| === henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
| stgraber | skaet: uploaded ltsp with the required fixes | 00:18 |
|---|---|---|
| stgraber | it's going to be horribly slow though as llvmpipe over network is a nightmare | 00:18 |
| stgraber | trying in VMs locally (so supposedly pretty fast), I have almost a second latency and all the fading is horribly slow | 00:18 |
| stgraber | but at least you get a "working" session | 00:18 |
| micahg | Laney: yeah, it's a new meta to drop the indicators and their settings and look packages | 00:22 |
| cjwatson | ^- beta-critical bug fix; requires debian-installer upload after its binaries have published | 00:26 |
| stgraber | can someone review ltsp too, it's beta critical | 00:29 |
| stgraber | I'll take biosdevname | 00:29 |
| stgraber | accepted | 00:34 |
| stgraber | also accepted livecd-rootfs. Does that one still need manual deployment on the buildds? can't remember if it auto-updates or not | 00:36 |
| stgraber | slangasek: if you have a minute, can you review LTSP? I believe infinity is at some meeting at the moment so can't poke him to do it ;) | 00:40 |
| infinity | stgraber: It auto-upgrades. | 00:41 |
| stgraber | oh, looks like infinity's back! if you have a sec, can you look at ltsp? | 00:42 |
| cjwatson | ltsp looks fine to me | 00:47 |
| cjwatson | though it'd be nice to update the comment along with the X_COLOR_DEPTH setting - but it's temporary so hopefully this won't matter for long | 00:48 |
| cjwatson | accepted | 00:48 |
| micahg | can someone please review the 3 ubuntu studio packages here ^^^ | 05:06 |
| pitti | ^ only fixes a dependency, and adds/fixes autopkgtests, so I'd appreciate if it could be accepted | 07:17 |
| === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
| === henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
| pitti | FYI, dpm prepared quantal langpacks, uploading now and waving throug queue | 08:30 |
| phillw | hiyas good people, a question on the updating of respins | 09:03 |
| pitti | hm, why does queuebot say that gvfs and gtkmm have been accepted, while they are still in unapproved? | 09:10 |
| pitti | is it getting confused because of the langpack uploads/accepts? | 09:11 |
| pitti | stgraber: ^ | 09:11 |
| pitti | ^ fixes two beta-milestoned major bugs; review appreciated! | 09:12 |
| Laney | Riddell: are you guys on top of the kde-telepathy stuff? | 09:22 |
| Laney | looks like it goes back to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ktp-common-internals/0.5.0-0ubuntu1 | 09:22 |
| cjwatson | pitti: gvfs> killall is in psmisc - is that guaranteed to be installed in this context? (besides, pkill is a better habit to be in IMO, which requires procps) | 09:43 |
| pitti | cjwatson: it is installed on our jenkins test boxes, but I'll add it anyway, thanks for spotting (and change to pkill) | 09:44 |
| === doko__ is now known as doko | ||
| pitti | oh, silly pkill/pgrep | 09:54 |
| pitti | I was wondering why pgrep gvfs-udisks2-volume-monitor utterly fails | 09:54 |
| pitti | Name:gvfs-udisks2-vo | 09:55 |
| pitti | (in status) | 09:55 |
| * pitti adds -f | 09:55 | |
| === mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|lunch | ||
| pitti | cjwatson: FYI, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/quantal/gvfs/quantal/revision/224 | 09:57 |
| === mmrazik|lunch is now known as mmrazik | ||
| Laney | knome: hey, looks like pidgin-libnotify is broken for now due to the indicator-messages transition, causing xubuntu to fail to build | 12:24 |
| knome | Laney, can you drop that until we fix the indicators? thanks | 12:26 |
| Laney | it'll need a pidgin upload to drop it | 12:26 |
| Laney | can you test an upload just dropping the recommends? | 12:26 |
| knome | i'm not a technical person, and i'm busy with real work now | 12:27 |
| knome | if you can, ask micahg or mr_pouit for that | 12:27 |
