| dobey | jethrogb: #ubuntu-packaging is more appropriate | 00:43 |
|---|---|---|
| jethrogb | dobey: thanks, ill try it there | 00:58 |
| jethrogb | although i think ive mostly figured it out | 00:58 |
| blueyed | What's up with the PPA buildds? I have uploaded a package yesterday and it still needs ~8 hourse before it gets build? | 07:48 |
| pmjdebruijn | the build farm was moved, so it has been offline for a few days | 07:48 |
| wgrant | We still don't have all the builders back after the DC move last weekend | 07:48 |
| pmjdebruijn | so it's still catching up on the build log | 07:48 |
| wgrant | The queue's about half the length it was yesterday | 07:48 |
| wgrant | If you have some builds you particularly care about, they can probably jump the queue a bit :) | 07:49 |
| pmjdebruijn | btw is seems the i386 queue is much more congested, I guess this is because all arch builds are done on i386? | 07:50 |
| wgrant | pmjdebruijn: Right | 07:50 |
| blueyed | wgrant: I am waiting for build 3734327 and 3734333. Thanks. | 07:50 |
| pmjdebruijn | btw | 07:51 |
| * pmjdebruijn loves the PPAs | 07:51 | |
| pmjdebruijn | wgrant: thanks for your great work | 07:51 |
| pmjdebruijn | (well and the rest of the launchpad team) | 07:52 |
| wgrant | blueyed: Should start in a couple of minutes | 07:52 |
| wgrant | pmjdebruijn: Thanks :) | 07:52 |
| wgrant | Hopefully the queues will clear in the next day or two | 07:53 |
| === mthaddon` is now known as mthaddon | ||
| pmjdebruijn | wgrant: I used to host my own repo, without superclean builds and signed packages | 07:54 |
| pmjdebruijn | the PPAs were quite the leap forward :) | 07:55 |
| wgrant | Yeah, they make that all a tonne easier. | 07:59 |
| === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Build delays due to hardware move | Help contact: czajkowski | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
| wgrant | blueyed: Those are built | 08:03 |
| vadi2 | Hi. I'm following instructions at https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/UploadErrors for the 'File <UPLOADED_FILE> already exists in <LOCATION>' error. It mentions: 'note that there is no need to include the original tarball in the upload, a reference to the right file will suffice' <- how do I do that? To begin with, I only did debuild and dput. | 08:40 |
| stewart | Anyone got an idea on this: | 08:59 |
| stewart | bzr: ERROR: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~percona-core/percona-server/5.6/.bzr/repository/packs/a1849bf089d97de2c75cd97f17f4998e.pack is redirected to https://launchpad.net | 08:59 |
| stewart | $ bzr branch lp:percona-server/5.6 /home/jenkins/workspace/percona-server-5.6-trunk | 08:59 |
| stewart | You have not informed bzr of your Launchpad ID, and you must do this to | 08:59 |
| stewart | write to Launchpad or access private data. See "bzr help launchpad-login". | 08:59 |
| stewart | bzr: ERROR: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~percona-core/percona-server/5.6/.bzr/repository/packs/a1849bf089d97de2c75cd97f17f4998e.pack is redirected to https://launchpad.net | 08:59 |
| stewart | czajkowski, ^ ? | 08:59 |
| stewart | czajkowski, this seems pretty consistent. | 08:59 |
| stewart | basically... are now *two* of our bzr repos in some way corrupt | 09:01 |
| mgz | if I curl that url, it's not a redirect | 09:02 |
| stewart | huh. | 09:02 |
| mgz | what happens if you log in and use bzr+ssh rather than http? | 09:02 |
| stewart | mgz, this is on jenkins slaves, which will never do bzr+ssh | 09:03 |
| mgz | ...but does it work? | 09:03 |
| stewart | trying locally... | 09:03 |
| wgrant | bzr+ssh would work, yes | 09:03 |
| wgrant | That HTTP thing was transient | 09:03 |
| stewart | okay... so if i try again it should work? | 09:03 |
