[01:19] <Daskreech> people are complaining in #kubuntu that the 12.04.1 ISO can't be burnt to a CD?
[01:34] <micahg> the i386 ISO looks very close
[03:24] <shadeslayer> morning
[03:40] <shumski> morning
[04:22] <JontheEchidna> g'night ;-)
[04:29] <shadeslayer> heh, bye JontheEchidna
[04:48] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: where do the firefox kde changes live?
[04:48] <shadeslayer> ( the opensuse ones )
[04:51] <ScottK> apachelogger: Should all be fixed up now.  Sorry for the confusion.
[04:52] <shadeslayer> anyone working on 4.9.1 packages?
[04:55] <shadeslayer> guess not ..
[05:55] <shadeslayer> debfx: so I was running your initial upload script, and this happened : [05:55] <shadeslayer> full log : http://paste.ubuntu.com/1182963/
[06:18] <jussi> shadeslayer: hows my KTP feature coming along? :D
[06:19] <shadeslayer> jussi: not going to work on it anytime soon :P 
[06:19] <shadeslayer> working on FF atm
[06:19] <jussi> shadeslayer: Im disappointed :(
[06:26] <shadeslayer> :(
[06:26] <shadeslayer> jussi: I'll get to it, but it's not a priority for me at the moment :(
[06:27] <jussi> shadeslayer: ok. I guess its just that Im very keen to be out from the cold clutches of Kopete...
[06:28] <shadeslayer> yeah, being at feature parity with kopete would be awesome
[06:43] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: nvm found it
[08:45] <debfx> shadeslayer: branch and archive are out of sync
[09:19] <apachelogger> ScottK: ping
[09:21] <apachelogger> ScottK: if you get a chance please transfer my id_rsa.pub from .100 to the other machines, or set a random password on them, I can't seem to figure out what my password used to be ^^
[09:22] <apachelogger> (.111 not reachable btw)
[09:25] <apachelogger> oh, actually a random password would be useful unless you switch off password sudoing on the non-gateway machines
[09:26] <apachelogger> on that note I am not a sudoer on 101
[09:28] <shadeslayer> debfx: oh meh
[09:29] <shadeslayer> install: writing `debian/firefox-locale-gl/usr/share/doc/firefox-locale-gl/changelog.Debian': No space left on device
[09:29] <shadeslayer> yay
[09:29] <apachelogger> it's loads of fun
[09:30] <shadeslayer> anywho, I think ff should build
[09:30]  * shadeslayer throws it in a PPA to check
[09:30] <apachelogger> what did you do to make it not build? :O
[09:30] <Riddell> claydoh: great forum thread that :)
[09:31] <shadeslayer> nothing, I'm just working on getting everything ported to 15
[09:31] <shadeslayer> all our patches failed to apply :P
[09:31] <shadeslayer> so I restole them from SUSE
[09:32] <apachelogger> good stuff
[09:35] <apachelogger> debfx: did you do an autobuild thingy of 4.9.1?
[09:38] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: I was trying to do that but kde4libs branch is out of sync with archive
[09:38] <shadeslayer> so that needs fixing first if you want some work :P
[09:39] <apachelogger> how can they diverge so that we need to speak of work? Oo
[09:39] <shadeslayer> someone didn't follow the guidelines
[09:40] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: just copy archive to branch then?
[09:41] <shadeslayer> yeah will do in a couple of minutes
[09:42] <soee> kubuntu 12.04, aby idea how can i solve ia23-libs problem ?
[09:43] <shadeslayer> afaik you don't need ia32-libs anymore
[09:43] <shadeslayer> multiarch ftw
[09:43] <soee> shadeslayer, but i have it as stopped package
[09:43] <shadeslayer> upgrading from something?
[09:44] <soee> 11.04 => 12.04
[09:44] <shadeslayer> I don't remember if 11.04 had multiarch support
[09:44] <shadeslayer> atleast not off the top off my head
[09:46] <shadeslayer> Ubuntu 11.04 introduces support for installing packages from multiple architectures on a single system. This makes a wider array of 32-bit applications available to users of 64-bit Ubuntu.