| seb128 | Laney, I plan to port pidgin-libnotify but probably not today | 12:28 |
| Laney | seb128: fair enough, so since it probably won't make beta i'll disable it for now | 12:31 |
| seb128 | yeah, I agree | 12:32 |
| Laney | skaet: hey! when do you want to disable crontab and start pushing to the b1 milestone on the tracker? | 12:45 |
| skaet | Laney, current plan is for Monday to disable the crontab | 12:50 |
| skaet | I think we can enable the milestone though today. | 12:50 |
| skaet | Will see if there's any new data that changes that after the meeting later today. | 12:51 |
| Laney | well, they won't really be candidate builds as long as cron is on | 12:51 |
| skaet | Laney, we're still missing some bits to land before any images can be considered candidates. | 12:51 |
| ogra_ | what has cron to do with the content of the image ? | 12:52 |
| Laney | it means that the builds will be overwritten | 12:52 |
| skaet | ogra_, more a comment on the contents of candidates | 12:52 |
| ogra_ | sure, but people should upload to proposed anyway | 12:53 |
| skaet | won't have true candidates until then. However gathering testing data over the weekend is useful to see if there are some "surprises" lurking. | 12:53 |
| skaet | s/then/all the missing bits land | 12:53 |
| * ogra_ still waits for a "compiz surprise" on arm :) | 12:53 | |
| ScottK | I know we have an upload that needs to happen for Kubuntu to fix KDE telepathy FTBFS. | 12:54 |
| ScottK | Should be done today though. | 12:54 |
| Laney | ah, good, I pinged Riddell about that earlier | 12:54 |
| ScottK | shadeslayer is going to fix it. | 12:55 |
| Laney | ^ is needed for xubuntu, please have a look | 12:55 |
| shadeslayer | yep | 12:58 |
| skaet | Laney, lets talk about the crontab disable/milestone enable after we get the data from the weekly meeting. | 12:59 |
| Laney | ok | 13:03 |
| === henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
| ScottK | skaet: Let's not keep moving stuff earlier. | 13:04 |
| === henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
| skaet | ScottK, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaProcess Release minus 6 day tasks | 13:07 |
| ScottK | skaet: Stopping the cronned image builds is release -3, i.e. Monday. | 13:11 |
| Laney | that's what we are currently saying | 13:12 |
| Laney | I was just checking and then confused because I thought that images posted to the milestone were supposed to be 'genuine candidates' (at least not /guaranteed/ to not be candidates due to cron still being on) | 13:12 |
| Laney | but if I'm mistaken then ho hum. | 13:12 |
| ogra_ | skaet, FYI, i'll not be around for the meeting today, steve will cover for me | 13:36 |
| skaet | thanks ogra_ | 13:36 |
| * skaet appreciates knowing who to nick highlight ;) | 13:36 | |
| pitti | ^ this makes autopkgtest actually report failed tests (*blush*), and fixes two race conditions in the tests | 13:46 |
| pitti | this only changes debian/tests/, nothing else, so I'd appreciate if it could be reviewed/accepted | 13:46 |
| dobey | hey all | 14:13 |
| dobey | i was wondering if we'll need a freeze exception to fix bug #974637 ? it's technically a regression, so just wondering if we need a UIFE for it, or just to notify i18n/docs teams that a change is coming | 14:14 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 974637 in ubuntu-sso-client "Qt Registration and Log-in dialogs have no way to perform the other action" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/974637 | 14:14 |
| jbicha | dobey: if the strings change, then yes you'll need to notify the -translators list | 14:16 |
| jbicha | we still don't have any docs for Ubuntu One or any of the sign-on part of USC | 14:16 |
| dobey | right; i know we'll have to notify either way. i just wanted to verify whether we needed the full FFe/UIFe process for it | 14:18 |
| ScottK | dobey: All U/I changes need a U/IFe now, AIUI. | 14:43 |
