| seanmontana | hello | 01:07 |
|---|---|---|
| seanmontana | Anyway to know an update on Launchpad Bug #1010981 | 01:08 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1010981 in linux "Computer does not power off when attempting to shut down by any route." [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1010981 | 01:08 |
| seanmontana | or a workaround | 01:08 |
| TheLordOfTime | that bug is marked as incomplete | 01:15 |
| TheLordOfTime | they want the latest upstream kernel tested | 01:15 |
| seanmontana | whats that mean | 01:16 |
| TheLordOfTime | (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1010981/comments/23) | 01:16 |
| ubot2` | Ubuntu bug 1010981 in linux "Computer does not power off when attempting to shut down by any route." [Medium,Incomplete] | 01:16 |
| TheLordOfTime | basically that means the bug is incomplete, so they can't fix it yet. | 01:17 |
| TheLordOfTime | i think | 01:17 |
| * TheLordOfTime isnt on the kernel team | 01:17 | |
| TheLordOfTime | see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BugTriage/BugStates#Incomplete_Bugs for what they mean by "incomplete" | 01:18 |
| TheLordOfTime | if you have questions, you could post those questions on the bug | 01:18 |
| TheLordOfTime | but in its state i dont think the kernel team can diagnose the problem in its current state | 01:18 |
| seanmontana | hmm | 01:19 |
| seanmontana | maybe ill do that kernel upstream thing | 01:19 |
| seanmontana | i have no idea how though.. | 01:19 |
| seanmontana | ill check it out | 01:19 |
| TheLordOfTime | they give you a link | 01:20 |
| TheLordOfTime | if you're unsure how to test, well... | 01:20 |
| TheLordOfTime | not sure that bug'll get fixed | 01:20 |
| TheLordOfTime | (although i can't confirm that bug anyways, with any kernel, and i'm running a Quantal kernel on Precise) | 01:21 |
| seanmontana | right cause you would have to have my computer model right | 01:22 |
| seanmontana | how do i know which mainline build is the most current | 01:27 |
| seanmontana | because i see v3.2.28-precise/ with timestamp 20-Aug-2012 | 01:28 |
| seanmontana | and then i see v3.3.1-precise/ with timestamp 02-Apr-2012 | 01:29 |
| seanmontana | which appears to be a higher version number but older date | 01:29 |
| seanmontana | how do i know which is the latest mainline build image to install | 01:43 |
| seanmontana | based upon version number alone? | 01:43 |
| penguin42 | xnox: Bug 1041838 - I think the naming is the feature, but it's still a bug - the ubuntu-devel notes are only work arounds; the only case I see where it's not a bug is if he set it as eth0 in a preseed | 14:07 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1041838 in ubiquity "i386 netboot install ubuntu server: no wired network after install [incorrect name in interfaces file]" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1041838 | 14:07 |
| xnox | penguin42: "set it as eth0 in a preseed" this must/should not be done any more. | 14:08 |
| penguin42 | xnox: Right, so the question is did he use a preseed, if he didn't preseed then it should have got it right | 14:09 |
| penguin42 | xnox: He doesn't say he preseeded | 14:09 |
| xnox | but he did use pxe boot, which sets options. | 14:10 |
| penguin42 | xnox: right, so I think it's important to ask where his pxe config came from; and the interesting thing is that the install process worked fine, it was only what happened after that didn't - so the installer did get the biosdev but the installed result didn't which seems to be the opposite of what's being suggested | 14:13 |
| === zyga is now known as zyga-afk | ||
| olmjo | folks, any help would be appreciated; I am working on triaging my first bug. | 14:38 |
| olmjo | turns out the first is, I think, a feature request. i need a bug-control member to change the "importance" to "wishlist", right? | 14:39 |
| penguin42 | olmjo: Yes, but we're happy to make the changes for you | 14:39 |
| penguin42 | olmjo: So just give the bug number and say what you want it to set to and why | 14:40 |
| olmjo | great, thanks. | 14:40 |
| penguin42 | does someone have an ARM install of Quantal that they can check a bug on? | 14:43 |
| olmjo | Bug #702905 should be changed to "Wishlist". The Ubuntu package depends on open-jdk, but the upstream project does not, so this isn't a feature request for upstream. The upstream project is at <http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rJava/index.html>. | 14:50 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 702905 in rjava "r-cran-rjava depends on openjdk-6-jre only" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/702905 | 14:50 |
| * penguin42 looks | 14:51 | |
| penguin42 | olmjo: I don't think that's a wishlist; I mean if it's possible to use a variety of JRE's then it *should* be dependent on something like java6-runtime | 14:54 |
| olmjo | penguin42: Okay. Fair enough. I guess I reasoned that is how it would be classified because the Ubuntu package is explicit about that dependency. It just shouldn't be artificially restricted that way. | 14:55 |
| olmjo | I'll re-read some of the bug triaging doc. Thanks! | 14:57 |
| penguin42 | olmjo: What I don't know is whether there is a reason that it's restricted to openjdk-6 - I'm guessing from the description it's a jni thing, and I wonder if those do move between jre's easily? I don't know enough Java foo | 14:57 |
| micahg | olmjo: that's invalid now | 15:00 |
| micahg | sun-java was dropped from the archive last year | 15:00 |
| micahg | err...this year | 15:01 |
| penguin42 | micahg: Should probably still be fixed to depend on java-runtime ? | 15:01 |
| micahg | penguin42: you'll want to check the packaging in quantal for something like that | 15:02 |
| olmjo | michag: Ah, I see. I knew I haven't had sun-java for a while now, so that makes sense. | 15:02 |
| penguin42 | micahg: Still says it's a depend on openjdk-6-jre on quantal | 15:02 |
| micahg | package hasn't been updated for java 7 or the new java packaging standards yet AIUI | 15:03 |
| penguin42 | micahg: Yeh which is probably the right thing to ask for | 15:03 |
| penguin42 | micahg: So back to a previous question; do you have a Quantal ARM board to hand? | 15:04 |
| micahg | no | 15:04 |
| * micahg disappears for a bit | 15:05 | |
| penguin42 | ok, thanks | 15:05 |
| olmjo | penguin42: can you clarify things for me? what is the right course of action? | 15:11 |
| penguin42 | olmjo: I'm not sure - but that's ok you don't have to triage every bug; I think '(16:03:34) micahg: package hasn't been updated for java 7 or the new java packaging standards yet AIUI' is the right comment here - the package really needs updating in various javay ways - but I don't know enough about Java to say that | 15:13 |
| olmjo | okay, great. | 15:14 |
| olmjo | thanks! | 15:14 |
| === Nafallo_ is now known as Nafallo | ||
| * penguin42 bug 235539 is fun | 18:05 | |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 235539 in acpi "Laptop boots at Midnight, by itself." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/235539 | 18:05 |
| RoyK | penguin42: Achluophobian laptop? ;) | 18:32 |
| penguin42 | RoyK: Thank you for the word of the day! | 18:32 |
| penguin42 | RoyK: You've not got an ARM quantal install do you? | 18:35 |
| RoyK | only precise atm | 18:35 |
| penguin42 | nod, not got any ARM stuff setup atm - I'm suspecting bug 501277 will still happen on ARM | 18:35 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 501277 in gdb "gdb "catch syscall" doesn't work, missing syscalls/amd64-linux.xml" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/501277 | 18:35 |
| === Logan_ is now known as Fluffer | ||
| === Fluffer is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === Ursinha` is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === io-non-esisto is now known as mapreri | ||
| === glebihan__ is now known as glebihan | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!