| === BenC__ is now known as BenC | ||
| ppisati | moin | 06:39 |
|---|---|---|
| smb | morning | 07:21 |
| === tjaalton_ is now known as tjaalton | ||
| === jussio1 is now known as jussi | ||
| * ppisati notices that if you don't read lkml on a daily basis, the associated folder tends to explode... | 08:04 | |
| apw | morning ... | 09:02 |
| cooloney | apw: morning, i'm trying to add 'ln -s' workaround in lxc-start-ephemeral | 09:57 |
| cooloney | apw: i don't fully understand where shall i add this 'ln -s', upper or lower. i think it should be lower directory | 09:59 |
| apw | cooloney, well if it is in the lower then its a one off thing | 09:59 |
| apw | cooloney, though as its a bodge, in the upper seems fine | 09:59 |
| cooloney | apw: cd ${upper}; ln -s rootfs / ? | 10:03 |
| apw | ln -s . rootfs | 10:04 |
| apw | i'd guess, as we want /rootfs to mean / | 10:04 |
| cooloney | apw: oh, i tried that. actually it doesn't work, | 10:14 |
| apw | and why does it not work ? | 10:14 |
| cooloney | apw: rootfs will be an endless loop point | 10:14 |
| apw | ? | 10:14 |
| apw | if you ln -s . rootfs it cannot be an endless loop | 10:14 |
| apw | i assume we end up with /rootfs in the names because somewhere you have a rootfs directory (a real directory) which is used to build the fake namespace | 10:17 |
| apw | inside that directory we need to add the link, not replace it | 10:17 |
| apw | as a test i would try and run "ln -s . rootfs; ls -ld /etc /rootfs/etc" as the command payload for an ephemeral lxc start thing | 10:18 |
| apw | cooloney, ^^ | 10:18 |
| apw | and see what that produces | 10:19 |
| cooloney | so in upper there is rootfs -> . | 10:19 |
| apw | ok that sounds right | 10:19 |
| apw | so what does ls -ld /etc /rootfs/etc do in that | 10:19 |
| cooloney | it looks like overwrite the real directory in lower, | 10:19 |
| cooloney | oh, the lxc hangs in the middle | 10:20 |
| apw | whats in rootfs in lower ? | 10:20 |
| cooloney | $ ls /var/lib/lxc/p1 | 10:20 |
| cooloney | config fstab rootfs | 10:20 |
| cooloney | this is lower | 10:20 |
| cooloney | rootfs is a directory containing everything for lxc container | 10:21 |
| apw | ok get rid of the symlink in upper | 10:21 |
| apw | and ln -s . /var/lib/lx/p1/rootfs/rootfs | 10:21 |
| apw | and try that | 10:21 |
| cooloney | after i added a link in upper named rootfs, it probably overwrite this real one | 10:21 |
| apw | yeah i don't want the top rootfs replaced i want to add rootfs/rootfs effectivly as a link | 10:22 |
| apw | so remove the upper one for now, and add the lower one and tell me waht that does | 10:22 |
| apw | note the double rootfs at the end | 10:22 |
| apw | cooloney, ^^ | 10:24 |
| cooloney | cd ${upper} sudo ln -s . ${lower}/rootfs/rootfs cd - | 10:25 |
| apw | ? | 10:25 |
| cooloney | apw: i added this | 10:25 |
| apw | no that is in upper | 10:25 |
| cooloney | oh, sorry | 10:25 |
| apw | actually that might be in lower, as its absolute | 10:26 |
| apw | so you don't need the cd | 10:26 |
| apw | ln -s . ${lower}/rootfs/rootfs | 10:26 |
| apw | looks right | 10:26 |
| apw | cooloney, and ? does it work / | 10:27 |
| apw | ? | 10:27 |
| cooloney | apw: oh, no, i got the same error with /rootfs | 10:28 |
| apw | ok | 10:28 |
| apw | actually which error | 10:28 |
| apw | this directory /var/lib/lx/p1/rootfs, is it persistant? always there? | 10:29 |
| cooloney | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1144614/ | 10:29 |
| cooloney | apw: yeah, always there | 10:29 |
| cooloney | since lower is a real directory | 10:29 |
| apw | ok rathan than putting it in the ephermal scripts like you are | 10:30 |
| cooloney | it might be ln -s rootfs ${lower}/rootfs/rootfs | 10:30 |
| apw | remove that change, and run: ln -s . /var/lib/lx/p1/rootfs/rootfs in the real filesystem | 10:30 |
| apw | outside of the container | 10:30 |
| apw | then paste me the ls -l /var/lib/lx/p1/rootfs | 10:31 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| cooloney | roc@roc-desktop:~$ sudo ln -s . /var/lib/lxc/p1/rootfs/rootfs | 10:34 |
