[06:48] <twb> What's the git:// URL for the ubuntu (i.e. not upstream) kernel repo?
[06:48] <twb> I'm looking at the wiki page and can't see it mentioned
[07:55] <rbasak> twb: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/KernelGitGuide
[07:55] <apw> rbasak, he's not here
[07:56] <rbasak> Good point. I guess he'll have to check the logs :)
[07:56] <ogra_> apw, yo ... moaning 
[07:57] <ogra_> apw, the initrd generation bug was from xnox
[07:57] <apw> ogra_, i put some stuff in the bug, the'll hopefully have found it there
[07:57] <ogra_> but i have seen this before when using dpkg -i to install a kernel ... i'm not sure why, how or if that has any imapct on the behavior
[07:58] <apw> ogra_, i have tested the scenarios suggested and they work here on x86 and on ti-omap4, i think it can only happen if we lose our link config.  which has happened to me in the past, and update broke it somehow
[08:00] <ogra_> oh, ok
=== henrix_ is now known as henrix
[08:29]  * cking reboots
[08:29] <brendand> is there some kind of massive power regression in the quantal kernel?
[08:29] <brendand> i am running the backports kernel on my (precise) system
[08:29] <brendand> and i now get about 30 mins battery, and no warning before the system powers off
[08:44] <brendand> cking, have you seen the bug roadmr raised on fwts yesterday? it's very strange
[08:45] <brendand> cking, basically when suspending the system using the fwts s3 test the audio is lost on resume
[08:45] <cking> brendand, yep, I've followed that up and I'm waiting for some more info 
[08:46] <cking> it's curious, because fwts is basically just called pm-suspend, so it is puzzling
[08:46] <brendand> cking, when you select suspend from the menu, it calls pm-suspend, right?
[08:47] <cking> brendand, ultimately, yes, at some point
[08:48] <brendand> cking, where does rtcwake come into it?
[08:48] <cking> brendand, it doesn't
[08:49] <brendand> cking, ok. i'll have to ask roadmr why he chose to test with that
[08:49] <brendand> cking, btw. if you would like you can have ssh access to the system. up to you
[08:50] <cking> brendand, nope, I'm going to wait until the bug report is responded to, it's more efficient on my time, especially as I think it's not a fwts issue
[08:51] <brendand> cking, no problem. i'll see if i can get the relevant info now. otherwise i'll make sure roadmr updates it when he gets in
[08:52] <cking> brendand, cool
[08:56] <brendand> cking, err. i won't be able to wake it back up after running pm-suspend without physical access though :/
[08:57] <brendand> oh well
[08:57] <cking> brendand, lemme supply a script to do that for you in the bug report then
[08:58] <brendand> cking, that would be cool. thanks
[09:05] <cking> brendand, done
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[12:01]  * cking -> lunch
[12:25]  * henrix -> lunch
[13:14] <rtg> ogra_, did the linux-firmware package I uploaded yesterday fix the wifi issue on the Panda ?
[13:14] <rtg> bug #1042918
[13:14] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1042918 in linux-ti-omap4 "no wireless networks detected during install of Quantal on Panda board" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1042918
[13:14] <ogra_> rtg, the installer offered me WLAN and it listed the networks in reach ... i wasnt able to connect but blame the installer for now 
[13:15] <rtg> ogaOK, at least teh device was initialized
[13:15] <rtg> gah!
[13:16] <rtg> ogra_, on a different topic, did you talk to apw about the kernel upgrade problem in bug #1041607 ? He had some pretty good thoughts.
[13:16] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1041607 in linux-ti-omap4 "linux-ti-omap4 generates the initial initrd to late for its own postinst scripts" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1041607
[13:18] <ogra_> yep, we sratched the surface of it today :)
=== jussi01 is now known as jussi
[15:41] <apw> hurrah
[15:52] <brendand> hi, i asked this in the morning but no response. is there a known power regression in the quantal kernel?
[15:52] <brendand> just took my laptop off the charger and it shows 50 mins
[15:53] <brendand> powertop shows 1803 wakeups p/s
[15:53] <apw> not that i have heard of, what does powertop say
[15:53] <apw> well theres your issue ...
[15:53] <brendand> now 370
[15:53] <brendand> apw - what's normal?
[15:53] <apw> not 2k
[15:54] <apw> how much power does it say you are using
[16:08] <brendand> apw, where do i check that?
[16:10] <brendand> is this worrying:
[16:10] <brendand>             100.0%                      Device         Audio codec hwC0D1: LSI
[16:13] <apw> i think that is pretty normal
[16:17] <brendand> so how do i check how much power i am using?
[16:26] <brendand> apw - so what just happened is that i looked at my battery indicator and it said 15 mins left. immediately after the system powered off without warning
[16:27] <apw> yep, low power handling sucks ass, the warning time and the time at which it becomes critical and triggers shutdown are not very far away if your machine is burning like yours
[16:28] <apw> you need to identify waht is making the load so high
[16:33] <brendand> apw - apart from powertop what can i look at?