| mgz | you could get your bot to do bzr+ssh by the way, some of ours do | 09:03 |
| wgrant | stewart: Yeah, it should work | 09:04 |
| stewart | mgz, even without launchpad login? | 09:04 |
| mgz | generally you create an account and generate an ssh key for it, then put that on the machine with the conf | 09:04 |
| stewart | we'd end up having a garbage account though... which wouldn't be ideal. just another place for compromise to occur :/ | 09:05 |
| czajkowski | stewart: sorry wasnt looking at irc, I see mgz is helping and will know more anyways | 09:09 |
| stewart | hoping it works. kinda takes a while when you have a several hundred MB repo | 09:13 |
| maxb | stewart: If you're using http access currently, the machine pseudo-account doesn't need any specific privileges at all - so there's no compromise risk | 09:31 |
| vadi2 | What does this exactly mean: Rejected: mudlet_2.0-rc13.dsc: Version older than that in the archive. 2.0-rc13 <= 2.0-rc12-2.1ubuntu2 <- no, it's not older, it's *newer* | 09:33 |
| maxb | vadi2: ah, I see what's happening | 09:33 |
| wgrant | vadi2: Nope, it's older | 09:33 |
| wgrant | vadi2: The upstream version is everything before the final - | 09:33 |
| vadi2 | So I should try 2.0-rc12-3 ? | 09:34 |
| wgrant | So it's (2.0, rc13) vs (2.0-rc12, 2.1ubuntu2) | 09:34 |
| wgrant | Right, you'll need another hyphen | 09:34 |
| wgrant | With anything at all after it | 09:34 |
| wgrant | Or nothing, if you want to be strange | 09:34 |
| vadi2 | Alright, thanks! | 09:35 |
| wgrant | vadi2: See http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version for details of how versions are interpreted | 09:35 |
| wgrant | And considuer using dpkg --compare-versions to check | 09:35 |
| vadi2 | What affects the naming of the resulting dsc file? | 09:42 |
| vadi2 | It unfortunately got re-made as "mudlet_2.0-rc13" again. | 09:42 |
| vadi2 | Ah, probably the changelog file | 09:43 |
| tsdgeos_ | Hi, is launchpad slower than usual? I created https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity-greeter/no_servers_configured/+merge/120736 30 min ago and the diff is still not updated while usually takes no more than 5 mins | 10:36 |
| czajkowski | tsdgeos_: there seems to be some delays | 10:38 |
| tsdgeos_ | ok, no problem, just reporting in case something was broken | 10:38 |
| tsdgeos_ | if it's just "slower" no biggie | 10:39 |
| czajkowski | they are looking into it | 10:39 |
| tsdgeos_ | my diff just appeared :-) | 10:42 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| FourDollars | Hi, When I execute `bzr branch lp:ubuntu/precise/totem`, it returns "bzr: ERROR: Revision {package-import@ubuntu.com-20120109161939-wfwd46cy3ytl1qq3} not present in "Graph(StackedParentsProvider(bzrlib.repository._LazyListJoin(([CachingParentsProvider(None)], []))))".". | 11:32 |
| mgz | let's stick to #bzr for that | 11:34 |
| KNRO_ | Hello. I have a package with version 1.0ubuntu1-0~22~oneiric1. I tried to upload a new package with version 1.0~5~22~201208221205~oneiric1m but launchpad says the latter version is "older"! How can I fix this? | 12:10 |
| mgz | that's a lot of tildes. | 12:14 |
| mgz | KNRO_: see the log from earlier today which covered just this question: | 12:14 |
| mgz | <http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/08/22/%23launchpad.html#t09:35> | 12:15 |
| KNRO_ | so if I add a hyped 1.0-5 it will be newer than 1.0ubuntu1 ? | 12:18 |
| KNRO_ | the 1.0ubuntu1 was a mistake at any rate, I forgot the hyper between the 1.0 and ubuntu1, and it seems I'm stuck now with this | 12:18 |
| KNRO_ | hyphen lol | 12:18 |
| KNRO_ | so it seems that debupstream 1.0ubuntu1 > 1.0 and this is where it fails | 12:24 |
| KNRO_ | This is the changelog for the package: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mutlaqja/libindi/packaging/view/head:/indi-gphoto/changelog | 12:28 |
