[00:15] <nathwill> blkperl: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595579
[00:15] <nathwill> in case you feel like rebuilding dconf, it looks like there's a patch for the issue
[00:32] <blkperl> nathwill: thanks
[01:26] <nathwill> slangasek, i may try testing that tonite if you think ubuntu'd consider carrying it as a diff until gnome pulls it in? seems like this'd affect a load of people..
[01:28] <nathwill> bbiaf
[01:31]  * slangasek waits for his return :P
[01:35] <slangasek> blkperl: short answer though is that the dconf author is a Canonical contractor and Ubuntu is unlikely to diverge from GNOME on this one
[01:36] <slangasek> and if he hasn't accepted the patch yet, despite him being well aware of the importance of fixing dconf-on-nfs, I'd guess the patch doesn't match the needed design somehow
[16:50] <nibalizer> slangasek: ping, you in for today?
[17:02] <slangasek> nibalizer: not joining the call today
[17:03] <nibalizer> kk
[17:35]  * bkerensa shakes fist at U.S. Customs as he talks to them and awaits a form to fill out
[19:45] <blkperl> bkerensa: I have poked again, hopefully we can get that servrer in soon
[21:39] <bkerensa> nathwill: ^ poking has occurred :D
[21:39] <bkerensa> blkperl: no worries :) its out of my place and at nathwills now :)
[21:43] <blkperl> hah ok
[22:43] <nathwill> wait, bkerensa, where did customs poke you?
[22:48] <bkerensa> nathwill: ?
[22:48] <bkerensa> nathwill: <blkperl> [19:45:39] bkerensa: I have poked again, hopefully we can get that servrer in soon