| tjaalton | wonderful, mesa failed to build on md64 | 03:27 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | Odd? Why? | 03:38 |
| Sarvatt | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/9.0~git20120903.e1673d20-0ubuntu1/+build/3768452 | 03:39 |
| Sarvatt | thats bad, screwed updates for amd64 people | 03:40 |
| tjaalton | built just fine on my sbuilder, dammit | 03:40 |
| tjaalton | and my ppa it seems | 03:41 |
| Sarvatt | new git checkout probably fixes it, only like 30 radeon/llvm commits since then | 03:44 |
| Sarvatt | ok most of those are radeonsi we dont enable :) | 03:45 |
| tjaalton | sure we do | 03:45 |
| tjaalton | on mesa at least | 03:45 |
| Sarvatt | oh i was thinking USE_R600_LLVM_COMPILER | 03:46 |
| ajmitch | so it should be relatively safe at the moment to install from the q-lts-backport ppa, I assume? | 03:46 |
| * ajmitch can pick up pieces if things go wrong | 03:46 | |
| Sarvatt | ajmitch: not sure, the guy updating that ppa has been on vacation for 2 weeks, it might not be ok | 03:47 |
| ajmitch | ah, he's still touring .au? | 03:47 |
| Sarvatt | lots of changes in quantal since then | 03:47 |
| Sarvatt | i've been on vacation too and havent kept up | 03:48 |
| * ajmitch mostly wanted the kernel, but new X on ivy bridge was tempting to try out | 03:48 | |
| ajmitch | I'll wait for a bit before I update that part then | 03:48 |
| tjaalton | that is kept uptodate | 03:48 |
| tjaalton | by the kernel team, so go ahead and use the kernel | 03:49 |
| Sarvatt | tjaalton: it still has mesa 8.0.4, way out of date | 03:49 |
| tjaalton | just fine for ivy | 03:49 |
| Sarvatt | 3.6 kernel is the biggest boost for ivy at the moment | 03:50 |
| ajmitch | is that still likely to land for quantal? | 03:50 |
| tjaalton | who wants boost, stability is what I'm after :) | 03:50 |
| Sarvatt | nope 3.5 | 03:51 |
| tjaalton | 3.4-> is what provides that | 03:51 |
| * ajmitch wants stability, this zareason laptop came with an odd 3.3.6 kernel from a PPA which is far from ideal | 03:51 | |
| Sarvatt | zareason shipped a ppa with a 3.3 kernel? | 03:52 |
| Sarvatt | yeah 3.5 is way better off | 03:52 |
| Sarvatt | 3.2 had problems that is taking quite a long time to backport fixes to | 03:53 |
| ajmitch | yeah I suspect that's why they used what they did, but it has some serious issues, I prefer to recommend they use something tested | 03:53 |
| tjaalton | oh i'm not on ubuntu-announce, that's why didn't notice beta was released | 03:56 |
| ajmitch | you're missing out :) | 03:56 |
| tjaalton | before these were sent to u-d-a | 03:58 |
| Sarvatt | zareason is strange, they ship what works, theres lots of people paid to make 3.2 work for oems which we're doing for lenovo hp asus and dell but -proposed updates only come once every 3 weeks so it takes awhile, by now 3.2 in -proposed should be ok (aka 3.2.0-31) but 3.5.x aka quantal really is optimal for performance reasons | 03:58 |
| tjaalton | ah, didn't know we have mesa 9.0 in quantal.. | 03:58 |
| Sarvatt | tjaalton: you uploaded it........ | 03:58 |
| tjaalton | a snapshot, yes | 03:58 |
| tjaalton | oh well :) | 03:59 |
| ajmitch | Sarvatt: it is a bit strange, they're a small team & have set up a NZ shop recently, so I met them last weekend | 03:59 |
| tjaalton | just sent one more patch to backport to 3.2.x, no reply yet though | 04:00 |
| tjaalton | ben is probably on holiday, no activity since aug 19th | 04:02 |
| tjaalton | on the stable tree at least | 04:02 |
| tjaalton | triggered a mesa rebuild on amd64, went fine this time .. | 05:00 |
| tjaalton | bf -> | 05:00 |
| RAOF | --parallel issues? | 05:01 |