| cooloney | roc@roc-desktop:~$ sudo ls -l /var/lib/lxc/p1/rootfs/ | 10:34 |
| cooloney | total 80 | 10:34 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:52 bin | 10:34 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 4 02:01 boot | 10:34 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:51 dev | 10:34 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 63 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:54 etc | 10:34 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:54 home | 10:34 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 12 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:52 lib | 10:34 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:49 lib64 | 10:34 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:48 media | 10:34 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 4 02:01 mnt | 10:34 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:48 opt | 10:34 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 4 02:01 proc | 10:34 |
| cooloney | drwx------ 2 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:48 root | 10:35 |
| cooloney | lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1 Aug 13 18:33 rootfs -> . | 10:35 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:52 run | 10:35 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:53 sbin | 10:35 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 12 02:36 selinux | 10:35 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:48 srv | 10:35 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 21 10:42 sys | 10:35 |
| cooloney | drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:53 tmp | 10:35 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:48 usr | 10:35 |
| cooloney | drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 4096 Aug 2 11:48 var | 10:35 |
| cooloney | apw: ^^^ | 10:35 |
| cooloney | looks like it is right. | 10:37 |
| * ppisati hates debian packaging... | 10:37 | |
| cooloney | apw: but the output still has /rootfs/ prefix | 10:38 |
| apw | cooloney, the output matters not, as long as the path whatever it is points to the right place | 10:45 |
| apw | so as long as ls -l /proc/$$/fds | 10:46 |
| apw | as long as those paths wrong though they are with /rootfs on the front now validly point to the right file | 10:46 |
| apw | which they should as the symlink effectivly strips the prefix (makes it point to the same as /) we should be safe | 10:46 |
| apw | does the container work right with it like that | 10:48 |
| * apw has to nip out for an hour ... will check back in when he gets back | 10:48 | |
| cooloney | apw: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1144648/ | 10:51 |
| * henrix -> lunch | 11:49 | |
| dileks | hi | 14:13 |
| dileks | can someone enlighten me why umask 0022 is not working as expected? | 14:14 |
| dileks | see this with linux-{3.5.1,3.6-rc1,next-201213} | 14:14 |
| dileks | http://nopaste.snit.ch/156629 | 14:14 |
| dileks | chmod 755 looks like the workaround | 14:15 |
| * dileks wants to understand | 14:15 | |
| dileks | looks like I have to umask on ${MOD_ROOT_FILES_DIR} | 14:22 |
| dileks | formerly I could do umask 0022 $local-git-repo | 14:24 |
| * ogasawara back in 20 | 14:52 | |
| jsalisbury | bjf, henrix, herton possible regression with 3.2.0-29. bug 1035590 | 15:30 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1035590 in linux "Kernel update on 10 Aug 2012 affects nm-applet signal strength" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1035590 | 15:30 |
| hggdh | ogra_: there? | 15:35 |
| herton | jsalisbury, ack. Only direct change to ipw drivers was "net/wireless: ipw2x00: add supported cipher suites to wiphy initialization" | 15:36 |
| jsalisbury | herton, I also added the network-manager package to the bug for their review | 15:37 |
| herton | I wonder if nm is trying to use now nl80211 because of that change, and that doesn't work well with this driver | 15:39 |