| ScottK | Would someone please respin Kubuntu i386/amd64 live. They should build now. | 14:44 |
| stgraber | pitti: hmm, yeah, queuebot or the LP API get confused when all the langpacks land/are accepted | 14:44 |
| Laney | doing | 14:44 |
| Laney | ScottK: I don't see any upload that would have fixed it? | 14:48 |
| ScottK | Laney: It was getting KDE telepathy out of binary new. | 14:48 |
| ScottK | Thanks. | 14:48 |
| Laney | I see, hence the other arches still being broken | 14:49 |
| ScottK | Yes. | 14:51 |
| ScottK | We'll need another upload for that. | 14:52 |
| Laney | kubuntu-amd64 on kapok.buildd finished at 2012-08-31 14:52:15 (failed) | 14:52 |
| dobey | ScottK: "now" as in "we are past UI freeze" or "now" as in "the rules have changed since last cycle" ? | 14:52 |
| ScottK | dobey: As in we're past UIF. | 14:53 |
| ScottK | Laney: Thanks. My mail didn't have the log, so let me have a look. | 14:53 |
| ScottK | Laney: I don't see the log: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/livefs-build-logs/quantal/kubuntu/ | 14:56 |
| ScottK | Can you point me at it or send it to me? | 14:56 |
| Laney | ScottK: They sync at :0 | 15:00 |
| ScottK | OK. Thanks. | 15:00 |
| ScottK | Right, so apparently that wasn't enough. Investigating. | 15:05 |
| Laney | i386 seems to be working | 15:06 |
| ScottK | Yeah. | 15:08 |
| * ScottK shakes fist at shadeslayer | 15:13 | |
| ScottK | I don't see it. | 15:14 |
| ScottK | i386 working is progress. | 15:14 |
| stgraber | seb128: bug 1044436 (screenshot attached) | 15:29 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1044436 in unity "unity on llvmpipe is unusable when in 16bit mode" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1044436 | 15:29 |
| seb128 | stgraber, thanks | 15:30 |
| === skaet_ is now known as skaet | ||
| slangasek | balloons: ok | 15:50 |
| Laney | so we won't be releasing alternates with b1? | 15:50 |
| slangasek | Laney: that's correct | 15:51 |
| Laney | or everything thereafter, I suppose | 15:51 |
| balloons | slangasek, just in general, there was anticipation that ubiquity wasn't going to meet needs.. folks claiming they could only get the alt installer to work, etc, etc | 15:51 |
| slangasek | balloons: "anticipation that it won't meet the needs" is not useful technical feedback :) | 15:51 |
| Laney | we should make sure cron, pad, ... is updated then | 15:51 |
| skaet | urg... forgot to ask that | 15:51 |
| balloons | slangasek, I know, I was just pointing out people are hesitant to change (not surprising) | 15:51 |
| slangasek | we genuinely want to know about any concrete problems that prevent the desktop CD from being usable | 15:51 |
| skaet | ScottK, is Kubuntu going forward with alternate or dropping them too? | 15:51 |
| Daviey | balloons: Sounds like panicking.. mini.iso should be able to cover their needs IMO. | 15:52 |
| slangasek | but yeah, vague concerns that it won't work are not going to change the calculation | 15:52 |
| ScottK | skaet: Not sure the status of that. Riddell? We don't have the U/I work done in the installer to support everything, so I'm not sure. | 15:52 |
| skaet | ScottK, ok, we'll leave them in there for you for now. | 15:52 |
| balloons | slangasek, yes don't misunderstand. I wasn't attempting to change direction. I encouraged those that had issues to voice them on your thread | 15:53 |
| Riddell | ScottK, skaet: I don't see us getting the UI work done in the installer this cycle, so presume to keep alternate | 15:55 |
| skaet | Riddell, ok. | 15:55 |
| xnox | ScottK: I didn't see any code/branches that bring in crypto/lvm support in the Qt frontend. And I'm not doing them (no time, nor post 3.5 Qt knoweledge) | 15:55 |
| slangasek | balloons: yep, sorry, that comment is really addressed to those raising such concerns and I'm using you as a proxy ;) | 15:55 |
