[02:38] <ESphynx> Hey guys, so how do I go about building on other platforms than i386/amd64 with the builders?
[02:51] <SudoKing> launchpad moderator here?
[02:52] <SudoKing> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/865672 re post #39 the fix committed status is incorrect and might confuse people (like myself, hoping there was an actual fix)
[02:52] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 865672 in adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu) ""Adobe Flash Player Settings" dialog does not respond to mouse clicks" [Medium,Triaged]
[03:20] <ESphynx> Guys? How to build for PPC on a PPA?
[03:22] <wgrant> ESphynx: You can't. We only provide builders for platforms where we have secure, fast virtualization that can run on readily available hardware.
[03:22] <wgrant> That basically means only x86 for now
[03:22] <ESphynx> wgrant: oh. and amd64, right?
[03:22] <ESphynx> wgrant: I remember before it was building ppc packages...
[03:22] <wgrant> ESphynx: Right, x86 being i386 and amd64
[03:22] <ESphynx> (And you still see the PPC builders in the list...)
[03:22] <ESphynx> right
[03:22] <wgrant> ESphynx: Those are for building official Ubuntu packages
[03:23] <wgrant> Where the uploaders are trusted
[03:23] <wgrant> So we can sort of get away without secure virtualization
[03:23] <ESphynx> ah ok... so if I sign my package? will that work?
[03:23] <wgrant> No.
[03:23] <ESphynx> Ok. so that answers my question :P I guess before it was less strict?
[03:24] <wgrant> Nope
[03:24] <wgrant> Always been this strict.
[03:24] <ESphynx> pretty sure I had a package build on PPC before!!
[03:24] <wgrant> Not unless you work for Canonical or uploaded the package to the Ubuntu primary archive.
[03:25] <ESphynx> might have dreamed
[03:26] <ESphynx> thanks!
[06:58] <chrisccoulson> does anyone have any idea why this keeps happening: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/+build/3719081 ?
[06:58] <chrisccoulson> it's happening consistently for every build in that PPA
[06:58] <czajkowski> wgrant: ^^
[06:59] <bigjools> czajkowski: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/112552998/upload_4033485_log.txt
[06:59] <bigjools> and chrisccoulson ^
[08:29] <crass_> I'm trying to merge an auto-generated account, but that feature seems to be broken. Is there another way to do this?
[08:35] <wgrant> crass_: Yeah, there's a bug there for some accounts right now. File a request at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion and an admin can sort it out for you.
[08:52] <crass_> thans wgrant
[10:40] <dholbach> hiya
[10:41] <dholbach> I know I'm pestering you about this, but do you think there's a workaround for seeing the data on https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches somehow?
[10:44] <czajkowski> dholbach: so I think skaet has swapped over a bug for that bug to be worked on
[10:45] <czajkowski> jam: do you happen to know any more about this issue?
[10:45] <dholbach> yeah, I know - I was just wondering if there was a workaround somehow :)
[10:45] <wgrant> Is that actually the one you care about, or is it getMergeProposals?
[10:46] <dholbach> the latter
[10:46] <wgrant> Right, that's entirely different :)
[10:47] <dholbach> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/+activereviews then :)
[10:48] <wgrant> Has +activereviews ever worked for ~ubuntu-branches?
[10:49] <wgrant> I'd be pretty surprised if it did.
[10:50] <lifeless> dholbach: activereviews is different to getMergeProposals again.
[10:50] <lifeless> dholbach: pick *a* think, and stick to it :>
[10:50] <wgrant> lifeless: Can I bump the timeout for ScopedCollection:CollectionResource:#branch_merge_proposal-page-resource back up to 9s? I think it should be enough to mostly work
[10:51] <wgrant> But yeah
[10:51] <wgrant> Conflating completely different timeouts -- particularly when some of them have probably not worked for >2 years -- is a bit confusing :)
[10:51] <lifeless> wgrant: perhaps; its the regression right ?
[10:52] <lifeless> wgrant: and purple are on it ? so the 9s is temporary ?
[10:52] <wgrant> lifeless: It's the recent regression, yes.
[10:52] <wgrant> We're looking at it.
[10:52] <wgrant> But stacking makes the world burn, as usual.
[10:53] <wgrant> A proper fix won't be coming this week.
[10:53] <dholbach> hum, I'm surprised now
[10:53] <dholbach> when I just tried launchpad.people["ubuntu-branches"].getRequestedReviews(status="Needs review") it worked
[10:53] <dholbach> let me see if it works in the script again
[10:53] <lifeless> thats a fourth api.
[10:54] <lifeless> And different *again*.
[10:54] <lifeless> Which one are you trying to use?
[10:55] <dholbach> .getRequestedReviews is used in the script we use
[10:56] <dholbach> aha!
