[02:36] <JoseeAntonioR> cjohnston: hey, have you got an automatic mailing system for sponsorship, so responses are sent automatically depending on the status of it?
[02:36] <JoseeAntonioR> ^: that's in summit
[03:00] <mhall119> JoseeAntonioR: no, summit doesn't do the mailing, those are done manually
[03:00] <JoseeAntonioR> mhall119: wouldn't it be nice to have that feature? added to the "sponsorship status" page it'd be a super system
[03:54] <bkerensa> jono: I'm finally a Ubuntu Accomplishments Contributor ;p
[03:54] <bkerensa> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-accomplishments-viewer-developers/ubuntu-accomplishments-viewer/accomplishments-viewer/revision/166
[03:54] <jono> bkerensa, :-)
[03:54] <jono> thanks bkerensa!
[03:54] <bkerensa> ;p
[06:01] <czajkowski> morning folks
[07:10] <dholbach> good morning
[08:53] <czajkowski> dholbach: you know much about AU ?
[08:56] <dholbach> no, not really
[08:56] <czajkowski> trying to work out the best URL to put on LP to point to an external tracker aka AU under maas
[08:57] <czajkowski> http://askubuntu.com/search?q=maas  or http://askubuntu.com/questions/tagged/maas?sort=active&pagesize=50
[08:57] <dholbach> no idea I'm afraid :-/
[08:57] <czajkowski> no worries
[08:58] <czajkowski> moves into one of the other items on the to do list
[08:58] <czajkowski> it's kinda never ending today
[09:55] <jussi> AU is a valuable metal iirc :P
[09:56]  * jussi hugs czajkowski
[09:58] <czajkowski> what have I done......
[09:58] <czajkowski> or
[09:58] <czajkowski> what do you want
[10:00] <jussi> czajkowski: :P :P Just make you cringe inside... :D
[10:03] <czajkowski> no no cringing
[10:03] <czajkowski> Ive noticed my pings increasing to get LP work done since I've started :)
[13:05] <czajkowski> jcastro: you about to help for a tick
[13:05] <czajkowski> please..
[13:06] <czajkowski> jcastro: any idea why I get http://askubuntu.com/questions/tagged/maas 57 results this way and http://askubuntu.com/search?q=maas 67 this way
[13:12] <popey> because the second one searches inside the questions, not just the tags
[13:12] <popey> so some questions will have mass in the text but not mass as a tag
[13:12] <popey> hence more
[13:12] <czajkowski> ah ok
[13:12] <czajkowski> most confusing
[13:13] <czajkowski> popey: thanks
[13:13] <popey> it does say in the top right :)
[13:14] <popey> stupid CTRL+W
[13:20] <dpm> any wiki guru around here who could tell me if it's possible to add a link within a page that takes you to the edit version of another page? I've tried adding a link as [[SomePage?action=edit|edit me]], but the wiki simply tries to create a page called "SomePage?action=edit" whenevr I click on it
[13:20] <czajkowski> dpm: can you add a link to a shortented link like bit.ly
[13:21] <dpm> hm... clever
[13:21] <czajkowski> every once ina  while I get a good one!
[13:21] <dpm> thanks czajkowski :)
[13:22] <czajkowski> :)
[13:22] <dpm> actually, I should probably be able to use the full URL as well: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SomePage
[13:22] <czajkowski> dpm: but now that I hae you :)
[13:22]  * dpm tries
[13:22] <czajkowski> any wee chance we can get translation love on the membership page...
[13:23] <dpm> czajkowski, I'll see what I can do, but I'm working full time on app development right now. Let me see if I've got some time before eod
[13:23] <czajkowski> thanks
[13:23] <czajkowski> or else tell me who or what to do
[13:24] <czajkowski> f I should mail a certain list I can do that
[13:24] <dpm> ok
[14:26] <czajkowski> http://impressapenguin.com/ hhehehe
[14:57] <dholbach> 213 people in #u-classroom - not bad for a start
[16:04] <pleia2> mhall119: is there any plans in the works to upgrade loco.ubuntu.com's server to 12.04? I'm wondering if we should be telling people to dev on 10.04 (plus that gets rid of the need to s/2.6/2.7 in instructions)
[16:04] <pleia2> of course that's sucky because... 10.04 :)
[16:04] <czajkowski> heheh
[16:05] <pleia2> but writing some python 2.7 specific stuff only to learn it won't run in production wouldn't be great either
[16:06] <pleia2> (is there much between 2.6 and 2.7 to be worried about?)