| KNRO_ | isn't the debupstream supposed to be 1.0-ubuntu2? | 12:29 |
| maxb | The upstream version is the version with the last hyphen-separated segment removed | 12:31 |
| maxb | So, no | 12:31 |
| KNRO_ | so just 1.0 in this case? | 12:32 |
| maxb | yes | 12:32 |
| KNRO_ | so how do I make this newer than the one in archive 1.0ubuntu1 ? | 12:33 |
| KNRO_ | other than making it 1.1 ! | 12:33 |
| maxb | 1.0.0 would work | 12:33 |
| maxb | Because . is newer than u | 12:34 |
| KNRO_ | hmm okay thanks I'll give that a try | 12:34 |
| maxb | That or 1.0z or 1.0+ or something like that | 12:35 |
| KNRO_ | well, I tried using deb-version {debupstream}~{revno}~{time} | 12:56 |
| KNRO_ | is there something wrong with using that deb-version? | 12:56 |
| KNRO_ | I'm getting this log: bzr: ERROR: bzrlib.errors.BzrCommandError: Invalid deb-version: {debupstream}~22~201208221247~oneiric1: Could not parse version: {debupstream}~22~201208221247~oneiric1 | 12:58 |
| dobey | {debupstream}+r{revno}-{revno:packaging} is what i use for my "daily" builds recipes | 13:01 |
| dobey | KNRO_: what bzr-builder format version are you using? | 13:01 |
| KNRO_ | 0.4 | 13:03 |
| KNRO_ | I'll use your suggestion! | 13:03 |
| dobey | hrmm | 13:03 |
| mgedmin | http access to bazaar.launchpad.net are very slow, what's happening? | 13:10 |
| czajkowski | mgedmin: hey they are looking into that at present | 13:27 |
| mgedmin | czajkowski, awesome! | 13:29 |
| apw | KNRO_, if thats a raw error from the logs, doesn't that imply debupstream was not subbed in | 13:35 |
| mgedmin | bzr branches access over http seems to be back | 14:03 |
| wgrant | mgedmin: Yeah, should be back to normal now. Our apache rewritemap script ran into some trouble, and apache likes to wait around even for requests that don't actually need it. | 14:05 |
| === jibel__ is now known as jibel | ||
| === cody-somerville_ is now known as cody-somerville | ||
| === cody-somerville_ is now known as cody-somerville | ||
| Daviey | You do still need to increment version numbers on deleted published packages from a PPA, right? | 15:49 |
| Daviey | wgrant: ^? | 15:49 |
| wgrant | Daviey: Yes | 15:49 |
| Daviey | wgrant: thought so, thanks. | 15:49 |
| mandel | is there any reason why launchpad would say a branch is empty yet I can perfectly branch it? | 16:27 |
| mgz | mandel: if the branch scanner missed it in the datacentre futzing | 16:28 |
| mgz | generally pushing a new rev to the branch makes the scanner wake up and realise the branch is populated | 16:29 |
| mandel | mgz, ok, I'll do that to see what happens, thx | 16:29 |
| === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Build delays due to hardware move | Help contact:-| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
| === svuorela_ is now known as svuorela | ||
| serg | hi. our repository on launchpad is apparently corrupted. what could we do? | 17:44 |
| serg | $ bzr branch lp:maria/5.1 foo | 17:44 |
| serg | bzr: ERROR: No such file: '/srv/bazaar.launchpad.net/mirrors/00/05/62/51/.bzr/repository/indices/b658cec5bdb393a80d29dc93e9c94ea3.rix' | 17:44 |
| TheLordOfTime | i take it PPAs cannot hold Maverick or EOL-release packages? | 17:54 |
| TheLordOfTime | (anymore) | 17:54 |
| dobey | TheLordOfTime: can't build new packages for them at least | 17:55 |
| TheLordOfTime | PPAs with old maverick packages will still publish them right? | 17:55 |
| TheLordOfTime | but no new ones can be built | 17:55 |
| TheLordOfTime | ? | 17:55 |
| dobey | i think previously built/published packages hang around, but you can't build new | 17:56 |
| dobey | at least, i have a ppa that seems to still have jaunty/intrepid/karmic/maverick packages in it | 17:57 |
| TheLordOfTime | lol | 17:57 |
| TheLordOfTime | i probably have a PPA with packages in it like that :P | 17:57 |
