[03:17] <cmars232> i'm unable to create a branch on a private project. i should have permissions, is there a lp issue?
[03:18] <lifeless> wgrant: StevenK: ^
[03:19] <wgrant> cmars232: Which project?
[03:19] <cmars232> ztrustee
[03:20] <cmars232> wgrant: unable to push to ~ztrustee/ztrustee/branch_name, or ~cmars/ztrustee/branch_name
[03:21] <wgrant> cmars232: Is ~ztrustee meant to have access to all of the branches?
[03:21] <cmars232> yes
[03:22] <wgrant> Right, that's what it looks like, but I think sinzui might have missed a click when he was migrating ztrustee to the new privacy stuff a few hours ago.
[03:22]  * wgrant fixes
[03:23] <wgrant> cmars232: Try now?
[03:23] <wgrant> cmars232: Project owners can now control access themselves at https://launchpad.net/ztrustee/+sharing
[03:23] <wgrant> But I've fixed this up for now
[03:24] <cmars232> much better! i'll look into the sharing, thanks!
[03:24] <wgrant> It looks like you're only a driver, not the owner, so you won't be able to edit it yourself
[03:24] <wgrant> But your admin team can
[03:25]  * wgrant is out for a while
[03:36] <LooneyKing> Does anyone know if Intel processes are little endian or big endian??
[03:36] <LooneyKing> Does anyone know if Intel processers are little endian or big endian??
[03:36] <LooneyKing> as in CPU
[03:36] <LooneyKing> addressing into memory wise??
[03:37] <StevenK> LooneyKing: x86 is little endian
[03:37] <LooneyKing> What about x64??
[03:37] <StevenK> Do you mean x86_64 or ia64?
[03:39] <LooneyKing> x86_64
[03:39] <LooneyKing> x64
[03:39] <StevenK> x86_64 is also little
[03:39] <LooneyKing> right on man!!
[09:16] <ali1234> so the CoC requirement for PPAs has been dropped?
[09:17] <ali1234> i can't find any announcement of this
[09:17] <ali1234> yet i just created a PPA without signing
[09:19] <czajkowski> hmm
[09:19] <czajkowski> ali1234: what's your lp id?
[09:20] <ali1234> if i tell you will you take away my shiny new PPA?
[09:20] <ali1234> https://launchpad.net/~a-j-buxton
[09:21] <czajkowski> wgrant: ping
[09:25] <czajkowski> this is odd as it does state that https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA?action=show&redirect=PPA#Activating_a_PPA
[09:25] <ali1234> yes.
[09:25] <czajkowski> bigjools: you about?
[09:25] <bigjools> not really
[09:26] <czajkowski> ah ok, just wondered did you know about the lack of signing of the Coc to have a PPA will work it out
[09:41] <iulian> It seems that Launchpad stopped notifying me when I comment on bugs when the team that I'm a member of is subscribed. I used to get those emails which were extremely helpful when it came to following up.
[09:42] <iulian> Is there a button somewhere I can press to enable this thing?
[09:42] <czajkowski> iulian: you can change your bug notification mails
[09:42] <iulian> czajkowski: Where is that?
[09:43] <czajkowski> http://blog.launchpad.net/cool-new-stuff/better-bug-subscriptions
[09:44] <czajkowski> http://blog.launchpad.net/general/silencing-bug-notifications-for-stuff-you-did
[09:47] <czajkowski> ali1234: did you ever sign the CoC ?
[09:47] <ali1234> no
[09:47] <czajkowski> hmm
[09:47] <ali1234> i haven't eve uploaded a GPG key
[09:47] <ali1234> never even generated one as far as i can recall
[09:48] <wgrant> iulian: Public or private bugs? Examples?
[09:49] <wgrant> iulian: Do you have the "Send me bug notifications for changes I make" option set on https://launchpad.net/~/+edit?
[09:49] <iulian> wgrant: I have that option ticked, yes.
[09:51] <wgrant> ali1234: The CoC restriction was probably dropped without anyone updating the docs
[09:51] <ali1234> or telling anyone about it at all :)
[09:52] <iulian> wgrant: Public I reckon. Here is an example, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcryptui/+bug/1046109.
[09:52] <ali1234> i see it was discussed in feb but seems no dicision was made in that thread
[09:52] <wgrant> Well, it's not exactly the sort of change that it's important to announce :)
[09:52] <ali1234> *decision
[09:54] <wgrant> iulian: Did you get notified of other comments on the bug?