[16:06] <pleia2> anyway, I bring this up because I saw updates to the ltp blueprint today about people sending emails to their locos about working on it, and I didn't get to updating instructions yet :)
[16:08] <czajkowski> pleia2: ah Iv'e yet to send the mail about dev
[16:08] <czajkowski> I've a longer mail to go out
[16:08] <pleia2> czajkowski: cprofitt acked his action item to do the same
[16:08] <czajkowski> most likely will not get to that till tomorrow, I thought 2 mails and a blog post was a lot already today :)
[16:08] <pleia2> so I was like "oh no, everyone is sending them out!" :)
[16:08] <czajkowski> ack
[16:09] <pleia2> it's really quite simple to get it going in 12.04 since daker fixed the environment issue I ran into, just a quick change in one file from the current instructions
[16:12] <czajkowski> sweet
[16:13] <czajkowski> I'm around till 17:00 UTC tomorrow and then just for the CC call although will be at the airport for that so this should be fun
[16:17] <mhall119> pleia2: the problem is that loco.u.c shares the server with a bunch of other sites (I don't recall which), they'd all have to be able to upgrade to 12.04
[16:18] <czajkowski> all the ones on the DC move
[16:18] <czajkowski> I can ask to see how much hassle it would be to upgrade if you want
[16:18] <czajkowski> as I'm in hands reach of them now
[16:18] <mhall119> there isn't much difference between 2.6 and 2.7, as far as I know loco-team-portal runs fine on 2.7
[16:18] <pleia2> mhall119: I know, just asking if any plans were in the works
[16:18] <mhall119> we'll get a new django version though, so it'll need to be tested with that
[16:19] <mhall119> pleia2: daker would be the one to coordinage an upgrade
[16:19] <mhall119> I don't know if he's talked with IS about it yet or not
[16:19] <pleia2> I'm really just asking so we know what to recommend to potential devs
[16:19] <pleia2> I don't care when it gets upgraded ;) but I don't want to tell people to dev on 12.04 if their code will be useless on 10.04 django and python 2.6
[16:19] <mhall119> pleia2: python 2.6 if they have it, 2.7 if they don't, and yeah it's kind of a sucky situation
[16:20] <mhall119> the django version we install to virtualenv should roughly match what's in production
[16:20] <mhall119> regardless of whether they are on 12.04 or not
[16:21] <pleia2> ok
[16:21] <mhall119> so only the python version would be different
[16:21] <pleia2> should we recommend people not use 2.7 stuff for now?
[16:21] <pleia2> stuff == new python things in 2.7
[16:22] <mhall119> yeah, but knowing which ones are new isn't always obvious
[16:22] <pleia2> of course
[16:22] <mhall119> but 2.6 to 2.7 is *much* better than when we went 2.4 to 2.6
[16:22] <pleia2> yeah :)
[16:24] <pleia2> ok, I'll add a new step to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoTeamPortal for 12.04 about manually updating the python version in the Makefile
[16:25] <czajkowski> ok I've spokent to elmo
[16:26] <czajkowski> he will upgrae the machine that ltp is on
[16:26] <czajkowski> if we get someone to help cordinate it
[16:26] <czajkowski> aka find someoen to poke the other 15 people who have stuff on that server
[16:26] <czajkowski> so if darker wants to do this I will help
[16:26] <czajkowski> then cranberry will be on 12/04
[16:26] <pleia2> I really wasn't suggesting an upgrade, since it needs to be tested and all and I don't know who is available for that, I was just asking for my instructions
[17:15] <dholbach> alright, dinner time - see you tomorrow :)
[18:34] <Pici> Where would I point someone looking for help/resources programming a HUD plugin?
[18:39] <mhall119> Pici: depends on what is meant by "HUD plugin"
[18:39]  * Pici shrugs
[18:39] <mhall119> HUD reads data from the indicators
[18:40] <mhall119> if it's in an indicator menu (including appmenu indicator, which does the global menu) then it'll be in HUD
[18:40] <Pici> mhall119: I personally don't use Unity (yeah, boo hiss whatever), so I'm a bit unfamiliar with its parts.  I suggested they try to ask in #ubuntu-unity.
[18:40] <mhall119> outside of that, there really isn't anything else you can do
[18:40] <mhall119> #ubuntu-unity would work, yeah