[00:01] hi [00:01] how are you wxl [10:27] has ubiquity thrown "unrecoverable error"s for other, or is it just xubuntu? [10:59] mvo, pitti I finally located the permission denied issue in software-center [11:01] mvo, pitti $PWD is different whether adt-run is run from binaries or from source [11:02] mvo, so in debian/tests/run-tests when you do ADT_BASEDIR=$PWD/.. [11:02] chown -R $USER ${ADT_BASEDIR} [11:02] it fixes the right directory when run from source e.g /tmp/tmp.VecPjeGVjm/ubtree0-ubtree/.. [11:03] but not when run from the binary package e.g /tmp/tmp.Jc4wZbf9oi/dsc0-build/software-center-5.3.11/.. [11:04] mvo, the other problem is set +x which outputs to stderr [11:05] mvo, then also mkdir tests/output which will fails if run as user since the built tree is supposed to be RO [11:07] mvo, and finally this error http://paste.ubuntu.com/1198417/ [11:07] in tests.test_database.TestDatabase [11:08] mvo, I'll find a way to make the permission fix reliable === TheDrums is now known as Guest38162 [11:31] mvo, $ADTTMP seems to be consistent and chown $ADTTMP/../.. should work in both cases === _salem is now known as salem_ [12:11] jibel: thanks, fixed the test now [12:14] jibel: I fixed the basedir now too, so fingers crossed [12:18] mvo, I'm running with the following patch applied to the source http://paste.ubuntu.com/1198526/ [12:18] mvo, and get http://paste.ubuntu.com/1198528/ [12:24] jibel: thanks, same problem as the other one (same root cause I mean, you can disable that too) [12:24] jibel: I added your patch now, thanks! [12:26] running the test again with the license assertion checked disabled [12:26] *check [12:55] mvo, first set of tests is ok, second set failed with the following errors http://paste.ubuntu.com/1198580/ [12:59] jibel: cool, thanks. just uploaded a new version with the fixes mentioned above, I will look at the other failures next === gridcube_ is now known as GridCube === skaet_ is now known as skaet [15:09] mvo, https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/quantal-adt-software-center/24/ [15:14] jibel: cool, a fairly large list of OK :) still to maiy FAIL though, but progress I would say [15:18] mvo, there seems to be only 3 types of errors [15:19] mvo, but right, is is progress, and the error are the same I had running locally from the source tree [15:20] jibel: very nice, yeah, one if about the oneconf stuff not starting === cking_ is now known as cking === yofel_ is now known as yofel [19:18] stgraber, hey, bug 1039158 updated [19:18] Launchpad bug 1039158 in Ubuntu QA Website "Add css to have dl/dt/dd show as numbered list for testcases" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1039158 [19:18] stgraber, (with attachment) === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha [20:34] hey knome, about 1039158, so since we have the css committed, shal we change over the testcases? [20:35] balloons, we have two tests in xubuntu in that format: the post-installation tests and the desktop tests [20:36] we still need to wait it to hit iso.qa.ubuntu.com... [20:40] knome, yes of course :-) [20:40] But I'm working on the ubiquity testcases.. so as part of re-writing them, I could convert them [20:40] so, you are the one that decides what the format is? [20:41] lol -- yep, I hereby declare it! [20:41] no, it was mutually decided last year [20:41] haha [20:42] we've stuck with it.. your changes just solidify the presentation of it [20:42] well, i suppose we should still hold the transition until we have the new css in iso tracker [20:42] making it valid markup for one :-) [20:42] but in the sandbox, yeah, that's fine [20:46] let me take you a shot [20:47] balloons, http://temp.knome.fi/ubuntuqa/new-markup-css.png [20:47] balloons, that's the style i'm proposing [20:48] balloons, it is visually a bit different, but i believe not having numbers on the "expected actions" is ok [20:48] balloons, and of course, if you don't have those "subheaders", like these xubuntu tests do, you will get numbering for dt's up to heavens [20:49] balloons, there's one more drawback with this; it won't work with IE... ;) [20:54] that's not a drawback, it's a feature [20:55] well, yeah, i imagine it's not too bad [20:55] and it only makes the numbering not work [20:55] so it still gracefully degrades [20:57] knome, k [20:57] knome, ok so in IE, everything is the same., except no numbers? [20:57] it should work with chrome too [20:57] balloons, yeah [20:57] which version(s) of IE are affected/ [20:57] i can set up a testing site [20:58] uhm, any that can't handle :before [20:58] i think any before IE8 [20:59] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4181884/after-and-before-css-pseudo-elements-hack-for-ie-7 [20:59] well yeah, if you want to go that road... [20:59] lol.. I think ie8+ is "ok" [20:59] ie 7 is default on vista? or was it 8? [21:00] let me set up a testsite. [21:02] http://temp.knome.fi/ubuntuqa/dl-test.html [21:02] balloons: IE7 is the default for Vista and Server 2008 [21:02] works in chromium on precise [21:03] right.. no one should still be running ie6, but not supporting ie7.. :-( [21:03] again, losing the numbers is the only thing that'll happen [21:03] right, it makes it harder to refer to steps, but it's still usable [21:03] exactly [21:04] I think that's better than putting in an ugly hack to make ie7 work [21:04] it is still definitely possible to refer to a step [21:04] thoughts? [21:04] i'd say the only way forward is to stop looking backwards [21:13] k, so for now I'll keep the old format on these re-writes [21:13] ok [21:13] you can see how it turns out to work, xubuntu are definitely going to use the new format for our desktop/post-install tests [21:14] it looks so much nicer [21:14] yeah, i have to agree [21:14] especially the markup [21:14] <-- not a visual designer [21:14] the funny thing is, I'm a visual learner.. [21:14] <-- definitely one [21:14] well, i'm an aural learner... [21:14] * balloons is happy knome is skilled in the area [21:14] except when the wife is nagging :) [21:15] hi [21:15] hello [21:18] how is the beta comming along ? [21:20] ? beta was released last week [21:21] that is why I asked [21:21] I couldn`t install it [21:21] but only ppc version [21:22] I mean, is it working fine or loads of issues with gnome and unity? [21:23] the beta? everything has stabliized as can be expected post ff [21:23] haven't heard more noise than usual so I guess it's not too bad for a beta [21:33] sounds good === salem_ is now known as _salem