[19:48] <dupondje> somebody around that could give me a help for building lightning-extension ?
[20:58] <slava_> if I have issues with packages in natty narwal, am I SOL or is it worth bringing them up?
[20:59] <jtaylor> sol?
[20:59] <slava_> shit out of luck
[20:59] <jtaylor> natty is still supported
[20:59] <slava_> yay
[20:59] <jtaylor> but not very long
[21:00] <slava_> I am trying to install libmossex-declare-perl which requires libmoosex-method-signature-perl, but the latter appears to both conflict with and depend on other packages ... I am not sure how to figure out what is messed up.
[21:02] <jtaylor> does that package still exist in latter versions?
[21:02] <slava_> not sure, but it should as it is actively maintained in cpan
[21:03] <jtaylor> I can't even find it in natty
[21:03] <jtaylor> is it an official package or from a ppa?
[21:03] <slava_> official
[21:03] <slava_> oops
[21:04] <slava_> libmoosex-method-signatures-perl
[21:04] <slava_> it's in universe
[21:05] <slava_> http://packages.ubuntu.com/natty/libmoosex-method-signatures-perl
[21:05] <jtaylor> it installs fine in a natty chroot
[21:06] <slava_> interesting ...
[21:06] <jtaylor> what kind of error do you get?
[21:07] <slava_> http://pastebin.com/ujgEKfqx
[21:08] <jtaylor> what happens if you try to install libmoose-perl?
[21:08] <slava_> it's installed
[21:08] <jtaylor> which version?
[21:09] <slava_> 1.23-1
[21:09] <jtaylor> are you sure? apt-cache  policy libmoose-perl
[21:10] <slava_> 500 natty/universe
[21:10] <slava_>  *** 1.23-1 0         500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/universe amd64 Packages
[21:10] <slava_> that's the only version available
[21:10] <slava_> libmoose-perl:   Installed: 1.23-1   Candidate: 1.23-1   Version table:  *** 1.23-1 0         500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/universe amd64 Packages         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
[21:11] <Lasall> slava_: and the other packages? libparse-method-signatures-perl libmoosex-types-structured-perl libmoosex-lazyrequire-perl
[21:11] <Lasall> (which version is installed if any?)
[21:14] <slava_> all exceed versions
[21:14] <slava_> http://pastebin.com/W5c8pDwc
[21:15] <Lasall> slava_: run the apt-get install command with option "-o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=true"
[21:15] <slava_> what I do not understand is why it say that the package will not get installed ... in synaptic it says that it will remove those packages ...
[21:15] <Lasall> but I think it's probably not the right channel
[21:15] <slava_> that gave me lots of stuff, thanks
[21:16] <slava_> sorry :(
[21:16] <slava_> I thought motu was for packaging stuff
[21:16] <slava_> or are older distros in other channels?
[21:17] <Lasall> no, but I think this is a general package manager issue
[21:17] <Lasall> (and not a bug in packaging)
[21:21] <slava_> ok, I found something
[21:22] <slava_> libpackage-stash-perl (version 0.33-1) is listed as breaking libmoosex-method-signatures-perl (<0.37~)
[21:22] <slava_> but moosex-method-signatures depends on the packages that breaks it ...
[21:22] <slava_> T_T
[21:22] <slava_> oh
[21:23] <slava_> I think I know what happened
[21:23] <slava_> I think I created that version :(
[21:23] <Lasall> :-D
[21:23] <slava_> thanks for the pointer :D
[21:23] <Lasall> and you were right, that actually was a packaging issue...
[21:23] <slava_> yeah, at some point I was trying to install later version of something related to mongodb
[21:23] <slava_> but not in the repo though :)
[21:24] <slava_> technically, I broke it :(
[21:24] <slava_> yay
[21:24] <slava_> maybe I should upgrade :)
[21:34]  * dupondje getting fustrated on building lightning-extension :(
[21:35] <dupondje> configure:17825:27: fatal error: sys/int_types.h: No such file or directory
[21:35] <dupondje> compilation terminated.
[21:36] <micahg> dupondje: the version in quantal should be fixed
[21:37] <micahg> just uploaded
[21:37] <dupondje> GREAT
[21:37] <dupondje> thats really good news :)
[21:38] <dupondje> was missing lightning for +1 month now
[21:38] <dupondje> which was annoying :(
[21:41] <dupondje> micahg: How is the correct way to get the orig tarball for lightning-extension? Cause I tried it (debian/rules get-orig-source), but I get a totally different tarball
[21:45] <micahg> dupondje: it's not a reproducible tarball, you'll get a different one each time
[21:45] <micahg> dupondje: in this case, just use pull-lp-source
[21:47] <dupondje> But if I want to build a package with a newer version?
[21:47] <dupondje> debian/rules get-orig-source should produce the correct tarball no?
[21:50] <dupondje> micahg: But what if I want to build a newer version (when it comes out)
[21:50] <dupondje> then debian/rules get-orig-source should get the newest version or ?
[21:51] <micahg> dupondje: ./debian/rules get-orig-source DEBIAN_TAG=CALENDAR_1_foo_BUILD1=1.foo+build1
[21:51] <micahg> dupondje: you have to get the upstream tag from the comm-beta channel
[21:52] <micahg> if it's a beta like 1.7b3,  DEBIAN_TAG=CALENDAR_1_7b3_BUILD1=1.7~b3+build1
[21:55] <dupondje> hmz ok! seems I missed DEBIAN_TAG
[21:55] <dupondje> i'll try it out, thanks!
[23:00] <xnox> bdrung: taking syncs from under my nose..... ;-)
[23:01] <bdrung> xnox: :) i help to reduce the sponsors queue by processing the sync requests
[23:01] <xnox> bdrung: I know, tell me about it ;-)
[23:01] <bdrung> xnox: 1) that's how i award the 'Debian first' rule
[23:02] <bdrung> xnox: 2) the patch pilots can work on hard stuff instead of just doing syncs ;)