| skaet | Daviey, do we move i386 out of Depreceated? | 15:56 |
| xnox | ah ok =) | 15:56 |
| slangasek | balloons: anyway, I'm confident based on the feedback on list that we're adequately covered with the other images | 15:56 |
| ScottK | xnox: Yes. Known. | 15:56 |
| skaet | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseManifest | 15:56 |
| skaet | also, any update on the netboot image? | 15:56 |
| xnox | ScottK: i'm a was out of sync reading backlog =) | 15:56 |
| ScottK | OK | 15:56 |
| balloons | slangasek, :-). no worries. Can you summarize your suggested images for folks who's needs might be better addressed by the mini iso, etc now? | 15:59 |
| skaet | knome, I'm assuming you'll be keeping Xubuntu alternates this release as well, unless you indicate differently. | 15:59 |
| skaet | s/release/beta release/ | 15:59 |
| slangasek | balloons: there's a bug open against ubuntu-release-notes that has the current recommendations | 15:59 |
| slangasek | skaet: btw, is there supposed to be a quantal series for the ubuntu-release-notes project? | 15:59 |
| skaet | Riddell, are we trying for the Kubuntu Active images for beta 1? | 15:59 |
| slangasek | AFAICS it's not there, but maybe I'm doing it wrong | 15:59 |
| * skaet goes to cross check it | 16:00 | |
| gilir | skaet, bug report about indicator-applications-gtk2 is bug 1044442 | 16:00 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1044442 in ubuntu "Re-introduce indicator-applications-gtk2" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1044442 | 16:00 |
| slangasek | http://pad.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-release is currently primed for 12.04.1... if we delete the alternate references, we'll need to add them back for 12.04.2, I guess? | 16:01 |
| slangasek | would it be better to have two separate pads? | 16:01 |
| skaet | slangasek, rather just recreate it each release | 16:01 |
| skaet | rather than pointing folks to different places | 16:01 |
| skaet | maybe just copy off for now? | 16:02 |
| slangasek | hmm, ok | 16:02 |
| skaet | and copy back | 16:02 |
| slangasek | I don't want to be in charge of copying it back ;) | 16:02 |
| skaet | it is history saved. | 16:02 |
| skaet | I'll do it. | 16:02 |
| slangasek | ok | 16:02 |
| skaet | let me finish looking at sorting out release notes, and then that will be next | 16:02 |
| slangasek | skaet: thanks, don't let me rush you :) | 16:03 |
| skaet | :) | 16:03 |
| Riddell | skaet: yes I'd like kubuntu active but it needs a bugfix to the session login I've not looked into yet, it'll still be a tech preview at best | 16:04 |
| skaet | slangasek, try again now to target to quantal, should be sorted now. | 16:06 |
| skaet | for ubuntu-release-notes | 16:06 |
| skaet | thanks gilir | 16:07 |
| slangasek | skaet: works now, thanks :) | 16:08 |
| seb128 | skaet, stgraber, Laney: ^ please ack libreoffice, the changelog doesn't list specific bugs but it's to address some of the appmenu implementation issues with the ff landing (like making unity eat 100% cpu for hours) | 16:08 |
| seb128 | well, that's a new rc version (we aim at 3.6.1 for quantal) as well | 16:08 |
| seb128 | but it includes the menus improvements and it would be really good to have those in beta1 | 16:09 |
| skaet | Laney, can you review? | 16:13 |
| Laney | ok | 16:13 |
| skaet | ev, have all updates for WUBI for 12.10 beta 1 been made? | 16:13 |
| Laney | please somebody look at pidgin-libnotify so that xubuntu can hopefully get some images | 16:14 |
| ev | skaet: I don't think we do anything special for beta | 16:15 |
| Daviey | skaet: yeah | 16:18 |
| skaet | ev, ok, thanks | 16:19 |
| skaet | Daviey, ok I'll move i386 back later. what about the netboot image? | 16:21 |
| Daviey | skaet: netboot is still important | 16:21 |