[10:56] <dholbach> maybe it was because I just use login_anonymously() for the test
[10:56] <dholbach> used
[10:57] <dholbach> we need to log in with the script though to find out who has which upload rights
[10:57] <dholbach> hmhmhm
[10:57] <dholbach> it might be a dirty workaround, but it'd work for now to login twice, once anonymously and once with credentials
[10:57] <czajkowski> wgrant: see pm please!
[13:15] <xnox> is https://launchpad.net/builders now private?
[13:15] <xnox> I used to go there to see how busy the builders are
[13:15] <mgz> apparently, I don't have rights either,
[13:15] <xnox> but i used to be able to see it, even without logging in
[13:16] <czajkowski> xnox: hmm I can see it
[13:16] <czajkowski> not sure it's private
[13:16] <xnox> it listed official ubuntu builders, ppa builders, current idle/busy and the queue counts
[13:16] <dobey> czajkowski: i can't see it
[13:16] <xnox> czajkowski: can you please logout and check again or like use a private window in your browser?
[13:16] <dobey> but i can see /builders/$hostname pages
[13:17]  * xnox is sad
[13:17] <czajkowski> dobey: hmm  dont see any privacy border
[13:17] <mgz> dobey: ha, so you can
[13:17] <dobey> czajkowski: because you're on the lp team
[13:17] <mgz> xnox: so, you just can't see the index page :)
[13:17] <dobey> czajkowski: you can see everything :)
[13:17] <czajkowski> dobey: you say that and then I equally get told I cant at times, it's most confusing
[13:17] <czajkowski> :)
[13:18] <czajkowski> xnox: anywyas I can see it what's up
[13:18] <dobey> czajkowski: well, you can see more than ~registry can, at least :)
[13:18] <mgz> there's a bug there somewhere, either the index should be public, or the individual pages should be private
[13:19] <czajkowski> dobey: it's so much fun at times, working out what I can see and what I am meant to see even 6 months in!
[13:19] <dobey> the index should be public; at least, it used to be
[13:20] <wgrant> It's public unless there's a bug.
[13:20] <mgz> I suspect it's an unintended side effect of cjwatson's work
[13:20] <wgrant> czajkowski can see it because she can see private PPAs
[13:20] <wgrant> It's unrelated to cjwatson's work
[13:20] <dobey> wgrant: ok, so there's a bug then :)
[13:20] <wgrant> Right, there are a couple of bugs like this
[13:20] <wgrant> Often involving private teams being involved in places they shouldn't normally be.
[13:21] <wgrant> Let's see if I can dig up one of the OOPSes...
[13:21] <mgz> okay, blame purple instead! :)
[13:21] <wgrant> Nah, it's usually a regression from the recipe stuff
[13:21] <wgrant> ... in 2010
[13:22] <mgz> wgrant: would a traceback from me be useful for finding an oops?
[13:22] <wgrant> mgz: Ah, indeed
[13:23] <wgrant> I don't need to hunt
[13:23] <wgrant> Often it's a 403 that's only visible to people outside ~launchpad
[13:23] <czajkowski> wgrant: well wouldnt a nice purple strip be nice to see so I'd know!
[13:23] <wgrant> So there's no easy way to get a traceback
[13:23] <wgrant> czajkowski: Well
[13:23] <wgrant> czajkowski: It's meant to be public

[13:24] <mgz> the named team is not visible to me, so presumably private
[13:25] <wgrant> Is it a recipe is it a recipe...
[13:25] <mgz> so, a builder is just happening to be working on something from a private ppa right now?
[13:25] <mgz> and that makes the whole index private?
[13:25] <xnox> but that used to simply say "tomato-builder: building private source"
[13:25] <xnox> without a link
[13:25] <wgrant> It does now, too :)
[13:26] <wgrant> mgz: It doesn't make "the whole index private"
[13:26] <xnox> tadah it's back
[13:26] <wgrant> It makes the view crash
[13:26] <wgrant> :)
[13:26] <xnox> we have 2 powerpc builders now! nice =)
[13:26] <dobey> hrmm
[13:26] <wgrant> Ah
[13:26] <wgrant> So
[13:27] <dobey> though, still can't build recipes from private branches i guess?
[13:27] <wgrant> In this case there's a private team owning a private PPA building a source that was copied from a public archive
[13:27] <wgrant> It's not actually recipe-related
[13:27] <wgrant> dobey: Right
[17:10] <anoninux> Hi guys, I submitted my package successfully like three times to my launchpad account but my page never updates: http://pastebin.com/wEXe7vXi
[17:10] <anoninux> am I missing something?
[17:20] <dobey> anoninux: you probably signed the package with a gpg key id that's different than the one for your lp account
[17:21] <dobey> anoninux: dput being successful itself does not mean the upload was entirely successful
[17:22] <anoninux> I couldn't find any place to enter my gpg key in launchpad
[17:25] <czajkowski> anoninux: http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/getting-set-up.html#upload-your-gpg-key-to-launchpad
[17:26] <anoninux> thanks a lot, I'll see if that works
[17:31] <anoninux> it asks me to upload my key to Ubuntu keyserver? what?
