[06:59] <dpm> Hey Launchpad folk, good morning. Last night I got a few e-mails about a failed PPA build. I don't quite understand what the issue is, as it's a daily build from a recipe, which uploads a new package upon every commit. I'm not sure whether it is a glitch or whether it is something I need to worry about. Here are the contents of the 2 first e-mails I got (of a total of 4): http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1150176/
[06:59] <dpm> Any ideas what the issue could be?
[07:03] <StevenK> File qreator_12.05.6-0~119~precise1.tar.gz already exists in Qreator daily releases, but uploaded version has different contents.
[07:03] <StevenK> The recipe tried to upload the same version
[08:52] <Laney> the downtime is why cdimage builds are failing, and why half the distro builders have gone away too?
[08:52] <Roj> how i can find path of ppa installation path in python?
[08:54] <czajkowski> Laney: yes I think so, wgrant yes?
[08:55] <wgrant> Laney: Yes.
[08:55] <wgrant> A lot of things like that will be broken for a few hours over the next few days.
[08:55] <Laney> fair enough
[08:55]  * Laney questions "Official Ubuntu distribution builders will be largely unaffected by
[08:55] <Laney> this maintenance." ;-)
[08:55] <czajkowski> Laney: see our blog or launchpadstatus on idenit.ca/twitter also G+ and FB
[08:56] <wgrant> Laney: Yeah, I'm not quite sure what happened there.
[08:56] <czajkowski> Laney: delays :)
[08:56] <Laney> czajkowski: I did see that, but all of the communication pretty explicitly mentions PPAs only
[08:57] <czajkowski> this is what we were told
[08:57] <czajkowski> and the others would be delayed hence the topic.
[08:57] <Laney> not criticising, just explaining why i'm confused
[08:57] <Laney> or was
[09:00] <czajkowski> nods
[09:33] <mandel> hello, I had to change my ssh keys in my machine and after I uploaded the public key I'm getting permission errors, any idea of what might be happening?
[09:33] <czajkowski> mandel: not sur etoday may have been a wise day to do this :)
[09:33] <czajkowski> wgrant: knock on effect ?
[09:34] <mandel> czajkowski, ouch..
[09:34] <wgrant> mandel: There's no problem on our end.
[09:34] <wgrant> Sounds like you might have uploaded the wrong one, or your SSH client isn't looking in the right place
[09:35] <mandel> wgrant, weird.. I'll delete all the config that sshebang added and will see if that helps
[09:35] <mgz> mandel: run `ssh -vv yourlpusername@bazaar.launchpad.net` and see what the added output says
[09:35] <mandel> on it
[09:38] <mandel> mgz, wgrant, the following is the output of ssh verbose: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1150320/
[09:39] <mgz> oo, that's fun, new one to me.
[09:39] <mgz> key is accepted but agent can't sign
[09:40] <mgz> try killing your ssh-agent and trying again? private key might be bad or have wrong perms or something
[09:40] <wgrant> Sorry, ISP routing fail.
[09:40] <mandel> mgz, sure
[09:41] <czajkowski> wgrant: so knock on effect..
[09:41] <wgrant> Heh
[09:42] <czajkowski> wgrant: hah see I had to br right at least once :)
[09:42] <czajkowski> it's rare
[09:42] <mandel> mgz, killed it and tried again and same issue
[09:43] <mgz> is the log output any different?
[09:43] <mgz> you should have been prompted for your private key password
[09:43] <mandel> mgz, same issue
[09:44] <mandel> mgz, interestingly I just did the same with a windows vm and worked.. so I don't think it should be a problem in your end
[09:46] <mgz> can you paste the output of ls -l on ~/.ssh please?
[09:47] <mandel> mgz, sure, here you have it: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1150332/
[09:47] <mandel> nothing too interesting i'm afraid
[09:47] <mgz> nice and simple
[09:49] <mgz> run `ssh-add -d`?
[09:50] <mandel> no luck
[09:50] <mandel> mgz, let me reboot the machine as a desperate move.. brb
[09:51] <mgz> I guess it's some other key agent that needs restarting? what's the gnome one called?
[09:55] <mandel> mgz, after restarting everything it worked.. I guess you were right some client was there with an old priv key in memory
[09:55] <mandel> that was annoying
[09:55] <czajkowski> mandel: at least tis sorted
[09:55] <mgz> right, I think it was just gnome-keyring or something that needing restarting
[09:55] <czajkowski> mandel: but next time not on days when lp is being a bit special!
[09:56] <mandel> czajkowski, yes, I should have not played with this things
[09:56] <mandel> mgz, really appreciate your help, I can get back to work now :)
[09:56] <mgz> :)
[11:26] <czajkowski> mgz: can you help me on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/205972  please
[12:12] <mgz> czajkowski: really stuff like that should just be punted to ubuntu or something
[12:13] <mgz> it's a packaging problem, better answered by people who do that (which it has been)
[12:13] <czajkowski> mgz: we do retarget some stuff over but less specific stuff is us
[12:15] <StevenK> We don't help with build problems like that, it's clearly not our problem.
[15:07] <Lasall> hi, is it possible to copy packages from one ppa to another? (and if yes, how?)
[15:12] <Lasall> ok found it, sry: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/89097
[19:58] <KPG> How can an existing ppa be deleted so that the ppa can be recreated from scratch?
[21:50] <ESphynx> Hey guys what does “No suitable builders” mean?
[21:57] <wgrant> ESphynx: It means that almost all of the buildds are in a truck moving to a new datacentre
[21:59] <ESphynx> wgrant: AH! LOL
[22:00] <ESphynx> Please drive carefully driver :P