/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/08/22/#launchpad.txt

dobeyjethrogb: #ubuntu-packaging is more appropriate00:43
jethrogbdobey: thanks, ill try it there00:58
jethrogbalthough i think ive mostly figured it out00:58
blueyedWhat's up with the PPA buildds? I have uploaded a package yesterday and it still needs ~8 hourse before it gets build?07:48
pmjdebruijnthe build farm was moved, so it has been offline for a few days07:48
wgrantWe still don't have all the builders back after the DC move last weekend07:48
pmjdebruijnso it's still catching up on the build log07:48
wgrantThe queue's about half the length it was yesterday07:48
wgrantIf you have some builds you particularly care about, they can probably jump the queue a bit :)07:49
pmjdebruijnbtw is seems the i386 queue is much more congested, I guess this is because all arch builds are done on i386?07:50
wgrantpmjdebruijn: Right07:50
blueyedwgrant: I am waiting for build 3734327 and 3734333. Thanks.07:50
pmjdebruijnbtw07:51
* pmjdebruijn loves the PPAs07:51
pmjdebruijnwgrant: thanks for your great work07:51
pmjdebruijn(well and the rest of the launchpad team)07:52
wgrantblueyed: Should start in a couple of minutes07:52
wgrantpmjdebruijn: Thanks :)07:52
wgrantHopefully the queues will clear in the next day or two07:53
=== mthaddon` is now known as mthaddon
pmjdebruijnwgrant: I used to host my own repo, without superclean builds and signed packages07:54
pmjdebruijnthe PPAs were quite the leap forward :)07:55
wgrantYeah, they make that all a tonne easier.07:59
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Build delays due to hardware move | Help contact: czajkowski | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
wgrantblueyed: Those are built08:03
vadi2Hi. I'm following instructions at https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/UploadErrors for the 'File <UPLOADED_FILE> already exists in <LOCATION>' error. It mentions: 'note that there is no need to include the original tarball in the upload, a reference to the right file will suffice' <- how do I do that? To begin with, I only did debuild and dput.08:40
stewartAnyone got an idea on this:08:59
stewartbzr: ERROR: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~percona-core/percona-server/5.6/.bzr/repository/packs/a1849bf089d97de2c75cd97f17f4998e.pack is redirected to https://launchpad.net08:59
stewart$ bzr branch lp:percona-server/5.6 /home/jenkins/workspace/percona-server-5.6-trunk08:59
stewartYou have not informed bzr of your Launchpad ID, and you must do this to08:59
stewartwrite to Launchpad or access private data.  See "bzr help launchpad-login".08:59
stewartbzr: ERROR: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~percona-core/percona-server/5.6/.bzr/repository/packs/a1849bf089d97de2c75cd97f17f4998e.pack is redirected to https://launchpad.net08:59
stewartczajkowski, ^ ?08:59
stewartczajkowski, this seems pretty consistent.08:59
stewartbasically... are now *two* of our bzr repos in some way corrupt09:01
mgzif I curl that url, it's not a redirect09:02
stewarthuh.09:02
mgzwhat happens if you log in and use bzr+ssh rather than http?09:02
stewartmgz, this is on jenkins slaves, which will never do bzr+ssh09:03
mgz...but does it work?09:03
stewarttrying locally...09:03
wgrantbzr+ssh would work, yes09:03
wgrantThat HTTP thing was transient09:03
stewartokay... so if i try again it should work?09:03
mgzyou could get your bot to do bzr+ssh by the way, some of ours do09:03
wgrantstewart: Yeah, it should work09:04
stewartmgz, even without launchpad login?09:04
mgzgenerally you create an account and generate an ssh key for it, then put that on the machine with the conf09:04
stewartwe'd end up having a garbage account though... which wouldn't be ideal. just another place for compromise to occur :/09:05
czajkowskistewart: sorry wasnt looking at irc, I see mgz is helping and will know more anyways09:09
stewarthoping it works. kinda takes a while when you have a several hundred MB repo09:13
maxbstewart: If you're using http access currently, the machine pseudo-account doesn't need any specific privileges at all - so there's no compromise risk09:31
vadi2What does this exactly mean: Rejected: mudlet_2.0-rc13.dsc: Version older than that in the archive. 2.0-rc13 <= 2.0-rc12-2.1ubuntu2 <- no, it's not older, it's *newer*09:33
maxbvadi2: ah, I see what's happening09:33
wgrantvadi2: Nope, it's older09:33
wgrantvadi2: The upstream version is everything before the final -09:33
