eric_ | latest edgers have broken graphics stack | 05:14 |
---|---|---|
eric_ | lots of blue | 05:15 |
eric_ | nvm, it's a gnome bug | 05:30 |
shadeslayer | question, is the X stack from -proposed compatible with the fglrx drivers I get from AMD's site? | 18:59 |
shadeslayer | i.e. ABI compatibility | 18:59 |
shadeslayer | well that was fun, binary driver from their site is unusable | 19:37 |
mlankhorst | there you go then :) | 20:32 |
shadeslayer | :P | 20:43 |
shadeslayer | it's basically because the kernel changed ABI in 3.5 | 20:43 |
shadeslayer | something to do with do_mmap | 20:44 |
shadeslayer | and the fact that I have X from proposed | 20:44 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
tjaalton_ | shadeslayer: no, it's not compatible | 21:15 |
shadeslayer | tjaalton_: some sort of incompatibility between fglrx and the kernel it seems | 21:16 |
tjaalton_ | no | 21:16 |
shadeslayer | oh? | 21:16 |
tjaalton_ | it doesn't support the xserver abi | 21:17 |
shadeslayer | ahh | 21:17 |
shadeslayer | I read your response in the wrong way | 21:17 |
shadeslayer | I read that as, no, it's compatible | 21:17 |
shadeslayer | tjaalton_: found out about it the hard way :P | 21:18 |
tjaalton_ | if it did support the abi, it would be in quantal too | 21:19 |
shadeslayer | right | 21:19 |
shadeslayer | is the ubuntu X team going to move the 1.13 packages from proposed to the main component without fglrx support? or is there some plan to get fglrx fixed and then move them together | 21:20 |
tjaalton_ | yes, no | 21:23 |
tjaalton_ | can't wait for amd | 21:24 |
tjaalton_ | the stack needs to move the coming week | 21:24 |
shadeslayer | right | 21:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!