| jibel | skaet, slangasek I filed bug 1044452, could someone knowledgeable look at it ? | 16:22 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1044452 in ubuntu "Quantal Bootspeed: Regression from Precise" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1044452 | 16:22 |
| tumbleweed | Laney: typo in the bug quoted in the pidgin-libnotify changelog. otherwise seems reasonable | 16:32 |
| Laney | hmm | 16:33 |
| Laney | shall I reupload? | 16:33 |
| tumbleweed | meh, it's easy enough to figure out | 16:33 |
| ScottK | I'll be out for awhile. If shadeslayer manages to fix kde-telepathy, someone please accept it. | 16:35 |
| mterry | Hello! Could a release team member look at bug 1044447 when possible, to tell me which of the four options you'd prefer? Or if the whole thing is awful. :) | 16:41 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1044447 in unity-lens-photos "[FFe, MIR] unity-lens-photo in quantal" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1044447 | 16:41 |
| xnox | | please approve this | 16:47 |
| xnox | V | 16:47 |
| Laney | mterry: #1 sounds fine, as long as you don't expect it for B1 :-) | 16:50 |
| mterry | Laney, no, not at all :) | 16:50 |
| mterry | Laney, but hopefully shortly after it's out | 16:51 |
| * mterry investigates oauthlib then | 16:51 | |
| Laney | make sure not to break the other rdeps while you're at it :P | 16:51 |
| * xnox the arrow worked! \0/ please approve ubiquity fixing critical bug in the ask page & removing alpha warning. | 16:52 | |
| xnox | the debdiff is tiny | 16:52 |
| mterry | Hopefully not yeah :) | 16:52 |
| Laney | slangasek: ^ (ubiquity) ? | 16:52 |
| seb128 | can I get https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-session/+bug/1044464 acked? | 17:02 |
| ubot2` | Ubuntu bug 1044464 in indicator-session "UIFe: add an Online Account menuitem" [Medium,Fix committed] | 17:03 |
| seb128 | it's a small UIFe, I would like to land that today still | 17:03 |
| seb128 | just adding an entry to indicator-session | 17:03 |
| slangasek | Laney: does that mean you're passing the review to me? | 17:03 |
| Laney | slangasek: yes, I'm asking if you would do it | 17:04 |
| Laney | slangasek: also, do you know of a workaround for timeouts when accepting packages? | 17:04 |
| Laney | libreoffice here | 17:04 |
| slangasek | jibel: will try to look at this, but the amount of time passed means it's going to be harder to trace | 17:06 |
| slangasek | Laney: hum, timeouts when accepting them which way? | 17:06 |
| slangasek | Laney: AIUI the API is the only way for us to do accepts at this time | 17:06 |
| slangasek | Laney: and yes, will review ubiquity | 17:07 |
| Laney | API using "queue" | 17:07 |
| Laney | queue -s quantal-proposed -Q unapproved accept libreoffice ← thusly | 17:07 |
| slangasek | Laney: yeah, we can't use the more direct method anymore because we don't have sudo on pepo :/ | 17:07 |
| Laney | keep trying until caches get sufficiently warmed up? | 17:07 |
| slangasek | I guess so? | 17:08 |
| Laney | ok, cheers | 17:09 |
| slangasek | xnox: should these partman string issues be unit-testable? | 17:09 |
| slangasek | (ubiquity accepted) | 17:09 |
| xnox | slangasek: all of them are, apart from the ones that need dynamic substitution after we detect $OS. | 17:10 |
| xnox | slangasek: there three that never change (dont' have $OS substitution: custom, lvm, crypto) but pulled the same way as the rest (replace/resize/upgrade/etc) | 17:10 |
| Laney | ah, there we go | 17:11 |
| Laney | fifth time lucky | 17:11 |
| xnox | slangasek: so a unit-test can catch this in the future for those three without subs, others are more tricky. Currently they are skipped in the translation unit-test. | 17:12 |
| slangasek | xnox: I guess best practice would be to add said unit test ASAP, so we at least test the parts that are testable | 17:13 |
| xnox | slangasek: unfortunately partman integration is not unit-tested currently, If you have any thought on how to unit test partman they'd be very welcome. | 17:13 |