[16:33] <apw> well that'd be my first step, how many watts does it say you are using
[16:33] <apw> as i'd want to know its not just your battery tanking
[16:34] <brendand> i don't see any wattage information
[16:35] <brendand> just wakeups p/s
[16:35] <apw> its only there when you are on battery iirc
[16:36] <brendand> apw - it wasn't even then
[16:37] <jwi> brendand: there's a regression that affects intel snb gpus.
[16:38] <apw> about 10s after i pull the power plug on my laptop here i get this in the overview panel in powertop
[16:38] <apw> The battery reports a discharge rate of 2.72 W
[16:38] <apw> (it is lying in my case cause it cannot add up)
[16:38] <apw> jwi, details ?
[16:39] <jwi> apw: 1ee9ae3244c4789f in linus' tree - not in 3.5-stable yet.
[16:40] <apw> brendand, this is quantal yes ?
[16:41] <brendand> apw - quantal kernel yes
[16:41] <apw> brendand, got a bug number?
[16:41] <brendand> apw - not yet. i'll raise one now
[16:41] <apw> ok once i have that i'll get a kernle together with this applied to test
[16:42] <brendand> apw - this is what i see from powertop, even well after unplugging: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1176231/
[16:42] <rtg> apw, it doesn't cherry-pick clean. It likely has some deps
[16:44] <brendand> jwi - i have an ATI gpu though
[16:47] <brendand> apw - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1043941
[16:47] <ubot2`> Ubuntu bug 1043941 in linux "[HP EliteBook 6930p] System burns through battery in ~30 mins, not even warning before hard-powering off" [Undecided,New]
[16:52] <jwi> brendand: yep, that's definitely a different bug.
[17:02]  * rtg bounces gomeisa for SSL update
[17:16] <rtg> jsalisbury, henrix, arges, ayan: need to reboot tangerine for SSL update sometime this morning. lemme know when your builds are done.
[17:16] <arges> rtg, ok will do. 
[17:16] <henrix> rtg: ack, should take a couple of minutes only
[17:18] <henrix> rtg: i'm done
[17:20] <jsalisbury> rtg, i'm done now.
[17:24] <arges> rtg, it's creating the image and ddeb right now... so should be 15m or less
[17:28] <rtg> arges, ok, I'll go get some lunch and come back in 15 min or so
[17:53] <apw> rtg i see my uvc cherrypicks won't apply now :)
[17:58] <arges> rtg, ok all done. thanks
[18:03] <rtg> jsalisbury, henrix, arges, ayan: tangerine is back
[18:03] <jsalisbury> rtg, thanks
[18:03] <arges> cool
[18:04]  * rtg -> EOW
=== orated_ is now known as orated
[18:21] <apw> broder, http://people.canonical.com/~apw/lp1043941-quantal/
[18:22] <apw> broder, soz mean for brendon who has logged off ... grr
[18:38]  * henrix -> EOD
[19:02] <brendand> jsalisbury, strictly speaking i only need http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.6-rc3-quantal/linux-image-3.6.0-030600rc3-generic_3.6.0-030600rc3.201208221735_amd64.deb, right?
[19:03] <brendand> jsalisbury, or would you advice to install -extra as well?
[19:15] <brendand> bjf - ok, we've hit this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1044018
[19:15] <ubot2`> Ubuntu bug 1044018 in linux "Precise 12.04.1 Fails to boot image on disk after installation via PXE" [Undecided,New]
[19:15] <brendand> bjf - tracking bug updated as such
[19:43] <jsalisbury> brendand, you would need to install both linux-image and linux-image-extra
[20:38] <adam_g> jsalisbury: ping
[20:38] <jsalisbury> adam_g, pong
[20:43] <adam_g> jsalisbury: im about to starting testing the kernels you linked in bug #1035172, but am unsure how to get past the missing firmware issue
[20:43] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1035172 in linux "DHCP broken for Openstack Nova instances since kernel v3.3" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1035172
[20:44] <adam_g> jsalisbury: actually, i *may* have just gotten it. rebooting
[20:44] <jsalisbury> adam_g, ok, cool.  
[20:45] <jsalisbury> adam_g, if it's easier, we can bisect between the Ubuntu kernels versus the upstream kernels(If you can't get around the firmware issue).
[20:46] <adam_g> jsalisbury: is there some difference in where upstream kernels expect their firmware vs ubuntu kernels? ie, /lib/firmware/bnx2/ vs /lib/firmware/`uname -r`/bnx2/ 
[20:47] <jsalisbury> adam_g, I don't believe so
[20:47] <jsalisbury> adam_g, /lib/firmware/bnx2x 
[20:47] <jsalisbury> s/bnx2x/bnx2