of other stuff | 01:13 |
| slangasek | hmm | 01:13 |
| slangasek | gar, not at all what I told it to do | 01:13 |
| slangasek | and I suppose uncommitting will simply anger the branch god | 01:13 |
| cjwatson | but looking at the diff | 01:14 |
| slangasek | oh, I see, I tried to create a branch under a 'precise-proposed' directory and UDD laughed at me | 01:15 |
| slangasek | sigh | 01:15 |
| slangasek | http://paste.ubuntu.com/1140316/ | 01:17 |
| slangasek | that's consistent | 01:17 |
| cjwatson | .../precise/... | 01:18 |
| cjwatson | compare https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/precise/aptdaemon/precise-proposed/+merge/119222 | 01:18 |
| cjwatson | i.e. the third bit is a series not a suite | 01:18 |
| cjwatson | anyway, approve review sent with a couple of minor notes | 01:19 |
| slangasek | right, so the fact that 'lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/aptdaemon' works is entirely because someone wants to watch me suffer ;) | 01:19 |
| slangasek | thanks for the review | 01:20 |
| slangasek | -p ab> heh, that was my next commit | 01:20 |
| stgraber | slangasek: upgrade completed, no error and a working unity desktop post-reboot | 01:22 |
| slangasek | stgraber: huzzah | 01:22 |
| stgraber | hopefully we'll know if we broke anyhing else in the process when we get some jenkins run with -proposed on Monday ;) | 01:23 |
| slangasek | indeed | 01:23 |
| cjwatson | and accepted | 01:44 |
| slangasek | cjwatson: the regressions/ subdir doesn't seem to be processed at build time by the testsuite in quantal; is it expected to be? | 02:05 |
| slangasek | hmm, language-selector was marked for python3 but the dbus backend isn't actually compatible at all :/ | 02:06 |
| slangasek | cjwatson: heh, and in fact test_lp768691 doesn't run under python3 at all (either the old or new test) because there's no such thing as 'unicode' | 02:11 |
| cjwatson | slangasek: I don't know | 02:16 |
| cjwatson | That would be a glatzor question | 02:16 |
| slangasek | fair'nuff | 02:16 |
| slangasek | ok, that's all the aptdaemon UnicodeDecode crashes that errors knows about, phew | 02:46 |
| === vanhoof_ is now known as vanhoof | ||
| === jbicha is now known as Guest72287 | ||
| slangasek | ev: so, that strange dip in all the crash graphs on 5/17... when did the retracer backlog get cleared? | 18:08 |
| ev | slangasek: I don't think it has to do with the retracers, as they're not involved for python crashes, which are also showing the dip | 18:08 |
| slangasek | ok | 18:09 |
| slangasek | interesting | 18:09 |
| ev | the retracers are a whole 'nother ball of pain for me, actually: | 18:09 |
| ev | ugh, damn open id | 18:10 |
| ev | the link I was going to paste isn't working | 18:10 |
| slangasek | it's also possible that many of these crashes hit users more than 3 times per week, so a week after upgrade they've stopped reporting | 18:10 |
| slangasek | but I wouldn't expect it to be quite so sharp, or quite so universal, in that case | 18:10 |
| ev | yeah | 18:11 |
| slangasek | anyway, just throwing out the thought... back to cleaning house now :) | 18:11 |
| ev | at least the lines aren't exactly the same | 18:11 |
| ev | it's not like it's just somehow sourcing the same data for all of them | 18:11 |
| ev | but there's something special about the 17th | 18:11 |
| ev | and I have no idea what it is yet :-/ | 18:11 |
| ev | I looked for apport uploads around that time | 18:11 |
| ev | but there really isn't anything that lines up | 18:11 |
| ev | and I suspect we'd see more of a gradual drop off if that broke it | 18:12 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === iulian is now known as Guest88558 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!