[09:46] <shadeslayer> ok, so it did
[09:46] <shadeslayer> soee: you can safely remove ia32-libs
[09:46] <shadeslayer> soee: see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec
[09:47] <soee> shadeslayer, ok thank you
[09:49] <Riddell> shadeslayer: did telepathy get sorted?
[09:50] <shadeslayer> Riddell: yep
[09:50] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: sent spam
[09:50] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: whut
[09:50] <apachelogger> about brnach != archive
[09:50] <shadeslayer> ah ok
[09:50] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: did you fix that yet?
[09:51] <shadeslayer> not yet, give some time, I'm sorting out firefox
[09:51] <soee> apachelogger, ok all works fine now, thank you again for your help
[09:51] <apachelogger> will do it in ~5 minutes if you have not done it :P
[09:51] <apachelogger> soee: I think shadeslayer helped :)
[09:51] <shadeslayer> I'd say just go for it :P
[09:51] <soee> ah yes, sorry :D
[09:51] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: well no, I am afk for 5 minutes, that's all I'm saying :P
[09:52] <shadeslayer> ah ok
[09:52] <shadeslayer> looking at it now
[09:58] <shadeslayer> 0.o
[09:58] <shadeslayer> bzr: ERROR: Cannot lock LockDir(http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kdelibs/.bzr/branch/lock): Transport operation not possible: http does not support mkdir()                 
[10:00] <apachelogger> you cloned from http
[10:02] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: fixed
[10:02]  * apachelogger broke his qtcreator \\o/
[10:03] <shadeslayer> w00t
[10:05]  * shadeslayer ponders how to test modifications to a kded module
[10:12] <apachelogger> !find libxcb-icccm.so.4
[10:12] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: restarting kded
[10:12] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: what's it about in particular?
[10:12] <apachelogger> !find libxcb-icccm.so.4 precise
[10:12] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: well ... I want to monitor the debug output
[10:12] <shadeslayer> is there a way to load it via konsole
[10:13] <apachelogger> sure
[10:13] <apachelogger> kded :P
[10:13] <shadeslayer> ( fwiw I did :  qdbus org.kde.kded /kded org.kde.kded.loadModule kded_ktp_integration_module  _
[10:13] <shadeslayer> s/_/)
[10:13] <apachelogger> kquitapp kded4; sleep 4; kded4 --nofork
[10:13] <apachelogger> or some such
[10:13] <shadeslayer> gotcha
[10:13] <apachelogger> and then you load
[10:14] <shadeslayer> kquitapp(16426): "Application kded4 could not be found using service org.kde.kded4 and path /MainApplication." 
[10:15] <shadeslayer> ah there we go
[10:15] <shadeslayer> ( I used kill :P )
[10:17] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: http://i.imgur.com/sKlox.png :D
[10:18] <apachelogger> ah
[10:18] <apachelogger> kquitapp needs kded
[11:41] <BluesKaj> Hey all
[11:43] <Riddell> hola
[11:44] <BluesKaj> Hi Riddell
[11:50]  * apachelogger gives up on doing useful things with qt5 -.-
[11:51] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: 4.9.1 building yet?
