[00:00] <cjwatson> penguin42: tags: don't care - but I've commented and reassigned that to the right place
[00:06] <penguin42> cjwatson: Thanks, it's a bit nasty that one
[00:06] <penguin42> cjwatson: There's an article somewhere by Matthew Garrett about efi bricking due to one bug he ran across
[00:09] <cjwatson> Fundamentally I wish somebody else would deal with this in Ubuntu so that I don't have to fumble around guessing
[00:09] <cjwatson> Anyway, after celebrating a wedding I should really be in bed not looking at ghastly bug reports :-)
[00:11] <penguin42> hmm bed, that is a good idea
[03:06] <nob> Anybody here know much about u1db
[08:31] <cc11rocks> I want to fix bugs for Ubuntu 12.10
[08:32] <cc11rocks> I'm assuming if I'm running that in a virtual machine, I have to install the dev packages and such (and make changes in/to) the guest image?
[08:56] <MCR1> cc11rocks: http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/getting-set-up.html#upload-your-gpg-key-to-launchpad
[08:56] <cc11rocks> I want to fix bugs (development). Should I be on this channel or #ubuntu-moto? If I should be on -devel or -motu, what is the different between the channels?
[08:57] <MCR1> cc11rocks: Best for you would be to read the above link and execute necessary steps to get into development
[08:57] <cc11rocks> Yes, I'm asking WHERE I set this up at?
[08:57] <cc11rocks> Not how...
[08:58] <cc11rocks> I already took notes on the Ubuntu Dev Week logs
[08:58] <cc11rocks> I just need to know where to set up. In Ubuntu 12.10 or in current OS?
[08:59] <MCR1> cc11rocks: If you want to fix a bug, bzr branch the source, fix the bug locally, commit it, create a branch on your launchpad account containing the fix and then propose this branch for merging :)
[08:59] <cc11rocks> Okay thanks
[09:00] <cc11rocks> So even if I'm fixing a bug for Ubuntu 12.10, I can fix it locally in Ubuntu 12.04?
[09:00] <MCR1> yes
[09:00] <MCR1> you might not be able to test your fix in all cases then, but you can still fix it ;)
[09:01] <cc11rocks> Okay, thank you for your help
[09:01] <cc11rocks> Do you know about the motu vs dev channel difference?
[09:01] <MCR1> nope, sorry
[09:02] <MCR1> cc11rocks: but development does not happen on the IRC channels - those are usually VERY quiet
[09:02] <cc11rocks> Okay, thanks
[09:02] <cc11rocks> I mean for help...
[09:03] <cc11rocks> Considering I will be just starting fixing bugs, I'll probably need it
[09:03] <MCR1> cc11rocks: Here you can see how development of Unity happens for example: https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity/trunk/+activereviews
[09:04] <MCR1> cc11rocks: Follow the guide I posted to get set up...
[09:04] <cc11rocks> iulian in moto said : "cc11rocks: Both and you might want to join -packaging as well. The difference is that -motu deals with unseeded packages and -devel with core packages."
[09:05] <MCR1> aha, thx ;)
[09:05] <cc11rocks> No problem.
[13:22] <Bluefoxicy> lol
[13:22] <Bluefoxicy> lol @ udd
[13:22] <Bluefoxicy> apparently encryptfs doesn't actually include security.
[13:38] <penguin42> ?
[18:49] <cc11rocks> have run "bzr branch ubuntu:" + "happycoders-libdbg-dev" & "opj2dat" & "liborigin0" & "liborigin0-dev", etc. They ALL return bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/+branch/ubuntu/" + $packageName + "/"."
[18:50] <cc11rocks> I ran them individually of course. I was just doing it in a quick format...
[19:37] <cc11rocks> If any of you gave an answer, if you could repost as I had to restart lightdm...
[19:41] <trism> cc11rocks: no answers, what are you trying to do? usually you would branch the source package, such as: bzr branch lp:ubuntu/libdbg
[19:53] <cc11rocks> Okay, thanks
[19:53] <cc11rocks> I'm just trying to get started by fixing one of the basic bugs at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/BugFixingInitiative
[19:55] <cc11rocks> It worked,thanks
[20:11] <cc11rocks> Completed first bug fix : https://code.launchpad.net/~cc11rocks/ubuntu/quantal/libxml-csv-perl/typo-fix
[20:11] <cc11rocks> Now what?
[20:13] <cc11rocks> Etc : How do I know if my change is accepted, etc?
[20:16] <trism> cc11rocks: click the "Propose for merging" button on your code.launchpad.net branch page, enter the information and then you will get email updates when somebody reviews the change
[20:17] <cc11rocks> This correct? https://code.launchpad.net/~cc11rocks/ubuntu/quantal/libxml-csv-perl/typo-fix/+merge/122418
[20:19] <trism> cc11rocks: looks fine to me
[20:19] <cc11rocks> Thanks for your help trism :)
[20:19] <cc11rocks> Have to go eat, then to work, but I'll try to fix some more basics when I get home :)
[22:02] <iulian> robert_ancell: I can see that you've recently uploaded nemiver and gthumb. Do you have FFes for them?
[22:03] <robert_ancell> iulian, no they contain only bug fixes, do they need ffes?
[22:06] <jtaylor> Logan_: do you know if ruby-vmc can use ruby-json instead of ruby-json-pure?
[22:06] <jtaylor> Logan_: ruby-json-pure is in a bad state and if ruby-vmc does not need it we should probably remove it (unless someone fixes it)
[22:07] <Logan_> sec
[22:08] <Logan_> jtaylor: okay so
[22:09] <Logan_> according to http://rubygems.org/gems/vmc , one of the runtime dependencies is json_pure < 1.7.0, >= 1.5.1
[22:09] <Logan_> so it appears to be a "yes," it needs it
[22:09] <Logan_> I haven't tested it without ruby-json-pure, though
[22:09] <iulian> robert_ancell: No, they don't, sorry. I just got lost in those big diff files and it appeared to me that some new functions were added. I've just read the ChangeLog and it's all good.
[22:11] <jtaylor> Logan_: from what I ahve been told -pure is the same as nonpure just nonpure is using a C extension and is thus faster
[22:11] <jtaylor> but won't work with other interpreters
[22:11] <Logan_> okay, interesting
[22:11] <iulian> robert_ancell: It'd be nice if you could mention "bug fix release" in the changelog in the future.
[22:11] <robert_ancell> iulian, ok, will do
[22:12] <iulian> Thanks.