/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/08/23/#launchpad.txt

veebersis ssh preferable/more stable?00:00
lifelessveebers: ssh is more efficient00:12
lifelessveebers: if you have network issues of anysort it would be better.00:12
veeberslifeless: cool, thanks00:12
veebersI'm not sure why I received the 2 different errors00:13
lifelesswe had an issue with http earlier today.00:13
lifelessYou may have been using it at the time.00:13
veebersahh ok, that would explain that00:15
GriffenJBSany way to pull a tarball of files out of launchpad?00:36
lifelesswget00:36
GriffenJBSlifeless: ... you made me feel really stupid.00:42
GriffenJBSthanks for the help00:42
lifelessGriffenJBS: sorry!00:42
GriffenJBSdon't be, I wasn't thinking00:43
lifelessah, no worries then :)00:43
GriffenJBSI looked at launchpad and saw bazaar everywhere was was thinking it was needed00:43
GriffenJBSI can wget -r the files, I would like to have it compressed on host then transfered, but I just need the files00:44
wgrantGriffenJBS: A URL like http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~loggerhead-team/loggerhead/trunk-rich/tarball will give you a tarball00:45
GriffenJBSoh nice, wget didn't work, and the compression is possible00:48
GriffenJBSwget checks robots.txt which disallows everything00:49
ajmitchyou can use wget -e robots=off00:51
GriffenJBSajmitch: the manual makes no mention of that00:52
ajmitchno, the manpage doesn't list every option00:52
GriffenJBSI got the files, wgrant, the tarball url worked like a charm00:55
lifelessyeah, recursive wget does the right thing; using robots=off would likely be detected and your ip blocked :P01:00
ajmitchblocked if it's just a single url being fetched, or does wget not look up robots.txt for that?01:01
lifelesswget -r obeys robots01:01
lifelesswget URL doesn't.01:01
ajmitchright01:01
ajmitchthen don't ignore robots.txt with -r, otherwise angry ops hunt you down :)01:01
=== verterok` is now known as verterok
=== sagaci_ is now known as sagaci
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact:czajkowski | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
ricotzcould someone please restart this freezed build? https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+build/373870711:14
ricotzbigjools, hi :) ^11:14
czajkowskiricotz: patience11:16
czajkowskiI'm just asking11:16
czajkowskiasked11:16
ricotzczajkowski, sorry, thanks11:17
ricotzczajkowski, jfyi, this freeze is happening quite often on some (i think, newer) i386 builders since the move of launchpad11:19
czajkowskiricotz: yes there was a backlog since the move11:19
ricotzczajkowski, sorry for bothering, is there any progress?11:39
ricotzhmm, the build is now cancelled which i could have done myself :\11:45
ricotzsorry, i need to run11:46
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
serghi. our repository looks corrupted:12:47
serg$ bzr branch lp:maria/5.112:47
sergbzr: ERROR: No such file: '/srv/bazaar.launchpad.net/mirrors/00/05/62/51/.bzr/repository/indices/b658cec5bdb393a80d29dc12:47
sergwhat could I do?12:47
jelmerserg: is that the entire error?12:47
mgzjelmer: I guess the useful part would be in the smart server log anyway...12:48
mgz(rather than on the client)12:48
sergyes. it's the error when I run bzr in a local shared repo. If I run it in an emtry directory it's an python exception12:48
sergthat still boils down to a missing file up the stack trace12:49
sergbzr: ERROR: bzrlib.errors.ErrorFromSmartServer: Error received from smart server: ('NoSuchFile', '/srv/bazaar.launchpad.net/mirrors/00/05/62/51/.bzr/repository/indices/b658cec5bdb393a80d29dc93e9c94ea3.rix')12:50
* serg notices that the first error message, was indeed, truncated. "...93e9c94ea3.rix" was missing12:52
mgzserg: so, the lo-fi way of fixing this would be for someone who has 5.1 to push it up to a new branch stacked on maria, then do a switcheroo12:55
mgzprovided that works.12:55
sergthat probably would. 5.2 branch works ok and it's stacked on maria too12:55