[11:57] <BluesKaj> why has it become such a PITA to report a bug on launchpad ? I mean how many different sites do i have to join and register , first ubuntu bug reporting , now kubuntu bug reporting. I joined launchpad a while back thinking it would be simpler to report a bug by clicking a link on my page ...unfortunately not the case , so I'll leave it up to ppl with more patience 
[11:58] <apachelogger> ubuntu gets ETOOMANY bugs
[11:58] <apachelogger> so making it difficult makes sense as only bugs that annoy one sufficiently get reported :P
[11:59]  * Riddell wonders what the kubuntu bug reporting site is
[11:59] <apachelogger> bugs.kde.org :P
[11:59] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: not yet
[11:59] <shadeslayer> was working on notification stuff for ktp
[11:59] <BluesKaj> yeah , that's one way alright ...make like a bureaucratic mess
[12:00] <shadeslayer> plus, I don't think my server has enough space to hold kde sc
[12:01] <shadeslayer> and ssh-add refuses to work :|
[12:02] <apachelogger> it's like the issues with the arm porter machines ^^
[12:27] <BluesKaj> heh, bugs.kde.org , accepted my login , when I tried yesterday I received incorrect pw ..anyway there are so many kate bugs files including the segfaults , so it's mere duplication if I file 
[12:29] <apol> ktp 0.5 is considered a bugfix release, why isn't people getting it in their installations?
[12:30] <shadeslayer> apol: it's in Quantal ... are you on precise?
[12:30] <eskerda> HI GUISE
[12:30] <apol> shadeslayer: yes
[12:30] <apol> I have the ppa myself
[12:30] <shadeslayer> I .. uh ... need to be more proactive for precise :D
[12:30] <shadeslayer> was working on some ktp kded stuff ...
[12:31] <apol> but I feel a bit dumb telling everyone to put a ppa to get bugfixes
[12:31] <shadeslayer> give me a couple of secs
[12:35] <shadeslayer> apol: backport script is running
[12:35] <shadeslayer> will ping you for testing :>
[12:36] <apol> :P
[12:36] <shadeslayer> you knew what you were signing up for :P
[12:37] <shadeslayer> apol: I'm uploading everything to https://launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+archive/nightly 
[12:40] <shadeslayer> lp sure is horrendously slow
[12:44] <shadeslayer> hm, bluedevil can shut down my bluetooth card on project neon but not on 4.9
[12:44] <shadeslayer> s/4.9/stable
[12:53] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: do you have a awesome internet connection? :P
[12:53] <apachelogger> not really
[12:53] <shadeslayer> hm
[12:53] <shadeslayer> any ideas how to fix ssh-agent to work on a server?
[12:53] <shadeslayer> ssh-add keeps failing
[12:54] <shadeslayer> and I don't want to sit for 2 hours entering my password
[12:58] <Riddell> shadeslayer: I've never used it on a server
[12:58] <shadeslayer> :(
[12:58] <Riddell> but middle click paste works well enough no?
[12:58] <Riddell> or remote debsign?
[12:59] <shadeslayer> remote debsign is fine, but the script uses scp to copy files from ftpmaster
[12:59] <apachelogger> simply use ftp?
[12:59] <apachelogger> .1 is public I believe
[12:59] <shadeslayer> and then bzr to checkout branches
[12:59] <shadeslayer> nah
[12:59] <shadeslayer> release is on wednesday
[12:59] <apachelogger> I thought that was cahnged? :P
[12:59] <shadeslayer> I don't think so
[13:00] <apachelogger> there was some mess around that
[13:00] <shadeslayer> ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/4.9.1
[13:00] <apachelogger> anywho, if the server is ultimately trusted you could always remove the passphrase from the key altogether
[13:01] <shadeslayer> uh, NOPE
[13:01] <shadeslayer> there was this other method to do it
[13:08] <shadeslayer> ah yes, keychain
[13:08] <shadeslayer> trying that
[13:08] <shadeslayer> yay, works
[13:08] <shadeslayer> I just hope that 4 GB's is more than enough 
[13:11] <CIA-49> [kdelibs] Rohan Garg * 424 * debian/patches/ (add_debian_build_type.diff series) Drop add_debian_build_type.diff, applied upstream
[13:13] <shumski> shadeslayer: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~schumski/+junk/kdelibs/view/head:/debian/patches/add_debian_build_type.diff
[13:14] <shadeslayer> what about it?
