[00:00] <micahg> notgary: so, we prefer packages to go through Debian, as that saves us from having to review a merge/sync later as well as makes it easier to sync packages in the future
[00:00] <micahg> but if Debian won't update for reason X, we can push new upstream versions in Ubuntu as well
[00:00] <micahg> except now we're past feature freeze, so we're mainly focusing on bug fix releases
[00:01] <micahg> and bug fixes in general
[00:03] <notgary> I've found this page (http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/) which contains a list of build errors that need to be fixed - packaging bugs basically. Is this the best place to find packaging bugs, or is there something better?
[00:03] <micahg> that's one place
[00:04] <micahg> there's http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/debcheck/ as well
[00:11] <notgary> Thanks a lot. This'll be helpful.
[01:38] <zx2c4> hey guys
[01:49] <zx2c4> might someone be willing to look at this?
[01:49] <zx2c4> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1047122
[06:56] <dholbach> good morning
[07:03] <geser> good morning
[10:16] <hakermania> Hello there :D I'm having a failed build over here: http://goo.gl/TuWGl (launchpad) and says: 'Project ERROR: Package x11 not found' while I depend on libx11-dev. (I know about #ubuntu-packaging but there are no answers so far). Any clues?
[10:28] <xnox> hakermania: looking for X in a wrong place? subtle / unexpected change to multiarch locations not expected by the configure scripts?
[10:28]  * xnox is guessing
[10:29] <xnox> qmake.... ARGH.... have fun.
[10:29] <hakermania> xnox: are you a qt hater or something :P ?
[10:29] <xnox> find out which path it's looking for & see where it searches in correct place to find the X bits it wants
[10:29] <xnox> hakermania: there are no sane buildsystems, some are worse than others.
[10:29]  * xnox doesn't hate anything.
[10:31] <hakermania> xnox: thanks for the tips, how am I supposed to find 'which path it's looking for' etc? In my debian/rules I only use dh $@ --parallel
[10:32] <xnox> you need to poke qmake, enable verbose bits, make it talk to you.
[10:32] <hakermania> xnox: Ok, I'll bring my shotgun
[10:32] <xnox> offer it cookies, sweets and candy.... or a shotgun would do =)
[13:48] <Laney> hardlinking debian ubuntu ubuntu-ports mirrors takes ages on the panda
[13:48] <Laney> like 5 hours
[13:48] <tumbleweed> for a fairly small space saving
[13:48] <tumbleweed> oh, ubuntu+ubuntu-ports is probably pretty decent
[13:51] <Laney> 5 gig or so
[13:51] <Laney> probably not worth it
[13:51] <Laney> or run it once daily overnight
[13:52] <ogra_> you run a mirror on the panda ?
[13:52] <Laney> yeah, it has a 1tb hard drive attached to it :-)
[13:52] <tumbleweed> IIRC paultag does that too
[13:52] <ogra_> insane
[13:52] <Laney> works well apart from hardlink
[13:52] <tumbleweed> (or was that an rpi)
[13:52] <ogra_> not with ubuntu if its an RPi
[13:53] <tumbleweed> debian
[13:53] <ogra_> yeah
[13:53] <ogra_> (though theoretically you could run ubuntu armel on it)
[21:18] <jtaylor> why does ubuntuone-client-gnome install something into /debian?
[21:18] <Laney> bug
[21:18] <Laney> upgrade
[21:19] <jtaylor> oh beta freeze is over 223 packages to upgrade :)
[21:19] <tumbleweed> see #ubuntu-devel logs for this afternoon
[22:58] <xnox> Laney: i only have laptops =/ so no PSUs here