[00:01] <silverarrow> hi
[00:01] <silverarrow> how are you wxl
[10:27] <knome> has ubiquity thrown "unrecoverable error"s for other, or is it just xubuntu?
[10:59] <jibel> mvo, pitti I finally located the permission denied issue in software-center
[11:01] <jibel> mvo, pitti $PWD is different whether adt-run is run from binaries or from source
[11:02] <jibel> mvo, so in debian/tests/run-tests when you do ADT_BASEDIR=$PWD/..
[11:02] <jibel> chown -R $USER ${ADT_BASEDIR}
[11:02] <jibel> it fixes the right directory when run from source e.g /tmp/tmp.VecPjeGVjm/ubtree0-ubtree/..
[11:03] <jibel> but not when run from the binary package e.g /tmp/tmp.Jc4wZbf9oi/dsc0-build/software-center-5.3.11/..
[11:04] <jibel> mvo, the other problem is set +x which outputs to stderr
[11:05] <jibel> mvo, then also mkdir tests/output which will fails if run as user since the built tree is supposed to be RO
[11:07] <jibel> mvo, and finally this error http://paste.ubuntu.com/1198417/
[11:07] <jibel> in tests.test_database.TestDatabase
[11:08] <jibel> mvo, I'll find a way to make the permission fix reliable
[11:31] <jibel> mvo, $ADTTMP seems to be consistent and chown $ADTTMP/../..  should work in both cases
[12:11] <mvo> jibel: thanks, fixed the test now
[12:14] <mvo> jibel: I fixed the basedir now too, so fingers crossed
[12:18] <jibel> mvo, I'm running with the following patch applied to the source http://paste.ubuntu.com/1198526/
[12:18] <jibel> mvo, and get http://paste.ubuntu.com/1198528/
[12:24] <mvo> jibel: thanks, same problem as the other one (same root cause I mean, you can disable that too)
[12:24] <mvo> jibel: I added your patch now, thanks!
[12:26] <jibel> running the test again with the license assertion checked disabled
[12:26] <jibel> *check
[12:55] <jibel> mvo, first set of tests is ok, second set failed with the following errors http://paste.ubuntu.com/1198580/
[12:59] <mvo> jibel: cool, thanks. just uploaded a new version with the fixes mentioned above, I will look at the other failures next
[15:09] <jibel> mvo, https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/quantal-adt-software-center/24/
[15:14] <mvo> jibel: cool, a fairly large list of OK :) still to maiy FAIL though, but progress I would say
[15:18] <jibel> mvo, there seems to be only 3 types of errors
[15:19] <jibel> mvo, but right, is is progress, and the error are the same I had running locally from the source tree
[15:20] <mvo> jibel: very nice, yeah, one if about the oneconf stuff not starting
[19:18] <knome> stgraber, hey, bug 1039158 updated
[19:18] <knome> stgraber, (with attachment)
[20:34] <balloons> hey knome, about 1039158, so since we have the css committed, shal we change over the testcases?
[20:35] <knome> balloons, we have two tests in xubuntu in that format: the post-installation tests and the desktop tests
[20:36] <knome> we still need to wait it to hit iso.qa.ubuntu.com...
[20:40] <balloons> knome, yes of course :-)
[20:40] <balloons> But I'm working on the ubiquity testcases.. so as part of re-writing them, I could convert them
[20:40] <knome> so, you are the one that decides what the format is?
[20:41] <balloons> lol -- yep, I hereby declare it!
[20:41] <balloons> no, it was mutually decided last year
[20:41] <knome> haha
[20:42] <balloons> we've stuck with it.. your changes just solidify the presentation of it
[20:42] <knome> well, i suppose we should still hold the transition until we have the new css in iso tracker
[20:42] <balloons> making it valid markup for one :-)
[20:42] <knome> but in the sandbox, yeah, that's fine
[20:46] <knome> let me take you a shot
[20:47] <knome> balloons, http://temp.knome.fi/ubuntuqa/new-markup-css.png
[20:47] <knome> balloons, that's the style i'm proposing
[20:48] <knome> balloons, it is visually a bit different, but i believe not having numbers on the "expected actions" is ok
[20:48] <knome> balloons, and of course, if you don't have those "subheaders", like these xubuntu tests do, you will get numbering for dt's up to heavens
[20:49] <knome> balloons, there's one more drawback with this; it won't work with IE... ;)
[20:54] <roadmr> that's not a drawback, it's a feature
[20:55] <knome> well, yeah, i imagine it's not too bad
[20:55] <knome> and it only makes the numbering not work
[20:55] <knome> so it still gracefully degrades
[20:57] <balloons> knome, k
[20:57] <balloons> knome, ok so in IE, everything is the same., except no numbers?
[20:57] <knome> it should work with chrome too
[20:57] <knome> balloons, yeah
[20:57] <balloons> which version(s) of IE are affected/
[20:57] <knome> i can set up a testing site
[20:58] <knome> uhm, any that can't handle :before
[20:58] <knome> i think any before IE8
[20:59] <roadmr> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4181884/after-and-before-css-pseudo-elements-hack-for-ie-7
[20:59] <knome> well yeah, if you want to go that road...
[20:59] <balloons> lol.. I think ie8+ is "ok"
[20:59] <balloons> ie 7 is default on vista? or was it 8?
[21:00] <knome> let me set up a testsite.
[21:02] <knome> http://temp.knome.fi/ubuntuqa/dl-test.html
[21:02] <roadmr> balloons: IE7 is the default for Vista and Server 2008
[21:02] <knome> works in chromium on precise
[21:03] <balloons> right.. no one should still be running ie6, but not supporting ie7.. :-(
[21:03] <knome> again, losing the numbers is the only thing that'll happen
[21:03] <balloons> right, it makes it harder to refer to steps, but it's still usable
[21:03] <knome> exactly
[21:04] <balloons> I think that's better than putting in an ugly hack to make ie7 work
[21:04] <knome> it is still definitely possible to refer to a step
[21:04] <balloons> thoughts?
[21:04] <knome> i'd say the only way forward is to stop looking backwards
[21:13] <balloons> k, so for now I'll keep the old format on these re-writes
[21:13] <knome> ok
[21:13] <knome> you can see how it turns out to work, xubuntu are definitely going to use the new format for our desktop/post-install tests
[21:14] <balloons> it looks so much nicer
[21:14] <knome> yeah, i have to agree
[21:14] <knome> especially the markup
[21:14] <balloons> <-- not a visual designer
[21:14] <balloons> the funny thing is, I'm a visual learner..
[21:14] <knome> <-- definitely one
[21:14] <knome> well, i'm an aural learner...
[21:14]  * balloons is happy knome is skilled in the area
[21:14] <knome> except when the wife is nagging :)
[21:15] <silverarrow> hi
[21:15] <knome> hello
[21:18] <silverarrow> how is the beta comming along ?
[21:20] <stgraber> ? beta was released last week
[21:21] <silverarrow> that is why I asked
[21:21] <silverarrow> I couldn`t install it
[21:21] <silverarrow> but only ppc version
[21:22] <silverarrow> I mean, is it working fine or loads of issues with gnome and unity?
[21:23] <balloons> the beta? everything has stabliized as can be expected post ff
[21:23] <stgraber> haven't heard more noise than usual so I guess it's not too bad for a beta
[21:33] <silverarrow> sounds good