[01:50] <shadeslayer> Hm ... ktp missed feature freeze
[01:50] <shadeslayer> FFe's will need to be filed ....
[01:53]  * shadeslayer makes a TODO list for today
[01:56] <shadeslayer> [kubuntu-dev] aim to create AC100/tegra images for desktop/active if testers: TODO
[01:56] <shadeslayer> does someone have hardware to test that?
[04:21] <shadeslayer> Let's say I'm purging a package, and there's a postrm script
[04:22] <shadeslayer> is it sufficient to add a 'remove' case
[04:22] <shadeslayer> or should I handling both of them separately?
[04:23] <shadeslayer> ( plymouth-kubuntu-logo only handles the remove case, purging the package won't call update-alternatives I think )
[04:24] <shadeslayer> unless purging a package calls the postrm script by passing remove first
[04:31] <shadeslayer> !find interest
[06:16] <shadeslayer> oh my
[08:56] <Riddell> !testers
[08:57] <Riddell> 12.04.1 testing needed!
[09:34] <Quintasan> shadeslayer: Transformer is tegra
[10:59] <Riddell> I'll be away from this evening to Sunday evening, so if you need me get your pings in now :)
[11:03] <apachelogger_> Riddell: ping
[11:14] <Riddell> apachelogger_: pong!
[11:23] <apachelogger_> Riddell: hug :*
[11:23] <apachelogger_> also that's qutie the latency ^^
[11:24] <Riddell> I'm running multiple install tests at once!
[11:25] <Riddell> latency will happen
[11:25] <apachelogger_> ah
[11:42] <Riddell> hi mparillo 
[11:43] <mparillo> Hi. I had no luck from home last night. I am guessing I messed up my keys some how.  On #bzr, they suggested I try sftp -v. I will try the KDE paste thing.
[11:43] <mparillo> http://paste.kde.org/538502/
[11:53] <debfx> JontheEchidna: do you remember what kubuntu_01_fix_rounded_corners.diff in kwin-style-crystal is supposed to do?
[11:55] <Riddell> mparillo: try using your lp username
[11:57] <Riddell> mparillo: sftp -v <lpuser>@bazaar.launchpad.net
[11:59] <Riddell> mparillo: sftp -v marco-parillo@bazaar.launchpad.net
[11:59] <Riddell> mparillo: is https://launchpad.net/~marco-parillo/+sshkeys the same as in /home/mparillo/.ssh/id_rsa.pub ?
[12:00] <mparillo> Same basic result: http://paste.kde.org/538520/
[12:01] <mparillo> Checking
[12:03] <mparillo> It looks as if the only file (other than . and ..) in .ssh is -rw-r--r--  1 mparillo mparillo  810 Aug 22 12:37 known_hosts 
[12:04] <mparillo> So, I should create id_rsa.pub there, by copying and pasting from the URL you gave me?
[12:09] <mparillo> Done. I might need to change the permissions. http://paste.kde.org/538526/
[12:17] <mparillo> I got further after I removed permissions from group and world: -rw-------  1 mparillo mparillo  396 Aug 23 08:12 id_rsa 
[12:18] <mparillo> But, now it seems to be either asking for the private key or the passphrase. I saved the .asc private key. Do I need to name it anything special?
[12:23] <yofel> mparillo: you need a key in there, remove the file again and run 'ssh-keygen'
[12:24] <yofel> wait
[12:24] <yofel> mparillo: what error do you get now?
[12:26] <mparillo> http://paste.kde.org/538550/
[12:27] <yofel> what are the contents of /home/mparillo/.ssh/id_rsa.pub ?