[13:15] <shadeslayer> it's already been applied upstream
[13:16] <shumski> no, just needs refreshing
[13:17] <shadeslayer> ok wth, I grepped the sources earlier and it did show the vars there
[13:18] <shumski> dunno about that :)
[13:19] <CIA-49> [kdelibs] Rohan Garg * 426 * debian/ (patches/add_debian_build_type.diff changelog patches/series) Refresh add_debian_build_type.diff
[13:20] <shadeslayer> ok, I *might* have to go due a situation developing at my home, which is why I'm not going to get my hands into this
[13:21] <shumski> shadeslayer: have you looked at kactivities so far? they seem a little odd,vs 4.9.0
[13:22] <mikhas> "Houston, we have a situation (at home)."
[13:22] <mikhas> kactivities is a horrible name, for German speakers
[13:22] <shumski> sqlite plugin doesn't get built
[13:23] <shadeslayer> build logs?
[13:24] <shumski> this did it: http://tinyurl.com/ccjkkx6 , i've reverted that, so it get's built 
[13:32] <shadeslayer> shumski: uhhhh ... you've 'reverted' it?
[13:32] <shadeslayer> won't that cause it to fail since it won't find sqlite?
[13:35] <shadeslayer> shumski: apachelogger how does one test ff kde integration? :P
[13:35] <shadeslayer> what all should I check that is
[13:35] <shadeslayer> backbutton seems to follow oxygen theme
[13:35] <shumski> shadeslayer: no, that way it works as with 4.9.0; otherwise it doesn't get built
[13:35] <shadeslayer> open file dialog looks sane
[13:36] <shumski> shadeslayer: yeah, opendialog and mimetypes should behave better than vanilla
[13:37] <shadeslayer> hmm .. yeah, says that it wants to open a pdf with okular
[13:37] <shumski> macro_optional_add_subdirectory(sqlite) is nested under KACTIVITIES_BUILD_NEPOMUK_PLUGIN; but i think there's no KACTIVITIES_BUILD_NEPOMUK_PLUGIN=True anywhere
[13:38] <shumski> previously, it was directly added
[13:38] <shadeslayer> shumski: please file a bug on bugs.kde.org if there's something wrong
[13:38] <shumski> shadeslayer: ok, as for firefox, that should be OK then :)
[13:38] <shadeslayer> starbuck: firefox kde copied to blue shell
[13:40] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: github
[13:40] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: ofcourse, doing that now
[13:40] <apachelogger> should be done before upload :P
[13:40] <apachelogger> last time you forgot
[13:41] <shadeslayer> heh
[13:42] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: what's the difference between MOZ_PKG_NAME and MOZ_APP_NAME
[13:42] <shadeslayer> and why did we have APP_NAME while upstream has PKG_NAME
[13:43] <apachelogger> where?
[13:43] <shadeslayer> debian/apport/source_firefox.py.in
[13:43] <apachelogger> I don't have pkg_name in there
[13:44] <apachelogger> also upstream likely does not use apport as that is an ubuntu thing?!
[13:44] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1183558/
[13:44] <shadeslayer> mm ... I've copied this over from what's in the ubuntu archives atm
[13:45] <apachelogger> I strongly believe you need to use the bazaar branch
[13:45] <shadeslayer> bazaar? 0.o
[13:45] <apachelogger> -.-
[13:45] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: I did a pull-lp-source and then switched out the patches
[13:46] <apachelogger> -.-
[13:46] <apachelogger> git branch -a
[13:46] <shadeslayer> what about it?
[13:46] <apachelogger> there is ubuntu/precise which is what the ubuntu moz team's bazaar branch held
[13:46] <apachelogger> then there is precise which is our change set
[13:46] <shadeslayer> I'm talking about quantal
[13:46] <apachelogger> i.e. ubuntu/precise gets synced to what bazaar has and then merged with precise
[13:47] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: same thing except you need to create the branches first
[13:47] <shadeslayer> ...
[13:47] <shadeslayer> better delete those debs ...
