[02:54] <quotemstr> Dammit, why does bzr fast-export -r date:2012-01-01-revno:-1 onlyexport one revision?
[02:55] <quotemstr> Oh. ...
[06:10] <jimis> bzr log -l N -rbranch:../repo/branch
[06:10] <jimis> no matter how big N is I always get only last log message
[06:11] <jimis> should I report a bug?
[06:20] <fullermd> Isn't that exactly what you'd expect?
[06:27] <fullermd> (well, I mean, obviously not, or you wouldn't bring it up.  But it's what _I_'d expect  :)
[06:28] <fullermd> I'd always expect `bzr log -r X` to show exactly one thing; the log message for whatever revision 'X' evaluates to.
[06:29] <fullermd> And for X == 'branch:/where/ever', that would be the head rev of the branch at /where/ever.
[06:29] <jimis> fullermd: oh, and how to get the log from another branch?
[06:30] <jimis> I 'm used to using -rbranch for that
[06:30] <jimis> (for everything else besides log that is)
[06:30] <fullermd> Mmm, it's probably not meaning exactly what you think it's meaning on those cases either.  But anyway.
[06:31] <fullermd> Log takes a path, so just `bzr log /where/ever` would be what you'd want.
[06:31] <jimis> fullermd: perfect! thanks :-)
[08:06] <mgz> morning
[16:29] <TJ-> Using bzr 2.5.1 on Ubuntu 12.0 amd64. Branched an Ubuntu project (bzr branch lp:ubuntu/precise-updates/gnome-control-center), wrote a patch, push it to my own LP account (bzr push lp:~tj/gnome-control-center/fix-979959).. The entire local repo is being pushed, but I thought - when branching from LP - my push should only contain my diff (assumed the LP server clones the original branch locally). Am I misunderstanding 'push' in this scenario?
[16:29] <TJ-> *Ubuntu 12.04
[16:38] <mgz> TJ-: if you're basing off the ubuntu branch, you need to push to that project, not the base one
[16:39] <TJ-> mgz: Ahhhh OK! I somehow had got the impression even for a clone it'd do a lightweight branch on the server to save bandwidth and storage.
[16:40] <mgz> so, lp:~tj/ubuntu/precise-updates/gnome-control-center/fix-979959
[16:40] <mgz> otherwise you stack on the wrong thing, which means you push all the ubuntu related revs along with your change
[16:41] <TJ-> mgz: Unfortunately using the same path to push to my own account fails. I'll just have to live with pushing the entire repo I guess.
[16:42] <mgz> TJ-: did you try the location I just gave? if so, can you paste the error in here?
[16:42] <TJ-> mgz: bzr: ERROR: Permission denied: "~tj/ubuntu/precise-updates/gnome-control-center/fix-979959/": : No such distribution series: 'precise-updates'.
[16:42] <TJ-> mgz: I also tried it with "precise" and without "ubuntu" and so on
[16:42] <mgz> TJ-: try just precise rather than with -updates
[16:42] <mgz> darn.
[16:43] <TJ-> mgz: hold that!...
[16:43] <mgz> I think precise should work, I'm not sure how they arrange the updates bits generally.
[16:44] <TJ-> mgz: that appears to be working... but it is still sucking out all the bandwidth.. says "Fetching revisions" would that be expected?
[16:45] <TJ-> mgz: I need to check my bash history I must have typoed when I tried just "precise" earlier :O
[16:45] <mgz> ideally not, but there may still be a large delta
[16:45] <TJ-> mgz: OK *blush* here's why it failed earlier: "bzr push lp:~tj/precise/gnome-control-center"
[16:45] <mgz> :)
[16:46] <TJ-> mgz: by 'delta' you mean my changes versus the origin? One 60 line diff.
[16:47] <mgz> but we're basing it on the precise branch, there may also be other changes in precise-updates
[16:48] <TJ-> mgz: OK, that was why I asked the question, so the delta is precise > precise-updates -> my patch
[16:48] <TJ-> mgz: thank-you so much. I'm a hardcore git user and bazaar still confuses me especially with the launchpad integrations
[16:50] <quotemstr> Why does "bzr branches" come up with "* (default)"?
[16:53] <mgz> because you're on a branch without colocated branches underneath I guess
[16:53] <mgz> what do you expect it to print?
[16:59] <quotemstr> git-bzr uses bzr branches to get a list of branches.
[16:59] <quotemstr> When it feeds '*' to the shell, Bad Things happen.
[17:00] <mgz> * denotes active in `git branch` output no?
[17:00] <quotemstr> Did the format change recently?
[17:01] <mgz> probably with the colocated things for 2.5, or perhaps in a more recent 2.6 change
[17:44] <quotemstr> Are you guys planning on fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/541626 ?
[18:23] <Noldorin> back