| henrix | yeah, it could be just a gui thing. it's not clear from the bug if the card actually works or not | 15:40 |
| henrix | (gui or nm) | 15:40 |
| ogra_ | hggdh, whats up ? | 16:11 |
| hggdh | ogra_: have you tried today's image for quantal-server armhf+omap4? On one machine (the lab, with the uboot) it loops on 'detecting hardware to find CDROM', on another (no preseed, manual) goes thru the language selection, then nothing | 16:21 |
| hggdh | on the loop: I ^C, see a message about seg fault, and hardware detection restarts | 16:21 |
| hggdh | same thing on the manual, it seems | 16:22 |
| ogra_ | well, i just tested desktop an that explodes as well but in ubiquity | 16:26 |
| ogra_ | hggdh, bug 1028905 for cdrom-detect ... try if wiping the partition table on the target disk helps | 16:27 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1028905 in cdrom-detect "cdrom-detect in quantal omap4 hangs trying to look for install media on an extended partition" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1028905 | 16:27 |
| hggdh | oh crap, forgot about this one | 16:27 |
| ogra_ | i'll try to nail it down this week | 16:29 |
| ogra_ | butu first i need a usable desktop install to test a kernel | 16:29 |
| ogra_ | *but | 16:29 |
| hggdh | ogra_: yes indeed, it is the extended partition | 16:31 |
| === skaet_ is now known as skaet | ||
| Kano | hi apw , why was aufs patched but not enabled? | 16:51 |
| apw | Kano, for the same reason we patch it every cycle, because if we don't need to we do not want to enable it | 16:52 |
| Kano | i would like it to be enabled by default | 16:52 |
| Kano | where is the dsc for the -10 package? | 16:52 |
| apw | Kano, in the archive ? | 16:58 |
| Kano | yes | 16:58 |
| Kano | i only see 9 | 16:58 |
| Kano | ok, found it on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/ | 16:59 |
| elmo | hey, do we have quantal kernels for precise yet at all? even in testing stages | 17:37 |
| elmo | I'm trying debs from quantal directly and not having a huge amount of luck | 17:37 |
| bjf | elmo: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/q-lts-backport | 17:40 |
| bjf | elmo: there be kernels there | 17:41 |
| elmo | bjf: thanks, will try that | 17:41 |
| elmo | bjf: interesting | 17:49 |
| elmo | bjf: so, the linux-image-3.5.0-9-generic in quantal doesn't have a hpsa.ko despite having it as =m in the /boot/config file | 17:49 |
| elmo | bjf: but the PPA deb *does* have the hpsa.ko | 17:49 |
| elmo | and hpsa is what gives me my root file system, so ... | 17:50 |
| bjf | elmo, so you are golden because you are using the ppa which has the module you need right? | 17:57 |
| elmo | bjf: sure sure | 17:57 |
| elmo | bjf: but I suspect if I was using quantal (userspace + kernel); the machine wouldn't boot | 17:57 |
| elmo | bjf: but I don't have time to (dis)prove that theory right now, so I'll wave my hands and assume you guys have that under control | 17:58 |
| bjf | elmo, ah, that was your point | 17:58 |
| bjf | elmo, a bug on that would be nice | 17:58 |
| elmo | bjf: ok, will file one in a sec | 17:59 |
| elmo | just got to quickly see if quantal fixes all my OCZ SSD woes | 17:59 |
| === tyhicks` is now known as tyhicks | ||
| ogasawara | elmo: by chance, when you were installing the .debs from quantal directly, did you make sure to install the linux-image-extra deb? | 18:03 |
| ogasawara | $ dpkg -c linux-image-extra-3.5.0-9-generic_3.5.0-9.9_amd64.deb | grep "hpsa" | 18:03 |
| ogasawara | -rw-r--r-- root/root 97080 2012-08-09 07:16 ./lib/modules/3.5.0-9-generic/kernel/drivers/scsi/hpsa.ko | 18:03 |
| Kano | elmo: what ocz problems? which drive | 18:05 |
| elmo | ogasawara: I was, I didn't | 18:06 |
| elmo | ogasawara: forgive my ignorance, but why are drivers split out into -extra? | 18:08 |
| ogasawara | elmo: we slit the -generic package so that we could eliminate maintaining a separate -virtual flavor. so the linux-image is a paired down offering for vm's, linux-image-extra provides everything else, so most will want both installed. | 18:09 |