[13:47] <apachelogger> nah, just check that what you synced is what is in bazaar
[13:47] <apachelogger> if that is the case it is alright
[13:48] <apachelogger> and make git do it right, with 2 branches
[13:48] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: I'd rebase master onto precise though
[13:48] <apachelogger> and use master for quantal
[13:49] <shadeslayer> that's what I was thinking
[13:49] <shadeslayer> use master for quantal
[13:49] <apachelogger> i.e. master (quantal) ubuntu/quantal (ubuntu bzr) precise (precise) ubuntu/precise (ubuntu bzr)
[13:49] <shadeslayer> mhmm
[13:49] <apachelogger> seeing as git cannot link master to a random branch, which would have been cool ^^
[13:50] <apachelogger> actually you may want to check first
[13:50] <apachelogger> on some repository I did magic trickery yielding a master that points no where
[13:50] <apachelogger> not sure if that was firefox-kde though
[13:51] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: you doing .1 yet?
[13:52] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: no, I might have to leave soonish due to medical emergency
[13:52] <apachelogger> oh
[13:52] <shadeslayer> I can give you access to my server if you want
[13:52] <shadeslayer> loads of bandwidth
[13:52] <apachelogger> not sure I know how to use the scriptery tbh
[13:53] <shadeslayer> apachelogger:  ./kubuntu-initial-upload -d quantal -v 4.9.1 -m "New upstream release" -t ../   
[13:53] <apachelogger> but what with the key and all that
[13:53] <shadeslayer> you can use keychain to unlock your ssh key for a extended duration
[13:53] <shadeslayer> eval `keychain --eval --agents ssh id_rsa`
[13:54] <shadeslayer> and then do a remote debsign
[13:54] <apachelogger> my key is not going to go to your server
[13:54] <shadeslayer> generate a temporary key for ftpmaster.kde.org :P
[13:54] <apachelogger> yah, just thought the same thing
[13:54] <shadeslayer> you already have 3 in there
[13:54] <apachelogger> well, we can give it a try
[13:54] <apachelogger> I do because I have 3 keys :P
[13:55] <apachelogger> soonishy 4 as I need a 8k one
[13:56] <apachelogger> actually
[14:06] <starbuck> shadeslayer: where is firefox 15?
[14:06] <starbuck> https://launchpad.net/~blue-shell/+archive/firefox-kde
[14:07] <shadeslayer> starbuck: yeah I deleted it for a couple of hours, just checking the diff between our package and bzr
[14:07] <shadeslayer> starbuck: https://launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+archive/experimental
[14:08] <starbuck> so firefox is supposed to be an adapted version under KDE or 1:1?
[14:08] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: ^
[14:09]  * apachelogger does not understand the question to be honest
[14:09]  * apachelogger can't edit ftpmaster keys in kate \\o/
[14:10] <shadeslayer> hehe 
[14:11] <apachelogger> always nice how people go "KIO is the awesomest thing ever invented" and only like 3 applications manage to use it in a working manner
[14:11] <starbuck> apachelogger: is firefox for kde the same package as for unity?
[14:11] <starbuck> or an adjusted binary?
[14:11] <starbuck> +mozhelper
[14:11] <apachelogger> different binary (due to the patches we apply)
[14:11] <starbuck> okay
[14:12] <starbuck> though it should be the same package name
[14:12] <starbuck> firefox
[14:12] <apachelogger> yep
[14:12] <starbuck> firefox-kde would be non-optimal?
[14:12] <starbuck> as you could want to have both (for whatever reasons )?
[14:13] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: ok question, what exactly did you do for 14?
[14:13] <apachelogger> you cannot have both, that's the problem
[14:13] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: simply merge bzr?
