=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== sil is now known as sil2100 | ||
sil2100 | seb128: hi! | 10:03 |
---|---|---|
sil2100 | seb128: as I wrote in the e-mail, strange thing with the bamf thing | 10:04 |
sil2100 | seb128: since the tarball is upladed and visible here https://launchpad.net/bamf/0.3 | 10:04 |
seb128 | sil2100, hey | 10:04 |
seb128 | weird | 10:04 |
sil2100 | But *strangely* the newly created series is not available from the home page :/ | 10:04 |
seb128 | https://launchpad.net/bamf/ doesn't list it on the right | 10:04 |
sil2100 | Indeed | 10:05 |
sil2100 | I think I need to tinker with the LP series properties | 10:05 |
sil2100 | mhr3: hi! You registered a series before, right? | 10:05 |
mhr3 | sil2100, hey, sure | 10:06 |
sil2100 | mhr3: what did I do wrong that the series I created is not visible on the main page? | 10:07 |
sil2100 | Do you have to set something explicitly? | 10:07 |
sil2100 | mhr3: ^ | 10:07 |
* mhr3 checks | 10:08 | |
mhr3 | set it as development focus, changed 0.2 status to "current stable release", you should also branch the 0.2 code into a separate branch now (when it didn't have the 0.3 features, so that bug fixes could be done in that branch) | 10:13 |
mhr3 | otoh bamf was never branched according to ubuntu releases, so... :/ | 10:14 |
mhr3 | sil2100, ^ | 10:19 |
mhr3 | sil2100, seb128, btw the plan was to make 6.x libunity release with ubuntu's beta, is it ok if we bump stuff now? | 10:21 |
mhr3 | cause it's 5.96 or something atm | 10:21 |
seb128 | mhr3, wfm | 10:21 |
mhr3 | k | 10:21 |
=== mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|lunch | ||
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
sil2100 | mhr3: so that branch is necessary, yes? | 10:50 |
sil2100 | mhr3: works for me regarding libunity as well | 10:53 |
sil2100 | mhr3: could you branch the bamf code to 0.2? Since I don't really know how to make this fancy lp:bamf/0.2 branch | 10:54 |
=== mmrazik|lunch is now known as mmrazik | ||
mhr3 | sil2100, why is bamf tagged as 0.3.0, yet configure says it's 0.2.122? | 11:32 |
sil2100 | Oh, maybe I didn't push? | 11:35 |
sil2100 | Ah yes | 11:35 |
sil2100 | Crap, last week was horrible | 11:36 |
sil2100 | Let me fix that | 11:36 |
mhr3 | sil2100, also, none of the upstream bugs that were fix committed were changed to fix released | 11:38 |
mhr3 | at least not automagically | 11:38 |
mhr3 | which it used to do | 11:38 |
sil2100 | Yes, since there was no one to run unify this time ;) | 11:38 |
sil2100 | And I left the milestone opened | 11:39 |
sil2100 | Since all of this was so chaotic that I didn't want to close it right now | 11:39 |
sil2100 | mhr3: pushed | 11:39 |
mhr3 | sil2100, the tag needs to be moved | 11:40 |
sil2100 | Yep | 11:43 |
sil2100 | One moment... | 11:43 |
sil2100 | mhr3: it should be fine now | 11:45 |
sil2100 | mhr3: I'll change them manually now | 11:45 |
sil2100 | mhr3: the bugs - or maybe you want to wait a bit? Since I might try familiarizing with that unity thing | 11:46 |
mhr3 | $ bzr pull | 11:46 |
mhr3 | Using saved parent location: bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/%2Bbranch/bamf/ | 11:46 |
mhr3 | No revisions to pull. | 11:46 |
mhr3 | Conflicting tags: | 11:46 |
mhr3 | 0.3.0 | 11:46 |
sil2100 | Strange, I overwrote the tags | 11:46 |
mhr3 | do i need to pull --overwrite? | 11:47 |
mhr3 | hmm, that worked | 11:48 |
sil2100 | I think so - although hm, now that I think of it, does bzr enable moving of tags without overwriting them? | 11:48 |
sil2100 | Since my bzr-foo is still weak | 11:48 |
mhr3 | like bzr tag --force? | 11:48 |
sil2100 | Yes, if I would do a bzr tag --force 0.3.0 and then push it to the remote repo, would it move the tag without me forcing --overwrite-tags ? | 11:49 |
mhr3 | if you used push --overwrite, it's not surprising that i had to pull overwrite | 11:49 |
mhr3 | afaik tag --delete and then tag again shouldn't require overwriting | 11:50 |
sil2100 | That's what I did actually... | 11:50 |
sil2100 | Strange that you had to overwrite during pull | 11:51 |
mhr3 | indeed | 11:51 |
mhr3 | but whatever, i didn't have half-finished branch | 11:51 |
sil2100 | Sorry about tha | 11:52 |
sil2100 | t | 11:52 |
mhr3 | nothing to be sorry about, i guess bzr is just being picky | 11:53 |
sil2100 | Shit, I did the same thing with nux, grrr | 11:53 |
sil2100 | Or wait, I think Timo put the tags on | 11:53 |
sil2100 | ANyway, need to fix that up | 11:53 |
seb128 | sil2100, mhr3: please guys no --overwrite that breaks all the mergers, distro tools, etc which default to pull and not pull --overwrite | 11:54 |
sil2100 | mhr3: what would be the best way to move a tag? bzr tag --delete, bzr tag and bzr push ? | 11:54 |
sil2100 | seb128: I just was doing --override-tags if anything | 11:54 |
mhr3 | hmm, seb128 has a point, next automerge to bamf will fail | 11:56 |