[12:28] <mparillo> ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQDfHMHOK8b/RzdOenpC93kuXOYMYjADaR8c48qJuoA4gomWYRn0BP9rxPelz9Q28AhtI6pw23ghqLt4MCI7YUIcBbqgEjVnuLiUzECl4rWMyYX2aEAaxq9lU7Kw7cnYEP+TAejyDBGUdBuzV0wtIxKPCjOrnIJUZKJkNqKQvtHtxdKgcgDdTNrihxqQaUOpxV4TYizKCFwXUv8LKWyClk053AbtViBHyiDclrfnnUXTwMwoPNfRRjw1BhBA/f2NkyHOMVoIlb+fBurPn7xPvLqmSMEERzyt15GJQzj8V3Ox6BNnCKRYmaTcVtje+rxYmiUioJz1Osg1LxcIyXG/BpB7 mparillo@ubuntu 
[12:28] <yofel> that doesn't match with https://launchpad.net/~marco-parillo/+sshkeys - you'll need to update the key on launchpad
[12:30] <Riddell> if your .ssh is empty then I'm not surprised it doesn't work :)
[12:33] <mparillo> yofel: I went to https://launchpad.net/~marco-parillo/+editsshkeys and deleted my old ssh key, and pasted in the new one, clicked import, and success! 
[12:33] <yofel> :)
[12:34] <mparillo> Connected to bazaar.launchpad.net. sftp>  
[12:34] <mparillo> So, now I try the bzr push again?
[12:34] <yofel> yep
[12:36] <mparillo> bzr push lp:~kubuntu-website/kubuntu-website/kubuntu.org bzr: ERROR: These branches have diverged.  See "bzr help diverged-branches" for more information. 
[14:02] <JontheEchidna> debfx: presumably it's to round the corners when there isn't a compositing window manager
[14:58] <Riddell> ScottK, JontheEchidna, apachelogger_ etc anyone want to attend the release team meeting tomorrow (I'm away)
[14:58] <JontheEchidna> I have move-in to my new place today, and I'll probably still be busy with that tomorrow
[14:59] <JontheEchidna> on the plus side I met the internet guy there yesterday and I'm connected to the 'net there already :)
[15:33] <dantti_laptop> Riddell: is s-c-p splited around kde git repos? I can only find printer-applet
[15:37] <Riddell> dantti_laptop: it's in kdeadmin and kdeutils
[15:38] <Riddell> system-config-printer-kde is the admin part
[15:38] <Riddell> printer-applet is the unil part
[15:39] <dantti_laptop> right, I always get lost in kde repos :P trying to find this admin part now...
[15:40] <Riddell> ooh tazz is famous! http://dot.kde.org/2012/08/23/gaurav-joined-game
[15:41] <tazz> Riddell, it was for a good cause. :p
[15:42] <Riddell> mparillo: bug 1040658 is a simple edit, I can give you the access details if you make the fiddly grammer decision :)
[15:43] <mparillo> Before you do, I think I might have a broken branch.
[15:43] <mparillo> bzr push lp:~kubuntu-website/kubuntu-website/kubuntu.org bzr: ERROR: These branches have diverged.  See "bzr help diverged-branches" for more information. 
[15:43] <Riddell> oh fiddly
[15:43] <Riddell> needs a new checkout and merge I think
[15:44] <Riddell> from a new dir  bzr branch lp:~kubuntu-website/kubuntu-website/kubuntu.org kubuntu.org2
[15:44] <mparillo> Since my changes are so small, can I simply delete my Release 1.0 directory, and pull it down again?
[15:44] <Riddell> yeah you can
[15:44] <Riddell> in kubuntu.org2 do a  bzr merge ../kubuntu.org
[15:44] <Riddell> would be one way
[15:44] <Riddell> or just start fresh and apply manually
[15:45] <mparillo> How about I start fresh and this time try to document what I do ;-)
[15:45] <Riddell> can do
[15:46] <ryanakca> Wouldn't just a 'bzr merge lp:~kubuntu-website/kubuntu-website/kubuntu.org' do it?
[15:47] <Riddell> yeah should do
[15:47] <Riddell> mparillo: try that
[15:47] <mparillo> I tried a bzr merge with no args. ryanakca I will try yours (without the quotes).
[15:49] <mparillo> ryanakca: I think I have a Contents conflict.
[15:49] <mparillo> +N  page-node-252.tpl.php                                                               RM  page-node-10.tpl.php => page-node-10.tpl.php.THIS 
[15:50] <ryanakca> Alright, make the manual changes (bzr diff to see the differences I think) and then you can commit the merge (bzr commit  I think)
[15:50]  * ryanakca hasn't used bzr in a while, so I might be very wrong
[15:52] <Riddell> mparillo: sounds about right, I removed page-node-10.tpl.php
[15:52] <Riddell> and added a minimal page-node-252.tpl.php, meanwhile in the drupal database node/252 has the content that was in 10
[15:57] <mparillo> Riddell: So that means the merge probably worked as expected, and I should try the push again?