| TheLordOfTime | (in which case those PPAs must die) | 17:57 |
| mgz | ...launchpad likes scaring me with timeouts on the bounceback to mp page after I've done a really long comment | 17:58 |
| mgz | bounceback loses the page you were just editing, but does appear to mean the comment did get registered | 18:00 |
| TheLordOfTime | LP times out pretty often | 18:05 |
| TheLordOfTime | randomly too | 18:05 |
| mandel | I have problems with all the branches I push, I just pushed 3of them and lp states that the 3 of them are empty.. which is blocking some code from landing to trunk | 18:06 |
| mgz | mandel: pushes fresh from today? | 18:08 |
| mandel | mgz, yes, a few mins ago, max an hour ago | 18:08 |
| mgz | okay, that needs some action then | 18:10 |
| mandel | mgz, one of the branches is for example: lp:~mandel/ubuntuone-control-panel/fix-1019224 pushed 2 hours ago | 18:10 |
| mandel | mgz, and lp:~mandel/ubuntuone-control-panel/left-tabs has the same code pushed a few mins ago | 18:11 |
| mgz | the one from three hours ago seems to have worked though | 18:11 |
| mgz | so it may just be horrid lag, fallout from the datacentre move | 18:11 |
| mgz | mandel: so, apparently it's just being slow due to a backlog | 18:14 |
| mandel | mgz, ok, if you need more info let me know in the internal channel or here :) | 18:15 |
| === zyga is now known as zyga-afk | ||
| cjohnston | Is anyone else having a problem looking at bzr branches in LP? | 18:19 |
| mgz | yes, depending on what exactly you mean. | 18:20 |
| cjohnston | It's very slow and/or timing out for me. Other parts of LP I am seeing fine | 18:20 |
| === jussio1 is now known as jussi | ||
| mgz | codehosting is little more unhappy than normal right now. | 18:23 |
| === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Delays due to codehosting, it's being looked into| Help contact:-| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
| === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Delays due to codehosting, due to backlog| Help contact:-| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
| cjohnston | Thanks mgz, czajkowski | 18:29 |
| czajkowski | <--- vanishing | 18:31 |
| jethrogb | if i uploaded a native source packages with an omission in the control file that makes the build fail, how do i upload a new version of that package? | 18:41 |
| jethrogb | I get "Rejected: File hybrid-screenclone_20120821.0.tar.gz already exists in Jethro's packages, but uploaded version has different contents." | 18:42 |
| === thomi_ is now known as thomi | ||
| === zyga-afk is now known as zyga | ||
| === Logan_ is now known as Chamserw | ||
| === Chamserw is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === Logan_ is now known as Logan | ||
| === Logan is now known as Fluffernutter | ||
| === Fluffernutter is now known as l | ||
| === \u03b5 is now known as Guest73127 | ||
| === dan64 is now known as Guest14436 | ||
| === jelmer is now known as Guest73241 | ||
| === dpb_ is now known as Guest92976 | ||
| === jpds is now known as Guest81255 | ||
| === jussi is now known as Guest83481 | ||
| === jibel_ is now known as jibel | ||
| mparillo | Hi, I am trying to do a bzr push, and I am wondering if I am not getting bzr to recognize my ssh keys. I have bzr launchpad-login marco-parillo, which is my launchpad id. | 21:29 |
| mparillo | And I do have a ssh key set in launchapd. | 21:30 |
| === Guest73241 is now known as jelmer | ||
| === wgrant changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
| veebers | Hi all, I have some automated jobs that run some 'bzr export' commands after a fresh install | 23:59 |
| veebers | twice just now I've received and error, both to do with the http access method | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!