[09:54] <iulian> wgrant: I did, yes.
[09:54] <wgrant> There's no intentional change here, and I know that works on bugs that I deal with
[09:54] <iulian> wgrant: I'm just not getting my own comments.
[09:54] <iulian> Hmm.
[09:54] <wgrant> Well
[09:55] <wgrant> Your LP email config is in an only semi-legal state
[09:55] <wgrant> But that shouldn't matter
[09:55] <wgrant> It's possibly Gmail doing strange things?
[09:55] <wgrant> If you use Gmail, it's known to play fun games with emails from yourself
[09:55] <ali1234> i can confirm that
[09:55] <wgrant> Like putting them in a Sent folder, even if you actually received them
[09:56] <iulian> Possibly but I highly doubt that. I shall check the options.
[09:57] <iulian> Argghht. You must be joking. It's in my SPAM folder. :(
[09:57] <iulian> How did those end up in there?
[09:57] <ali1234> gmail has been spam filtering messages from linux kernel ML recently, for me
[09:57] <ali1234> probably cos i never read them, but that isn't the point
[09:57] <wgrant> iulian: Yeah, just checked logs and it definitely sent
[09:58] <ali1234> also it's been putting bug emails into my inbox, even though i have a filter set to skip inbox
[09:58] <iulian> OK, let me see if I can unspam them.
[10:00] <iulian> I also have a filter for these emails. Why is Gmail putting them in my spam folder... Oh well.
[10:00] <wgrant> Yay Gmail :)
[10:00] <ali1234> it steal beats thunderbird
[10:00] <ali1234> *still
[10:01] <iulian> Uh oh, just noticed another email which should've been sent to another folder.
[10:01]  * iulian sighs.
[10:02] <iulian> OK guys, thanks for your help! I now have to find a way to teach Gmail not to do stupid things. :(
[10:03] <wgrant> Glad it's not our fault :)
[10:06] <mgz> iulian: one thing I noticed with filters is they silently started having a length limit recently
[10:07] <mgz> so, try to filter on "some long string with identifying information at the END"
[10:07] <mgz> will end up matching "some long string with identifying information at the"
[10:07] <mgz> and putting things in the wrong boxes
[10:10] <iulian> mgz: There's also an option to "Never send it to Spam".
[10:14] <iulian> mgz: I just have Matches: bugs.launchpad.net "name_of_team".
[10:15] <iulian> So, I don't think that counts as a length limit problem.
[11:46] <marcoceppi> Hi, I uploaded to a ppa 8 hours ago, says I can't re-upload because it already exists, but I haven't gotten an email and nothing has shown up in the ppa. Where's the best place for help with this?
[11:47] <czajkowski> marcoceppi: what's the ppa ?
[11:47] <marcoceppi> ppa:marcoceppi/xbmc-raspbmc-sync
[11:49] <czajkowski> two ticks
[11:51] <czajkowski> marcoceppi: have you checked your spam folder?
[11:51] <czajkowski> https://launchpad.net/~marcoceppi/+archive/xbmc-raspbmc-sync
[11:51] <czajkowski> but has no activity
[11:53] <marcoceppi> czajkowski: yeah, like a hawk ;) Unless it's that Viagra email. Here is dputs output: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1187130/
[11:53] <marcoceppi> should I just bump the version and try again?
[11:54] <czajkowski> marcoceppi: that would be the easiest but still no idea why it didnt work the first time
[11:54] <marcoceppi> czajkowski: well, I'm sure I goof'd it, or something
[11:55] <czajkowski> ok try by increaseing number and see what happens
[11:56] <dpm> hi all, could a losa have a look at this question and reassign team ownership? https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/207737
[11:56] <dpm> thanks
[11:57] <czajkowski> blue jam jelmer mgz can someone investigate the checklogs on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/207688  please
[11:58] <czajkowski> dpm: I think you need to ask in -ops
[11:59] <marcoceppi> czajkowski: I get this while uploading, http://paste.ubuntu.com/1187136/ not sure if that could be the problem
[11:59] <Daviey> marcoceppi: ls *.upload
[12:00] <dpm> thanks czajkowski. Is there any way to mark the question as Open? Right now it appears as Answered, and I don't seem to have rights to change the status
[12:00] <marcoceppi> Daviey: there's one from the previous upload, this one is still uploading (the ubuntu1 bump)
[12:01] <Daviey> marcoceppi: right.. so dput checks for that file to know that you already uploaded.. so told you to "go away".. it never reached launchpad, only dput on your local machine.