[14:14] <apachelogger> starbuck: since the file names are completely identical you could not ever have firefox and firefox-kde installed at the same time
[14:15] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: i.e. you need not worry as the changes in precise are applied ontop of a clean bzr import, so you'd simply update ubuntu/precise and merge it into precise
[14:15] <apachelogger> (and probably fix conflicts in changelog)
[14:15] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: I'm talking about quantal here
[14:15] <shadeslayer> here's what I was thinking
[14:15] <apachelogger> same thing
[14:15] <shadeslayer> pull-lp-source firefox, copy over debian folder with patches from suse
[14:15] <shadeslayer> commit to git
[14:15] <shadeslayer> voila done
[14:16] <shadeslayer> ( you also edit the rules a bit )
[14:16] <apachelogger> git co ubuntu/precise && git co -b ubuntu/quantal && IMPORTFOO && git co master && git merge ubuntu/quantal
[14:16] <apachelogger> (note: master is equal to precise right now)
[14:16] <shadeslayer> aha, that's why
[14:16] <shadeslayer> no wonder why it's a huge diff
[14:17] <apachelogger> it's a huge diff because it contains everything between ubuntu/precise 14 and ubuntu/quantal 15
[14:17] <shadeslayer> rigth
[14:17] <shadeslayer> *right
[14:18] <apachelogger> (note: ubuntu/precise 15 and ubuntu/quantal 15 ought to be almost identical as they keep maintenance cost down by doing a lot of meta stuff, so only very few things are actually series specific ... changelog being the most obvious)
[14:19]  * shadeslayer might have to leave soonish
[14:23] <Riddell> gosh, a skaet, should be on holiday no?
[14:24] <shadeslayer> !find autotools_dev.pm
[14:25] <shadeslayer> hah
[14:25] <shadeslayer> libwibble-dev
[14:26] <JontheEchidna> that one's by Peter Rockai, iirc
[14:26] <JontheEchidna> Adept and libept use it
[14:27] <JontheEchidna> well, Adept did, before its timely demise
[14:31] <JontheEchidna> which reminds me, we can clean out adept's bugs out now. I'll do that I suppose
[14:32] <JontheEchidna> kind of sad, those were some of the first bugs I triaged :(
[14:33] <shadeslayer> :D
[14:36] <JontheEchidna> If I recall correctly, the first contributions to Kubuntu that I made were ~20 bug reports against the Qt4 port of gtk-qt-engine :D
[14:36] <shadeslayer> lol
[14:36] <JontheEchidna> it was kind of horrible
[14:36] <shadeslayer> 'kind of'
[14:37] <apachelogger> JontheEchidna always was a gtk fanboi
[14:37] <skaet> RIddell,  too much fun going on,  so plan on taking a swap day.
[14:37] <skaet> later
[14:37] <JontheEchidna> my firefox looked like shit and I wanted to help make it look not as horrible :P
[14:38]  * shadeslayer waves fist at bzr for taking so long to branch stuff
[14:38] <JontheEchidna> back before you kids had your fancy chromium
[14:38] <JontheEchidna> and oxygen-gtk
[14:38] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: checkout is your friend
[14:38] <shadeslayer> ^_^
[14:40] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: still takes alot of time :P
[14:40] <shadeslayer> and this is when branching at almost 2 MBps
[14:41] <apachelogger> why its still bzr
[15:02] <apachelogger> here's a scary though
[15:02] <apachelogger> t
[15:03] <apachelogger> you ssh onto a remote machine to build source packages and debrsign
[15:04] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: ?
[15:04] <apachelogger> debrsign!
[15:04] <apachelogger> so you tunnel onto the remote host and then you tunnel back for signing
[15:05] <shadeslayer> I thought it copied over the files, signed them locally and copied them back
[15:05] <apachelogger> though TBH the tunneling back makes no sense in an automation use case as you'd have to enter your password all the time to enable signing
[15:05] <apachelogger> well, actually
[15:05] <shadeslayer> ok, bye
[15:05] <apachelogger> enter your user password and then your gpg key ring password
[15:05] <shadeslayer> have to go ... bye
[15:05] <apachelogger> just for the sake of madness
[15:05] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: bye
[15:05] <shadeslayer> might not be available for the next 24 hours
[15:05] <shadeslayer> starbuck: ^
[15:07] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: debsign != debrsign
[15:07] <apachelogger> debrsign is the other way around, your local machine cannot sign but a remote can, so instead of downloading and debsigning it will upload and debsign 
[15:08] <shadeslayer> ah ok
[15:08] <apachelogger> which then requires continous passwording because you connect from an untrusted to a trusted host, whereas remote debsign is trusted to untrusted which you can easily do with a passwordless key authorization on the untrusted end
[15:14] <Riddell> claydoh: beta 1 this week, fancy doing a release page?