vadi2So I should try 2.0-rc12-3 ?09:34
wgrantSo it's (2.0, rc13) vs (2.0-rc12, 2.1ubuntu2)09:34
wgrantRight, you'll need another hyphen09:34
wgrantWith anything at all after it09:34
wgrantOr nothing, if you want to be strange09:34
vadi2Alright, thanks!09:35
wgrantvadi2: See http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version for details of how versions are interpreted09:35
wgrantAnd considuer using dpkg --compare-versions to check09:35
vadi2What affects the naming of the resulting dsc file?09:42
vadi2It unfortunately got re-made as "mudlet_2.0-rc13" again.09:42
vadi2Ah, probably the changelog file09:43
tsdgeos_Hi, is launchpad slower than usual? I created https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity-greeter/no_servers_configured/+merge/120736 30 min ago and the diff is still not updated while usually takes no more than 5 mins10:36
czajkowskitsdgeos_: there seems to be some delays10:38
tsdgeos_ok, no problem, just reporting in case something was broken10:38
tsdgeos_if it's just "slower" no biggie10:39
czajkowskithey are looking into it10:39
tsdgeos_my diff just appeared :-)10:42
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
FourDollarsHi, When I execute `bzr branch lp:ubuntu/precise/totem`, it returns "bzr: ERROR: Revision {package-import@ubuntu.com-20120109161939-wfwd46cy3ytl1qq3} not present in "Graph(StackedParentsProvider(bzrlib.repository._LazyListJoin(([CachingParentsProvider(None)], []))))".".11:32
mgzlet's stick to #bzr for that11:34
KNRO_Hello. I have a package with version 1.0ubuntu1-0~22~oneiric1. I tried to upload a new package with version 1.0~5~22~201208221205~oneiric1m but launchpad says the latter version is "older"! How can I fix this?12:10
mgzthat's a lot of tildes.12:14
mgzKNRO_: see the log from earlier today which covered just this question:12:14
mgz<http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/08/22/%23launchpad.html#t09:35>12:15
KNRO_so if I add a hyped 1.0-5 it will be newer than 1.0ubuntu1 ?12:18
KNRO_the 1.0ubuntu1 was a mistake at any rate, I forgot the hyper between the 1.0 and ubuntu1, and it seems I'm stuck now with this12:18
KNRO_hyphen lol12:18
KNRO_so it seems that debupstream 1.0ubuntu1 > 1.0 and this is where it fails12:24
KNRO_This is the changelog for the package: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mutlaqja/libindi/packaging/view/head:/indi-gphoto/changelog12:28
KNRO_isn't the debupstream supposed to be 1.0-ubuntu2?12:29
maxbThe upstream version is the version with the last hyphen-separated segment removed12:31
maxbSo, no12:31
KNRO_so just 1.0 in this case?12:32
maxbyes12:32
KNRO_so how do I make this newer than the one in archive 1.0ubuntu1 ?12:33
KNRO_other than making it 1.1 !12:33
maxb1.0.0 would work12:33
maxbBecause . is newer than u12:34
KNRO_hmm okay thanks I'll give that a try12:34
maxbThat or 1.0z or 1.0+ or something like that12:35
KNRO_well, I tried using deb-version {debupstream}~{revno}~{time}12:56
KNRO_is there something wrong with using that deb-version?12:56
KNRO_I'm getting this log: bzr: ERROR: bzrlib.errors.BzrCommandError: Invalid deb-version: {debupstream}~22~201208221247~oneiric1: Could not parse version: {debupstream}~22~201208221247~oneiric112:58
dobey{debupstream}+r{revno}-{revno:packaging} is what i use for my "daily" builds recipes13:01
dobeyKNRO_: what bzr-builder format version are you using?13:01
KNRO_0.413:03
KNRO_I'll use your suggestion!13:03
dobeyhrmm13:03
mgedminhttp access to bazaar.launchpad.net are very slow, what's happening?13:10
czajkowskimgedmin: hey they are looking into that at present13:27
mgedminczajkowski, awesome!13:29
apwKNRO_, if thats a raw error from the logs, doesn't that imply debupstream was not subbed in13:35
mgedminbzr branches access over http seems to be back14:03
wgrantmgedmin: Yeah, should be back to normal now. Our apache rewritemap script ran into some trouble, and apache likes to wait around even for requests that don't actually need it.14:05
=== jibel__ is now known as jibel
=== cody-somerville_ is now known as cody-somerville
=== cody-somerville_ is now known as cody-somerville
DavieyYou do still need to increment version numbers on deleted published packages from a PPA, right?15:49
Davieywgrant: ^?15:49
wgrantDaviey: Yes15:49
Davieywgrant: thought so, thanks.15:49
mandelis there any reason why launchpad would say a branch is empty yet I can perfectly branch it?16:27
mgzmandel: if the branch scanner missed it in the datacentre futzing16:28