[17:32] <czajkowski> anoninux: yes that's gine
[17:32] <czajkowski> *fine
[17:33] <anoninux> but the launchpad tutorial says nothing about that
[17:36] <czajkowski> anoninux: it's the correct server
[17:36] <czajkowski> have to head
[17:36] <czajkowski> but it's trusted
[17:37] <dobey> anoninux: yes it does
[17:37] <dobey> anoninux: https://help.launchpad.net/YourAccount/ImportingYourPGPKey#Publishing_your_key_to_a_keyserver
[17:37] <dobey> anoninux: agree it could be more explicit about that though
[17:38] <anoninux> ubuntu keyserver doesn't like my key for some reason: Error handling request. Exception raised: Failure("Error while decoding ascii-armored key: text terminated before reaching PGP public key header line")
[17:43] <anoninux> isn't the format of my "ASCII-armored key"(?) like: F8DA CB5B F576...
[17:52] <anoninux> why uploading something to launchpad is so frustrating
[17:53] <dobey> i don't know. i've never had such issues
[17:56] <dung> is this true? from source to ppa, no binary upload and unsupported arm*
[17:58] <dobey> dung: yes, you can only upload source packages to PPAs; just the same as you can only upload source packages to ubuntu or debian. arm is not available to all PPAs, but if you have special need for it, you can submit a question on launchpad against the launchpad, and ask for arm to be enabled for your PPA, explaining why you need/want it
[17:59] <dung> thanks
[18:01] <dung> i found an entry in the mailing list with one replay 2009!
[18:09] <dung> that's ok security - binaries can be anything
[18:10] <dung> and source is trustable when reviewed
[18:10] <MCR1> bzr merge and bzr push are not asking me for my password anymore and then fail with broken pipe errors - What can be wrong here ?
[18:11] <MCR1> I have my ssh key set-up, until Sunday everything worked normally...
[18:12] <MCR1> nothing has changed, the public part is uploaded to launchpad, other parts are in ~/.ssh
[18:12] <MCR1> Help
[18:15] <dobey> MCR1: what does ssh -vv yourlpusername@bazaar.launchpad.net say about the broken pipe?
[18:17] <MCR1> dobey: ssh: Could not resolve hostname mcr2010: Name or service not known
[18:18] <dobey> MCR1: what is mcr2010?
[18:18] <MCR1> it is my username
[18:18] <dung> his hostname
[18:18] <dobey> there is no such user on launchpad; so it is not your lp username
[18:18] <MCR1> ah sry, moment
[18:29] <MCR1> I mistyped - now it works - but I cannot paste anything anywhere :-/ - strange
[18:30] <MCR1> pastebin.com, paste.ubuntu.com all fail with all browsers - something's really strange here
[18:32] <MCR1> but the command says: debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 279, input_userauth_pk_ok, Authentication succeeded (publickey), Authenticated to bazaar.launchpad.net ([91.189.90.11]:22).
[18:34] <anoninux> A message has been sent to okasion@gmail.com, encrypted with the key.. yay!
[18:39] <dung> Kids!?
[18:39] <dung> or daily live?
[18:49]  * MCR1 removes the webapps PPA, which maybe messed with his config...
[18:49] <MCR1> thx for the help
[18:49] <dobey> MCR1: seems like maybe you have some network issues perhaps
[18:50] <MCR1> dobey: yes, I remember there were some network related updates on Quantal on Sunday...
[18:51] <MCR1> maybe it was the webapps preview ppa, which messed up things - we'll see
[18:51] <MCR1> dobey: anyway, thanks a lot for your help - I know more now :)
[18:52] <dobey> sure
[19:29] <Corey> How do I grab the sources for a package that lives in a PPA? lp-pull-source doesn't seem to doit.
[19:35] <xnox> Corey: if you have the ppa added, you can do $ apt-get source $package
[19:35] <xnox> or find the url of the repository, find link to the *.dsc
[19:35] <xnox> and do $ dget http://*.dsc
[19:36] <xnox> dget will fork the http url as in the sources line, not on the launchpadlibrarian links
[19:36] <Corey> xnox: Hmm, thought there was a tool that did it.  Thanks. :-)
[19:36] <Corey> That worked well, thanks.
[19:36] <Corey> Have to rename a package since the ppa author screwed it up.
[19:37] <Corey> python-zmq is correct, python-pyzmq is... what are you even thinking. :-)
[21:34] <ScottK> Is Error ID: OOPS-6d217177125a7771c6e43d54bf15c6ad something it would be useful to file a bug about?
[22:13] <wgrant> ScottK: Hm, yes, that's a new one.
[22:16] <ScottK> wgrant: Bug #1036882
[22:23] <wgrant> ScottK: That's not a timeout, actually.
[22:23] <wgrant> It's a crash
[22:23] <ScottK> Oh.
[22:23] <ScottK> Using the queue page has convinced me that all OOPS's are timeouts I think.
[22:24] <wgrant> Heh