[06:35] <wigs> is this the right place to have aptitude bugs nominated for oneiric, precise?
[06:37] <wigs> specifically these two: 824708, 975793
[07:00] <RoyK> bug 824708
[07:00] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 824708 in aptitude "aptitude can no longer show changelogs: "Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed." Please merge the fixed version, 0.6.8, from Debian." [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/824708
[07:01] <RoyK> bug 975793
[07:01] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 975793 in aptitude "'aptitude safe-upgrade -d -y' enters infinite loop" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/975793
[13:11] <alo21> mvo: hi
[13:12] <mvo> hi alo21
[13:13] <alo21> mvo: I am trying to fix a bug in Ubuntu Software center (835018)
[13:13] <smartboyhw> alo21: Good job, mate
[13:13] <alo21> mvo: and I cannot find where description app detail is
[13:14] <alo21> mvo: is it a label or something else?
[13:14] <alo21> smartboyhw: hi
[13:17] <alo21> smartboyhw: why you said me 'Good job, mate'?
[13:19] <mvo> alo21: you are look for the code? softwarecenter/ui/gtk3/view/appdetailsview.py is the part that should contain it
[13:20] <mvo> alo21: hm, actually, the description is in softwarecenter/ui/gtk3/widgets/description.py
[13:21] <mvo> alo21: and it seems this is working for me now?
[13:21] <smartboyhw> alo21: Good job in fixing bugs:)
[13:58] <wigs> hi
[13:58] <wigs> I wonder if someone here can nominate aptitude bugs for oneiric, precise?
[13:59] <wigs> bug 824708
[13:59] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 824708 in aptitude "aptitude can no longer show changelogs: "Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed." Please merge the fixed version, 0.6.8, from Debian." [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/824708
[13:59] <wigs> bug 975793
[13:59] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 975793 in aptitude "'aptitude safe-upgrade -d -y' enters infinite loop" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/975793
[14:00] <wigs> both have small, safe patches tested in sid
[14:39] <njin> hallo, this is high , bug 1037515 , can someone set it right, tyhanks
[14:39] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1037515 in ubiquity "ubiquity-dm crashed with MissingProgramError in run(): No window manager found (tried metacity, xfwm4, matchbox-window-manager, openbox-lubuntu, openbox)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1037515
[16:54] <alo21_> mvo: hi.... It's me again... the file is correct, but I cannot understand what kind of widget 'desc' variable is
[16:58] <mvo> alo21_: its the AppDescription widget from description.py
[17:00] <alo21_> mvo: AppDescription is a box which contains the text. Right?
[17:07] <mvo> alo21_: yeah
[17:10] <alo21_> mvo: and as a box, it must contains a widget. What is the text widget which contains the description in "class AppDescription"?
[17:11] <mvo> alo21_: its the "Layout" class created via "self._new_layout"
[17:11] <mvo> ()
[18:37] <penguin42> is all the logic for Grub installation on a Kubuntu install CD identical to an Ubuntu install - just a different frontend on ubiquity?
[18:39] <alo21__> h
[18:43] <alo21__> what is the best way to fix a little bug? Via patch or branch?
[18:44] <TheLordOfTime> i think you need to define fix.
[18:44]  * TheLordOfTime prefers seeing patches
[18:44] <TheLordOfTime> but that's me :P
[18:45] <alo21__> TheLordOfTime: to fix a little bug, I shoud add just 3 lines of code
[18:45] <alo21__> should*
[18:45] <TheLordOfTime> hey, i've seen patches that are oneliners :P
[18:45] <TheLordOfTime> but typically, for fixing the *package* a branch merge request might work, or a patch which can be turned to a debdiff
[18:46] <TheLordOfTime> (which is why I prefer patches0
[18:47] <alo21__> TheLordOfTime: ok.. So I can do whatever I think is the best
[18:47] <TheLordOfTime> generally, i write patches.
[18:47] <TheLordOfTime> but as i said, either method works
[18:51]  * penguin42 wonders what to do with bug 486498 - debian's closed it since it's removed the package, and it's not been in ubuntu since Oneiric
[18:51] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 486498 in mlview "mlview assertion failed" [Unknown,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/486498
[18:51] <penguin42> bad bot; the fix-released is the upstream status
[18:52] <TheLordOfTime> penguin42:  heh
[18:52] <TheLordOfTime> the bot doesn't like you.  that's why it did that :P
[18:52] <TheLordOfTime> nah, just kidding.
[18:52]  * penguin42 waves a soldering iron at the bot
[18:52]  * TheLordOfTime returns to porting a C++ application from Windows to Linux.
[18:53] <penguin42> graphical?
[18:57] <TheLordOfTime> nope, someone else is working on the graphical portion
[18:57]  * TheLordOfTime is porting part of the internal workings of the program, though
[19:00] <penguin42> ah, so mostly build mechanics and  fixing all the types?
[19:03] <TheLordOfTime> mhm
[19:12] <alo21> hi
[19:13] <alo21> How can I create a patch system?
[19:45] <penguin42> how do you mean - what exactly do you want to do?
[20:22] <RoyK> TheLordOfTime: what application?