| tjaalton | most likely | 05:15 |
| Sarvatt | cool | 05:16 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: What was that -intel bug where compiz was hung with a black screen after resume, waiting for a swap that'll never complete? | 06:16 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: Nevermind; backscroll wins! | 06:17 |
| tjaalton | :) | 06:17 |
| tjaalton | 966744 | 06:17 |
| tjaalton | so I've hit other bugs trying to reproduce that :/ | 06:18 |
| tjaalton | +while | 06:18 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: Were you still reproducing that on Quantal? Jason Warner & Didier seem to be seeing it. | 06:23 |
| tjaalton | RAOF: yeah, but not that frequently | 06:24 |
| tjaalton | was it you or ickle who suggested to run compiz with xtrace | 06:24 |
| RAOF | ickle, I think. | 06:25 |
| tjaalton | uploaded intel-gpu-tools 1.3, forgot to close the bug on the changelog | 06:36 |
| RAOF | :) | 06:39 |
| tjaalton | "oops, no ffe" | 06:39 |
| tjaalton | RAOF: hey, could you accept gvfs for precise-proposed, fixes bug 819304 | 07:14 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 819304 in gvfs (Ubuntu Precise) "gvfsd-cdda crashed with signal 5 in _g_dbus_oom()" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/819304 | 07:15 |
| dileks | hi. are you planning mesa-9.0 backports in q-lts-backport ppa? | 09:14 |
| tjaalton | later | 09:20 |
| tjaalton | the whole stack will be copied | 09:20 |
| tjaalton | what gets in quantal | 09:20 |
| dileks | what means exactly later, one of the next betas or very later? | 09:22 |
| dileks | I can do packaging myself, thats not the problem. | 09:22 |
| tjaalton | it doesn't need packaging but running scripts | 09:23 |
| tjaalton | maybe next week once maarten is back from vacation | 09:23 |
| dileks | scripts sounds good | 09:23 |
| dileks | where are those "scripts"? | 09:23 |
| tjaalton | bzr somewhere, i was supposed to review them but.. :P | 09:24 |
| tjaalton | seem to be working fine | 09:24 |
| dileks | I was thinking of bumping to xserver-1.13 (final) and take sources for libdrm/intelgfx from quantal | 09:25 |
| dileks | hmm, v2.20.6 released of intelgfx ddx | 09:25 |
| tjaalton | can't wait until next week? | 09:26 |
| dileks | looks like I only need to rebuild quantal package | 09:27 |
| dileks | no. want to do some drm-intel-next testing. | 09:28 |
| tjaalton | then run quantal | 09:30 |
| dileks | maybe | 09:30 |
| dileks | just read today an article about q beta is released | 09:30 |
| dileks | anyway, got to go | 09:32 |
| dileks | thanks for the informations | 09:32 |
| tjaalton | yw | 09:33 |
| tjaalton | apw: did you have issues with the mesa in quantal? mind giving the newer snapshot a try if yes? | 10:36 |
| apw | tjaalton, is it in -proposed? | 10:36 |
| apw | tjaalton, or has it been in there a few days? | 10:36 |
| tjaalton | since after the beta, but hang on | 10:36 |
| apw | the machine which was very unwell has -proposed enabled and now seems ok | 10:38 |
| tjaalton | it went straight to quantal | 10:38 |
| tjaalton | but there are people saying that a compiz/unity update fixed it, probably papering over the actual bug | 10:38 |
| tjaalton | since compiz is using gles now | 10:38 |
| apw | tjaalton, yes then i think i see the same | 10:38 |
| apw | as the issue went away around monday | 10:39 |
| tjaalton | hmm | 10:39 |
| tjaalton | ok, well good to know that it's better, now to figure out how to find out if the old bug is still there | 10:40 |
| tjaalton | downgrading compiz isn't easy, I'm told | 10:40 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!