sil2100 | Overwriting tags? | 11:58 |
sil2100 | Ah, right | 11:58 |
sil2100 | Ok, hm, how to fix this now - maybe I'll bring back the tag to the previous version? | 11:59 |
sil2100 | But then the commit with the version bump won't be around | 11:59 |
mhr3 | i guess the branch signature changed already, the only way to revert it is to push --overwrite the original branch | 12:00 |
mhr3 | although i'm just guessing | 12:00 |
sil2100 | mhr3: do you have the original branch somewhere? | 12:01 |
mhr3 | no, i --overwritten it a moment ago | 12:01 |
sil2100 | Ok, so officially I broke the mergers today | 12:02 |
sil2100 | Great | 12:02 |
sil2100 | hm hm | 12:02 |
mhr3 | at least you didn't do it last week :) | 12:03 |
sil2100 | Yeah, great ;p | 12:03 |
sil2100 | Maybe if I tag the same commit, it'll get fixed, right? | 12:03 |
mhr3 | no idea.. #bzr? | 12:03 |
sil2100 | Since only the tag is a conflict, and it should be related to the commit it points to | 12:04 |
sil2100 | Ok, so it seems we can re-add the tag at the old place and it will be te same then | 12:09 |
sil2100 | mhr3: but do we want that actually? Since the tag was wrongly placed anyway... | 12:09 |
sil2100 | mhr3, seb128: maybe we can do bzr pull --overwrite-tags once in the mergers to fix those? | 12:10 |
mhr3 | from upstream pov - no, from unbreaking distro tools pov - yes | 12:10 |
seb128 | not sure, but the merge is only one place you might have broken | 12:10 |
seb128 | --overwrite should be banned from such public projects... | 12:11 |
mhr3 | sil2100, perhaps ask #bzr people if there's a way to move tag without it causing this problem? | 12:12 |
mhr3 | maybe with a dummy commit or something | 12:12 |
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
sil2100 | mhr3: waiting for an answer | 12:24 |
sil2100 | seb128: ok, I'll put the tag back | 12:24 |
seb128 | sil2100, thanks | 12:25 |
sil2100 | seb128: should be as it was before | 12:30 |
seb128 | sil2100, great, thanks | 12:32 |
sil2100 | seb128: we would need 2 branches for precise merged, for renaming geis | 13:12 |
sil2100 | seb128: who should I poke about this? | 13:12 |
seb128 | sil2100, Didier when he's back wednesday | 13:12 |
seb128 | I don't have time to deal with precise geis stuff this week with beta1 | 13:13 |
sil2100 | seb128: is there anyone else I could ping about this before that time? | 13:13 |
seb128 | well, me I guess | 13:13 |
seb128 | what's the issue? | 13:13 |
seb128 | is that only vcs merges to do? | 13:14 |
seb128 | or is that sponsoring and uploads? | 13:14 |
sil2100 | For now only a vcs merge | 13:16 |
sil2100 | Since we'd need to have the packaging change uploaded so that we can merge in the code changes | 13:16 |
sil2100 | hmm, but I need to re-do the branch though | 13:17 |
sil2100 | Since Francis added some quilt patches | 13:17 |
seb128 | sil2100, just tell me what to merge where and I will run the command | 13:20 |
OwaisL | Hi everyone, has the messaging menu API changed in Quantal? I can see we have libmessagingmenu and after latest updates everything but empathy is missing from the messaging menu | 14:14 |
=== Chipaca` is now known as Chipaca | ||
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
=== dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
gotwig | hello | 17:32 |
gotwig | unity scope devs here? | 18:37 |
gotwig | would be pleased to know if if self.scope.get_filter('appetizers'): | 18:38 |
gotwig | baseurl = "http://www.chefkoch.de/rs/s0g2/%s/Vorspeisen-Rezepte.html" does work in a scope file. Seems it does not. What do I need to do, so I can check if a filter is active, in a scope? | 18:38 |
* gotwig is afk | 18:38 | |
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch | ||
gotwig | unity scope devs here? | 19:16 |
gotwig | I have questions regarding using filters.. | 19:16 |
=== cjohnston_ is now known as cjohnston | ||
gotwig | unity scope/lens devs available? | 20:04 |
seb128 | gotwig, wrong day,time I guess, it's late for anything but the U.S and it's an holiday in the U.S today | 20:11 |
gotwig | and here in Germany, too :/ | 20:11 |
seb128 | gotwig, davidcalle or mhr3 when they are around (european hours), or maybe mhall119 can help you | 20:11 |
gotwig | I wrote David Calle a message on GTalk | 20:11 |
seb128 | he's maybe not around...? | 20:11 |
gotwig | yeah, he gets it as an Email I guess | 20:12 |
gotwig | I am working on my cooking lens | 20:12 |
gotwig | First filters, than previews ;P | 20:12 |
gotwig | I have time, till 12.10 ^^ | 20:12 |
gotwig | around 230,000 recipes are searchable, I guess | 20:12 |
gotwig | even some specialized things for Netherlands, Germany | 20:13 |
seb128 | nice | 20:13 |
gotwig | yip.. | 20:14 |
gotwig | Germany got 200,000 recipes | 20:14 |
gotwig | lol | 20:14 |
gotwig | Germans like to cook really often | 20:15 |
gotwig | night 2 all | 20:20 |
=== dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!