| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 07:04 |
|---|---|---|
| === herac|ide is now known as heraclide | ||
| geser | good morning dholbach | 07:19 |
| dholbach | hey geser | 07:19 |
| === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| alo21 | hi all | 08:21 |
| alo21 | I have just read some guides.... and I am wondering what should I do now | 08:23 |
| alo21 | can someone follow me for a short period of time? | 08:23 |
| FlowRiser | I want to see what's inside a library, can i do that ? | 09:09 |
| Zhenech | get the source? | 09:10 |
| FlowRiser | i have the source | 09:11 |
| FlowRiser | Zhenech: i got it using apt-get install liblightdm | 09:12 |
| FlowRiser | Zhenech, i'm sorry i'm a newb, is that the source ? | 09:12 |
| Zhenech | apt-get source liblightdm will give you the source | 09:13 |
| FlowRiser | Zhenech, i see, thanks | 09:14 |
| FlowRiser | Zhenech, where will it save the source code ? | 09:14 |
| Zhenech | it will tell you :) | 09:14 |
| FlowRiser | Zhenech, thanks alot :D | 09:14 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| alo21 | hi.. | 10:45 |
| alo21 | when I am upgrading a package, should I put "quantal" as release? | 10:46 |
| alo21 | yofel: could help me for a while? | 10:50 |
| tumbleweed | alo21: the release in the changelog is the release you are uploading to | 10:52 |
| tumbleweed | which is almost always going to be the development release, currently: quantal | 10:52 |
| alo21 | tumbleweed: for example I am trying to fix this (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gajim/+bug/1044292) | 10:52 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1044292 in gajim (Ubuntu) "[new-upstream]Gajim 0.15.1" [Undecided,New] | 10:52 |
| alo21 | tumbleweed: Is a good idea to put 'quantal'? | 10:53 |
| tumbleweed | yes | 10:54 |
| alo21 | tumbleweed: and as I learnd I should write 'new upstream' as a comment. Right? | 10:54 |
| alo21 | new upstream release* | 10:55 |
| tumbleweed | yes, and then mention all teh packaging changes you had to make (if there are any) | 10:55 |
| alo21 | tumbleweed: I have just applied the debdiff to the new version | 10:56 |
| alo21 | tumbleweed: Should I list it? | 10:56 |
| tumbleweed | no, that's not a change | 10:57 |
| tumbleweed | does this new release have new features? or only bugfixes? | 10:57 |
| alo21 | tumbleweed: how I know it? | 10:58 |
| alo21 | tumbleweed: I did not introduce any other changes, a part joining the debdiff | 11:01 |
| tumbleweed | alo21: read the diff? look at the upstream commit history? | 11:03 |
| tumbleweed | from the changelog in the bug, the only potential issue looks like farsight -> farstream (I don't know enough about them to know offhand how invasive that is) | 11:04 |
| alo21 | Nafallo: | 12:15 |
| alo21 | Nafallo: hi.. I am fixing this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gajim/+bug/1044292) | 12:15 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1044292 in gajim (Ubuntu) "[new-upstream]Gajim 0.15.1" [Undecided,New] | 12:15 |
| alo21 | and I create the package. Where should I upload it? | 12:15 |
| Nafallo | alo21: sorry. I haven't touched the package for years, and I probably haven't got upload rights anymore. | 12:18 |
| Nafallo | -EPERSON | 12:18 |
| mitya57 | alo21: I think you should contact the current maintainer (check https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gajim for his name) | 12:19 |
| alo21 | Nafallo: ok.. thanks | 12:19 |
| Nafallo | actually, looking at that page, we're using the debian package these days | 12:21 |
| Nafallo | alo21: don't touch it. the only thing necessary is getting it synced from debian :-) | 12:21 |
| Nafallo | what's the pre-release freeze currently in effect about? | 12:22 |
| alo21 | Nafallo: I downloaded the source from the website (http://gajim.org/downloads.php?lang=en#tarball). Isn't right? | 12:22 |
| Nafallo | alo21: no | 12:22 |
| Nafallo | alo21: it's a sync from Debian these days. not an ubuntu package at all. | 12:23 |
| alo21 | Nafallo: ok | 12:23 |
| Nafallo | we're in beta1 freeze? | 12:24 |
| Laney | yesyes | 12:25 |
| Laney | DOUBLE YES | 12:25 |
| Nafallo | :-) | 12:26 |
| Nafallo | so yeah, get it synced. it's a bugfix release :-) | 12:27 |
| Nafallo | gajim (0.15-1.1) unstable; urgency=high | 12:27 |
| Nafallo | * Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team. | 12:27 |
| Nafallo | * Fix CVE-2012-2093: insecure use of temporary files when convering LaTeX | 12:27 |
| Nafallo | IM messages to png images. Closes: #668710 | 12:27 |
| ubottu | src/common/latex.py in Gajim 0.15 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a temporary latex file, related to the get_tmpfile_name function. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-2093) | 12:27 |
| Nafallo | -- Luk Claes <email address hidden> Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:22:00 +0200 | 12:27 |
| Nafallo | even better. security release. | 12:27 |
| Nafallo | should probably get synced to precise-security as well | 12:28 |
| alo21 | Nafallo: So... reguarding ubuntu 12.10, I was able to upgrade package until July 5th. Right? | 12:30 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| dholbach | lfaraone_, lfaraone__: do you know which version of the sugar source packages in Ubuntu should be current right now? | 13:42 |
| dholbach | it seems like there's a few merge proposals for older versions of it and I'm not quite sure if they should have been replaced or anything | 13:42 |
| ScottK | dholbach: Sugar is pretty unmaintained in Debian and Ubuntu ATM. It's a mess. | 14:05 |
| dholbach | ok | 14:05 |
| dholbach | it just wasn't clear to me what to do with the packages that are in Ubuntu but not in Debian | 14:05 |
| dholbach | it's hard to figure out if they're needed somewhere | 14:06 |
| Laney | I mailed him about the packageset the other day and he indicated that the maintenance effort (at least in the distro) is no more | 14:07 |
| ScottK | I'd remove anything in Ubuntu that's not in Debian since no one in Ubuntu is looking after them. | 14:07 |
| alo21 | can someone follow me step by step via this long trip? | 14:11 |
| jbicha | dholbach: I agree with ScottK, we should remove the old Sugar packages that were remove in Debian | 14:23 |
| dholbach | agrandi's fixes in http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/ made me aware of it | 14:24 |
| jbicha | http://bugs.debian.org/674547 | 14:26 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 674547 in ftp.debian.org "RM: sugar-base-0.86 -- ROM; obsolete Sugar version" [Normal,Open] | 14:26 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| dholbach | there seem to be some 0.84 bits in the archive as well | 14:33 |
| DktrKranz | dholbach: ScottK: I had some conversations with Jonas, here are some useful bits: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/2011-October/003723.html http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/2012-May/003943.html | 14:34 |
| DktrKranz | also, that should clarify other versioned packages shouldn't be versioned at all | 14:35 |
| dholbach | great | 14:35 |
| tumbleweed | the ubuntu-only sugar bits do look fairly neglected http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/neglected/ (newest one was touched 2 years ago) | 14:36 |
| DktrKranz | that reminds me, I should ask for potential 0.88 removal | 14:36 |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === 16WAA1TWW is now known as zeref | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!