| elmo | ogasawara: ah, I see. so PEBKAC, then, no bug needed. thanks for explaining | 18:09 |
| elmo | 0b:00.0 SCSI storage controller: OCZ Technology Group, Inc. Device 1044 (rev 02) | 18:10 |
| elmo | Kano: ^-- those; they spass out when more than one is in a given box at the same time | 18:10 |
| elmo | unfortunately, the OCZ binary driver works in that case, but the mvsas driver does not | 18:10 |
| elmo | I was hoping quantal's 3.5.xx might fix it, but it doesn't | 18:10 |
| Kano | elmo: a pci-e ocz? | 18:11 |
| elmo | Kano: yes | 18:11 |
| Kano | i only have got ocz via sata | 18:11 |
| Kano | whats the pci-id? lspci -vnn | 18:11 |
| elmo | Kano: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1145316/ | 18:12 |
| elmo | or http://paste.ubuntu.com/1145320/ (as root) | 18:13 |
| Kano | http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg54932.html | 18:14 |
| Kano | hmm thats the part you could write a bug report | 18:14 |
| Kano | do you use latest firmware? | 18:14 |
| Kano | mvsas is the driver | 18:15 |
| Kano | btw. did you look at modinfo mysas | 18:16 |
| Kano | that driver has got 2 modes | 18:16 |
| micahg | jsalisbury: you marked bug 1036063 as triaged, do you need more information from me or not? | 18:24 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1036063 in linux "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#4 stuck for 22s! [rm:30630]" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1036063 | 18:24 |
| Kano | apw: i reenabled the aufs module, now it fails on hash check (after renameing 9.9 to 10.10 for as 10.10kanotix1) | 19:29 |
| Kano | apw: how to fix that | 19:30 |
| apw | Kano, hash check? | 19:30 |
| Kano | apw: http://paste.debian.net/183416/ | 19:31 |
| apw | Kano, what does debian/rules printenv say | 19:33 |
| * apw suspects you have not pulled a real 10.10 ABI into your package | 19:33 | |
| Kano | no i just renamed 9.9 to 10.10 because it failed | 19:33 |
| Kano | wget -qO- 'http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-quantal.git;a=patch;h=eddf18835fe46235ed6800ff80b88251a390b84b'|sed s/8.8/9.9/g|patch -Rp1 | 19:34 |
| apw | then its saying what it should that the ABI is changed, you either need a real abi or to disable it for your build 'skipabi=true' | 19:34 |
| Kano | i did that, then moved 9.9 to 10.10 | 19:34 |
| apw | abi is not disabled it its failing | 19:34 |
| Kano | http://paste.debian.net/183417/ | 19:35 |
| apw | if you just renames 9.9 to 10.10 thats not going to work | 19:35 |
| apw | you need to turn of the abi check or get accurate abi files | 19:35 |
| Kano | so how to do it? | 19:35 |
| apw | skipabi=true | 19:35 |
| Kano | and then? | 19:36 |
| apw | then it won't do the check | 19:36 |
| apw | and you need to build it again | 19:36 |
| Kano | and when i want to update the check? | 19:36 |
| apw | update the check? | 19:36 |
| Kano | well the way you do it | 19:36 |
| Kano | how would you enable aufs? | 19:37 |
| apw | i would use getabis to pull the abi information, but as you are going to then end up with a failed abi check because you need it to be called 10.10xxx1 you need to disable the check | 19:39 |
| Kano | but when i compile it twice? | 19:39 |
| apw | no just add skipabi=true | 19:40 |
| apw | and build it just once | 19:40 |
| Kano | i want to build it with pbuilder | 19:41 |
| apw | so add skipabi in the arch.mk files | 19:41 |
| Kano | and how do you update it? | 19:41 |
| apw | update what | 19:42 |
| Kano | the abi check | 19:42 |
| apw | if you mean the abi, if you update it you will have to make your version 11.10 | 19:42 |
| apw | and the you will be newer than our 11.11 | 19:43 |
| apw | and your versioning will go to hell | 19:43 |
| Kano | hmm | 19:43 |
| Kano | cant you just enable aufs by default ;) | 19:43 |
| apw | heh | 19:44 |
| === rsalveti` is now known as rsalveti | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!