[12:01] <marcoceppi> Daviey: OH, I see now. That makes sense
[12:01] <Daviey> (the first pastebin you linked)
[12:01] <marcoceppi> So, the success was possibly a false positive?
[12:02] <czajkowski> dpm: done
[12:02] <dpm> thanks czajkowski
[12:02] <Daviey> marcoceppi: i assume you tried to upload previously, which you ctrl+c'd or something.. then tried to upload again.
[12:02] <Daviey> the second pastebin.. that warning/error.. is fine
[12:04] <marcoceppi> Daviey: I don't think so, but it's quite a "big" upload. I know there's a 2gb limit, which doesn't get there, it's probably around 53mb for the orig.tar.gz
[12:09] <mindlace> hi, i'm trying to push a personal branch of a project, and I get "permission denied" back.
[12:09] <mindlace> the original project is ~mailman-coders/postorius/postorius_standalone/
[12:09] <mindlace> and I'm trying to push to ~mindlace/postorius_standalone/use_local_postorius_db
[12:10] <mindlace> er, i don't get permission denied, I get "project does not exist".
[12:26] <Delemas> Did something break wrt/ launchpad searches? All ppa based packages are no longer showing up in searches...
[12:47] <marcoceppi> So, I've tried uploading twice, each time it stops at 55190k/55191k for 10+ mins, never completing
[12:50] <czajkowski> jelmer: are you about to help marcoceppi please? on stand up
[12:50] <jelmer> marcoceppi: have you tried uploading with sftp instead? That seems to work better.
[12:51] <marcoceppi> jelmer: I have not, I was only really aware of dput. I'll follow the LP Help for SFTP and try that instead, thanks!
[12:52] <marcoceppi> jelmer: is this still up-to-date? https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Uploading#Uploading_with_SFTP
[12:52] <jelmer> marcoceppi, yep
[12:58] <mindlace> finally figured it out.
[12:59] <mgz> mindlace: you needed to push to lp:~mindlace/postorius/use_local_postorius_db right?
[12:59] <mgz> (sorry, missed the question earlier)
[13:00] <mindlace> mgz… i think i hit a weird corner case, i am trying to submit a patch/branch to lp:~mailman-coders/postorius/postorius_standalone
[13:02] <mgz> right, so you want to push to your user space (~mindlace), stacked on the project (postorius), with a name for your branch (use_local_postorius_db)
[13:03] <mgz> then propose for merging against the postorius_standalone you branched from
[13:03] <mindlace> ok, thanks.
[13:04] <mgz> your example earlier was trying to use the parent branch name as the project (third element as the second element), so told you there was no postorius_standalone project
[13:05] <mgz> yell if you get stuck.
[13:05] <mindlace> i think i'm clear at the moment, thanks for your help.
[14:33] <marcoceppi> It's been about an hour, ppa sftp uploaded, but still no email or update to the ppa
[14:40] <czajkowski> jethrogb: marcoceppi is still having issues, is the PPA upload behaving?
[14:42] <dobey> marcoceppi: you didn't sign the source with a gpg key that doesn't match the one for your lp account, did you?
[14:48] <jethrogb> czajkowski: tab-error?
[14:49] <mgz> jelmer dropped off irc and hasn't returned, it seems
[14:49] <czajkowski> bah
[14:49] <marcoceppi> dobey: fuuuuuuuuuuuuu, I made a new key for this machine.
[14:49] <czajkowski> mgz: can you please help marcoceppi
[14:49] <czajkowski> dobey: go and hide
[14:50] <dobey> heh
[14:50] <czajkowski> marcoceppi: just mgz or jam to help in this case
[14:50] <dobey> czajkowski: i think i found marco's problem :)
[14:50] <mgz> :)
[14:50] <marcoceppi> czajkowski: thanks, I think dobey has found it. I'm not sure why LP didn't yell at me about not having my gpg key added
[14:51] <dobey> marcoceppi: because it has no way to verify that you are the correct you to yell at, if the gpg key is wrong :)
[14:52] <dobey> if you upload to a PPA and don't get any reply; it's almost always mismatched gpg keys
[14:56] <marcoceppi> dobey: that is great to know
[15:21] <marcoceppi> dobey czajkowski et al, thanks again for your help!
[15:21] <dobey> no problem :)
[19:17] <MCR1> It would really be nice to have more information presented on the Active code reviews page, for example if there is a lock active that currently prevents landing of approved reviews...