[06:13] <iToast> bazhang:  whats that for -_-
[06:13] <bazhang> iToast, what help do you need here
[06:13] <chu> iToast: There is a policy which you explicitly chose to ignore.
[06:13] <iToast> I can't speak in the other channel after you.
[06:13] <iToast> chu: I didn't know about the anti google but I was starting
[06:13] <iToast> That I believe you should try and help yourself first.
[06:14] <iToast> There is Ubuntu wiki, Ubuntu Forums, Google, Man pages
[06:14] <bazhang> iToast, it is a clear channel policy.
[06:14] <chu> Maybe you should read the guidelines.
[06:14] <iToast> bazhang: were?.
[06:14] <chu> iToast: The guidelines for using the Ubuntu channels can be found here: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/Guidelines
[06:14] <iToast> I don't know were they are -_-
[06:14] <bazhang> !google
[06:14] <iToast> ...
[06:15] <chu> I'm not sure if the guidelines mentions that though.
[06:15] <bazhang> iToast, was there anything else
[06:15] <iToast> "google-fu" My query "text only webbrowsers for linux"... "lynx" is well known... >_>
[06:15] <bazhang> to you
[06:15] <iToast> Lynx is known by millions. its the most POPULAR text based browser
[06:16] <iToast> I think there is a Apple //e port.
[06:16] <bazhang> iToast, that's beside the point.
[06:16] <iToast> "[02:16] == Cannot send to channel: #ubuntu"
[06:16] <iToast> I was +q'd for my oppinon
[06:16] <bazhang> no
[06:17] <iToast> Not to mention the thousands of times I was told by common helpers in #ubuntu to "google it" and they were NEVER punished.
[06:17] <bazhang> for choosing not to follow channel guidelines, that one.
[06:17] <iToast> bazhang: you +q'd AFTER I said it.
[06:17] <iToast> Specificly after I said MY oppinion.
[06:17] <bazhang> iToast, you chose to ignore the !google that chu sent you
[06:18] <iToast> I didn't say google it aain after he did that.
[06:18] <iToast> So it's a +q for my oppinion.
[06:18] <bazhang> not so.
[06:18] <bazhang> iToast, if there is nothing further, please exit the channel
[06:18] <iToast> "[02:18] <+bazhang> not so. [02:18] <+bazhang> iToast, if there is nothing further, please exit the channel"
[06:19] <iToast> I can't speak in the other channel is kinda my problem?
[06:19] <bazhang> iToast, and that won't be lifted at this time.
[06:19] <iToast> Thats the reason I'm here..
[06:19] <iToast> Why?
[06:19] <bazhang> we don't unban/unquiet on demand
[06:20] <iToast> 1. I was requestiong not demanding, 2. I got muted for oppinion.
[06:20] <iToast> I only got muted AFTER stating my oppinion on the issue.
[06:20] <bazhang> iToast, it's not up for debate. the +q will not be lifted
[06:20] <iToast> Can I make a complaint about this on the forums.
[06:20] <iToast> I think it's wrong because its oppinion.
[06:20] <bazhang> !appeal | iToast
[06:21] <iToast> So send a email in that you will end up replying to?
[06:21] <bazhang> not me, no
[06:22] <bazhang> step one was coming here. follow up with the email is step two
[06:24] <bazhang> !idle | iToast
[06:25] <iToast> bazhang: http://pastebin.com/bS1zcZ19
[06:26] <IdleOne> iToast: If there is nothing else, please part this channel.
[06:27] <iToast> IdleOne: I wish I could get a -q but this is a matter of a +o's oppinion and has to be dealt with with the assistance of opers who are willing to accept a oppinion.
[11:53] <bazhang> heads up: dfrostedwang in #k
[12:27] <mneptok> uh.
[12:27] <knome> ugh
[12:27] <mneptok> 00:15 < iToast> Lynx is known by millions. its the most POPULAR text based browser
[12:27] <mneptok> well, W3M used to be installed by default. may still be. looks like iToast's massive google-fu didn't help on that score.
[12:29] <chu> I know w3m comes default with Debian (Squeeze(
[12:31] <mneptok> i'm all disoriented and cranky because i'm awake at 0530.
[12:31] <mneptok> sounds like i'm ready for some -offtopic op work.
[12:32] <IdleOne> mneptok: there is a troublesome user named elky in -ot
[12:33] <IdleOne> please remove them
[12:33] <mneptok> no. elky tends to be able to dial up crankiness faster than i can. and we have no nationaloized health care.
[12:46] <elky> mneptok, they were calling makers mark WHISKY
[12:46] <elky> IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE
[13:01] <IdleOne> lol
[13:02] <mneptok> elky: that's just sacrilege. Maker's Mark is Kentucky bourbon whiskey. not whisky.
[13:03] <mneptok> it's good stuff. but it definitely needs that "e" when you spell it.
[14:28] <yaffs> !ops
[14:28] <yaffs> !staff
[14:29] <yaffs> !ops
[14:29] <yaffs> !ops
[14:40] <pottytheshitter> !ops
[14:40] <pottytheshitter> !staff
[14:40] <pottytheshitter> hahahahahaha
[14:41] <chu> Hello yaffs.