sergbut I'll loose all subscribers and I don't know what else12:56
sergbut if it's the only solution, I'll do that, of course12:56
mgzah, hold that for a sec12:57
mgzthe branch is listed as stacked on 5.3?12:57
mgzthat does not sound right, perhaps the stacking just needs resolving12:58
mgz...they were created at about the same time by you though...12:58
sergand it's me who actually broke 5.1 branch. I pushed, it hanged (this happens, rarely), I ^C, broke the lock. And the branch is broken.13:00
mgz...that's not good, seeing the server log from that operation would be nice13:01
mgzbut probably some odd stacking interaction13:01
sergok, I'll recreate it, then :(13:02
mgzwhat do you have in .bzr/repository/indices locally for that branch?13:03
wgrantserg, mgz: I'd recommend moving the .bzr away and pushing with --use-existing-dir13:04
wgrantRather than deleting the branch and the metadata and blah13:04
czajkowskihttps://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/206528  is serg question on LP13:05
wgrantThis'll preserve the stacking relationships and merge proposals and subscriptions and blah13:05
sergmgz: it's a shared repo.13:05
sergwgrant: what do you mean "moving the .bzr away" ?13:05
wgrantRename .bzr on the server to some other permitted name (like backup.bzr)13:05
mgzserg: a hack with sft13:05
wgrantSo you can push up a clean copy of the branch13:05
mgz*sftp13:06
wgrantInto the existing branch on Launchpad13:06
sergoh. interesting13:06
mgzwhich lets you poke the contents of .bzr directly13:06
mgzwgrant is right that just wiping then pushing fresh is probably safest as stacking complicates things13:06
wgrantWell, "wiping" except with a backup so we can recover the old one if something goes wrong :)13:07
mgzso... you need to do this yourself (as we don't have access to the branch), but in short13:07
sergwgrant: thanks! very useful, I could've used it earlier too, we had problems before (but nothing that bad)13:09
=== Guest81255 is now known as jpds
czajkowskiserg: can we close your question on LP so ?13:09
serghmm. I got permission denied when I tried to rename13:10
mgz`sftp serge@bazaar.launchpad.net:~maria-captains/maria/5.1`13:10
mgzthen rename to er... needs to be a specific thing, just checking13:10
wgrantALLOWED_DIRECTORIES = ( '.bzr', '.bzr.backup', 'backup.bzr', 'backup.bzr.~1~', 'backup.bzr.~2~',13:11
sergczajkowski: 1 min. I'll close it myself when I'll fix it. by the way, do you want me to put this trick in the answer? or better not?13:11
mgzbackup.bzr13:11
mgzright, what wgrant said :)13:11
czajkowskiserg: up to you13:11
serggot it, thanks!13:11
sergthanks! worderful!13:12
sergczajkowski: I'm closing it now13:12
ricotzczajkowski, hi, are you still around?13:27
ricotzsince the mentioned build was canceled which i was told can't the restarted from this state, i uploaded a new build which got stuck too https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+build/373875413:32
czajkowskihmm another one13:34
czajkowskiwgrant: any ideas13:34
czajkowskias now I'm confused13:34
ricotze.g. this one worked https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+build/373728213:35
ricotzthe problem might be that the g-ir-scanner is requested to initialize clutter and xthreads where some builders running into problems it seems13:37
ricotzi can cancel and upload new build over and over again until it works, but i dont like this idea, so i asked to restart this specific build to avoid a rebuild of the amd64 packages13:38
ricotzso please don't just cancel it again ;)13:39
czajkowskiricotz: I didnt cancel it, I requested it to be restarted!13:39
ricotzhmm, looks canceled to me :\ https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+build/373870713:40
czajkowskiyes it was but that wasn't what I requested13:40
czajkowskiand I'm also no tthe one who did it.13:40
czajkowskimgz: can you please help out13:40
czajkowskithanks13:40
mgzrequest to restart = cancel current, start again, no?13:40
ricotzczajkowski, alright, just saying13:41