| slangasek | xnox: no specific ideas, sorry | 17:13 |
| xnox | slangasek: i will think about it and implement some unit tests. | 17:14 |
| seb128 | Laney, stgraber, skaet: ^ please consider that one, it fixes some bug and it lands a few UI tweaks that would be nicer to get earlier than late | 17:50 |
| skaet | seb128, Daviey, can you please take a pass at putting the appropriate upgrade information in to: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/QuantalUpgrades | 17:59 |
| skaet | slangasek, do we want to put some special comments there about the alternates? ie. what to do if you're used to using alternates? or is there a better place? | 18:00 |
| seb128 | skaet, ok | 18:01 |
| slangasek | skaet: I don't think we want to put comments about the alternates, just remove them? The supported upgrade method is now the network upgrade | 18:01 |
| shadeslayer | uhm, could someone approve that ^ | 18:38 |
| tumbleweed | shadeslayer: done | 18:52 |
| shadeslayer | thanks :) | 18:52 |
| shadeslayer | I also have a fixed armhf build for telepathy-qt that's test building atm | 18:53 |
| shadeslayer | but that'll take some time | 18:53 |
| === henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
| micahg | slangasek: when you get a chance, could you please review my gnome-dictionary SRU in precise, it affects lucid -> precise upgrades | 20:19 |
| cjwatson | Laney: I have a branch in progress that moves bug processing on queue accept to an async job, which will deal with that problem. In the meantime you can ask webops on #launchpad-ops (internal) to run queue accept as lp_archive@pepo for you, or harass GSA to fix the RT about us not having sudo any more :-) | 20:51 |
| cjwatson | I think it stalled partly due to my vacation and partly because it took a while for the DB patch to be deployed (largely because fastdowntime was on hold for a bit following the DC move) | 20:55 |
| slangasek | micahg: gnome-dictionary accepted | 21:09 |
| seb128 | is there any way release people could start reviewing the unity stack (bamf, compiz, ...)? | 21:13 |
| micahg | slangasek: thanks | 21:20 |
| seb128 | Laney, slangasek, stgraber, skaet: is there anyone to review the unity stack as it gets uploaded? (some components already in the queue, I would like to get comments while I'm still around to reply to eventual concerns) | 21:22 |
| slangasek | seb128: let me have a look | 21:23 |
| seb128 | slangasek, thanks, bamf and compiz there so far, nux about to come, unity in a bit | 21:26 |
| skaet | thanks slangasek. | 21:26 |
| stgraber | seb128: busy with plumbers, so if slangasek can do it, that'd be great. Poke me once accepted though so I can make sure it gets built immediately (if there's something else in the buildd queue) | 21:26 |
| slangasek | seb128: bamf accepted; but eh, why spend the effort trying to verify that the public functions weren't used, instead of just bumping the soname? | 21:37 |
| seb128 | slangasek, the #ps guys didn't want to "make the transition" harder and they had rolled their testing ppa etc already, I tried to argue a bit but I decided I didn't care enough to fight that battle and moved to the other components in their stack where most of work was laying (compiz, unity especially) | 21:38 |
| seb128 | slangasek, thanks for approving it | 21:39 |
| slangasek | meh, false optimization | 21:39 |
| slangasek | who should I go lecture about ABIs? :) | 21:39 |
| seb128 | mhr3 ;-) | 21:40 |
| seb128 | well racarr is the one who broke it, mhr3 argued it was easier to not change the soname ;-) | 21:40 |
| infinity | slangasek: What's with the kexec-tools upload you sponsored to precise without a bug closure in the changelog? | 21:40 |
| slangasek | infinity: that's an interesting question | 21:42 |
| slangasek | infinity: I thought I sponsored one /with/ a bug closure in the changelog | 21:42 |
