[01:17] <StevenK> wallyworld_, wgrant: Your thoughts on http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1176978/ ?
[01:19] <wallyworld_> BRANCH_POLICY_ALLOWED_TYPES perhaps?
[01:20] <StevenK> Which is just awkwardly long
[01:20] <wallyworld_> but more clear
[01:21] <wallyworld_> i don't agree that it's awkward
[01:21] <wallyworld_> but that's just mho
[01:21] <wallyworld_> wgrant can have the casting vote
[01:22] <StevenK> But he isn't old enough to vote?
[01:22] <wallyworld_> lol
[01:24] <wgrant> Hey, I can even drink the US as of a few months ago!
[01:24] <wgrant> I agree with wallyworld_
[01:24] <wgrant> Both on that BRANCH_POLICY_ALLOWED_TYPES is good, and that I should have the casting vote because I'm awesome.
[01:25]  * wallyworld_ gets a bucket
[01:25] <wgrant> :)
[01:27]  * StevenK pushes up the branch, since you both suck
[02:12] <StevenK> wallyworld_, wgrant: https://code.launchpad.net/~stevenk/launchpad/exported-policy/+merge/122184
[02:13] <wgrant> StevenK: 8	- 'POLICY_ALLOWED_TYPES',
[02:13] <wgrant> 9	+ 'BUG_POLICY_ALLOWED_TYPES',
[02:13] <wgrant> 10	'POLICY_DEFAULT_TYPES',
[02:13] <wgrant> Perhaps rename POLICY_DEFAULT_TYPES as well?
[02:15] <wallyworld_> +1
[02:17] <StevenK> wallyworld_: And POLICY_REQUIRED_GRANTS in branchnamespace?
[02:17] <StevenK> Rargh, tab fail
[02:17] <wallyworld_> why not, might as well
[02:27] <StevenK> wgrant: Diff updated
[02:36] <wgrant> StevenK: r=me, thanks
[02:36] <wgrant> StevenK: Your security_contact droppage is good to go out tonight?
[02:38] <StevenK> wgrant: Yeah, applied in 0.2 on sourcherry
[06:06] <StevenK> Sigh. We use apt-ftparchive generate for contents generation
[07:49] <adeuring> good morning
[10:12] <mgz> so, I had a message from buildbot about my (ec2 tested) change failing when merged along with one from wallyworld
[10:12] <wgrant> mgz: It's on production now
[10:13] <mgz> given there was a NDT since that d... right
[10:13] <mgz> so, is my "just ignore it" attitude right, or should I be following stuff like that up?
[10:13] <wgrant> That was probably the run that we selfishly had killed so a later rev could be deployed
[10:13] <mgz> that sounds likely.
[10:14] <mgz> aborted after running a few hundred tests, from the report
[10:14] <wgrant> The rule of buildbot failures: if the current/last build in either lane of http://lpbuildbot.canonical.com/waterfall is red, you need to do something
[10:14] <wgrant> otherwise ignore it, because someone else has fixed it
[10:14] <mgz> okay, thanks!
[13:59] <abentley> jcsackett: I had a look at the filebug implementation of information_type, and it looks totally separate from the bug one.
[15:20] <bac> i'm attempting to login to staging.launchpad.net but am getting invalid password errors from the two-factor auth query.  could this be something unique to staging or likely my 2fa is broken?
[16:23] <nigelb> lifeless: How'd your keynote go?
[16:23] <nigelb> Or is it later today?
[20:13] <lifeless> nigelb: in 1 hour
[23:31] <wgrant> bac: ISD manage even staging SSO, but I believe they know of issues with 2FA there (mostly that they don't properly disable it when they copy the DB across)
[23:33] <bac> wgrant: thanks i got it worked out.
[23:33] <bac> staging and production cannot use the same devices or they get out of sync
[23:33] <bac> and if you set 'always use 2fa' then you are screwed b/c staging will try to use it...but you don't have a registered device.
[23:36] <wgrant> bac: Right, I believe they intended to disable that setting for everyone on staging, because you obviously can't use the same device on both
[23:36] <wgrant> So everyone would be locked out