[06:21] <babyface_> failed to install quantal desktop iso(build:20120909) with a popup window showing: the installer encountered an unrecoverable error. A desktop session will now be run so that you may investigate the problem or try installing again
[06:21] <babyface_> and I filed a bug : 1048477
[08:12] <Daviey> cjwatson: Did you see server sqaushfs's failed today?  Are you working on that as part of the kernel bundling fixes?
[08:12] <Daviey> (Mornin' btw)
[08:12] <Daviey> It looks related.
[08:19] <psivaa> Daviey, Im not sure if this is what you are already referring to, but the report.html for quantal server has some entries
[08:25] <Daviey> psivaa: no, that is a c-m issue i believe
[08:26] <cjwatson> Daviey: only just started so I haven't seen it, but yes of course I'll clean up my own breakage :)
[08:26] <psivaa> c-m issue?
[08:27] <cjwatson> component-mismatches
[08:27] <cjwatson> Though report.html is irrelevant when the live filesystems failed to build before that stage
[08:28] <Daviey> cjwatson: muchas gracias
[08:28] <psivaa> cjwatson, understand, thanks
[08:31] <cjwatson> psivaa: looking at it though, this is one of the cases where non-empty report.html won't render the entire image unusable, just the MaaS bits
[08:32] <psivaa> cjwatson, yes i noticed that our other server tests passed without any issues
[08:36] <cjwatson> Daviey: livecd-rootfs 2.85 should fix it
[08:45] <Daviey> super!
[08:47] <cjwatson> babyface_: will look
[08:47] <Laney> there were bugs over the weekend about ubiquity not launching
[08:48] <Laney> xnox might remember numbers (we were at the global jam)
[08:48] <Laney> in only-ubiquity mode; IIRC it was fine from the live session
[08:48] <cjwatson> maybe, but nothing relevant fixed in bzr so I might as well debug it
[08:48] <xnox> looking at it now, the only relevant bits are in /var/log/installer/dm
[08:49] <xnox> GDBus gives many warnings
[08:49] <xnox> and then there is Backtrace from X =/
[08:49] <xnox> could be changes on the -desktop =/
[08:54] <babyface_> no quantal alternate isos today?   the automated tests on quantal alternate isos was started due to there is change in :http://cdimage.ubuntu.com//daily/current/SHA256SUMS, but I didn't find any iso, why?
[08:55] <xnox> cjwatson: Laney: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1048541
[08:55] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1048541 in ubiquity "[Master] Installation failed: The installer encountered an unrecoverable error" [High,Confirmed]
[08:55] <xnox> cjwatson: Laney: X errors https://launchpadlibrarian.net/115365735/UbiquityDm.txt
[08:56] <xnox> babyface_: didn't we drop alternate CDs ?!
[08:56] <Laney> trolyes
[08:56] <Laney> erm, "yes"
[08:57] <cjwatson> I was about to say that, but we haven't actually done so yet AFAICS
[08:57] <babyface_> xnox, yes, I know this,  so we wont have the alternate iso from today ?
[08:57] <cjwatson> But you might as well stop testing Ubuntu alternate images permanently
[08:57] <cjwatson> They aren't targeted for release
[08:57] <Laney> I thought we fixed cron
[08:57] <babyface_> cjwatson,  ack. thanks.
[08:57]  * Laney looks
[08:57] <cjwatson> No
[08:58] <Laney> yeah that was xubuntu
[08:58] <cjwatson> babyface_: There are images on the master system so it must be a mirroring problem of some kind *shrug*
[08:59] <cjwatson> I've poked it in case it helps
[08:59] <cjwatson> I suspect cdimage.u.c must be out of space
[09:01] <babyface_> cjwatson, ok,  when  will we drop alternate iso?  is it good time to stop testing them from today?
[09:02] <cjwatson> babyface_: I don't know exactly when we'll drop them but there's no reason you need to wait for that.  Please stop testing them today.
[09:02] <babyface_> cjwatson,  ack. thanks.
[09:02] <cjwatson> We certainly aren't going to put effort into fixing any bugs you find so there's no point :-)
[09:02] <babyface_> cjwatson, ;)
[09:25] <cjwatson> babyface_: I've sorted out the (probably) out-of-space problem on cdimage.ubuntu.com too
[09:28] <babyface_> cjwatson, ah, yes, there are alternate isos again.  btw, I stopped all the automated test on alternate isos just now.
[09:28] <cjwatson> Thanks.
[09:31] <Daviey> cjwatson: I noticed that server images at least, are not being garbaged
[09:31] <Daviey> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/
[09:32] <cjwatson> Oh yes, I turned off purge-old-images around beta
[09:32] <Daviey> is that still required ?
[09:32]  * cjwatson reverts that
[09:32] <Daviey> groovy
[09:33] <cjwatson> I'll just let it autopurge next time rather than doing anything manually
[09:35] <Daviey> right
[14:24] <dobey> do we need an FFe to drop a package out of the archive? or to drop binary packages?