ricotzat least i was told there is no going back from "cancel"13:41
ricotznot sure if that changed recently13:42
mgzso, how do we know the 3738754 build has hung?13:45
mgzjust that it should have progressed by now?13:46
ricotzmgz, trust me i know13:46
ricotzmgz, i already waited out some of those13:47
mgzokay, so gumiho hasn't managed to do anything for two hours13:55
=== cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox
mgzricotz: so, the builder is doing work, but not obviously getting anywhere14:07
mgzinside the /usr/bin/g-ir-scanner process from the log, is running `python /usr/bin/check-implicit-pointer-functions --inline --warnonly`14:08
mgzbut that's not a complicated looking script14:08
ricotzmgz, are you able to gdb this process and send a SIGSEGV?14:10
mgzso, it's not clear whether the builder is at fault somehow, or the build script is unreliable14:10
mgzwe could, though getting a dump off the builder is a bit of a fag14:10
ricotzi see14:11
ricotzmgz, can you paste the versbose log somewhere?14:13
mgzwill have a look now, best guess is an io deadlock of some kind14:13
ricotzwhile it works on some builders, something is different then with e.g. this one14:14
mgzactive process from the build is lt-ClutterGst-2.014:14
ricotzyeah, that is the one trying initialize clutter and X14:15
ricotzwhich should just fail and still work14:15
mgzricotz: so, stracing that process had the side effect of breaking the loop, so you can now see the full build log14:25
mgzricotz: and a chunk of the strace <http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1162745/>14:28
mgzbasically seems to be cloning, communicating a bit, waiting for child to exit, repeat14:30
mgzand gumiho is now successfully building other things, so probably out of the blame14:31
mgzthe build log <https://launchpadlibrarian.net/113396105/buildlog_ubuntu-quantal-i386.clutter-gst-2.0_1.9.90-0ubuntu1~12.10~ricotz3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz>14:31
ricotzmgz, thanks, i copied the logs14:45
ricotzmgz, i will just restart it and hoping for a working builder14:45
mgz^actually, build just got killed after 150mins, missed that in the log14:47
mgzricotz: so, my point is it's probably not a working builder you're hoping for, but the luck to avoid a race/loop in your package's build process14:48
mgzthe builders are pretty much homogeneous14:49
ricotzmgz, alright, thanks for your time14:52
ricotzi might be back ;)14:52
mgz:)14:52
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact:- | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
=== jibel__ is now known as jibel
tsmith-awayhow do i create a release for my project??? I CANNOT figure this out and have thoroughly googled.20:35
tsmith-awayThe project is https://launchpad.net/phpu-training/20:35
cmars232hi, quick question about the launchpad builders... would they block a build from downloading additional sources from bzr, hg, git, etc?22:12
cmars232my build does this and it seems to have timed out22:12
cmars232https://launchpadlibrarian.net/113443191/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.hockeypuck_0.1~alpha_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz22:12
maxbcmars232: The builders permit no internet access22:14
cmars232maxb: bummer22:14
cmars232maxb: thanks22:14
=== zyga_ is now known as zyga
maxbThis is entirely deliberate, to enforce that the source package is actually a complete representation of what you need to build the package22:14
cmars232the source package builds, it's just that the language tools are able to provision all the deps22:16
cmars232they're not debian packaged22:16
cmars232becoming a maintainer of all of the deps would be ... cumbersome for a developer22:16
cmars232maybe i could put all the deps in the source tarball?22:17
cmars232is there a limit on source tarball size?22:17
=== Ursinha` is now known as Ursinha
maxbI don't believe so22:26
maxbYou're unlikely to beat libreoffice, anyway :-)22:26
cmars232maxb: haha, thanks22:30

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!