| infinity | slangasek: The changelog disagrees. :P | 21:43 |
| slangasek | infinity: must be your imagination, I see the ref there plain as day | 21:44 |
| slangasek | queuebot: shhhhh | 21:44 |
| infinity | slangasek: *smirk* | 21:44 |
| infinity | slangasek / cjwatson: I'm not going to accept that debian-installer until after the current ti-omap4 kernel has made it from the PPA to proposed, since the last one had a nasty regression. | 21:45 |
| infinity | (for precise) | 21:45 |
| infinity | slangasek: Y'know, since it's technically your SRU day and all. | 21:45 |
| slangasek | infinity: hmm, so what are you doing SRU processing for? Aren't you supposed to be somewhere throwing peanuts at Lennart? | 21:46 |
| infinity | I'm throwing Stephane at Peter and Matthew. | 21:46 |
| stgraber | ... | 21:46 |
| infinity | He's compact. | 21:46 |
| stgraber | infinity: what happened to your wifi? shouldn't you be looking at your syslog? | 21:47 |
| slangasek | infinity: trying to get on the olympic swiss tossing team? | 21:47 |
| infinity | slangasek: I'm actually mostly doing some work in this session to debug my wireless for Seth. :P | 21:47 |
| * skaet tempted to go downstairs and watch.... | 21:47 | |
| cjwatson | infinity: mkay. I was mostly just throwing it at the archive as the most efficient way to respond to a question from rbasak earlier today without him actually being on IRC to be responded to. | 21:47 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Fair enough. I had planned to do the same upload a bit later, so less effort for me. :P | 21:47 |
| cjwatson | What I'm actually supposed to be doing right now is writing a best man speech, so this is displacement activity ... | 21:48 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Someone invited you to a public event to say something nice about them? | 21:48 |
| infinity | cjwatson: I suspect a speech questioning their sanity might work. | 21:49 |
| cjwatson | I think it's revenge for me doing the same in reverse seven years ago. | 21:49 |
| * slangasek grins | 21:50 | |
| slangasek | infinity: any test case for bug #1034568? | 21:51 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1034568 in build-essential "build-essential shouldn't be Multi-Arch: foreign" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1034568 | 21:51 |
| infinity | slangasek: dpkg-deb -I? | 21:52 |
| slangasek | dpkg-deb -I succeeds in both cases. :) | 21:52 |
| infinity | *rolls eyes* | 21:52 |
| infinity | Pedant. | 21:52 |
| slangasek | yes | 21:52 |
| slangasek | accepted | 21:52 |
| infinity | dpkg-deb -I | swiss-toss | 21:52 |
| infinity | slangasek: But thanks for reminding me that I might need to SRU up some of those eglibc bugs. At least the ones that aren't pretty obvious. | 21:53 |
| infinity | I kinda didn't bother after we delayed it. | 21:53 |
| * slangasek pauses his terminal where it is :) | 21:53 | |
| ScottK | slangasek or infinity: Would you please retry Kubuntu amd64 live? | 22:12 |
| slangasek | looking | 22:12 |
| ScottK | Thanks. | 22:12 |
| infinity | ScottK: Only if you fix the symbols file in telepathy-qt. | 22:14 |
| ScottK | infinity: shadeslayer is working on that. Test build on armhf was fine. | 22:14 |
| ScottK | I want to make sure we don't have another problem before we upload to the archive. | 22:14 |
| infinity | ScottK: Yay, just glad that someone's fixing. | 22:15 |
| ScottK | Since amd64 doesn't have that problem, it should have been fine. | 22:15 |
| ScottK | See. No threats needed. | 22:15 |
| infinity | ScottK: (I think slangasek was doing it for you anyway) | 22:17 |
| seb128 | slangasek, nux and unity as well quantal-proposed, having them reviewed before I take off would be appreciate | 22:17 |
| seb128 | d | 22:17 |
| shadeslayer | ScottK: someone will have to upload tp-qt since it's not in the kubuntu packageset | 22:19 |
| infinity | shadeslayer: Give me a pointer to it. | 22:20 |