[14:41] <pottytheshitter> what up homie?
[14:41] <chu> Not much man, but I'd really rather if you didn't do that.
[14:42] <pottytheshitter> why?
[14:42] <chu> It's annoying.
[14:42] <pottytheshitter> ohh
[14:42] <pottytheshitter> ok since you asked so nicely i will!
[14:43] <pottytheshitter> time to kill noobs on COD Black ops!
[16:09] <DFrostedWang> Why the hell am I banned from #kubuntu-offtopic?
[17:00] <ikonia> DFrostedWang: still unclear why you are banned ?
[17:02] <DFrostedWang> Yeah
[17:03] <ikonia> so there are many reasons
[17:03] <DFrostedWang> Why?
[17:03] <ikonia> 1.) you are constantly messing around with your nickname trying to provoke an issue, despite multiple warnings, kicks and bans about it
[17:03] <ikonia> 2.) making jokes about anal sex - is that really appropriate for a channel that contains a family friendly policy
[17:04] <DFrostedWang> 1.) When did that happen, and when did I get a warning, kick, or ban about it?
[17:04] <knome> for starters, you have a ban in #xubuntu.
[17:04] <DFrostedWang> 2.) It happened once, and I agreed not to do it again.
[17:04] <DFrostedWang> knome, I know
[17:04] <ikonia> DFrostedWang: you first got kicked on the 28th may from #xubuntu about your nickname
[17:04] <DFrostedWang> I have a ban in #ubuntu too
[17:04] <ikonia> yes
[17:04] <ikonia> I know, I think I put it there
[17:04] <DFrostedWang> That's why I had to switch to KDE
[17:05] <ikonia> (I will confirm and check)
[17:05] <ikonia> why you cannot just pick a normal name like "Logan" rather than sexual reference nicknames despite multiple warnings, I don't know
[17:05] <DFrostedWang> It's my nickname
[17:05] <ikonia> why you continue to change it to icweiner/seymorebutts and other such nicknames persistantly in channels, I don't know
[17:05] <DFrostedWang> Why do you have an issue with it?
[17:06] <ikonia> that's been explained to you multiple times
[17:06] <ikonia> personally, I don't have an issue with it, but I can see why it does cause a conflict with the channels policy
[17:06] <ikonia> however after multiple changes and warnings about it you persist, so I guess you've hit the end of the road with it now
[17:07] <DFrostedWang> Well, I can't change it in just one channel
[17:07] <ikonia> sure you can't, but for some reason you keep changing it to ICWeiner and Seymorebutts
[17:07] <ikonia> which are just provoking the situation
[17:07] <ikonia> if your nickname really was DFrostedWang you'd keep it
[17:07] <DFrostedWang> I am not provoking it. I am changing it in one channel
[17:07] <ikonia> but you keep changing it to other nicknames to try to provoke an issue, well, you've created an issue,
[17:08] <DFrostedWang> I can't decide what channels it changes in
[17:08] <ikonia> DFrostedWang you know you can't change it in one channel, you change it one channel, you change it in all
[17:08] <ikonia> and as other channels are asking you to change it also, it may be better to consider a less problematic nickname
[17:09] <ikonia> and as you are not even using kubuntu any more but PCBSD you may not need to use the ubuntu channels any more so won't have this problem
[17:09] <ikonia> (just a thought)
[17:09] <DFrostedWang> It isn't like I'm all-caps typing "DFROSTEDWANG" in the channel all the time. Nobody notices my nick most of the time.
[17:09] <DFrostedWang> I am booting many OSes
[17:09] <ikonia> DFrostedWang: you are persisantly changing to ICWeiner and Seymorebuts, it's tedious and the operator team for the ubuntu channels are tired of talking to you abou tit
[17:09] <knome> i don't think there's much sense to continue this discussion.
[17:10] <DFrostedWang> Well, I am tired of getting banned from *buntu channels
[17:10] <ikonia> DFrostedWang: you know the rules/guidelines of the channel,
[17:10] <knome> you know why you should change the nick, but since you still won't do that, no reason for us to unban.
[17:10] <DFrostedWang> I like the OS, but without any support at all, it's just awful
[17:10] <ikonia> DFrostedWang: I suggest taking a break and have a think about if you want to use the channels, look at how your approach/nickname may conflict and either decide to alter it, or stay out
[17:11] <ikonia> DFrostedWang: (FYI: I'd personally cut you a lot more slack if you chose the nick DFrostedWang and stuck with it rather than trying other provokotive names)
[17:11] <DFrostedWang> This happens every time I give *buntu another chance. Just f*ck it. I'm tired of dealing with you guys. I need the free space on my computer anyway, I suppose that's what has to go.
[17:11] <knome> ikonia, agreed with that. it's not just the nick, but that in addition to the attitude
[17:12] <ikonia> DFrostedWang: fair enough, please leave the channels if you're done
[17:12] <DFrostedWang> Yeah, fine.
[17:12] <knome> very well. enjoy other distros with looser guidelines
[17:12] <ikonia> thanks
[17:12] <knome> why does something tell me we're going to see him again?
[17:12] <knome> rageshouting or sth
[17:52] <Tm_T> thanks guys for dealing with the banforward I did set