[15:18] <soee> 12.04 lightdm - only white screen and nothing more any ideas ?
[15:22] <Riddell> dunno, there's probably a reason we don't use lightdm in 12.04
[16:15] <skaet> Riddel,  any chance we'll be getting a fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm-kde/+bug/1029150 for beta 1?
[16:17] <skaet> also, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1028984 ?
[16:17] <skaet> Riddell, ^ 
[16:24] <Riddell> skaet: 1029150 should be fixed, am about to confirm
[16:24] <skaet> :)  thanks Riddell
[16:24] <Riddell> bug 1028984 I'm yet to get to, maybe tomorrow
[16:27] <apachelogger> subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['bzr', 'branch', 'bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/mplayerthumbs', 'bzr']' returned non-zero exit status 3
[16:27] <apachelogger> the tool needs some serious error handling changes
[16:39] <shumski> Can someone take a look at this, so i don't think i'm imagining things: http://paste.kde.org/543440/
[16:40] <shumski> vs http://paste.kde.org/543452/
[18:29] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: did you push stuff to ninjas?
[18:48] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: nay, crapped out due to missing packaging and from what I have seen it does not like to continue where it left off, so I decided to screw it for today
[18:48] <shadeslayer> ah ok
[18:51] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: if you want you can continue with my script checkout tho, it doesn't push to bzr automatically nor does it dput automatically (both because I wanted to do batch remote sign)
[18:51] <apachelogger> ah, on a related note it runs the source building without signing obviously ;)
[18:51] <apachelogger> otherwise I'll probably end up fixing the scriptery tomorrow or something :P
[18:51] <shadeslayer> likewise, can't do it before tomorrow
[18:52] <shadeslayer> maybe not even tomorrow since I want to look at KNotification context hackery tomorrow
[18:52] <apachelogger> ok only doing .1 tomorrow then
[18:53] <apachelogger> or rather setting up the toolchain so it does not fall over every 3 minutes
[18:53] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: fwiw kde-workspace does not have my awesome patch in the tarballs
[18:53] <shadeslayer> please keep in mind when packaging workspace
[18:53] <apachelogger> what patch is that?
[18:53]  * apachelogger requests a mail to kubuntu-devel
[18:55] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kde-workspace/repository/revisions/a651fff01cfcef8874c5ddcf7a080467edc49d16/diff/libs/plasmagenericshell/scripting/scriptengine.cpp
[18:55] <apachelogger> ah, yes, mail regardless please
[18:55] <shadeslayer> ok, will do
[19:02] <shadeslayer> hey launchpad, y u no auto rebuild packages
[19:04] <shadeslayer> ->sleep
[20:16] <ScottK> apachelogger: You are sudoer now on 101.  .111 is offline because it's not upgraded yet.
[20:59] <JontheEchidna> shumski: other people on the kde-packager mailing list are experiencing that too. It seems to be a bug with the 4.9.1 tarballs
[21:00] <shumski> JontheEchidna: yeah, saw it :-)
[21:00] <JontheEchidna> k :)
[21:00] <shumski> JontheEchidna: good to know i'm still sane :-)
[21:01] <JontheEchidna> hehe
[21:10] <Quintasan> This is hell
[21:11] <yofel> Quintasan: welcome ;)
[21:20] <Quintasan> yofel: Hi
[21:21] <Quintasan> It's totally not like I have 758 bits/second transfer
[21:21] <Quintasan> The hell is going on with this connection
[23:56] <xnox> Kubuntu Devs please look into bug 1038522
[23:56] <xnox> it is Qt frontend specific