| shadeslayer | infinity: https://launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+archive/nightly/+files/telepathy-qt_0.9.3-0ubuntu2.dsc , but I'm just waiting for it to build on amd64 and i386 to make sure it doesn't break on those | 22:20 |
| shadeslayer | https://launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+archive/nightly/+build/3757038 | 22:20 |
| infinity | shadeslayer: Erm. Why only "on armhf"? | 22:22 |
| infinity | shadeslayer: Tell me that this includes the armel and powerpc symbols changes too. | 22:22 |
| shadeslayer | infinity: haven't tested it on armel and powerpc since I don't hardware to test build on those arch's | 22:22 |
| infinity | shadeslayer: armel is the same hardware as armhf. But if you were using symbolhelper, why not just feed it all the build logs? | 22:23 |
| infinity | That's kinda the point of it. | 22:23 |
| infinity | (Or, you can do it by hand from the failed build logs...) | 22:23 |
| shadeslayer | well, I did use symbol helper, and I believe it worked for armhf, but patches fail to apply for armel and powerpc most likely because some of the symbols were already patched | 22:24 |
| shadeslayer | plus, there are more missing symbols not in the build log that I found out later on | 22:25 |
| infinity | shadeslayer: Perhaps I'll do this, since I can test on all the arches. | 22:31 |
| infinity | shadeslayer: (As for the patch application failure, that's because you were trying to do it incrementally... What you wanted was "pkgkde-symbolshelper batchpatch armel.log armhf.log powerpc.log" on the same invocation) | 22:34 |
| infinity | shadeslayer: Anyhow, verifying this here now. | 22:35 |
| shadeslayer | yeah, that's what I've did now, lemme test build | 22:35 |
| shadeslayer | alright | 22:35 |
| infinity | shadeslayer: I'm already on it. | 22:35 |
| shadeslayer | okay | 22:35 |
| shadeslayer | thanks! | 22:35 |
| === Ursinha` is now known as Ursinha | ||
| knome | hey skaet | 22:51 |
| slangasek | seb128: looking at them now - though I hope you realize I can't do reviews and XDG_RUNTIME_DIR at the same time ;) | 22:53 |
| seb128 | slangasek, I do and I wouldn't ping you if I could get anyone else from the release team to review them but seems they are all focussed on plumbers ;-) | 22:55 |
| seb128 | slangasek, thanks for the reviews! | 22:56 |
| slangasek | http://paste.ubuntu.com/1178764/ - heh | 23:01 |
| slangasek | and there's unity accepted | 23:03 |
| seb128 | slangasek, their contributors script seems buggy, I will tell them ... thanks ;-) | 23:06 |
| slangasek | :) | 23:06 |
| infinity | shadeslayer: My arm and PPC testbuilds may end up interfering with my plans to drink heavily tonight, but I'll make sure this gets uploaded on the weekend if I don't finish tonight. | 23:25 |
| skaet | knome, ? specific question? ;) | 23:39 |
| knome | skaet, no, just re: the alternates, i will inform you before monday on our final decision if that's still ok.. | 23:39 |
| knome | had real work and life mess up today's schedule.. | 23:40 |
| skaet | knome, fair 'nuf. :) thanks. | 23:41 |
| knome | no problem | 23:41 |
| herton | infinity, just heads up, ^ ti-omap4 finished building, run the script here for the sync | 23:47 |
| infinity | herton: Accepted. | 23:49 |
| herton | thanks | 23:50 |
| stgraber | seb128: is the unity stack ready to be copied? looks like the build queue is empty | 23:50 |
| seb128 | no | 23:50 |
| infinity | herton: No problem. Thanks for doing the rebase. | 23:51 |
| seb128 | stgraber, build failed on slow archs for unity due to mismatch versions in nux,compiz | 23:51 |
| seb128 | stgraber, it needs a retry after the next publisher run on those | 23:51 |
| seb128 | stgraber, then they are ok to publish once they built | 23:51 |
| seb128 | so ~1h | 23:52 |
| stgraber | ok | 23:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!