[14:25] <tumbleweed> you need an FFe to do anything risky
[14:25] <tumbleweed> dropping leaf binary packages (with good cause) should be fine
[14:25] <tumbleweed> s/binary//
[14:27] <dobey> i want to do this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-installer/+bug/1048669
[14:27] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1048669 in ubuntuone-control-panel/trunk "Drop ubuntuone-installer package" [High,In progress]
[14:27] <dobey> :)
[14:29] <tumbleweed> that seems FFe-worthy. Add some diffs to the bug and you'll get some review
[14:29]  * Laney remembers angst around the introduction of that
[14:29] <tumbleweed> yeah (also post FF, IIRC :P )
[14:30] <dobey> it was a necessary evil at the time
[14:30] <xnox> is ubuntu-one stuff the only bit that uses Qt on the Ubuntu Desktop CD, now that unity-2d is gone?
[14:31] <xnox> or does e.g. landscape client does as well?
[14:31] <xnox> is landscape-client included or is it installer again?
[14:31] <xnox> what is the status on porting ubuntu-one to python2?
[14:31] <dobey> python3?
[14:32] <cjwatson> you can ask germinate this kind of question ...
[14:32] <xnox> yes =)
[14:32] <xnox> cjwatson: how do I use germinate?
[14:32] <micahg> umm, won't the ubuntuone client still be there which needs Qt
[14:32] <cjwatson> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.quantal/rdepends/ALL/libqtcore4
[14:33] <dobey> partial porting for Q. dirspec is ported; and a bunch of work has been done on ubuntu-sso-client
[14:33] <dobey> micahg: yes it needs Qt
[14:33] <cjwatson> in this case grep for desktop seed and bend your brain around the tree display
[14:34] <cjwatson> but briefly: appmenu-qt, checkbox-qt, software-center -> oneconf -> python-dbus -> python-qt4-dbus, possibly others 'cos I got bored
[14:34] <xnox> so unity-2d "transitional" packages reverse depend on libqtcore4.... seems odd.
[14:35] <cjwatson> only indirectly, by way of including support for global menu bars for Qt applications
[14:35] <cjwatson> I don't see that unity-2d is at all related directly
[14:36] <cjwatson> it just shows up because it depends on unity which recommends indicator-appmenu which recommends appmenu-qt
[14:36] <xnox> hmm maybe my brain bending skills are not mature enough yet ;-)
[14:36] <xnox> right. ok. so we do need qt.
[14:36] <dobey> yes we need qt
[14:36] <xnox> and do we have landscape-full-client on cd now?
[14:37] <xnox> s/cd/ISO/
[14:37] <dobey> i don't think so, but it doesn't use qt does it
[14:37] <xnox> still would be nice to have. Well, I would want it.
[14:37] <dobey> oh
[14:38] <dobey> and i don't think it's ported to python3 yet either because it possibly uses twisted?
[14:38] <dobey> anyway, i guess i'll have to FFe :-/
[14:41] <xnox> good luck & have fun :-/
[14:44] <jbicha> that new ubuntut online accounts stuff requires Qt too
[16:15] <bjf> infinity, linux-lts-backport-natty 2.6.38-15.66~lucid1 (bug 1036914)  and  linux-lts-backport-oneiric 3.0.0-25.41~lucid1 (bug 1036577) are all ready for -updates
[16:15] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1036914 in linux-lts-backport-natty "linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.66~lucid1 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1036914
[16:15] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1036577 in linux-lts-backport-oneiric "linux-lts-backport-oneiric: 3.0.0-25.41~lucid1 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1036577
[16:18] <infinity> bjf: Shiny, thanks.
[16:18] <bjf> infinity: oh no, thank _you_
[16:25] <micahg> infinity: can you release my chromium into precise-proposed please?
[16:27] <infinity> micahg: Done.
[16:28] <micahg> infinity: thanks
[16:55] <psivaa> server report.html contains quite a number of entries just in case it has not been noticed
[17:00] <cjwatson> psivaa: it's a reporting bug
[17:00] <cjwatson> well, hm
[17:02] <cjwatson> no, image build bug
[17:05] <psivaa> cjwatson, ok, can i assume the issue will be looked at?
[17:06] <cjwatson> I think I've fixed it - respinning to see
[17:06] <psivaa> ok thanks
[17:07] <cjwatson> which probably means the server test I was in the middle of is pointless:)
[17:29] <cjwatson> psivaa: looks better now (when it finishes mirroring) - not empty but these problems at least don't look like image build bugs
[17:30] <psivaa> cjwatson, thanks, will see how the tests go
[18:38] <plars> cjwatson: the issue psivaa reported earlier seems to have become worse with the 20120910.2 build
[18:42] <infinity> bjf: ^-- I already copied those an hour or so ago.
[18:43] <bjf> infinity: my bad. checked the SRU page, checked the ppa, didn't see anything from queuebot here so ... i'll look harder next time
[18:44] <infinity> bjf: Yeah, queuebot doesn't have much to say when I copy kernels, since they don't hit the queue. :P
[18:44] <infinity> bjf: But I did update the tracking bugs appropriately, at least.
[21:11] <skaet_> slangasek, infinity, cjwatson - have updated the crontab to remove ubuntu alternate from the daily builds.
[21:13] <skaet_> (cdimage commit rev 1498)