mgzgenerally pushing a new rev to the branch makes the scanner wake up and realise the branch is populated16:29
mandelmgz, ok, I'll do that to see what happens, thx16:29
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Build delays due to hardware move | Help contact:-| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
=== svuorela_ is now known as svuorela
serghi. our repository on launchpad is apparently corrupted. what could we do?17:44
serg$ bzr branch lp:maria/5.1 foo17:44
sergbzr: ERROR: No such file: '/srv/bazaar.launchpad.net/mirrors/00/05/62/51/.bzr/repository/indices/b658cec5bdb393a80d29dc93e9c94ea3.rix'17:44
TheLordOfTimei take it PPAs cannot hold Maverick or EOL-release packages?17:54
TheLordOfTime(anymore)17:54
dobeyTheLordOfTime: can't build new packages for them at least17:55
TheLordOfTimePPAs with old maverick packages will still publish them right?17:55
TheLordOfTimebut no new ones can be built17:55
TheLordOfTime?17:55
dobeyi think previously built/published packages hang around, but you can't build new17:56
dobeyat least, i have a ppa that seems to still have jaunty/intrepid/karmic/maverick packages in it17:57
TheLordOfTimelol17:57
TheLordOfTimei probably have a PPA with packages in it like that :P17:57
TheLordOfTime(in which case those PPAs must die)17:57
mgz...launchpad likes scaring me with timeouts on the bounceback to mp page after I've done a really long comment17:58
mgzbounceback loses the page you were just editing, but does appear to mean the comment did get registered18:00
TheLordOfTimeLP times out pretty often18:05
TheLordOfTimerandomly too18:05
mandelI have problems with all the branches I push, I just pushed 3of them and lp states that the 3 of them are empty.. which is blocking some code from landing to trunk18:06
mgzmandel: pushes fresh from today?18:08
mandelmgz, yes, a few mins ago, max an hour ago18:08
mgzokay, that needs some action then18:10
mandelmgz, one of the branches is for example: lp:~mandel/ubuntuone-control-panel/fix-1019224 pushed 2 hours ago18:10
mandelmgz, and lp:~mandel/ubuntuone-control-panel/left-tabs has the same code pushed a few mins ago18:11
mgzthe one from three hours ago seems to have worked though18:11
mgzso it may just be horrid lag, fallout from the datacentre move18:11
mgzmandel: so, apparently it's just being slow due to a backlog18:14
mandelmgz, ok, if you need more info let me know in the internal channel or here :)18:15
=== zyga is now known as zyga-afk
cjohnstonIs anyone else having a problem looking at bzr branches in LP?18:19
mgzyes, depending on what exactly you mean.18:20
cjohnstonIt's very slow and/or timing out for me. Other parts of LP I am seeing fine18:20
=== jussio1 is now known as jussi
mgzcodehosting is little more unhappy than normal right now.18:23
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Delays due to codehosting, it's being looked into| Help contact:-| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Delays due to codehosting, due to backlog| Help contact:-| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
cjohnstonThanks mgz, czajkowski18:29
czajkowski<--- vanishing18:31
jethrogbif i uploaded a native source packages with an omission in the control file that makes the build fail, how do i upload a new version of that package?18:41
jethrogbI get "Rejected: File hybrid-screenclone_20120821.0.tar.gz already exists in Jethro's packages, but uploaded version has different contents."18:42
=== thomi_ is now known as thomi
=== zyga-afk is now known as zyga
=== Logan_ is now known as Chamserw
=== Chamserw is now known as Logan_
=== Logan_ is now known as Logan
=== Logan is now known as Fluffernutter
=== Fluffernutter is now known as l
=== \u03b5 is now known as Guest73127
=== dan64 is now known as Guest14436
=== jelmer is now known as Guest73241
=== dpb_ is now known as Guest92976
=== jpds is now known as Guest81255
=== jussi is now known as Guest83481
=== jibel_ is now known as jibel
mparilloHi, I am trying to do a bzr push, and I am wondering if I am not getting bzr to recognize my ssh keys. I have bzr launchpad-login marco-parillo, which is my launchpad id.21:29
mparilloAnd I do have a ssh key set in launchapd.21:30
=== Guest73241 is now known as jelmer
=== wgrant changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
veebersHi all, I have some automated jobs that run some 'bzr export' commands after a fresh install23:59
veeberstwice just now I've received and error, both to do with the http access method23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!