[16:01] <Riddell> mparillo: you should manually resolve it
[16:01] <Riddell> bzr conflicts
[16:01] <Riddell> will tell you what's conflicted
[16:01] <Riddell> and bzr resolve <filename> 
[16:01] <Riddell> will tell it that it's resolved
[16:02] <Riddell> anyway if you're editing page-node-10.tpl.php then it doesn't exist any more so there's nothing to commit :)
[16:02] <Riddell> and I can give you details to edit it in the database
[16:03] <mparillo> I had to bzr resolve page-node-10.tpl.php then bzr commit then push, and it looked successful: Pushed up to revision 11.
[16:05] <Riddell> mparillo: groovy
[16:06] <Riddell> mparillo: so want these details?
[16:06] <mparillo> Sure, but I am afraid  I more effort that I am worth.
[16:10] <mparillo> And I have assigned myself to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kubuntu-website/+bug/1040658
[16:13] <Riddell> mparillo: /msg'ed
[16:14] <Riddell> mparillo: got it?
[16:27] <mparillo> Got it. Sorry I did not notice the /msg, but on webchat, there was just a quiet tab with your name on it at the top (and I look at the bottom for new posts).
[16:51] <Riddell> I'm away for the weekend, 12.04.1 is due to be released shortly
[16:52] <Riddell> if anyone with web access can put up a story on kubuntu.org when that happens that would be great
[16:52] <Riddell> or help mparillo with doing it, he has access now
[16:55] <shadeslayer> Riddell: can you send them to me as well?
[16:55] <mparillo> I will try to stay on IRC, and would appreciate the help.
[16:55] <shadeslayer> kubuntu.org access details
[16:55] <shadeslayer> mparillo: yeah, I'm around, feel free to highlight :)
[16:55] <shadeslayer> I'll be up for the next 10 hours
[16:59]  * genii-around makes more coffee
[18:10] <shadeslayer> Riddell: apachelogger_ seems that qt4-x11 depends on libtiff5-dev when it should really depend on libtiff-dev
[18:10] <shadeslayer> this should have been caught as a part of the tiff transition
[18:11] <shadeslayer> but it seems it wasn
[18:11] <shadeslayer> *wasn't
[18:11] <apachelogger_> depends or build depends?
[18:11] <shadeslayer> build depends
[18:12] <debfx> shadeslayer: there is no libtiff-dev package
[18:13] <shadeslayer> uh, it's a virtual package iirc
[18:15] <debfx> build-depending on virtual packages is not really a good idea
[18:16] <shadeslayer> any particular reason?
[18:20] <debfx> the build environment is inconsistent if there are multiple packages that provide it
[18:20] <shadeslayer> hm
[18:25] <debfx> looks like several packages build-depend on libtiff-dev so meh
[18:32] <shadeslayer> debfx: yeah, that's because there was a tiff transition recently
[18:32] <shadeslayer> where everything was moved to depend on libtiff-dev
[18:33] <shadeslayer> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/tiff.html 
[18:34] <debfx> and by everything you mean everything in main ;)
[18:39] <shadeslayer> right :P
[18:40] <shadeslayer> debfx: so, transition to libtiff-dev, fine with you?
[19:26] <shadeslayer> I'm going to take that as a yes
[21:07] <skaet> shadeslayer, where will the kubuntu announce info be posted?   would like to include a link in the email.
[21:09] <shadeslayer> sec
[21:09] <shadeslayer> skaet: http://www.kubuntu.org/news
[21:09] <skaet> thanks shadeslayer :)
[21:09] <shadeslayer> that amarok image is ETOOLARGE
[21:09] <shadeslayer> np
[21:17] <skaet> shadeslayer:   this link ok?  Kubuntu: http://kubuntu.org/news/12.04.1-release  or just go with /news/
[21:17] <shadeslayer> skaet: just go with /news
[21:17] <shadeslayer> I can't say what the url will look like
[21:31] <skaet> shadeslayer, ok.   was just going with the pattern from last time,  but will simplify.
[21:33] <shadeslayer> well .. it'll be the top story there :P